Ledama ✳️🔺

The $AWR movement has inspired me in many ways. One of the biggest has been getting back in the studio to compose more music. Retirement to me = traveling the world, spending time with family and friends, trying new recipes, spending more time outside, kayaking, hiking, and camping, but having the time and energy to compose more music = top of the list. In lieu of doxxing myself publicly, this is my contribution to the $AWR movement. Music is original, composed by me for Damazone Productions @wesmanifests @allwillretire @MarcosPaulo2024

@Menziwabantwana @markpougatch My double masters degrees say otherwise…

@Ldeezee @markpougatch No bro, it didn't. Whatever u knew abt physics was all wrong.

Too late for conspiracy theories- it didnt hit the wire!

@stokieadam @kayzo21 Total dive... holding all game then he finally got reaction and flopped

@kayzo21 A dive from being two Handed pushed in the chest by someone nearly twice his size.

I’m staggered the amount of people who genuinely don’t think Elliot Anderson was fouled by Haaland for Norways disallowed goal. You just can’t go round the pitch pushing people over with 2 hands. He didn’t dive, Haaland is 6ft 5, massive, Elliot off balance, it’s a foul.

A week ago I was really sad @AnthropicAI was hiding Fable 5 behind API pay structure but today, I don't really care. Why? Because @OpenAI GPT5.6-Sol blows it out of the water and is available for all users in Codex and via Oauth. This is genius by one company and a disaster for the other...

@NCHammer1980 It may have been but there were others that the ref just looked the other way, like the penalty in 75th minute. The entire game was a disgrace to FIFA soccer fans all over the world.

I know people hate England and can't stand the fact they've won the game and are in the semis, but I'm dumbfounded by the number of people seriously claiming that Haaland's push isn't a foul.

@markvalorian Never watching FIFA again. I thought the WWE was the only sport with pre-planned story lines and winners. Guess I was wrong.

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

@gong7jun This game was a travesty. I’m so saddened by the obvious and blatant disregard for the rules of the game by the ref, and the league. The result is a permanent stain on football.

哈蘭德整個人被抱住勾住，裁判不吹黃牌？還有哈蘭德輕推一下對方，對方明顯乘機假摔，就被裁判判挪威進球無效，這裁判是賭球了買英格蘭贏嗎？

@raidenkrn Sometimes you just come upon the right post at the right time... thanks for the info

if you're bored this weekend, Palworld 1.0 is now live (and it's really good)

@goon_crypto Nice to see your post pop up on my feed! I missed that dip earlier today but looking at the chart rationally, I think there's a chance to fatten the bag between 0.01369 - 0.01833 unless big announcements drop in which case I'll ride with what I got.

if you've been waiting for an entry on base:0xff8104251e7761163fac3211ef5583fb3f8583d6, this is it. the last few hours wiped out the entire move. some paper hands took the exit and think they're smart. they're not. this is the exact candle they'll look back on and call the biggest mistake of the cycle. fundamentals didn't move an inch: ➜ fees still climbing ➜ orquestra nodes going live and growing ➜ enterprise onboarding already in motion ➜ something brewing with Robinhood on RWAs (alpha nobody's pricing in yet) and right now you're getting paid 8.5% on base:0xff8104251e7761163fac3211ef5583fb3f8583d6 just for holding it through @BaselineMarkets the setup writes itself, don't fall asleep at the wheel anon.

I'm totally blown away by @OpenAI GPT5.6 SOL I've been working with Claude Code for 3+ months and this model is blowing my mind. In my limited testing, there really is no comparison, even against Fable 5. On design tasks where I thought Fable would do better, GPT5.6 SOL won by a landslide even without all the details, taste-skills and additions + it's almost 50% cheaper to run @aiedge_ @0xKaroshi

@CirocObama42 @qt_captain @markpougatch Have you ever heard of inertia? Trajectory doesn't change by magic

@qt_captain @Ldeezee @markpougatch This is literally a perfect arc

@cadelucas @markpougatch It's all over the Internet. Why do you think we have CableGate? Just do a basic search and you'll find out.

@Ldeezee @markpougatch You cannot tell at all from that angle. Side on is clearer, but it's far from obvious. As for independent organisations.....who?

@HarryNSkinner @markpougatch Give it a rest buddy. Everyone saw what happened except you I guess -- I've been watching football since the 90's

@Ldeezee @markpougatch It does NOT reverse direction 😂 I swear you people are all watching football for the first time

@cadelucas @markpougatch why are people still arguing about this. It was obvious, but you can believe whatever you want I guess. Independent organizations have analyzed the footage and it's clear what happened--- the trajectory of the ball changed and it's not a debate

@Ldeezee @markpougatch Not sure how you can say it obviously hit the wire when you can't even see the wire.

@CBSSportsGolazo @ChristinaUnkel Why are you saying this? It is not even a debate. The ball clearly hit and came down with different trajectory. It doesn't take technology to see, it was obvious...

"You don't see the ball trajectory change... It's a perfect rainbow arch, there's no change." Rules analyst @ChristinaUnkel didn't see any issue with England's first goal vs. Norway 👀

If someone told me I'd be watching Netflix during a World Cup game a week ago, I wouldn't have believed them but here I sit, after a game that was so poorly officiated, watching Netflix. I refuse to watch any more of the World Cup after that England v Norway in which England was handed the victory without earning it.

The ball changed trajectory, it was obvious to people without technology. The technology is flawed because it’s only as good as the humans who make decisions to use it. No reason not to review the play given everyone pointing to the sky. There is no coming back from this. I am done watching this World Cup over this and likely done with watching for the foreseeable future.

Technology says there was no touch. The goalkeeper, the coaches, the players were sure they saw a touch. Who do we believe? I lean towards technology.

@001Oxygen This game was really poorly officiated and the calls or no-calls directly influenced the outcome. This was a clear foul -- game should've ended at full time with Norway the winners (1-0)

Norway are being robbed . He was clearly pushed and should be a penalty

@FableWhisper @fifamedia You can see the ball come back after it obviously hit something... It's obvious, nothing to argue about.

@fifamedia I'm yet to see an angle that even shows the ball moving off course, people are just coping

Before England’s goal in minute 45+2 against Norway, the sensor in the Connected Ball showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air, and therefore no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball.