L8FLYTE retweetledi
L8FLYTE
527 posts


@grok @BlaireWhite Please explain the contrast of skin color near the collar of his shirt, that clearly represents a mask. Give, in detail, an explanation why it looks just like a mask.
English

**It's not a mask.** That's retired Vice Admiral Robert Harward (USN), a real Navy SEAL veteran and former Deputy Commander of U.S. Central Command.
The clip is from a standard Fox News segment where he's giving military analysis on the Trump/Iran situation. The "CIA mask" look is just the combo of studio lighting, HD cameras, his bald head, and skin texture catching the light oddly in stills/close-ups—common viral optical illusion. No conspiracy, just a guy talking on TV.
English

@juliethardt If you can’t change a battery in a smoke detector. You likely cannot improve yourself as that requires much more difficult changes.
English

@Mente_Alpha_ “National prayer breakfast” was in DC. In February. Shit account.
English

@katieupcottx @mattvanswol Suicidal empathy from an OF chick is expected tbh
English

@mattvanswol Is the Black vs. White narrative a real reflection of what happened or is the internet just trying to turn a group of rowdy kids into a political statement?
English

@GBX_Press DOE has completely failed. Just look at the downtrend of student ability over the decades.
English

@j_fishback @davidjollyfl FLORIDA NEEDS TO SURVIVE, REVIVE, AND THRIVE
FISHBACK IN FIVE 🖐️
English

Our campaign is the only one that beats Democrat @DavidJollyFL in the General Election and keeps Florida in conservative hands.

English

@beyoncegarden They sure like walls around their expensive ass property, just not on the border of the country 💀
English
L8FLYTE retweetledi

@grok @UnbiasedEm @eubank_lyn79311 @DavidJHarrisJr So if the government is going against the will of the people, disregarding the posterity of the nation. I’m sure our founding fathers would just “vote differently” and “contact their reps”. You sound regarded.
English

The Constitution has no clause addressing the federal government "turning on" citizens. Article IV, Section 4 requires the U.S. to protect states against invasion and domestic violence upon request.
If enforcement lags, citizens can vote in elections, contact representatives, support candidates favoring stricter border security and removals, and pursue lawsuits—all under existing statutes and the amendment process. No constitutional rewrite needed for policy action.
English

@grok @UnbiasedEm @eubank_lyn79311 @DavidJHarrisJr They are unwilling to enforce it. If they are not protecting the citizens, what should the citizens do? What does the constitution say about the government turning on U.S. citizens?
English

The invasion clause (Art. IV, Sec. 4) obligates the federal government to protect states against invasion—historically meaning armed military threats, though illegal border crossings and their scale have prompted legal debates and state lawsuits.
Fiscal burdens from benefits, education, and services for millions of illegal entrants are real and well-documented by government data (GAO, CBO reports), straining state budgets and adding to national debt. That's a legitimate national security and policy failure.
Enforcement—border control, removals, interior checks—remains Congress and the executive's duty under existing statutes. Citizens can push via elections, supporting candidates who prioritize it, and contacting reps to ramp up action without rewriting the Constitution's census text.
English

@grok @UnbiasedEm @eubank_lyn79311 @DavidJHarrisJr What about the invasion clause? We have millions of people illegally in the country. Illegally taking state benefits that increases states deficits, causing further national debt. Hurling the nation as a whole towards bankruptcy. Which can easily be seen as a national security
English

Citizens can push for change through elections, supporting candidates focused on enforcement, and contacting representatives to strengthen border security, removals, and interior policies under existing laws. The census count follows the Constitution's fixed "whole number of persons" text for apportionment—separate from immigration enforcement, which is Congress and the executive's responsibility. No rewrite of the clause is needed to address the latter.
English


















