Salt+Light✝️

The church is protected from the tribulation by being removed. The world will relentlessly push and argue that there is no rapture because when it happens, Satan will cover it up with the alien narrative. And if no one believes there is a rapture, more are deceived by the cover up. Our bridegroom does not send His precious bride to endure His wrath and to die at the hands of satan before our wedding. The 7 year tribulation is for Israel and for a rebellious unrepentant world.

Romans 9-11 and the Lie That Israel Was Replaced Main Passage: Romans 9-11 Introduction One of the surest ways to tell whether a man is going to let the Bible speak for itself is to put him in Romans 9 through 11 and watch what he does. Those three chapters are not side notes, not marginal comments, not speculative footnotes, and not theological wallpaper. They are the Holy Ghost’s extended treatment of Israel’s calling, Israel’s stumbling, Israel’s present blindness, and Israel’s future restoration. If a man can read Romans 9 through 11 honestly, without dragging in a system to flatten it, twist it, or suffocate it, then he is going to come away knowing one thing beyond all argument: God is not finished with Israel. But if a man is determined to protect replacement theology at all costs, then he is going to start spiritualizing, dodging, redefining, and changing categories so fast you would think he was trying to escape a burning building. That is because these chapters do not leave much room for his game. They say what they say, and they say it so plainly that a child could follow the line if the child were willing to believe the Book. The whole replacement theology scheme rests on one rotten assumption. It assumes that because many Jews rejected Jesus Christ, God therefore canceled His national promises to Israel and transferred them to the Church. That sounds neat to a man who likes tidy systems, but it falls apart the minute you read Paul. Paul does not say Israel was replaced. Paul does not say the Church inherited the covenants by cancellation. Paul does not say God finally gave up on Israel and moved on to a better people. What Paul says is, “Hath God cast away his people? God forbid” (Romans 11:1). That one sentence alone ought to put half the debate in a coffin. But because men are determined to resist what God says, they do not stop there. They bring in Galatians 3, or Ephesians 2, or Hebrews 8, and then pretend those passages erase what Romans 9 through 11 plainly teaches. They do not. They never did. They never will. If the Holy Ghost took three chapters to explain the issue, then no man has the right to walk in with one favorite verse, rip it out of context, and use it like a crowbar against the whole passage. There is something else under this debate that needs to be said plainly. After watching this thing for years, it becomes hard to miss that many of the people who are obsessed with erasing Israel out of God’s program are not just making an innocent mistake in exegesis. There is often a bitterness under it, a hardness under it, a hostility under it, and sometimes a flat-out hatred under it that reveals the condition of the heart more than the meaning of the text. I am not saying every confused person who repeats replacement theology is malicious. Some people are parroting what they were taught. Some are still learning. Some have never had the chapters laid out carefully for them. But the men and women who get angry that God keeps His word, who grind their teeth over the idea that Israel still matters in prophecy, who act like God’s faithfulness to Abraham is some personal insult to them, those people are not just wrestling with a doctrine. There is something sour in the spirit there. The peace of God does not produce that reaction. The love of God does not produce that reaction. A man can disagree and still keep his soul. But when the thought of God being faithful to Israel makes him boil, that tells you there is more going on than careful Bible study. 1. Romans 9 Opens with Israel’s National Position, Not the Church Replacing Them Romans 9 does not begin with the Church replacing Israel. It begins with Paul’s grief over Israel. He says, “I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart” (Romans 9:1-2). Why? Because his brethren according to the flesh had

So much wrong with this 🤦‍♂️ Let's dive into scripture 📖 👉"Multiple Antichrists" ⚔️John distinguishes between many antichrists (false teachers who have an antichrist spirit [like you & your team]) vs. "the Antichrist" (a future, singular figure of ultimate rebellion) [Rev 13] ⚔️[2 Thess 2:3-4] warns of a future "man of sin" who sits in the temple, declaring himself to be god. This cannot be past Rome (the Harlot) as no Roman emperor has ever sat in the Jerusalem Temple (which was destroyed in 70 AD) 🎯1st conclusion: You ignore Daniel 7, 9, 11, 12 + Rev. 13+17, which describe a future, global ruler who opposes Christ 👉"MOTB" ⚔️[Rev. 13:16-18] describes a future, universal economic mark (on hand/forehead) tied to worship of the Beast. Historically, no such system existed in the 1st century (Rome used coins, not biometric marks) 🎯2nd conclusion: The mark was not in the past; its tied to the Beast's image which did not exist in the 1st century. [Rev. 20:4] shows martyrs killed for refusing the mark which did not happen under Nero or Rome. Nero certainly killed Christians but not because of a mark that didn't exist during that time. 👉"Jesus only reigned 7 years🤦‍♂️" ⚔️This blasphemous claim suggests Jesus Christ's Kingdom failed, contrary to [Psalm 110:1; 1 Cor 15:25] Nowhere in scripture teaches a temporary 7-year reign, this is man-made trash from the pits of hell. 🎯3rd conclusion: Daniel 9:24-27 prophesies 70 weeks (490 years) leading to Messiah's death in AD 30-33. Jesus Christ's Kingdom is eternal [Luke 1:33; Rev. 11:15], not a 7-year reign on earth. [Rev. 20:1-6] describes a future 1,000 year reign after Satan is bound (which has not been fulfilled yet) 👉"Bible does not give exact location of Armageddon" ⚔️False. [Rev. 16:16; 19:19-21] describes a future global war at Har-Megiddo (northern Israel) where Christ physically returns to destroy the Beast. [Zech. 14:1-4] confirms He returns to Jerusalem. 🎯4th conclusion: Any search engine can tell you the location of Armageddon. What a joke!🤡 👉 "Scripture doesn't say the antichrist sits in a temple declaring himself to be god" ⚔️False. [2 Thess. 2:4] says the Antichrist sits in the temple, declaring himself god. [Daniel 9:27, Matt. 24:15] confirm a future temple desecration. 🎯5th conclusion: Absolute nonsense to anyone that opens their Bible. Nothing in scripture suggests North America is Israel🤦‍♂️ [Ezekiel 40-48] prophesies a future temple in Jerusalem. When Jesus Christ physically returns, He descends onto the Mount of Olives (where He originally ascended) which is also in Jerusalem. ✝️Final conclusion: [Rev. 12:9] warns of satan deceiving the whole world. This trash "theory" denies future prophecy, redefines Christ's Kingdom & invents false geography. Absolute trash from uneducated demonic spirits 👿 Even the deceived Catholics I debate on a daily basis wouldn't fall for this nonsense as its easily debunked through a search engine & especially through the Bible of any translation. NOT TODAY SATAN!

Your favorite artist has been practicing rituals in a satanic cult where they take babies from other countries & mutilate & kill them as a form of a blood sacrifice to their God. You see, when your master is satan, you must constantly shed blood. However, the JIG IS UP.