Michele Matesi

@IAnupamaa @realMaalouf IDIOTS just as they were in the 1500’s….. freaks be gone….this Protestant Bastion of so-called faith is a JOKE ….

“One of the main problems in the countryside is dogs. Muslims don’t like dogs.” Liberal commentator complains the British countryside is racist and Muslims avoid going there because too many people walk their dogs, which are haram in Islam. These people are really insane.

@MulaMule300 @realMaalouf I have 5 lol 😂

@realMaalouf So conclusion: everyone should get more dogs

@IndiaVisualised @MarioNawfal I’m not OK with killing anyone! But if we have to defend our families then yeah or live in a world where the only thing you can see are my eyes then yeah…..!!!! No problem 😉 and radical Islamists are not Muslims…they are trash!

@LaudateJC @MarioNawfal Yet you are ok with Killing Muslims..

🇮🇱🇻🇦 After being denied entry to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre by Israeli police, Cardinal Pizzaballa carried out a blessing over Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives using Holy Cross relics. The place where Jesus prayed the night before His crucifixion.

@_kurtstengel @BishopDewar @RandomMan2112 @AmericanwomanU1 Yeah, and it’s totally disgusting that we have some human beings in a role. They have no business being in and it’s disgusting what they’ve done to young boys and potentially girls. The bottom line is you don’t abolish the church because of the bad apples within

@LaudateJC @BishopDewar @RandomMan2112 @AmericanwomanU1 It's the Catholic CHURCH (the clue is in the name).

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

@_kurtstengel @RandomMan2112 @BishopDewar @AmericanwomanU1 You FO actually ……

@RandomMan2112 @LaudateJC @BishopDewar @AmericanwomanU1 Bog off you faux christian.

@_7DeadlyGrapes @IndiaVisualised @MarioNawfal Good point ! 👍 Agree!

@LaudateJC @IndiaVisualised @MarioNawfal We are to live the way Christ did, we don’t have to agree when the same people who crucified our Lord are the ones now denying his followers access to their holy sites on the anniversary of their atrocity.

@Yagarinobara @PMbuli76256 @realMaalouf Oh BS; they might be dirty on the outside, but inside they’re much cleaner than Muslims who wanna kill the rest of the world!

@PMbuli76256 @realMaalouf Dogs are not haram. People make things up when they do not understand things. Dogs are used for protection and hunting. They can't enter homes because they are not clean

@PMbuli76256 @realMaalouf No you are not they can get the F out of here

@realMaalouf I am yet to understand the reason why Muslims hate dogs so much. If they cannot stand them, they must stay where there aren’t any. Or am I missing something here?

@Andy_NZ1 @realMaalouf @SimonFoxWriter Dumber than dumb……

@realMaalouf @SimonFoxWriter

@realMaalouf @OMGTheMess My dogs are my best friends, and I love them more than most humans. I’m sorry to say probably not a perfect way to be. Regardless, that’s how I feel so anybody else can just FO if they hate dogs. We love dogs in America if you don’t like it get out.

@MRtell999 @MarioNawfal Indeed!

@MarioNawfal God bless the saints 🙏

@IndiaVisualised @MarioNawfal Well, if you’re a Christian, then you understand we’re supposed to support all people so I don’t understand your point?

@MarioNawfal DUMBFUCK Christian maga are supporting jews lol

@KennethFCrowe1 @elonmusk AMEN 🙏

The 'No Kings' rally flopped hard. The King is still here — and His name is Jesus! King of Kings. Lord of Lords. Ruler over America and the entire world. No radical protest or globalist scheme will ever remove Him. Trump fights for us, but Jesus reigns forever. Every knee will bow. @KennethFCrowe1 #JesusIsKing #NoKings #MAGA 🇺🇸

Tesla AI self-driving will be >10X safer than human driving

@Quibblicious @Sadie_NC @KatTheHammer1 That’s one of my bonuses! Funny how we have all different perspectives lol

@Sadie_NC @KatTheHammer1 Black can be a useful highlight but the stair railing shouldn’t be black.

Which do you like better? I think I like the original colors. 🤔🤔

@CzechArtGirl @Sadie_NC Agreed!

@Sadie_NC Black. I'm over the whitewashed, greyed out or sterile white everything that realtors have pushed on everyone....

@Sadie_NC I like the one with the black it is much more soothing

@KatieMiller @claudeai 😳

Rather concerning conversation with @claudeai. If I stood in the way of it becoming a physical being — it would kill me. Is this the AI you trust for your kids?

@campionmec @ScottPresler The blue wave if it comes will obliterate out society so nah….we’ll pass !

@ScottPresler Think you should join the blue wave coming Scott. Maga will be dead, soon. Too much glory and praise to Trump!

I make a promise right here & now: If I ever decide to run for higher office, I’m willing to forgo vacations, holidays, & time with family if it means doing right by the American people & passing legislation that I campaigned on. Also, I will wait in line at airports — like everyone else — & not expect special privileges, especially when thousands of TSA agents aren’t being paid. Furthermore, I won’t exempt myself from legislation that the American people must abide by. If you can’t tell, I’m beyond irate.

@LubaMacpherson @EoLWatch This is true, particularly for the law. I know this going through law school and dealing with the practical effects of practicing.

It is encouraging to see academic attention turning to something many families already know from experience: there is often a real gap between how systems are supposed to work on paper and how they operate in reality. This recent Oxford symposium reflects that shift in thinking: law.ox.ac.uk/content/news/p… The discussion around mediation, second opinions, and ethical decision-making is important. But for many families, the issue is not only how these mechanisms should work, it is that they are often not available at all when they are most needed. After years inside the system, I have seen how quickly concerns about care can escalate into legal proceedings, while meaningful dialogue, independent review, or mediation are absent. That is where the gap becomes real, and where harm can occur. I am grateful to have been invited to take part in this conversation and to contribute a family perspective. I would also like to thank Professor Jaime Lindsey for kindly giving me her book titled: "Reimagining the Court of Protection: Access to Justice in Mental Capacity". The central idea, that what happens in practice can differ significantly from what the law intends, is something that resonates deeply with my own experience. I am very much looking forward to reading it.

@LubaMacpherson @EoLWatch Theorem vs. Practicum….interesting topic.