Miralib Balamar

1.6K posts

Miralib Balamar banner
Miralib Balamar

Miralib Balamar

@KaspaCrypto

This is a private account re the amazing Kaspa cryptocurrency and related stuff. Visit @kaspaunchained for what's as close to the "official" one as possible.

Katılım Aralık 2021
53 Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
Rereading KIP-9 github.com/kaspanet/kips/…, I remembered: I always underestimate how deep the Kaspa design goes. Every time I expect a "security compromise", I find out the only real compromise is my own laziness to look under the hood. Once you dive deep, it’s flawless. No hacks, no clutches. Security? Sure yes, here. Wait, but micropayments?.. Ah yes, elegantly covered as well. Man. Kaspa devs are pure geniuses.
English
3
35
132
5.4K
Miralib Balamar retweetledi
Wolfie
Wolfie@Kaspa_HypeMan·
@nikitabier @mistor @santisiri @steipete @openclaw @nikitabier love it — quality > spam. Any chance $KAS (Kaspa) could be part of the new Smart Cashtags rollout? Top 100 coin w/ a huge organic community. Founder @hashdag even went viral turning down @binance “top 100” spot 😅 x.com/hashdag/status…
Yonatan Sompolinsky@hashdag

@binance, Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal! I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out. Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed. There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects. When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement. You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog? Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point. @cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity. Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto. We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes. Please fix this. Thanks again, hashdag cc @michaelsuttonil Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus

English
16
90
300
7.5K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
What a nice one, $KAS fam!
DagVault@DagVaultRWA

DAG Industrial | Episode #006: The Agentic Web 🤖🔗 In 2026, the workforce has changed. 82:1. That is the ratio of Autonomous AI Agents to human employees. But these agents have a problem: They are unbanked ghosts. 👻 Episode 006 breaks down how #Kaspa provides the financial nervous system for the $26 Trillion Machine Economy. The 2026 Tech Stack: 🔹 The Problem: You can't run a fleet of million-transaction-per-second AI agents on a 15-minute block time. 🔹 The Solution: KIP-17 Covenants. We can now program "Spending Limits" directly into the UTXO. Your AI agent can hold money, but it can only spend it on approved services (Data, Energy, Compute). 🔹 The Scale: From V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) to DePIN, Kaspa is the only PoW layer fast enough to catch the "stream" of machine payments. The future isn't just about "Human-to-Human" transactions. It's about Machine-to-Machine (M2M) settlement. Watch the full briefing below. 👇 #KAS #BlockDAG #AI #MachineEconomy #DePIN #Web3 #FutureOfWork

English
3
5
40
1.1K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
The man describes $KAS and still doesn't name it out loud. Well, well.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

Have been following reactions to what I said about L2s about 1.5 days ago. One important thing that I believe is: "make yet another EVM chain and add an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a 1 week delay" is to infra what forking Compound is to governance - something we've done far too much for far too long, because we got comfortable, and which has sapped our imagination and put us in a dead end. If you make an EVM chain *without* an optimistic bridge to Ethereum (aka an alt L1), that's even worse. We don't friggin need more copypasta EVM chains, and we definitely don't need even more L1s. L1 is scaling and is going to bring lots of EVM blockspace - not infinite (AIs in particular will need both more blockspace and lower latency than even a greatly scaled L1 can offer), but lots. Build something that brings something new to the table. I gave a few examples: privacy, app-specific efficiency, ultra-low latency, but my list is surely very incomplete. A second important thing that I believe is: regarding "connection to Ethereum", vibes need to match substance. I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". For example I think there's a large chance that the optimal architecture for prediction markets is something like: the market gets issued and resolved on L1, user accounts are on L1, but trading happens on some based rollup or other L2-like system, where the execution reads the L1 to verify signatures and markets. I like architectures where deep connection to L1 is first-class, and not an afterthought ("we're pretty much a separate chain, but oh yeah, we have a bridge, and ok fine let's put 1-2 devs to get it to stage 1 so the l2beat people will put a green checkmark on it so vitalik likes us"). The other extreme of "app chain", eg. the version where you convince some government registry, or social media platform, or gaming thing, to start putting merkle roots of its database, with STARKs that prove every update was authorized and signed and executed according to a pre-committed algorithm, onchain, is also reasonable - this is what makes the most sense to me in terms of "institutional L2s". It's obviously not Ethereum, not credibly neutral and not trustless - the operator can always just choose to say "we're switching to a different version with different rules now". But it would enable verifiable algorithmic transparency, a property that many of us would love to see in government, social media algorithms or wherever else, and it may enable economic activity that would otherwise not be possible. I think if you're the first thing, it's valid and great to call yourself an Ethereum application - it can't survive without Ethereum even technologically, it maximizes interoperability and composability with other Ethereum applications. If you're the second thing, then you're not Ethereum, but you are (i) bringing humanity more algorithmic transparency and trust minimization, so you're pursuing a similar vision, and (ii) depending on details probably synergistic with Ethereum. So you should just say those things directly! Basically: 1. Do something that brings something actually new to the table. 2. Vibes should match substance - the degree of connection to Ethereum in your public image should reflect the degree of connection to Ethereum that your thing has in reality.

English
4
5
58
1.9K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
@ChunqiuShi Oh noes!! It'll take them years though, I believe. Replacing the consensus system on the fly isn't something easily achievable. It's not even something achievable with a moderate amount of effort.
English
0
0
0
15
chunqiu shi
chunqiu shi@ChunqiuShi·
@KaspaCrypto Ethereum is preparing to copy Kaspa's research achievements regarding Layer 1(L1).
chunqiu shi tweet media
English
1
0
2
43
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Have been following reactions to what I said about L2s about 1.5 days ago. One important thing that I believe is: "make yet another EVM chain and add an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a 1 week delay" is to infra what forking Compound is to governance - something we've done far too much for far too long, because we got comfortable, and which has sapped our imagination and put us in a dead end. If you make an EVM chain *without* an optimistic bridge to Ethereum (aka an alt L1), that's even worse. We don't friggin need more copypasta EVM chains, and we definitely don't need even more L1s. L1 is scaling and is going to bring lots of EVM blockspace - not infinite (AIs in particular will need both more blockspace and lower latency than even a greatly scaled L1 can offer), but lots. Build something that brings something new to the table. I gave a few examples: privacy, app-specific efficiency, ultra-low latency, but my list is surely very incomplete. A second important thing that I believe is: regarding "connection to Ethereum", vibes need to match substance. I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". For example I think there's a large chance that the optimal architecture for prediction markets is something like: the market gets issued and resolved on L1, user accounts are on L1, but trading happens on some based rollup or other L2-like system, where the execution reads the L1 to verify signatures and markets. I like architectures where deep connection to L1 is first-class, and not an afterthought ("we're pretty much a separate chain, but oh yeah, we have a bridge, and ok fine let's put 1-2 devs to get it to stage 1 so the l2beat people will put a green checkmark on it so vitalik likes us"). The other extreme of "app chain", eg. the version where you convince some government registry, or social media platform, or gaming thing, to start putting merkle roots of its database, with STARKs that prove every update was authorized and signed and executed according to a pre-committed algorithm, onchain, is also reasonable - this is what makes the most sense to me in terms of "institutional L2s". It's obviously not Ethereum, not credibly neutral and not trustless - the operator can always just choose to say "we're switching to a different version with different rules now". But it would enable verifiable algorithmic transparency, a property that many of us would love to see in government, social media algorithms or wherever else, and it may enable economic activity that would otherwise not be possible. I think if you're the first thing, it's valid and great to call yourself an Ethereum application - it can't survive without Ethereum even technologically, it maximizes interoperability and composability with other Ethereum applications. If you're the second thing, then you're not Ethereum, but you are (i) bringing humanity more algorithmic transparency and trust minimization, so you're pursuing a similar vision, and (ii) depending on details probably synergistic with Ethereum. So you should just say those things directly! Basically: 1. Do something that brings something actually new to the table. 2. Vibes should match substance - the degree of connection to Ethereum in your public image should reflect the degree of connection to Ethereum that your thing has in reality.
English
1.7K
609
5K
1M
Miralib Balamar retweetledi
Pumpolinsky
Pumpolinsky@pumpolinsky·
Make this post go viral. Delete your Binance account. #CZBinance is anti crypto. They are only listing crypto memes which they eventually rug. They are ignoring real projects like $KAS Like, Repost and comment.
Pumpolinsky tweet media
English
14
104
311
6.1K
Miralib Balamar retweetledi
Wolfie
Wolfie@Kaspa_HypeMan·
@star_okx So Bro why Don't you show us how cool YOU actually are and activate spot trading for $KAS WE DID THE INTEGRATION WORK TWO AND A HALF YEARS AGO :)))
English
27
76
371
12.3K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
And 8 more donations to kas.coffee/kaspa_nigeria since my last intervention, totaling in ~2946 $KAS. I think this time I'll simply match the amount. C'mon folks, we're down to pennies! Let's push this over the finish line!
Miralib Balamar tweet media
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto

$KAS Wake up, community! Each time, hundreds vote 'YES' but LITERALLY almost no one donates. This has to stop! I’m matching the current balance RIGHT NOW. After that, I’ll add 50% of every new total between my updates. Stop voting, start sending! kas.coffee/kaspa_nigeria

English
2
6
39
1.9K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
Know and tell everyone: - chains, by definition, cannot scale securely; - sharding of peer chains fails on latency; - hierarchical shards only add complexity. Conceptually, only BlockDAG solves scaling at the fundamental layer of P2P ledgers. Study $KAS!
Miralib Balamar tweet media
English
1
17
67
1.6K
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
$KAS Wake up, community! Each time, hundreds vote 'YES' but LITERALLY almost no one donates. This has to stop! I’m matching the current balance RIGHT NOW. After that, I’ll add 50% of every new total between my updates. Stop voting, start sending! kas.coffee/kaspa_nigeria
Miralib Balamar tweet media
English
12
25
119
15.8K
Ryan Loveletter
Ryan Loveletter@RyanLoveletter·
@KaspaCrypto Okay. I wasn’t referring to an ad buy. That was your comparison. There are other marketing ideas.
English
1
0
0
21
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
@Crypt0_Titan Yep, it's hard to appeal people these days. Too many possibilities around them.
English
0
0
3
151
IQ 3,000 | Titan
IQ 3,000 | Titan@Crypt0_Titan·
@KaspaCrypto I always said this and unfortunately still true - they will say one thing then do the other I spent around $5k building a game they said they would love to play Launched it - crickets
English
1
0
2
202
Miralib Balamar
Miralib Balamar@KaspaCrypto·
I haven't lost hope that the early whales will wake up and start contributing to the community, even in small ways. Why the hell have I spent over 20% of my total KAS holdings on donations and community support, yet I see zero signs of similar effort from those who joined in the first six months? What are they even thinking?
English
10
16
106
6.3K
jses195710
jses195710@jses234514·
@KaspaCrypto You're seeing the biggest flaw in a community funding model.
English
1
0
3
578