
Lee Hatherell
19.7K posts

Lee Hatherell
@LeeHatherell
Fantasy sports. Game of Thrones. Civilization. Pastafarianism.








Why would the CGT concessions be for tech only? Why not for all Aussie businesses? Why is tech more important than any other sector? And given the polling suggests voters clearly would have rejected these proposals at the last election, and there is patently no mandate to introduce them given the election was won on the many promises not to ever touch CGT and negative gearing, why not do the only honest and honourable thing - and put these radical changes to the test of an election? Either call one now or put them to the next election. Trying to railroad them home on the basis of a majority government that was voted in on the premise it would not make these changes is demonstrably non-democratic. It is also very unAustralian… At least give everyone a chance to vote on whether they want to overhaul the economy in this way. Even @DHughesy is up in arms about being rorted by the professional pollies who have never started a business or hired another Aussie in their lives








"Flogging Labor’s budget this week, Albanese said that his proposed new minimum 30 per cent tax on capital gains is “fair” because it matches what the majority of workers pay on their income. For Chalmers, “one of the big principles in the budget is to try and better align the way that we tax people who work with people who earn their income in other legitimate ways”. The other legitimate ways involve capital. One of the hoariest myths in the socialist lexicon is that it’s “fair” to tax income from labour just the same as income from capital. This has its roots in the kind of class warfare and ideology we all thought had disappeared when the Berlin Wall fell. We had all hoped that while Albanese may have felt safe in telling the 1991 ALP national conference in a debate on inheritance tax that “accumulated income in the form of capital is for all socialists at least part of the source of many social injustices”, he had learned a bit more about the real world since then. Sadly, no. Neither Albanese nor Chalmers have learnt the lessons that a few years in the private sector, or a few years running a small business, might have taught them. Either they do not understand the difference between capital and income, or they are being deliberately duplicitous by ignoring the differences." credit @jkalbrechtsen





Big news from Australia 🇦🇺 A new study tracked 15 companies that switched to a 4-day work week (100% pay, 80% hours, 100% output). Results? • 14 out of 15 companies decided to keep it permanently • Zero reported a drop in productivity • 6 companies actually saw productivity increase Less burnout, same (or better) output. The 4-day week is no longer just a dream, the data backs it up.




















