🪁 Keom

3.6K posts

🪁 Keom banner
🪁 Keom

🪁 Keom

@KeomProtocol

The suite of #zkDeFi products powered by Polygon 2.0 Links: https://t.co/8afR9xO8i3

Decentralized Katılım Mart 2022
171 Takip Edilen50.6K Takipçiler
🪁 Keom
🪁 Keom@KeomProtocol·
Today, NickAI (getnick.ai), a protocol for AI-agent trading, announced a strategic arrangement for the absorption of Keom’s community stewardship, key team members and selected technical resources into NickAI’s ecosystem. There will be no immediate changes for users and more information for existing will follow shortly. No immediate changes will occur for users with additional guidance to be provided in the near future.
English
4
0
5
1.4K
🪁 Keom
🪁 Keom@KeomProtocol·
⚠️ Important Note for Astar zkEVM Users Keom users on Astar zkEVM should withdraw all assets before the chain is terminated on April 1, 2025. Please check your wallets for any active LP positions or funds that need to be withdrawn. Reference Astar's post here for more context
Astar Network@AstarNetwork

📣 Attention Astar Community As we move closer to the termination of Astar zkEVM, we highly urge you to take the necessary steps to withdraw ALL your assets before Astar zkEVM sunsets on April 1st, 2025. 👇

English
3
0
7
2.6K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Astar Network
Astar Network@AstarNetwork·
📣 Attention Astar Community As we move closer to the termination of Astar zkEVM, we highly urge you to take the necessary steps to withdraw ALL your assets before Astar zkEVM sunsets on April 1st, 2025. 👇
English
19
24
158
140.3K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Miden
Miden@0xMiden·
In Miden Alpha Testnet v6, builders can use a more powerful foreign procedure invocation including also private smart contracts, account creation is way faster, the VM switched to element-addressable memory, and our Node has a real mempool. → polygon.technology/blog/polygon-m…
Miden tweet media
English
2
19
46
3.6K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Fede’s intern 🥊
Fede’s intern 🥊@fede_intern·
Miden is an amazing piece of tech. Bobbin is one of the founders we have worked in our history. Highly recommend you follow him. He is not doing a copy cat L2. He is pushing what is possible in Ethereum. Privacy, scaling, client side proving. I honestly believe there is no more advanced design in the L2 world.
Bobbin's Threadbare@bobbinth

We have an interesting take on this: in Miden VM all invocations are content-addressable (i.e., "call-by-hash"). This means that all external dependencies are cryptographically fixed, and even programs with dynamically-linked dependencies are always guaranteed to execute the exact same sequence of instructions every time. Here is more about how programs work in Miden VM: 0xpolygonmiden.github.io/miden-vm/desig…

English
7
18
62
16.9K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
asadox.apt
asadox.apt@asad_ahmed04·
It was great chatting with @bobbinth this week on Miden. Few things amazing about it: 1. UTXO based functioning allowing DAG flows to be created 2. Accounts holding asset allowing for parallelism 3. Transition proofs to be submitted by client.
English
2
5
24
5.2K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Marc | Polygon Labs (💜,⚔️, ※)
It will interesting to see the Aave governance decision when it comes to the Polygon vote. Is the Aave DAO willing to lose a protocol on which it has generated over $120,000,000 in revenue and still generates between $10M and $20M of revenue per year just because of one man’s ego? Time for the DAO to step up. Needless to say we are ready to take the necessary actions to address whatever decision Marc Zeller decides to force through the Aave DAO if successful.
Marc Zeller@Marczeller

Aave on Sonic Aave on Mantle Aave on BoB Aave on Linea LBTC onboarding eBTC onboarding rlUSD onboarding Pendle PT tokens Onboarding Gnosis instance increased efficiency Polygon offboarding Umbrella deployment WLF deployment (and more) Enjoy your Holidays, we'll keep grinding.

English
39
17
183
73.1K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Marc | Polygon Labs (💜,⚔️, ※)
TLDR: • Polygon governance was great over the last few days, showing it knows how to take a strong position against a proposal it dislikes. • Aave and surrounding teams are monopolies that use dirty tactics to create fear. • Aave and those teams did the same when proposing to shut down Polygon PoS in reaction to Morpho potentially receiving bridge assets that they themselves made a proposal for a month ago. I’m proud of the governance process that played out in only a few short days on the Polygon forum and X. People should always stand firm in what they believe and make their voices known. Others need to be outed for the destructive impact they have had on the web3 ecosystem, exhibiting massive monopolistic behavior to control lending in web3. Specifically the Aave and ACI teams were at their usual games yesterday. At the mention of only a pre-pip (many months away from anything real potentially happening), they put forward a proposal to wind down activities on Polygon PoS. Unlike Polygon governance, Aave governance is highly concentrated. @marczeller (Mark Zeller) reminded me of this yesterday when sending an unsolicited DM trying to intimidate me by informing me that his Aave DAO proposal was guaranteed to pass. I’ve never spoken to Marc Zeller in my life, and it was unsolicited only to create fear. The problem for him is that Polygon isn’t a nascent ecosystem that fears Aave; unfortunately, not all are in the same position, especially other lending protocols they attack. Aave will seek support as they did yesterday to respond to this tweet and others to retain the control they have over lending in this industry. However, new players are emerging who will create a better web3 future. Upstanding people like @PaulFrambot , Founder of @MorphoLabs, @euler_mab, Founder of @eulerfinance, and @CoreyCaplan3, Founder of @Dolomite_io, will disrupt lending on a level playing field. Let’s create that level playing field so web3 should become what it can be. How can web3 be better? Let’s just take Morpho as an example: • Morpho developed simple, immutable code like Uniswap that can be deployed without centralized risk management of the Aave DAO. Decisions are made by that captured Aave DAO. Some say “just use Aave” but I think they really mean, “just use Marc Zeller.” • Morpho has a much simpler code base with fewer attack vectors. Morpho actually used to use Aave until it had to fix so many bugs that it decided to build something better. No more constant war rooms that one day will unfortunately fail for Aave users. • Morpho allows for significantly greater capital efficiency that can be tested and improved on in independent implementations of Morpho. This cannot happen with one giga-deployment of Aave that needs to be more conservative simply because it is less efficient. • Morpho is so much simpler than Aave that it has much lower gas fees (3-5X lower fees). This is great for more complex integrations with a lending protocol. • Morpho allows users to create personalized lending markets tailored to their specific needs and risk appetites. Aave has a standardized approach, where lending conditions are uniform across all of Aave. • Morpho has a peer-to-peer lending model that mitigates overall economic risk for users. The impact of a default is limited to the specific market involved, preventing a single default from affecting other markets within the protocol. Aave's pooled liquidity model means a single default could potentially destabilize the entire pool. The whole concept of bad debt is so broad on Aave that all users need to at all times be vigilant. It's time we build a truly open web3.
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)@sandeepnailwal

BIG UPDATE REGARDING STAKE THE BRIDGE AND AAVE SITUATION! A few days back @AllezLabs and @Yearnfi put up a “Pre-PIP”, a proposal for the proposal, to enable staking of Polygon PoS bridge funds. The Polygon community made their voice heard and was generally against the proposal. I personally spoke to 50+ community members and feel that the pre-proposal in its current form does not address some of the concerns of the community and hence I am also unsupportive of the proposal. Considering many other Polygon community members, this STB pre-proposal looks to be rejected. Voicing loudly opinions against a proposal is a huge success of Polygon Governance. NOW! Let's talk about what Aave leadership did here, but first a few facts: Aave Campaigned Hard for the similar proposition previously When this pre-proposal was first brought into discussion, Aave leadership was super excited about it and lobbied heavily to make sure the bridge funds go to Aave deployment. During the public RFP process on Polygon Governance portal, Aave leadership had multiple meetings and invited Polygon Labs leadership to various dinner meetings and presentations to garner Polygon Labs support to “select Aave” for stake the bridge process. They posted their own pre-PIP, which generated very little conversation in the Polygon community. What Morpho Did Differently Considering what Morpho wanted to bring into the Polygon ecosystem — huge grants to Polygon Defi community as incentives, superior decentralisation and control over contracts for the Polygon community, as well as very simple smart contracts with fewer attack vectors — Morpho got a head start in garnering other community members who were supportive of their vision of STBl. In this version, Aave was still going to receive a large part of the yield for its users on Polygon POS deployment. Aave Attacking Polygon Once there was some traction after Morpho (and others) posted their pre-PIP, Marc Zeller — a vocal delegate in the Aave community —posted a vicious threat proposing to discontinue Aave deployment on Polygon PoS bringing huge hassle to their users, just to make sure that the biggest and fastest-rising competitor to Aave - Morpho — didn’t get the growth boost from STB. The proposal disregards the security measures already in place and feels more like “sour grapes” than a constructive contribution to the dialogue. Ironically, this move would harm the very users it claims to protect by disrupting their access to a stable and thriving DeFi ecosystem. It's hypocritical to claim concern for user security while simultaneously attempting to destabilize an ecosystem that so many depend on. To underscore just how personal this attack was, a prominent Aave leader even went as far as tweeting, "Operation Polygon(e)." This is extremely monopolistic and anti-competitive behaviour from Aave leadership and not at all aligned with the Ethos of Web3. This is a prominent example of a DAO leadership engaging in anti-competitive tactics and bullying other ecosystems to play to their tune. The Polygon community should not be intimidated by monopolistic tactics or aggression and should continue to explore innovative mechanisms to achieve more success. Our commitment is to a thriving, competitive, and truly decentralised DeFi ecosystem that serves the best interests of all users and builders. The Polygon community will continue to push the boundaries of what’s possible, standing resolute against any actions that undermine the principles of Web3. We remain open and eager for positive, constructive dialogue with the community, but on equal terms. This goes both as well as with both for Morpho, and Aave or any other Web3 player to ensure a collaborative path forward.

English
41
67
459
183.7K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Polygon | POL
Polygon | POL@0xPolygon·
due to current market conditions I now identify as a L1
English
139
183
1.3K
130.2K
🪁 Keom retweetledi
Naval
Naval@naval·
Upcoming deregulation wave will create an economic sonic boom.
English
541
3.6K
38.1K
2.1M