Matthew Mark | FORMIDABLE Families

Me when someone is wearing shorts at Mass.

MICHAEL CLARY : Loser Theology is attractive because the alternative is hard. Our culture is in a state of accelerating decline, and many believers feel genuinely ill-equipped to do anything about it. The cultural ground we’ve lost took generations to build, generations to lose, and will take generations to recover. The institutional courage required to push back is costly. The personal discipline required to raise children who can engage the world rather than retreat from it is exhausting. Loser Theology offers a way out—a theological permission slip to accept defeat rather than do the painful work of resistance. It feels more like wisdom than giving up. Rather than recovering cultural ground, rebuilding institutional courage, and training a generation to engage the world with confidence, Loser Theology changes the story. When we see cultural decline and growing hostility from secularism, we say, “Being a minority in society is actually good. It’s better to lose than to win. This is the way of the cross.” Every external signal that something is wrong gets reinterpreted as a mark of authentic Christianity, leaving the church feeling more faithful as it shrivels away. But it doesn't have to be this way. We must reject Loser Theology.

Both buildings cost $847,000,000 Both are in Chicago Trump built one Obama built the other