jonny_d_live

@DividonBX @oliverburdick It actually gets old. It’s nonsensical rage for clicks and impressions. If every day I said Protestants are tools for the Devil, I’d get more followers probably. Since I’m not here for a living, I won’t

@oliverburdick The slander these “X” evangelists spread is impressive and sad as they continue to spread contradictory information. They’re only commonality is that “Catholicism is evil” and that there is a Jesus that saves one way or another.

Catholicism is not a Christian denomination. It’s a non-Christian cult.

@oliverburdick Not true and click bait ignorance

@Allesontiire @ParapetSee St. Irenaus vs you? lol

@ParapetSee I will leave that to Christ, for now, I'll keep on preaching the gospel to Roma paganistas and the rest of the lost.

You absolute sickos man IT WAS THE OBEDIENCE OF CHRIST TO GOD THE FATHER, NOT MARY, YOU ROMA PAGANISTAS

@realmikolson “Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?” “You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by the works.” “See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.”

Bible teaching moment: This is a classic misunderstanding of the text below. You’re quoting James chapter 2, where James is addressing how to recognize whether someone is a Christian, not what makes a person right before God. This is clear from the context of chapter 1 and continues throughout the rest of the letter. When James uses the word “justified,” he’s not using it in the same sense as Paul does in Romans 3, for example, or as Luke does in his Gospel: “wisdom is justified by her children” (same Greek word, but obviously not used in a soteriological sense). This is known as semantic range. In James 2, “justified” means “vindicated.” In other words, he’s saying that real faith produces works. If no good works follow, the faith is not genuine. James is NOT saying doing good stuff gets you to heaven or merits righteousness with God.

@Truth_matters20 And with the state of Protestant churches, it should affirm why the Authority to teach and interpret is important

The Roman Catholic "Church" did not give us the Bible. God did. If it was up to Catholics, laymen would be banned from owning a Bible.

@CoffinMedia @frfrankpavone These buzzwords in snippets

Bought and paid for people like @frfrankpavone still hardsell the ideology that you can be 100% Catholic and 100% for Trump. This is how cults work.

@philstege @AlinejadMasih This isn’t true so

@AlinejadMasih It's rather eye opening to see the pope support men who gang rape young women before hanging them in the public square

So, dear Pope, quick question: You’ve got these guys in Iran who say they’re doing God’s work… by hanging protesters at sunrise and beating women into forced confessions. Apparently, that’s what “holy” looks like now. And I’m just wondering, when people get executed for asking for freedom, does that qualify as a “massacre,” or are we still workshopping the language? Because from the outside, it looks like religion being used as a cover for straight-up brutality. And when the people who actually claim to speak for God stay quiet… it kinda sounds like God’s on mute. So, are you going to say something about it, or is this one of those moments where silence is the safest prayer? #StopExecutionsInIran

@mkeith1229 @BillArnoldTeach 28:16-20

@BillArnoldTeach Where?

You say you don’t need a priest Scripture says otherwise

@mkeith1229 @BillArnoldTeach Matthew 28:16

@TrevorSheatz No they don’t

When people read the Bible for themselves, they often leave Catholicism. They see that many church dogmas actually go against the clear teaching of the Scriptures, or aren't supported by Scripture in any clear way.

@peterpeccavi Is the Trinity in the Bible?

If the Catholic Church give us the Bible, then why do so many of its teachings either contradict the Scriptures, or cannot be found within its pages (e.g., doctrines like confession to a priest, Marian dogma, indulgences, purgatory, the Treasury of Merit, the office of pope, praying to saints, etc.)? You can’t claim to be the “infallible” guardian of Scripture while simultaneously binding consciences with doctrines Scripture neither teaches nor permits. The Church doesn’t stand above or alongside the Word. The Church is judged by the Word.

@Michaeldudufudu He’s authoritative on matters of doctrine. You don’t have to agree with him on personal opinions of politics

Whats even the point of being Catholic if u wont submit to the pope

@realCarola2Hope Yes.

She told me I wasn’t a Christian because I’m Catholic, then she got community noted. Fellow Catholics, have you ever been told you’re not Christian too?

@BibleInContext1 A pathetic statement of ignorance

To be deep in your Bible is to cease to be Catholic!

@BishopBarron Amen

There is a way past the absurd and deeply divisive “war” between the President and the Pope, which has been enthusiastically ginned up by the press. And it is indicated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 2309 to be precise. After laying out the various criteria for determining a just war—proportionality, last resort, declaration by a competent authority, reasonable hope of success, etc.—the Catechism points out that “the evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.” The assumption is that the just war principles function, to use the technical term, as heuristic devices, designed to guide the practical decision-making of those civil authorities who have to adjudicate matters of war and peace. The role of the Church, therefore, is to call for peace and to urge that any conflict be strictly circumscribed by the moral constraints of the just war criteria. But it is not the role of the Church to evaluate whether a particular war is just or unjust. That appraisal belongs to the civil authorities, who, one presumes, have requisite knowledge of conditions on the ground. So, is the war in question truly the last resort? Is there really a balance between the good to be attained and the destruction caused by the war? Are combatants and non-combatants being properly distinguished in the waging of the conflict? Do the belligerents have right intention? Is there a reasonable hope of success? The posing of those questions—indeed the insistence upon their moral relevance—belongs rightly to the Church, but the answering of them belongs to the civil authorities. The Pope has said, on numerous occasions, that he is not a politician and that his role is not the determination of any nation's foreign policy. But he has just as clearly said that he will continue to speak for peace and for moral constraint. In making both of these claims, he is operating perfectly within the framework of paragraph 2309 of the Catechism. If we understand that the Pope and the President have qualitatively different roles to play in the determination of moral action in regard to war, we can, I hope, extricate ourselves from the completely unhelpful narrative of “Pope vs. President.”

@0ctavi0GBE @BibleInContext1 “For our paschal lamb, Christ, has been sacrificed. Therefore, let us celebrate the feast…”

Catholics verify if your in Christ or in the Catholic Church Church in Rome history Eucharist: Transubstantiation( bread and wine turn into Christ body and blood. Emerged In 11th and 12 century and was first used officially at the fourth Lateran council in 1215 under pope innocent III through the concentration defined at council. The monstrance(ostensorium, ostensory) was not part of the early church or Roman rite. It emerged in the western Latin church during the high middle ages as a response to growing popular devotion to the real presence of Christ in the blessed sacrament. 1226 in Avignon France perpetual adoration after military victory. 1246 feast of Christi was instituted in liege at the urging of st juliana and extended to the universal church by pope urban in 1264. This feast included solemn processions of the blessed sacrament creating a practical need for a vessel visibly show(monstrare)the host. Earliest know surviving monstrance dates to 1286. After Council of Trent 1545-1563 the radiant burst designed emerged. 14 century monstrances became common in France and germany. Latin western Catholic tradition centered in Rome didnt adopt the monstrance until 13-14 century closely tied to the rise of Corpus Christi and Eucharist adoration. It was never a feature of Ancient Rome rite but became a standard element of western Catholic devotion by Middle Ages

The Roman Catholic transubstantiated Eucharist is another Jesus! The Eucharist does not exist without the Mass. The claim that Jesus can wholly and entirely be present, even in the smallest element of a crumb (1377), is utter blasphemy, degrading the King of Kings, the Lord of Glory, down to a crumb. If Jesus is wholly present in each individual wafer, then how many Jesus's does Catholicism have? But it gets worse. They believe that by consuming their consecrated host, it actually removes sin & preserves you from sin (CCC 1393-95). In the Presbyterorum Ordinis, it says this: That, "The priests must instruct their people to offer to God the Father, the divine victim in the sacrifice of the Mass..." So they're instructing people to join to the offering of Christ on the cross their own lives. Then in the Catholic Catechism 1368 it says "...the Eucharist, the sacrifice of Christ becomes also the sacrifice of the members of his body, and that Christ's sacrifice present on the altar makes it possible for all generations of Christians to be united with his offering." The Christian does not offer themselves along with Christ on the cross. There's nothing we can do to add to the finished work of Jesus on the cross two thousand years ago. So not only is the Roman Catholic transubstantiated Eucharist blasphemy, but the entire Mass itself is heresy. Jesus himself was never a victim, but a victor on the cross, and at the Last Supper, he said, "Take and eat," not, "Make more offerings and sacrifices to the Father" #bible #christianlife #theology #christianapologetics

@BibleInContext1 “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?” 1 Corinthians 10:16

@nchokie02_adam @gonefishin1948 @VanillaDeedle You’re not worshipping a picture or a statue. The love is reserved for what those items represent in spirit.

@gonefishin1948 @VanillaDeedle Only if he kisses their picture Father. Cmon you know that.

No, they don't worship her at all.

@VanillaDeedle A deep devotion triggers you?

@SonofManwithus Well your opinion isn’t based on facts

Just my opinion but the Pope is not infallible!