Hull Lass

12.1K posts

Hull Lass

Hull Lass

@LassHull

Katılım Nisan 2021
61 Takip Edilen176 Takipçiler
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@HigginsKieron This is nonsense and I think you know it is. There is no absolute poverty in the UK. You are talking about relative poverty (ie having less than 60% of median income). Incomes rise, median income rises, there will still be people whose income is less than 60% of that figure.
English
0
0
1
3
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@MbarkCherguia Whenever possible, leave them there. And don't allow anyone to bring them food or water. I think they'd soon be calling to be rescued.
English
0
0
0
1
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺@MbarkCherguia·
How should society respond to climate activists gluing themselves to roads? 🤔
English
1.9K
76
281
25.5K
Hull Lass retweetledi
British Intel
British Intel@TheBritishIntel·
🚨🇬🇧 WATCH: STARMER CALLS FOR MORE MUSLIMS IN SENIOR GOVERNMENT ROLES Keir Starmer says he wants more Muslims at the top levels of government. Why?
English
258
191
291
8.5K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
Please read and remember it when the next general election comes along.
Claire Adams@claire_adams694

🚨 Labour’s Grooming Gang Inquiry Has Been Deliberately Delayed Until After The Next Election 🚨 I took the time to read through the latest details of this so called national inquiry properly, not headlines, not spin, the actual substance, and here is the reality. On 8 January 2025, the Government rejected calls for a new national grooming gang inquiry, arguing the focus should instead be on implementing previous recommendations. Then on 14 June 2025, Keir Starmer stood there and announced a National Grooming Gang Inquiry. Six months later, on 9 December 2025, Anne Longfield was appointed to lead it. And now, months on from that announcement, this is where we actually are. The Terms of Reference are still not finalised. Still being drafted. Still being negotiated. Anne Longfield herself has admitted the draft is not strong enough and not detailed enough, and she did not even write it. If the person leading the inquiry is telling you it is weak, then it is weak. Even now the wording around one of the most critical issues, ethnicity, race and religion, only says the inquiry “should” look at it. Not will. Not must. That is not a technicality, that is a loophole. It means it can still be watered down. This is being sold as a national inquiry, yet only a single digit number of areas will actually receive full local investigations. The rest of the country, dozens of affected towns and thousands of victims, will be pushed into a general call for evidence. That is not full exposure, that is containment. There is currently no advisory panel in place. The previous one has been disbanded. The legal team is still being hired. This is not a system ready to deliver justice, it is a system still being built behind closed doors. They have also made it clear the Terms of Reference will define what the inquiry does, and only after that will survivors be brought in to shape how it is done. That is completely backwards. Victims should be shaping the scope, not just the process. We are told there will be no no go zones, but there is no explanation of how that is enforced, who decides it, or what happens when it is challenged. Without that, it is just words. And here is the part they do not want you focusing on. The inquiry will start in April 2026, run for three years, and the final report will not be published until after the next General Election. That is not a coincidence. That is a political decision. Labour has structured this so the consequences land after the public have already voted. That is not about justice, that is about control. This inquiry has potential, but right now it is too slow, too limited, too vague, and far too politically convenient to deliver the accountability victims deserve. I am not interested in what they promise. I am interested in what they deliver. Right now, this is not good enough!

English
0
0
0
1
Hull Lass retweetledi
Margaret Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher@realmrsthatcher·
Freedom can also be lost little by little, by what the Fabians call the doctrine of gradualness. A little more taxation here, a little more government expenditure there, year after year until the people are no longer the masters of the state but its servants. There are always, it seems, good reasons advanced for the state to have more power. But rarely for the state to divest itself of power. Each new problem becomes an excuse for more government intervention and less individual responsibility.
English
119
2.1K
6.2K
130.1K
Hull Lass retweetledi
The Free Speech Union
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion·
In less than a week, Labour’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition has shown its true colours. Labour MPs have already tried to weaponise this non-statutory definition of Islamophobia to silence the Shadow Justice Secretary for calling out political Islam. Rather than allowing the definition to face scrutiny in Parliament, Labour set up a five-member working group to draft it — all of whom had ties to Islamist organisations. Watch FSU External Affairs Officer @_ConnieShaw on @TalkTV👇
English
95
1.7K
5.4K
60.3K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@DalrympleWill I could only spot one what I believe was a woman. Are women not allowed to pray?
English
0
0
0
4
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@paullewismoney "Welfare...comprises state-provided financial support, social services, and benefits. It includes Universal Credit, State Pensions, disability benefits (PIP), housing support, and child benefits designed to support low-income, disabled, or retired individuals." So ME is correct?
English
0
0
0
22
Paul Lewis
Paul Lewis@paullewismoney·
That’s nonsense because many of the people who get what he calls welfare do in fact Work. And much of this total is paid to pensioners in return for their national insurance and they would certainly not consider it welfare. But it’s fake statistics like these that can influence peoples beliefs.
Matthew Elliott@matthew_elliott

The Government will collect £331bn in income tax this year, and spend £333bn on welfare. In other words, we now spend more on people not working than we raise from those who do. And the cost? Debt per person has risen from £11.5k in 2000 (inflation adjusted) to over £41k today.

English
139
586
1.1K
62.9K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@Robbie_Reasons Definitely not. Starmer is disliked, Rayner is (in my experience) detested.
English
0
0
0
8
Robbie
Robbie@Robbie_Reasons·
Could Angela Raynor win the next general election if she takes over the Labour party?
Robbie tweet media
English
225
8
29
3.2K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@DavidMcGregorBN Do you ever think about the lives of the children? Or is it only the wishes of parents that count? I accept that for some parents going back to work is unavoidable, but to trumpet being brought up by strangers (as Phillipson does) as the best start in life is, IMO, totally wrong.
English
0
0
0
13
David
David@DavidMcGregorBN·
Not to be hyperbolic, but this is such a massive change to people’s lives. Tories brought the 15 hours in and refused to fund the 30 needed. Now Labour are providing parents the freedom to return to work.
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP

😞 Our offer of 30 hours of government-funded childcare is no longer saving families £7,500... ...it's now saving them £8,000! 😃 Labour is delivering for working families and tackling the cost of living.

English
179
86
297
28.3K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@bphillipsonMP When will you show some care for other groups? Those who can't afford to start a family? Those who stay at home to look after their children? Those who are retired, with incomes just over the pension credit limit? Those who have lost jobs/businesses as a result of your policies?
English
0
0
0
4
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
😞 Our offer of 30 hours of government-funded childcare is no longer saving families £7,500... ...it's now saving them £8,000! 😃 Labour is delivering for working families and tackling the cost of living.
English
988
136
511
99.3K
Mr Ethical 🚩
Mr Ethical 🚩@nw_nicholas·
Why doesn't Farage accept that the vast majority of the country loathes him & his band of spivs and throw in the towel?
English
782
191
1.3K
36.9K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@LabourBerry It isn't just about lowering bills but about ensuring we have a reliable source of energy. At present a prolonged spell of calm, cloudy weather would not produce sufficient renewable energy to keep the lights on. And power cuts are not just a minor inconvenience, are they?
English
0
0
0
7
ABerry 🇬🇧🌹
ABerry 🇬🇧🌹@LabourBerry·
NEW analysis from University of Oxford finds a UK fully powered by renewable energy could save households up to £441 a year on energy bills. The idea drilling the NSea would make UK more secure & significantly lower Bills - is sheer fantasy msn.com/en-gb/money/ot…?
ABerry 🇬🇧🌹 tweet media
English
134
264
517
15K
Hull Lass retweetledi
Gully Foyle #UKTrade
Gully Foyle #UKTrade@TerraOrBust·
"So you want the UK to join the EU?" "Yes" "So you want to give up the Pound and accept the Euro" "No" "So you want to join the Schengen area and allow completely open borders" "No" "So you want to be part of the EU Migration Pact, another 100k illegal migrants to the UK a year" "No" "So you want to re-introduce the testing of cosmetics onto animals, required by EU law" "No" "So you want to re-introduce live exports of animals for fattening or slaughter" "No" "So you want to give control of UK fishing waters and quotas back to the EU" "No" "So you want to reverse the protections of UK marine birds like puffins, who were endangered due to EU overfishing of the main food source" "No" "So you want to give up the better trade relationship the UK now has with the USA, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Singapore, and countless other countries" "No" "Well it sounds like you don't want to join the EU then"
English
107
1.1K
3.1K
110.1K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@ox_anna29 It really hasn't. The war began on the very last day of February, but the borrowing figures you refer to are for the 27 days before that.
English
0
0
0
3
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@SpeechUnion I've read many comments on X re the fact that some politicians advocate leaving the ECHR. People angry, people saying how we would lose all our human rights (including the right to free speech) if those politicians are voted into power. Why are those commentators silent now?
English
0
0
1
54
The Free Speech Union
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion·
The Free Speech Union is bringing a judicial review against Communities Secretary Steve Reed, challenging his decision to impose an official definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ (Islamophobia). This is a Muslim blasphemy law by the back door, which will silence legitimate criticism of Islam and prevent people from speaking out on issues such as the grooming gangs scandal. The proposed definition is vague and subjective, and liable to be weaponised to shut down lawful debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history. Adopting such a definition — let alone appointing an Islamophobia ‘Tsar’ — breaches the ‘occupying the field’ doctrine in public law. Our lawyers have sent a Pre-Action Protocol letter setting out why the definition is unlawful, and have asked the Government to pause both its rollout and the appointment of the ‘Tsar’ until the case is resolved. Judicial reviews against Secretaries of State are costly, but this is a fight we must win. Blasphemy laws were abolished by Parliament in 2008 — let’s keep it that way. Read our letter and support our crowdfunder 👇
English
92
1.8K
7K
57.4K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@triffic_stuff_ Surely this has got to be AI generated? No MP would be naive enough to say this out loud (even if they are saying it in their head)?
English
0
0
0
5
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
🚨EPIC BETRAYAL: LABOUR MP SAYS BRITS MUST JUST SUFFER TO ACCOMMODATE MORE MIGRANTS! 😡 York MP Rachael Maskell Declares NHS Delays, Overcrowded Schools & Higher Taxes Are “Worth It” While Labour Floods Communities “We must keep going until we really are at saturation point. What does it matter if we have to wait another week for a hospital visit, or if our class sizes are bigger, if we have to pay more into the system? Surely it is worth it.” 🤬 This is naked, sneering contempt from Rachael Maskell for the British people of York she pretends to serve. She stands there in her own city and openly declares that longer NHS queues, crumbling school standards, and squeezed wallets for hardworking families are a price worth paying so Labour can keep cramming migrants into our communities until everything snaps. And this isn't just one rogue MP, this is the rotten core of Keir Starmer's Labour Party. This is who they are, they despise working-class concerns. Complain and you’re instantly smeared as “racist” or “far-right”. Every single one of them, from Starmer down to Maskell, shows zero care for the people they claim to represent. This is why Britain is boiling with rage. This is why trust is gone. This is why Labour under Starmer is poison for ordinary Brits. Rachael Maskell doesn't represent York. Keir Starmer's Labour doesn't represent Britain. They represent its deliberate downfall.
English
1.1K
2.1K
4.3K
162.5K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@MosiniElisa We all know why the UK would be welcomed back. Because we were always net contributors to the budget - if we pay in, other countries get to pay less.
English
0
0
1
13
Elisa Mosini 🇪🇺🇮🇹
British politicians now speak about returning to the EU. As a European, this makes me truly happy. I will support this with all my strength, so that when the British people decide to come back, they will find an open door waiting for them. Because we are one European family 🇪🇺🇬🇧
Elisa Mosini 🇪🇺🇮🇹 tweet media
European Democrats@democrats_eu

When even London’s mayor @SadiqKhan @MayorofLondon says the UK cannot afford to drift between Trump’s tariffs, geopolitical shocks and the long shadow of Brexit, it’s time to listen — in Britain and beyond. Sadiq Khan’s message is clear: the illusion of sovereignty has come at a real cost, with weaker growth and less influence. In an unstable world, standing alone is not strength. Rebuilding a close partnership with Europe is not nostalgia — it is a strategic necessity.

English
889
941
3.9K
83.2K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@bphillipsonMP @educationgovuk When will government try to help other sections of society? Not everyone has children and those that did made a conscious choice to have those children. And please stop using the word 'free'. Every person in the country who works, pays VAT, drives a car etc is paying.
English
0
0
1
10
Bridget Phillipson
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP·
This government is focused on the cost of living. At @educationgovuk, we're saving families cash: £450 on free breakfast clubs £50 on school uniforms £500 on free school meals £300 on school holiday clubs Now it's confirmed we've halved childcare costs, saving parents £8,000.
English
2K
131
456
109.5K
Hull Lass
Hull Lass@LassHull·
@BenGrahamUK Not just a waste of tax payer money but also a distraction for drivers, especially in poor visibility.
English
0
0
1
3
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK·
This rainbow junction in Hounslow cost £48,174 of public money. Some will say it promotes inclusion. Others will question the cost. Where do you stand?
Ben Graham tweet media
English
4.4K
465
1.8K
227.7K