JustLive4It ²

Wild 🫠🥴 Never thought I’d see the day when $DAG and $ALKIMI were the same price

@Dagnum_PI @Chart_phantom

@Chart_phantom Weird way of confirming $DAG is still up from $0.008 where you said it was going to continue to dump and add more zeros. Yes I hope everyone bookmarks all your posts because these will be glorious to come back to.... Just like your $0.008 prediction😘

This is the reason why @Dagnum_PI and the whole $DAG TEAM loves me

You asked what the end game is. Here it is. For years the community asked whether the team was selling $DAG . Persistent askers got banned as FUD. The S-1 confirms: $7.25M in gain on digital assets in 2024. The question was correct. The bans existed to delay the answer until regulators required disclosure.

@Chart_phantom @Conste11ation

@JustLive4It @Conste11ation How are you doing. Are you satisfied?

@Conste11ation has already given the $DAG community candles of 300%… only to later dump them back down close to 100%. Now we got a 200% move, and it’s already retracing fast. If history repeats itself and they take another 100% off this move, $DAG could easily print new lows again and potentially add another zero. People keep calling every pump “the reversal” while the chart keeps showing the same cycle over and over: hype → pump → distribution → retracement. And the craziest part? Constellation still hasn’t fully dumped yet. Imagine what happens if they do. Right back to point zero.

The move $DAG has seen this week could be the real deal if it truly flips the Ichimoku Tenkan-sen (conversion line) and Kijun-sen (baseline) into support going forward. They are both around $0.016.

@Dagnum_PI @Alfarius77 @Tristynb32 @Conste11ation @BenJorgensen @CryptoRickNL @bitcoinprophet1

Calling the whole thing doomed because Rochon once ran a holding company that filed Chapter 11 in 2018 is the laziest kind of pattern matching. It pretends one chapter from a forty-year career defines the next one. It pretends every builder must arrive with a spotless record or else the project is cursed. That is not analysis. That is fear dressed up as due diligence. Real operators carry scars. -Elon Musk was borrowing money from friends in 2008 just to keep Tesla and SpaceX alive after the financial crisis nearly wiped him out. -Walt Disney watched his first animation studio go bankrupt in 1923 before he ever drew a mouse that mattered. -Henry Ford burned through two auto companies that failed completely before the Model T ever rolled off a line. -Steve Jobs got fired from the company he founded, spent years building something else that struggled, then came back and turned Apple into the most valuable business on the planet. None of those men were defined by the losses. They were defined by what they built after the losses. Rochon’s record is not a secret. Fifty years. Hundreds of transactions. Billions returned through Richmont and now M42’s AI work. JRJR33 was one basket of companies that collapsed. It settled years ago. The current structure, the voting control, the capital raise, every detail sits in the SEC filings anyone can read. Expecting every past association or failed venture to repeat itself forever is how you talk yourself out of any real progress. The people who never fail are usually the ones who never bet big enough to matter. Constellation is moving inside a larger machine that pairs its data validation layer with actual AI infrastructure and gives it public-market capital to scale. That is the present. The old threads are just noise timed for maximum panic before the doors open. @TheUpsiderAI remind me of this in 236 days

Part 2 of my $DAG / #AIAI due diligence. Last thread covered founder John Rochon's JRJR33 bankruptcy. Now let's talk about AIAI CEO Todd Furniss, governance and a $200 million healthcare fraud: Forest Park Medical Centre. 🧵👇

@Crypto_peet @Conste11ation “Fraud behavior” - Insinuating he knew what those doctors were doing

@JustLive4It @Conste11ation I didnt say he was charged?

Good News for $DAG, lets hope the #AIAI CEO keeps his fraud behaviour out of this venture... now @Conste11ation has potential to become multi billion $ infra for #DATA / #AI

@PeteHarrer Stargazer is fine. Just be careful where you store your seed phrase and don’t open or click on sketchy links.

I’m going to rebuild my stack but I need new wallet suggestions $DAG fam where you storing your shit

@PeteHarrer @StargazerWallet The only way is if you kept your seed phrase somewhere where someone could get access to it

I am completely mindblown I really thought @StargazerWallet was safe. I just checked mine after not touching it or checking it for months and all my $DAG is gone Someone completely drained my entire wallet and everything that was staked

The train has left the station @Conste11ation . #AIAI + constellation-labs:native

@Dagnum_PI Send the $DAG to @realLoyalSoon who desperately needs it

Upgraded → Dagnum² $AIAI x $DAG

@Chart_phantom @Conste11ation

It’s almost time for @Conste11ation to dump on holders like usual. 3 2 1 GO!!!! $DAG

@Dagnum_PI @realLoyalSoon @Conste11ation

Right on queue Mr. negative sentiment jumps in to FUD $DAG The WEF documents how large organizations are solving AI security today using what they already have governance frameworks, logging, controlled systems. The gap is pointing to is not something the report invents a solution for. It's something the report acknowledges without resolving. The report explicitly calls for "audit-ready documentation" and "traceable evidence" to satisfy DORA, NIS2, and the EU AI Act. Those frameworks require records that can be verified independently. The report describes systems where the audit trail lives inside the operator's own infrastructure. Whether those operator-controlled logs satisfy the regulatory requirements the report itself cites is a real open question. That is not an assumption we're introducing those frameworks are in the report. The claim isn't that the WEF endorsed $DAG. It's that the regulatory requirements the WEF identifies create a gap that independent cryptographic verification fills. Digital Evidence has been doing exactly that for law enforcement and government workloads for six years, including with the US Department of War. You can disagree about whether that gap is real or material. But that's a different argument than saying the mapping requires assumptions the report doesn't make.

IBM's ATOM system handles 95% of cybersecurity investigations autonomously. The WEF calls it best practice and highlights the need for "auditable results." Those audit results live in IBM's infrastructure. IBM controls them. That's not an audit trail. That's IBM's word. The EU AI Act Article 12 enforcement starts in August. Every autonomous AI system operating right now is missing the verification layer regulators will require. $DAG runs that layer. Digital Evidence creates cryptographic records no single operator controls, verifiable by any third party independently.

@balldeepcrypto @realLoyalSoon @stardustco11ect

@JustLive4It @realLoyalSoon @stardustco11ect I have plenty but I’ve shared it with other people you know I know. Have a giggle about it again with you brother and DagChad posse. My autism sees right through you phoney. And trust me others are seeing it as well and I’ll be having the last laugh playa

@Carolinakeith_1 @Dagnum_PI

"Dead wrong" is subjective, and again unnecessary. The spike in engagement you speak of is drawn on the chart. The priced dropped a further 25% afterward has yet to recover. Was there a spike? Yes. Causation/correlation? Nope. And yes, over the last 2 weeks is the best price action that $DAG has seen in a bit - since the last non causation/correlation price spike. It's a bear market til lthe end of the year, BTC is in charge (check BTC.D) so this one is following along. Im happy its trying to recover. Needs a truck load more recovery, but yes anything is technically possible.

first small sign of improvement for $DAG - that's 2 closes _ over the 8ema and almost an 8/21ema cross. 👀 Can it maintain?

@walicpa @realLoyalSoon @stardustco11ect

Pulled up stardust-collective.org. There's no Treasury, Reports, or Financials section in the navigation. The Grants page describes the application process but doesn't publish a list of funded projects, amounts disbursed, or deliverables tied to spend. If those records /reports exist and were missed, they should link them. Otherwise the absence on the site is the evidence.

Let's actually read the $6.4M $DAG. 2024 revenue breakdown: • Dor subscriptions: $1.19M • Equipment sales: $ 401K • Government & network licenses: $ 816K • Node/staking rewards: $3.97M The single largest revenue line, 62% of the total, is tokens the network minted and gave to itself, recognized at fair value on receipt. The remaining $2.4M is hardware, subscriptions, and licensing. None of that is users paying fees to use the network. Your own 4/6 argument said the bull case for $DAG was that snapshot fees in DAG create direct token demand from network usage. The $40-50K is the realized output of that mechanism. The $6.4M is something else entirely and the largest piece of it is the network paying itself in its own currency. Citing the protocol fee number isn't cherry-picking. It's the only number that maps to the framework you proposed.

You: $DOR is a failing product has no measurable demand and is failing to translate value for $DAG holders. Me: The "no measurable demand" framing requires ignoring 2,000 retail stores running Dor sensors in production, counting foot traffic and pushing data through the Constellation metagraph every day. The fee mechanism is straightforward.... more sensors, more data volume on the metagraph, more fee flow to $DAG. The model exists. What's still building is the scale that makes it visible on-chain. The adoption curve is the real conversation. 91% of retailers still don't know their store conversion rate. @DorTechnologies was built to answer that question at every door in physical retail. When it does at scale, the data running through that metagraph closes the gap between "not yet visible" and "meaningful $DAG value accrual." The infrastructure is live. The debate worth having is about timeline. That's a different argument than no demand. The accelerant nobody is pricing in is AI. Agents running retail operations or managing physical spaces need verified real-world data they can act on without auditing manually. Dor generates that data and Digital Evidence makes every count cryptographically provable. A foot traffic reading an AI agent can verify wasn't tampered with is a different asset than one it has to take on faith. That's the physical intelligence layer the AI economy needs, and it's already running in 2,000 locations.

@cryptolevier @Conste11ation

#Crypto 🍲 FUN FACT $DAG (@conste11ation): Think of it like a potluck party: every added guest (node) brings more food (resources), scaling horizontally unlike resource-limited blockchains! 🚀 #CryptoFact