Justice for Globianceusers

ICC Should Exercise Due Diligence @iccwbo @XDCNetwork Participation The ICC Digital Standards Initiative Digital Trade Readiness Assessment lists XDC Network as one of the contributing organisations involved in developing the framework for evaluating digital trade capabilities. The initiative itself is important. Efforts to digitise global trade documentation and improve interoperability across supply chains are long overdue and could significantly improve efficiency and transparency in international commerce. However, when institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce bring external blockchain networks into discussions around global digital trade standards, thorough due diligence becomes essential. There are currently ongoing allegations circulating within the digital asset community regarding @globiance and individuals connected to that ecosystem, including disputes raised by users about access to funds and unresolved platform incidents. Some of those discussions also reference links between individuals involved in the #Globiance ecosystem and the #XDC Network community. These remain allegations and claims raised publicly by affected users, and the facts will ultimately need to be determined through proper investigation. However, the existence of these allegations raises an important governance question: Has sufficient due diligence been conducted before incorporating blockchain projects into global digital trade initiatives? The frameworks being developed by the ICC Digital Standards Initiative could influence how digital trade infrastructure evolves globally. The credibility of contributors therefore matters enormously. Before organisations become embedded in international standards discussions, it is reasonable to expect that: • governance structures are transparent • ecosystem relationships are clearly understood • unresolved disputes within associated platforms are examined This is not about opposing innovation or blockchain technology. It is about ensuring that the systems shaping the future of global trade are built with trusted, thoroughly vetted participants. Where allegations and unresolved disputes exist within related ecosystems, it would be prudent for institutions like the ICC Digital Standards Initiative to take a closer look and ensure the integrity of the initiatives they are leading. Global trade infrastructure deserves nothing less than full transparency and responsible governance. @AndreCasterman @atulkhekade @riteshkakkad #Globiance #XDC #AndreCasterman #Accountability #CryptoScam @XinFin_Official @AndreCasterman #Globiance @Globiance_Help @Glowbiance @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @SECGov @elonmusk @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @Oliver_LaRosa @IrinaLa_Rosa #CryptoNews #CryptoCommunity @SeanoftheWeb3

@watashinouen @riteshkakkad @atulkhekade @globiance If a licence exists, please provide the regulator, legal entity, licence number and verification link. This is necessary for reporting and due diligence.

【訂正】少なくとも、以下の表記は2026年1月14日まではありました。 #globiance --------------- ライセンス／地域 Globianceは、「仮想通貨取引所」に加え、「金融機関」としてのライセンスも取得しています。米国や欧州などの国々における金融機関ライセンスには、遵守しなければならない追加の規制や要件が定められています。これらの要件は、仮想通貨取引所としてのみ運営されているプラットフォームの要件よりもはるかに厳格です。 Globianceは以下の国でライセンスを取得しています。 スイス（SRO会員） オーストラリア 米国 欧州（リトアニア） ペルー

@atulkhekade Enough is enough for everyones patience on globiance matter.. It is clear that, as things stand, your words ring hollow and undermine the credibility of @XDCNetwork. You of all people should understand that we can only move forward by correcting this properly.

@MHiesboeck has been very quite since shit hit the fan.... @XDCBanker @Oliver_LaRosa @Oliverla_rosa @UpholdInc @XinFin_Official @XDCNetwork #XDC @atulkhekade @AndreCasterman @iccwbo @UN_News_Centre @INTERPOL_Cyber @OCCRP

I want to address this directly. At this point, I will be transparent I do not currently have the evidence on hand to prove that Quincy actively promoted @Globiance. It appears that a significant amount of historical content may have been deleted, which makes it difficult to reference what was previously visible. From most promoters and influencers. That said, I find it highly unusual that over a year ago, and on several occasions thereafter, I directed posts and questions at Quincy without receiving any response. That window of time would have been more than sufficient for any historical content to be removed. I want to be clear: I would not have included Quincy on any list of promoters without having seen something that indicated involvement at the time. Prior to this situation, I was not familiar with his online presence, so there would have been no reason for me to single him out arbitrarily. I will continue to look for verifiable proof, and if and when I find it, I will bring it forward publicly. In the meantime, considering Quincy’s position and reputation within the #XDC ecosystem, one would expect a stronger stance in protecting users and addressing what many believe to be a serious issue. When things are going well, promoters are often very visible and engaged but when things go wrong, the silence becomes noticeable. I think the community deserves clarity.

But accusations base on associations leave me the primary target for blame whenever anything bad happens on the network a decentralized network Something happens over there QUINCY WHY DID YOU DO THAT!! Um I didn’t decentralization means anyone can do anything

If you’re going to accuse me of doing something or promoting something the least you can do is drop A Clip of me saying it or post I’ve had It’s the internet call me out with my own words I’ll be forced to address it

I want to address this directly. At this point, I will be transparent I do not currently have the evidence on hand to prove that Quincy actively promoted @Globiance. It appears that a significant amount of historical content may have been deleted, which makes it difficult to reference what was previously visible. From most promoters and influencers. That said, I find it highly unusual that over a year ago, and on several occasions thereafter, I directed posts and questions at Quincy without receiving any response. That window of time would have been more than sufficient for any historical content to be removed. I want to be clear: I would not have included Quincy on any list of promoters without having seen something that indicated involvement at the time. Prior to this situation, I was not familiar with his online presence, so there would have been no reason for me to single him out arbitrarily. I will continue to look for verifiable proof, and if and when I find it, I will bring it forward publicly. In the meantime, considering Quincy’s position and reputation within the #XDC ecosystem, one would expect a stronger stance in protecting users and addressing what many believe to be a serious issue. When things are going well, promoters are often very visible and engaged but when things go wrong, the silence becomes noticeable. I think the community deserves clarity.

I want to address this directly. At this point, I will be transparent I do not currently have the evidence on hand to prove that Quincy actively promoted @Globiance. It appears that a significant amount of historical content may have been deleted, which makes it difficult to reference what was previously visible. From most promoters and influencers. That said, I find it highly unusual that over a year ago, and on several occasions thereafter, I directed posts and questions at Quincy without receiving any response. That window of time would have been more than sufficient for any historical content to be removed. I want to be clear: I would not have included Quincy on any list of promoters without having seen something that indicated involvement at the time. Prior to this situation, I was not familiar with his online presence, so there would have been no reason for me to single him out arbitrarily. I will continue to look for verifiable proof, and if and when I find it, I will bring it forward publicly. In the meantime, considering Quincy’s position and reputation within the XDC ecosystem, one would expect a stronger stance in protecting users and addressing what many believe to be a serious issue. When things are going well, promoters are often very visible and engaged but when things go wrong, the silence becomes noticeable. I think the community deserves clarity.

I want to address this directly. At this point, I will be transparent I do not currently have the evidence on hand to prove that Quincy actively promoted @Globiance. It appears that a significant amount of historical content may have been deleted, which makes it difficult to reference what was previously visible. From most promoters and influencers. That said, I find it highly unusual that over a year ago, and on several occasions thereafter, I directed posts and questions at Quincy without receiving any response. That window of time would have been more than sufficient for any historical content to be removed. I want to be clear: I would not have included Quincy on any list of promoters without having seen something that indicated involvement at the time. Prior to this situation, I was not familiar with his online presence, so there would have been no reason for me to single him out arbitrarily. I will continue to look for verifiable proof, and if and when I find it, I will bring it forward publicly. In the meantime, considering Quincy’s position and reputation within the #XDC ecosystem, one would expect a stronger stance in protecting users and addressing what many believe to be a serious issue. When things are going well, promoters are often very visible and engaged but when things go wrong, the silence becomes noticeable. I think the community deserves clarity.

@pgexpert @saveourplanet_9 @SeanoftheWeb3 @globiance @atulkhekade Atul Goals: 1. AlphaEx, 2. Globiance, Now. Primenumber 🤡

@WalterW64317879 @Justice4glob @Oliver_LaRosa @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @InterpolLyon @globiance 8. Meanwhile still no evidence or proof of hack. 9. Lack of onchain refund evidence.

@Justice4glob @Oliver_LaRosa @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @InterpolLyon la société@globiance a bloqué les fonds des utilisateurs depuis plus d'un an. Il ont été accusés de fraude par plusieurs enquêtes. Il viennent d'ouvrir un portail pour les forces de l'ordre afin de donner des informations.

@Justice4glob @saveourplanet_9 @Oliver_LaRosa Ah yes — ‘terrorist group’ for officials, ‘sabotage’ for the public. Same story, different audience. Funny how the narrative evolves, but refunds don’t 👏

@Justice4glob @Oliver_LaRosa Is that why to they move from country to country on run from the terrorists?

@WalterW64317879 @Justice4glob @Oliver_LaRosa @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @InterpolLyon @globiance 5. Customers make groups to discuss globiance where they can chat with out getting muted or blocked. 6. Globiance accuse these people of being criminsls. 7. Globiance use the customers been criminals made up reason to revoke any refunds.

@Stephen66991682 @Justice4glob @Oliver_LaRosa @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @InterpolLyon @globiance vous oublié juste les différentes publicités faites par l'équipe xdc et les plus gros comptes xdc qui font comme si ce n'était pas vrai aujourd'hui

@SeanoftheWeb3 @BrogneriLi47783 @saveourplanet_9 @YourBroQuincy @globiance Did he promote Globiance, yes or no?

What’s actually unfortunate is dismissing legitimate concerns as speculation instead of engaging with them. If there are facts that contradict the concerns raised, I’m open to them. Otherwise, dismissing this as “speculation” does not move the conversation forward. Why is he keeping silent? Not a single post, but he was happy to promote them. Do you not find that suspicious?

Calling it a “terrorist group” in one place and “sabotage” in another isn’t transparency, it’s narrative management. If the claim is real, stand by it publicly. If not, it shouldn’t be used at all. You don’t get to adjust the truth depending on the audience. @Oliver_LaRosa @OliverLa_Rosa @globiance @GlobianceCS @XDCNetwork @XDCNetwork_News #XDC @INTERPOL_HQ @INTERPOL_Cyber @iccwbo @UN_News_Centre @FBI @FRANCE24 @FranceTV @XHNews @ChinaDaily #Cryptoscammer