anArmyScout 📜 🇺🇸

@Gladstone1431 @garner_forest @NathanDahm @davidmweissman @ThisIsKyleR “That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United states who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” - Samuel Adams

@IrkCipher @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 You already lost. 🤡

@Kessol @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 let's play a little game did Charlie Kirk say “I think it's worth it. It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment,"? Just say Yes or No.

You don’t say?

@IrkCipher @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 “It's quite literally what he would've wanted.” - Volshatter, arguing for the same thing but too stupid to realize it.

@Kessol @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 “I think it's worth it. It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment," ~Charlie Kirk, Gun Death.

@IrkCipher @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 This is you making the argument, not Charlie. Hell, you’re even putting words in his mouth. Sit down and shut your mouth.

@Kessol @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 I never argued that they are, Kirk did. Kirk said, "“I think it's worth it. It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment". That was his position. Lives for Guns.

@IrkCipher @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 You’re arguing it now.

@IrkCipher @HammerUrBenis @Howlingmutant0 We have the 2nd Amendment whether there are a thousand gun deaths or zero. They are independent of one another. You’re wrong. 🤡

@HammerUrBenis @Howlingmutant0 Was his death not worth the 2nd Amendment? Prove Me Wrong.

@IrkCipher @freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 The flaw in your argument is that no deaths are required to have the 2nd Amendment.

@freddard_ @SunshineSnowbir @Howlingmutant0 If they shot a man standing next to Charlie Kirk, instead of Kirk himself, would Kirk have changed his mind and said that the man's death wasn't worth the 2nd Amendment?

@IndianaFootball @CFBPlayoff Congrats Indiana!

Introducing your 2025 @CFBPlayoff Champions.

@Angry_Staffer She wasn’t murdered. She was killed in response to her choice of assaulting a law enforcement officer.

The most enlightening and disappointing thing to come out of this ICE shooting is that the right legitimately does not give a fuck about human life if it harms their political narrative. Watching people malign a 37 year old mother for being murdered by her country is insane.

Being right wing must be a trip because your whole job is just making shit up.

@tbonier It can be both. 🤦🏻‍♂️

So which is it: are immigrants working the same jobs as citizens, but for 70% less pay, or are they lazy and living off our tax dollars? I'm confused.

@BenMRogers @JamesHu27192912

@JamesHu27192912 Remind me what that first amendment was? Something about free speech.

Immigrants raise rents by increasing the demand for housing Immigrants spike premiums by driving & visiting the ER without insurance, meaning the insured subsidize them Immigrants rig the economy by lowering wages, working for less than you can since they also claim welfare

@dan_lyle @ESPN_Schick Everyone else paid before. 🤡

@ESPN_Schick SEC just mad everyone else can pay 💰 now

SEC fans this year: “Indiana would be 7-5 if they had to survive this gauntlet.” Indiana:

@ProudSocialist It’s not horrifying at all. The man should not have tried to grab the agents weapon. The agent was defending himself.

Another horrifying image out of Minneapolis. Look at the terror on this man’s face as a federal agent points a gun at his face & threatens his life. Enough is enough. Our government is committing war crimes abroad & murdering & terrorizing citizens at home. We need a revolution.

@Ace_Archist @CaliforniaOld She’s not a victim. She was the aggressor. 🤡

@CaliforniaOld Victim blaming. This is like asking a rape victim why she was wearing a short skirt. Because she fucking can is the answer. The real question is why the fuck did that pig shoot her in the face from the side of her car?

This is genuinely what right wingers believe. The one held at gunpoint must remain completely calm and rational. But if the cop gets spooked by an acorn falling on the roof of a car, then he gets to unload on you because he “feared for his life”.

@AVGirl4Life There’s no such thing as trans rights. There are human rights. Everyone has them.

Thoughts?

@ATLCWorker The value of their labor is equal to what the worker agreed to exchange it for, nothing more.

Capitalism would not exist if workers were paid the full value of their labor.

@Garnet_2203 Guns are inanimate objects, it’s impossible for it to be the guns. Educate yourself.

It’s the guns

I’ll withhold judgement until I see how Notre Dame looks in their bowl game.

@ShamashAran Very well said.

I’m a black woman who pretends to be a catgirl on the internet. I enjoy sci-fi novels and I fix cars for enjoyment. None of that tells you a damn thing about the usefulness of MY stance of gun control. Just like you being a gun owner, a veteran, or married to a crime victim tells nobody anything about whether a proposed law is constitutional, effective, or even coherent. Personal biography is not policy analysis. It’s just vibes in a dress uniform. In your case, I'll bet the medals are on backwards. Gun control is a nice idea. So is banning drugs. So is banning murder. The problem isn’t intention, it’s reality. Laws don’t operate in a vacuum where only good people follow them and bad people politely comply. They operate in the real world, where criminals route around restrictions the way water routes around rocks. Felons and domestic abusers are already prohibited from owning firearms. The "Charleston loophole" rhetoric pretends this isn’t true, as if violent criminals are currently wandering into gun stores, twirling mustaches, and lawfully purchasing rifles because a stopwatch hit zero. That isn’t how crime works, and it isn’t how criminals acquire guns. (HINT: They steal them, generally) What these laws ACTUALLY do is expand discretionary denial and delay for people who are already legal, already vetted, and already compliant. They turn a right into a permission slip that expires if the government is slow, incompetent, or simply hostile. If the state can block a right by failing to act, that right no longer exists. It’s a favor. You can believe gun control should work. (Many people do.) The thing is, belief isn’t evidence. Your credentials aren’t arguments. If the policy fails in practice, pointing at your life story doesn’t make it succeed.