Keldasi

@Davetron3 @I__HATE_SOCCER It's not a matter of insecurity. It's a symbol for a hate group, Megalia. It's like someone adding a couple swastikas and doing the Roman salute. South Korea has extremist misogynists and extremist misandrists. reddit.com/r/korea/commen…

@I__HATE_SOCCER That’s so fucking pathetic. Like you’re really that insecure?

I’m gonna cry man

@bingus51455 @Tachiiikari It isn't saying they have a tiny dick. It's a sign of affiliation to a hate group, which chose that sign as a small-penis mockery.

@Tachiiikari Are we surprised that community is offended by this gesture🤏? Getting upset and thinking they're saying they have a tiny dick when seeing it has to be the biggest self-report.

I was wondering how stupid someone has to be to compare a slur with a LONG history behind it to a hand gesture and then saw the community the post was made in

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 That's because you are refusing to read the substantion...

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Nope, l'm just seeing more unsubstantiated claims here. No wonder you're an evolution cultist, you never require actual evidence for your own argument.

If there really was a global flood, like the Bible says, we should find billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the Earth. And that’s exactly what we find!

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 That was plain english. Do you need to get some sleep?

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Againn try communicating in plain English, try to be an adult if you have a coherent point to make, all you're demonstrating at the moment is hubris and bluster.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Less fancy machines in the 90s had some issues with low ages. So the minimum was higher. The reason why is in the reference. Unfortunately the website of the lab in the early 90s was not screenshot so you don't get a handy picture. This makes their results perfectly explainable

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 I have no idea what you're supposed to be claiming here.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 That I make? Are you under the impression I wrote that instead of finding it with as much effort as you did?

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Yet Brent Dalrymple, a National Medal of Science winner critiqued their work and doesn't make the absurd claims you make. I'm going to take a wild guess he's far more objective than you are, and any criticisms he raised are dealt with.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Sorry that a website from the 1990s wasn't perfectly preserved, now you have to read a research paper from the 60s The specific reference is listed by name in the main body of the text, and found at the bottom Dalrymple, G.B., 1969

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 They provided no evidence for their claim reference the lab, and when l asked you for evidence your response was 'meh...references' It's not very convincing is it. So ironically the people lying here are not Creation Ministeries, whose work gets critiqued by Brent Dalrymple

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Why would I need a paper to refute an overtly biased blog piece? An overtly biased blog piece is a perfect way to refute it. I don't need to guess, or ask them. They said so themselves in plain English.

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Mate you can make all the claims you like here, but where is the paper refuting it all with ur claims? An overtly biased blog piece isn't it and neither is your guesswork on what did or didn't happen with this lab. Stop being a coward and ask them, l'd love to see their response

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 ? What cult members? I'm not in a cult Why would they be taken down, they have the free speech to say obviously false shit even after being successfully challenged You pointed out nothing, you called it anti-creationist and stopped there. Refusing to address any portion of it.

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 You can't even provide any truth here 😂 . If what you claim is true they would have been taken down a long time ago by your other cult members. No-one has properly challenged them and your little biased blog piece is laughable in it's obvious deception, which l've pointed out.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 If no-one lied then your objection that "the lab knew, because contract" is nullified and this comes back up. They did not inform the lab that an age was known. This type of radiometric dating does not work on rocks this young. Their 'big scoop' is that they did the wrong test.

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 No-one lied here, clearly there was a commercial agreement with the lab who were happy to test the samples as described. Creation Ministeries have not hidden anything. I suggest you be a man and put your accusations to them, l recommend taking legal advice before you do.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Off the top of my head? Its not slander if its true. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Voyag… I'll keep that in mind if I ever consider slandering anyone, especially a reputable organization which these scumbags are not. Why would I contact people that knowingly lie to correct their lies?

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Where's your evidence they're 'known for lying'? I would be careful about slandering reputable organisations who publish their work, if l were youn especially American ones. Why don't you contact them with your claims, let me know how that goes.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 So which explanation is correct: 1) Austin lied to his readers and the lab knew the samples were improperly young 2) Austin lied to the lab and the lab did not know the samples were improperly young Because it sounds like you think 1 is true, but I want to make sure.

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 I definitely read it, and that doesn't support what you're claiming, because any lab like that will contract with you and be clear about their T's and C's, especially in the US, where litigation is rife, so try again.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Do you think the creation ministry, a creationist org known for lying to discredit science, would ever publish a thorough takedown of themselves? Wow you are naive I literally did refute them. The minimum age for K-Ar dating exceeds 6,000 years, it is not an appropriate test

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 I didn't blindly accept it, there are lots of examples of radio dating fails, this was just one of many. You haven't provided a single credible piece of evidence that refutes these test results. Where's the rebuttal on the creation ministeries website? They welcome feedback there

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Should I take this as an admission that you did not in fact read it?

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 There's nothing in any link l provided that states what you claim, if you think there is feel free to screenshot it and provide it.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 To be clear, there is evidence all over the page of different flaws with the 'study' that have been referenced. Ironic that you'd blindly accept a creationist blog with an anti-radiometric hit piece but not an anti-creationist rebuttal

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 No, do you seriously expect me to read every single reference in order to look for your evidence? Show me evidence of this lab claim? Because a claim in a blog piece with a stated agenda isn't it buddy, try again.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Unsubstantiated? That's directly from YOUR link, did you not read it?

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Another unsubstantiated claim, do you think they just turned up with a bag of rocks and just said 'test these, and the lab just said 'oki doki'? I mean seriously are you really this biased and stupid?

@DecodingFoxNews @ILA_NewsX @WallStreetMav Because he paid for it with Argentinian pesos. It was a currency swap.

@ILA_NewsX @WallStreetMav They why did we give him billions? Seems like he is the welfare state.

Argentina's Annual Inflation Rate 2023: 211% Dec 2023 (Javier Milei takes office): 2024: 117% 2025: 30% Afuera! ("out of the way") Milei reduced inflation primarily through a radical reduction in public spending to eliminate the deficit and by ending the central bank's printing money

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 Did you miss the massive list of references at the bottom? They did get told what they were testing. Dacite with low argon and no mention of known age. It's called dishonesty, they intentionally messed up to try and get abnormal results.

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 That's not evidence, that's an anti creationism blog with an anti-creationism hit piece. There's no evidence on that opinion piece of what they claim reference the lab, who would have asked what they were testing, and agreed to it. You'll have to do better than that mate.

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 noanswersingenesis.org.au/mt_st_helens_d… Here you go

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 That's a claim you're making with no evidence, that's the dishonest part

@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 I did, the lab they used had a minimum accurate year of 2,000,000. There are labs with more advanced machines with a minimum accurate year closer to 6,000. All the results came in under 2,000,000 except one at 2,900,000 That is dishonesty. They intentionally misused the test

@KingGossard @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 I see no evidence of any dishonesty here and you haven't provided any?