Kittster

@cfdownes_ Has She been on the Sherry!!

Laughably desperate.

@prestonjbyrne Why can't parents verify their child's age? Why should adults have to prove their age so someone else's child can go on social media?

You got a ban. A ban is a ban. What more do you want?

🚨If any of the men who took part in this event yesterday have the balls, I’d love you to join my show this evening, to explain to me why you think it’s ok for my 5 year old son (and hundreds of other children) to see you naked near their park…. I find it mind boggling that today @Keir_Starmer has announced a social media ban to protect kids from nudity etc. But less than 24 hours ago, hundreds of children (including my own!) were literally exposed to full adult nudity on the streets & that’s apparently ok. We live in a 🤡🌍

@MichelleDewbs On my iPad I can't view this without age verification!! On Android I can 🤷

@NickDixon I can't stand to hear his voice or read his drivel. His posts are rapidly scrolled past!!

Banning Starmer from social media would make everyone happy.

@GoodwinMJ If your campaign was so strong that people believed in it then you shouldn't have to be worried about where people decided to place their votes.

Two Makerfield polls. Same story. A vote for Restore is a vote for the most left-wing Labour prime minister in decades. Stop the boats. Leave the ECHR. End two-tier policing. Vote Reform. Save Britain.

@zatzi Was anyone offended by the display of flags?

No matter how much the government and the left want us to be ashamed of our history, traditions and culture, we should rightly celebrate our great Great Britain. Happy Birthday Your Majesty.

@PolitlcsUK @thetimes 896 in who was counting them in? Since this scheme started there's been a hell of a lot more than 896. You get that in one day when the sea conditions are on their side.

🚨 NEW: The Government has limited the "one in, one out" migrant deal with France - currently 896 in, 921 out - due to the risk some migrants pose "They’re mainly young men more likely to engage in criminal activity, so we don’t want to take many more" [@thetimes]

@MarkKeenan5 @lincslincs The State Pension is not just paid to the British who paid into the system. It is well documented that "non British" and indeed many Brits who live off welfare who do not work are a drain on the Welfare State. Once they reach pension age they too get a state pension.

@lincslincs Firstly, pensioners who worked, should have saved for their retirement either through work pensions, or private pensions. and secondly why does a pensioner need a full time wage, their costs are a lot lower?

@LeeHarris I lived in Greece and they have an "Aliens Bureau" that deals with immigration and residency of anyone who is not Greek.

This is brilliant. Nick Ferrari *rightly* holds Hilary Benn to account for his disingenuous attack calling out the 'alien culture' comment... And he doesn't give Hilary Benn an inch! You can see him visibly squirming. Incredibly satisfying to watch.

@ArchRose90 Don't forget Breakfast clubs!!

Mr Speaker, I’m appalled at what happened in Belfast. We should not look back in anger since beheadings and crime have actually fallen. We will implement Digital ID to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

@vpopulimedia It clearly isn't working though is it.

🇬🇧 Starmer’s ally claims those who want to LEAVE the ECHR are happy for migrants to “DROWN in the water.” Attorney General Lord Richard Hermer has FORCEFULLY defended the ECHR, claiming it was the only body we can use to REDUCE channel migrants in the UK.

@RWTaylors Very good point.

So Christians have previously been told by employers to remove a cross from around their necks as it can be offensive to others but protection is given to a religion that allows them to carry knives!!

@EssexPR @ShabanaMahmood If a kirpan is allowed to be carried but is only classified as an offence weapon if used unless in self defence then why can't women carry pepper spray under the same terms?

Hi @ShabanaMahmood , what weapons are women and girls allowed to carry to protect them from the rapists and sexual deviants coming across the channel ? What religion can they claim to follow ?

@Togetherdec He can fuck right off. I am a meateater!!

NET ZERO: "Cut down on meat and dairy! Miliband to impose stringent new climate targets despite Net Zero backlash" "The Energy Secretary has signed up to a legally binding goal to cut the UK’s carbon emissions by 87% by 2040" mol.im/a/15867153

@dshensmith @sophielouisecc Also schools.

It is even permitted in court buildings. The first time I, somewhat naively, hadn't even realised it was permitted even there – so long as the blade is no more than 4 inches and overall length no more than 6 inches. This was unsuccessfully challenged in Gulshan v Lord Chancellor [2023] EWCA Civ 306 (where the kirpan was 8 inches)

If the Kirpan is purely symbolic as they are suggesting then it shouldn’t be functional - it could be plastic, fully blunted etc. They should not however be able to carry it in the form of a fully functioning knife - no matter if they don’t intent to ever use it

@jarvis_jim1161 @EngGentleman7 @MayuranSenthil I have actually.

@Kittster2 @EngGentleman7 @MayuranSenthil You've actually read one all the way through? Kudos.

My dear fellow @MayuranSenthil, One does so enjoy a spot of intellectual jousting, but when the opponent arrives armed with little more than speculation, selective reading, and a curious case of projection, the affair becomes less a duel and more an act of gentle correction. Permit me, as a proud member and supporter of Restore Britain, to dismantle this rather laboured critique with the precision of a gentleman’s rapier rather than the bludgeon one might expect from the other side. No concessions were begged, sir; a mere statement of observable fact was offered—that Restore Britain is a vigorous new movement founded to unite patriots beyond the stale party system. And yes, one notes with mild amusement your selective memory. Rupert has indeed directed attention to the excellent Mass Deportations paper, but not that long ago was he was championing the Britain-First Energy Security Strategy with equal vigour. Multiple policies, multiple strengths. Do try to keep up, old bean. Basic research is not merely for the lower orders. Ah, and then the bold assertion that Reform will somehow “deport more.” One leaves such crystal-ball gazing to the soothsayers and astrologers; Restore Britain prefers concrete proposals over hopeful incantations. As for Mr Jenrick’s televised mishap—well, it was a thing of rare comedic splendour. One hasn’t heard a peep since either. Then we reach peak invention. You claim Restore Britain lacks substance on revoking granted asylum. Had you troubled yourself to actually read the Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics paper (as repeatedly recommended), you would have encountered the crystal-clear Retrospective Action section: “All asylum and humanitarian protections granted to individuals who entered Britain illegally within the last decade should be rescinded in full, and those individuals deported within a reasonable time period.” It further demands detention and removal for the 56,605 recent grants and the outstanding cases. Comprehensive, unapologetic, and rooted in restoring the rule of law. Facts, dear chap. Not the fog of wishful misrepresentation. Is that an apology I hear? You appear strangely agitated that Rupert Lowe and Charlie Downes might hold subtly different emphases on the precise nature of British identity. How terribly shocking that a broad patriotic movement allows room for intellectual range! This is not a defect, it is a feature—unlike certain other outfits marching in ideological lockstep. The party does not define itself by any single ethnic-reductionist formula (one searches the policy papers in vain for such a declaration), but by restoring Britain for the British people. And on the matter of lecturing natives about whether “British” can encompass ethnicity: one might gently observe that commentary from those without roots in this soil carries rather less weight than the considered view of those whose families have tilled it, defended it, and loved it for generations. Declaring Rupert a closet Tory is mere opinion, and rather lazy opinion at that. The man has made it his mission to dismantle the uni-party establishment that has failed the British people so spectacularly. He and Charlie are aligned in their contempt for it. Differences within a healthy movement keep everyone honest. That is not weakness; it is the English way. You also claim no issue with Reform’s “true conservatism” branding, yet the broader picture tells another tale. Many who once flocked to Reform did so precisely because they were finished with the Conservative Party’s betrayals. Watching elements of it morph into what feels like Tory 2.0 has been instructive. Restore Britain seeks to transcend that failed paradigm entirely. Rupert has never positioned himself as a Conservative restorationist; he is about ripping up the establishment rot. As for this phantom “nativist position” the party is supposedly “selling”—one again invites you to furnish the policy document where this is proclaimed. It does not exist. What does exist are robust, detailed blueprints for mass deportations, energy independence, protecting the English home, abolishing the inheritance tax raid on farmers, and saving the British pub. Concrete, deliverable patriotism - in just a few months of being a party. In sum, my good sir, your critique collapses under the weight of its own inaccuracies, selective blindness, and a touch of that all-too-common modern affliction: lecturing the natives on their own country while displaying scant familiarity with the actual policies on offer. Restore Britain is not here to play the old games. We are building something fresh, serious, and rooted in the real concerns of the British people—cheap reliable energy, secure borders with teeth (including retrospective action), self-defence rights restored, and an end to the war on the productive classes. One suggests a thorough reading of the papers before the next sally. We remain, as ever, open to honest debate. But flimsy caricature? That simply won’t do. Yours in profound and thoroughly entertained contempt, A Gentleman of the Old School #RestoreBritain #Reform #ReformHypocrisy

@W4Restore @RupertLowe10 Sent email to @MichaelPayneUK yesterday

@RupertLowe10 Email them even if you don’t think they’ll respond. Tag them in the posts. Don’t give them any excuses to pretend they ‘weren’t aware’ of this happening. To find your local MP 👇🏻 members.parliament.uk/FindYourMP

Please invite your local MP to our Rape Gang Inquiry parliamentary debate on Monday in Westminster Hall at 16.30. Let's put the pressure on.

@LNallalingham @BenObeseJecty Do you not want the Public Accounts held to account?

Hi @BenObeseJecty, I trust you will be raising it privately with your leader. The Tories have given Restore a seat on the influential public accounts committee. After all of these terrible revelations about Restore, will Kemi do the right thing?