linton

125 posts

linton

linton

@LintonC

cooking 🧑‍🍳🍲

Melbourne, Victoria Katılım Ocak 2024
308 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
linton retweetledi
François Chollet
François Chollet@fchollet·
A mental model for working with coding agents is that they're blind squirrels running into a maze and bumping into walls. You must place the walls (verifiable constraints) strategically so that they end up in the general region you want them in.
English
106
161
1.5K
123K
Notion
Notion@NotionHQ·
🤔💭🪩
Notion tweet media
QME
551
580
22.7K
923.4K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@hagaetc 100% Trying to be happy and relaxed all the time is an easy way to guarantee a bad life
English
0
0
0
30
linton retweetledi
Elisa
Elisa@eeelistar·
Being sociable is a skill Self-isolation is addictive so much more harmful than you realise The world expands and opens up for those who are people-centric, just as it shrinks for the introverted and nervous Don’t fall into the trap of being a lone wolf
English
107
5
262
6.4K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@fedesimio @paulg And not even the whole social media app. It’s just the infinite scroll feed that’s responsible for 90% of unhealthy tech habits
English
0
0
0
21
Federico Simionato
Federico Simionato@fedesimio·
@paulg But phones are just a platform through which you can use multiple apps. I bet social networks are >80% of the cause.
English
1
0
8
502
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
If Steve Jobs were still alive, he would have the moral authority to face and maybe even to solve this problem. But I doubt anyone in the phone business now does.
Paul Graham tweet media
English
595
505
6.9K
883.8K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@Jeyffre Yep, you gotta get the edge from somewhere
English
0
0
0
71
Jeffrey Scholz
Jeffrey Scholz@Jeyffre·
Your ability to grind is not what separates you from your peers. In India, Singapore, and China, grinding is part of the culture. Grinding is necessary but not sufficient. Your ability to grind with uncertain and delayed payoffs is what separates you from your peers. If you only chase things that appear to be certain, you enter the same crowded trade as everyone else. That only works if you have some other ace up your sleeve besides your ability to grind.
English
7
19
204
6.6K
linton
linton@LintonC·
Can we bring back the Windows phone? I think the world lost something valuable when Microsoft abandoned it.
English
0
0
2
44
SrinivasanSS
SrinivasanSS@SrinivasanSS52·
Rust Developers get "paid" more than C++ or Go or Python what could be the reasons?
English
32
0
93
14.8K
Ayush Agarwal
Ayush Agarwal@ayushagarwal·
we are built so much infra in-house that we can abstract and create ton of saas and open source projects. i just created one open-source project today, excited to ship it soon.
English
8
3
103
4.9K
Brian Halligan
Brian Halligan@bhalligan·
I don't remember where I found this, but its spot on.
Brian Halligan tweet media
English
729
6.6K
32K
45M
linton
linton@LintonC·
@ConnerBean Yep, I think every org should calculate the dollar cost of all their meetings every quarter and track that as a KPI. Hopefully then they’ll realise how expensive these meetings are and drive those costs down
English
0
0
1
30
Conner Bean
Conner Bean@ConnerBean·
If you're still having engineers spend the majority of their time trapped in meetings, you've already lost
English
4
1
24
1.2K
Dhravya Shah
Dhravya Shah@DhravyaShah·
todays learning: many people you respect and look up to, and have known for years are completely hostile and rude for no apparent reason. it's actually kinda sad. anyways. back to building
English
22
7
284
16.3K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@e2e_developer @icanvardar Spot on! Don’t attack the man, attack the argument. People who give personal criticism are not being constructive. And inversely, people who perceive criticism of their argument/behaviour/decision as a personal attack are also not being constructive.
English
0
0
1
22
Sebastian Heitmann
Sebastian Heitmann@e2e_developer·
@icanvardar The difference lies in whether the criticism is directed at the person or at the behaviour. Most people are not good at providing feedback without making it personal. And most are not good at receiving criticism without feeling personally attacked.
English
2
0
2
37
Can Vardar
Can Vardar@icanvardar·
when people dismiss your work, that's not constructive criticism. don't normalize it, it erodes confidence and distorts decisions until you doubt yourself. not all criticism is harmful. sometimes it's blunt honesty and the issue is your filter
English
7
2
14
710
linton
linton@LintonC·
@tylerangert Is there really much of a stigma around frontend work? I assumed people respected frontend devs more because it’s harder in a lot of ways than backend work
English
1
0
1
120
Tyler Angert
Tyler Angert@tylerangert·
What’s funny about the industry stigma against frontend work is that before the internet, basically all programming was “frontend” in a way. Eg it was all about graphics, local performance, proper memory management, etc. sort of “back of the frontend” work all baked together. The service-ification of algorithms + compute has created an artificial divide between where “real work” lives software
English
9
3
85
5.7K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@Glenn6 @aashatwt Exactly. Either companies will realise they still need good devs like they did when they experimented with no code tools, offshoring, etc…, or this is something entirely new
English
0
0
1
384
Glenn
Glenn@Glenn6·
@aashatwt that's either the best or worst career choice right now and i can't work out which
English
3
3
63
12K
aasha
aasha@aashatwt·
literally crazy that my irl friends still learning coding to become a software engineer
English
97
11
1.4K
116K
linton
linton@LintonC·
A leading indicator for PMF is customer complaints. If someone complains about something broken in your product then you know that they care enough about the solution to have unmet expectations. If all you get are compliments then odds are that your users are trying to spare your feelings and your lagging indicators - your churn and retention metrics, will give you a rude shock one day. That’s another reason why it’s important to ship before you’re ready, besides the benefits of rapid iteration and more customer insight from running more experiments. This piece of advice is so hard to follow, speaking from personal experience. Every engineering & perfectionist instinct in your body needs to be resisted. It feels obvious as a builder that a potential user might reject your product if it’s not polished enough. But think about how many times you’ve tolerated a broken button or a clunky UI because you needed to get something done as a consumer.
English
0
0
1
52
linton
linton@LintonC·
@won__sikkk @housecor As they should. I can’t imagine a small team setting up a CI server and a Terraform repo to manage their infra. That would be overkill
English
0
0
1
20
Wonsik Oh
Wonsik Oh@won__sikkk·
@housecor Two-person team advantage: no change approval boards, no long-lived branches, no politics. We just push, test, and ship. Small teams skip half this list by default.
English
1
0
1
110
Cory House
Cory House@housecor·
In 2026, many dev teams still fail to get the basics right. Click ops No CI server No feature flags No automated tests Long-lived branches Big, ambiguous tickets Change approval boards Infrequent, manual deploys Many long-lived environments I still often see all this.
English
10
8
103
9K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@poteto Everyone in the world, including all the cooks?
English
1
0
2
315
lauren
lauren@poteto·
everyone is cooking but who is eating
English
142
54
840
87K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@luluneverstops @incentivising It’s absolutely tragic when someone’s doing everything right but fails because they’re in the wrong place :(
English
1
1
1
10
Melvin Luu
Melvin Luu@luluneverstops·
@incentivising yup competence is only useful when it sits where opportunity can see it. you can be excellent in the wrong room, under the wrong label, solving the wrong visible problem, and stay invisible for years. positioning creates the frame before merit gets judged
English
1
0
15
436
Incentivising
Incentivising@incentivising·
I've watched highly intelligent people with every possible structural advantage lose to someone intellectually inferior. While the genius optimized for merit, the latter optimized for positioning. Not skill or resources, nor intelligence, but pure positioning. This made him visible. And most modern environments favor leverage over merit. It's the arrogance of competence, and you must realize that pure merit without an overarching strategy won't get far.
English
25
150
1.3K
35.7K
linton
linton@LintonC·
@arturchyk9 @thdxr If you’ve got something that helps you see things differently and step outside that box, you probably have a massive advantage
English
0
0
0
28
Artur Zhdan
Artur Zhdan@arturchyk9·
@thdxr I agree. It is likely because programming is a selective factor for a specific type of mind, with outliers ofc. However, the mind can be changed; it is a flexible construct.
English
1
0
9
1.6K
dax
dax@thdxr·
programmers are so good at rationalizing themselves out of building things that work for a lot of people it's why programmer takes on business are usually exactly backwards
English
42
11
980
59.3K