🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄

22.7K posts

🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄 banner
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄

🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄

@Kareno38

#Nana #Mama #Me

United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2009
185 Takip Edilen231 Takipçiler
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄 retweetledi
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
Sweden has just banned cousin marriage. It causes serious health problems in certain communities, and it's inherently un-British. We must have a serious conversation about a ban in Britain, too.
English
1.2K
1.3K
11.4K
478K
Zara Hussain
Zara Hussain@zarahussain999·
I read……White British births hit record low in England & Wales. Over 33% of new mothers born overseas — led by India, Pakistan, Nigeria & Romania. Why aren’t British people having children?
English
123
1
36
8.1K
Clive
Clive@Montpop2000·
Pot calling the kettle black Mike. Peter Mandleson still has the Labour Whip and is a Labour Lord. How precisely would you describe this shower? Angela Rayner - tax evasion. Louise Haigh - fraud. Mike Amesbury - GBH. Rachel Reeves - CV lies and rental improprieties. Peter Mandleson - Close paedophile and sex trafficker associate. Tulip Siddiq - convicted MP Rushanara Ali - price gouging tenants. Lucy Powell - “Dog whistle politics”. Johnathon Reynolds - fake solicitor. Jas Athwal - slum landlord. Andrew Gwynn - WhatsApp scandal Ivor Caplin - Paedophile sting Dan Norris - Child sex allegations. Nick Brown - ?????
English
30
85
618
5.2K
Mike Tapp MP
Mike Tapp MP@MikeTappTweets·
One of the problems Reform continue to face is those wishing to become its politicians are often reprobates and knuckle draggers. Not all of them, but a high proportion. The public are starting to notice.
English
2.1K
178
663
87.9K
Nicola 🇬🇧
Nicola 🇬🇧@beyondhills_·
Living it every day, Rupert. A whole town in the North West gone, schools that were majority British kids a generation ago are now unrecognisable. That town now has its own rules. Certain areas are no-go zones and it’s genuinely dangerous to drive through at times. And not forgetting voter fraud.
English
5
21
227
3.5K
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Go through different parts of the North West, and it is genuinely like being transported to a foreign country. This has not happened by accident - this was a wilful decision to import millions of low-skilled migrants from the third world by Labour, Reform and Conservative politicians. This is an increasing problem. It is getting worse, not better. Quickly. Men walking around with two, three, four women in burqas - this is NOT normal. I detest it. Some of the high streets in different suburbs of Manchester? It is Islamic. British family run businesses driven away, and it's a takeover. Colonisation. Ratcliffe was right. These streets are all quite outwardly and deliberately designed to demonstrate it. A show of strength. British women do not feel comfortable walking down these streets any more. Once their streets. Can you blame them? Men from cultures and societies that treat women like shit are now the majority in these places. The vast majority, and growing. Demographic reality is hitting, hard. These people have more children. Lots more children, very often at taxpayer expense. This is just a fact. One that nobody else in Parliament will even touch. I'll get attacked for stating the obvious, but guess what? The people of Manchester can use their eyes. They can see what has happened, and is happening. It hasn't reached Ashton, Hindley, Winstanley, Orrell, Abram, Worsley Mesnes, Bryn, Hindley Green, Platt Bridge and the rest of Makerfield to the same extent. But it will. There is one route out. There is one political party with the courage to do what is necessary. Restore Britain. Ban the burqa, sharia courts, cousin marriage, halal slaughter, dominating public prayer. Reverse mass immigration. Deport foreign islamists. End political islam. We're told to shut up, and just accept it - even embrace it. No longer. We refuse. Restore Britain will do what needs to be done. I promise you that.
English
802
3.5K
19.2K
470.5K
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄
@RupertLowe10 I was with my grandchildren in a park in Levenshulme yesterday. You would think we were in Pakistan with the amount of Muslims there celebrating Eid, they took the park over as their own.
English
0
0
0
45
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄
Absolutely spot on
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677

@MatthewStadlen, the word "Islamophobia" has a more revealing origin than its current defenders acknowledge. It was coined by Iranian fundamentalists in the late 1970s specifically to place Islam beyond criticism by declaring anyone who questions it a racist. It was then popularised in British political discourse through the 1997 Runnymede Trust report launched by Labour Home Secretary Jack Straw. Its purpose then and now is identical. To place criticism of Islam and its political manifestations beyond legitimate public debate by framing such criticism as a form of racism comparable to antisemitism. The distinction is an important one. Antisemitism is hatred of Jews as a people. It targets an ethnicity. Islamophobia as currently deployed is used to shut down legitimate criticism of an ideology, a set of beliefs, a political and legal framework that in many of its manifestations is incompatible with the liberal democratic values this country was built on. Criticising sharia law is not hatred of Muslims. Documenting the role of political Islam in grooming gang networks is not hatred of Muslims. Naming the ideology that produced the October 7th massacre is not hatred of Muslims. The Policy Exchange poll published this month found that 25 percent of British Muslims have a favourable view of Hamas. It also found that 45 percent believe Jews control the media and 39 percent believe Jews control Parliament. Those are antisemitic conspiracy theories with no basis in fact. The poll documents not their truth but their prevalence. The fact that such beliefs are held by significant proportions of a specific community is precisely the public policy conversation the word Islamophobia is designed to prevent. Reform's argument is not that Muslims should face hatred or discrimination. It is that an ideological construct designed to silence legitimate scrutiny of a specific belief system should not carry the same legal and social weight as genuine racial hatred. That is not disgusting. That is a distinction any serious journalist should be capable of making. The word that is actually being used to mislead the public is the one you are defending.

English
0
0
1
3
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄 retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
We Are Not Failing to Stop the Boats. We Are Choosing Not To The small-boats crisis is no longer a failure of policy. It is a refusal to apply one. The British state knows how to stop these crossings. It chooses not to. Everything else is smoke, mirrors, and motion designed to disguise that fact. We have paid France £480 million to help protect our border. Not symbolically. In hard cash, over a fixed period, for a stated purpose. A country does not hand over half a billion pounds unless it expects cooperation, and a country that accepts that money is, by definition, willing to help. Yet the boats still leave French beaches in broad daylight. They are tracked, filmed, and escorted across one of the most monitored stretches of water on earth before being delivered into Britain. That is not failure. It is consent dressed up as effort. The missing step is obvious and never addressed. Cooperation is not the obstacle, so the answer is simple. Anyone intercepted in the Channel should be returned to French shores. No asylum claim. No processing theatre. No reward for illegal entry. The Royal Navy has the ships, the discipline, and the command structure to intercept safely and decisively, separating crews from passengers and enforcing a clear outcome. That single rule would end the trade overnight. Smugglers know it. Migrants know it. Ministers know it. Which is precisely why it is never applied. Instead, we are offered distraction. Patrols that observe but do not enforce. Payments that continue regardless of outcome. And now, a new sleight of hand: China. Keir Starmer's "landmark" deal with Beijing to share intelligence on Chinese engines is the latest attempt to move the argument anywhere except where it belongs. We are told that sixty per cent of the engines are Chinese, as if the nationality of an outboard motor explains why tens of thousands of people are delivered safely into Britain each year. It does not. Engines are replaceable. Routes are not. What makes the journey worthwhile is not the boat, but the guarantee of arrival. If every Chinese engine vanished tomorrow, the crossings would continue. Different engines. Different suppliers. Same beaches. Same outcome. Because the policy signal remains unchanged: reach British waters and you will be brought ashore. That is not border control. It is assisted entry with uniforms and paperwork attached. This is why the Royal Navy is kept at arm's length. Not because it lacks ships or skill, but because once interception becomes enforcement, the question of return can no longer be dodged. And once that question is answered honestly, the entire performance collapses. Calling this problem "complex" insults the public. The solution already exists. It is not applied because the outcome is tolerated. The £480 million paid to France is not buying deterrence. It is buying plausible deniability. The China deal is not smashing gangs. It is smothering scrutiny. And while this theatre continues, the cost is not abstract. It is paid in pressure on housing, policing, and public trust. It is paid in the erosion of social cohesion. And it is paid most heavily by women and girls, who are asked to absorb the risks of a system that refuses to enforce its own borders while insisting everything is under control. Everyone can see this now. The pretence is threadbare. Yet the government persists with the lie, because admitting the truth would require doing the one thing it will not do. The boats keep coming not because we cannot stop them, but because we choose not to. "The Royal Navy has the ships, the discipline, and the command structure to intercept safely and decisively, separating crews from passengers and enforcing a clear outcome."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet mediaJim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
211
1.4K
3.4K
36.1K
Matthew Evans
Matthew Evans@Neuro_Matt·
Most clothing stores I’ve been to in the last 39 years have had unisex cubicles for changing rooms. Why are we pretending this is in any way new, or illegal? It’s not.
English
495
84
2K
63.1K
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
On Eid al-Adha, I send my warmest wishes to all those celebrating across the UK and around the world. At this special time, I wish you and your loved ones peace, joy and good health. May Eid bring comfort and inspire us all to continue standing together in the spirit of unity and mutual respect. Eid Mubarak.
UK Prime Minister@10DowningStreet

Wishing Muslims in the UK and around the world a very happy and blessed Eid al-Adha. Eid Mubarak.

English
9.1K
1.1K
9.2K
1.7M
Maliq
Maliq@MasterMaliq·
I have a dream that Christians and Muslims will live together in harmony” Most of you will call me naive. Most of you have already given up. But I still believe it’s possible.
English
789
5
69
18.9K
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄 retweetledi
Peter Bleksley
Peter Bleksley@PeterBleksley·
The sun has got his hat on, and in the past three days alone, 912 illegals have entered the UK via 13 dinghies. More on the way today… RIP Rhiannon.
Peter Bleksley tweet media
English
79
872
5.1K
41K
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄 retweetledi
John Ganges
John Ganges@dunstablian·
24.000 Pakistani's have applied for UK citizenship with thousands more applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain, the final step before applying for citizenship. Will someone tell me how our country will benefit from that? Pakistan is not at war, why are they here?
English
201
1.4K
6.6K
101.2K
🤷‍♀️ KO 🙄
@AvaLovelaceX No, not secondary citizens but men pretending to be women cannot use women’s loo’s and changing rooms. There’s no such thing as cis women, we’re women.
English
0
0
0
4
Ava Lovelace 🏳️‍⚧️
The Supreme Court has ruled that under UK law, trans people are secondary citizens and shouldn’t have access to services and amenities. You know they’re gonna do the same thing to gay people and cis women, right?
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The Supreme Court has ruled that under UK law, trans people never had the rights people like you insisted they had. You misrepresented the law and cheered on the removal of women’s rights. Trans people have lost nothing except the mistaken belief you fostered.

English
709
99
881
78.6K
Naomi Canton
Naomi Canton@naomi2009·
It was 34 degrees in the UK yesterday, the hottest May on record. The UK governmemt should make air-conditioning mandatory in all hotels, restaurants, shops, cinemas, trains, buses, shopping malls and anywhere in doors and it should also be installed now as a matter of course in all new builds. The UK weather has changed and buildings have not caught up. @ClaireCoutinho @KemiBadenoch @ZiaYusufUK
English
960
166
1.5K
413.1K
𝚁𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚢 🌹
Why are men so quick to reject trans women? What’s your honest answer to this? 👀
𝚁𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚢 🌹 tweet media
English
3.2K
34
146
52K