Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Cory House
41.9K posts

Cory House
@housecor
I help dev teams be insanely productive with AI. Courses: https://t.co/D5emROQa4J & https://t.co/6L1fD898mh Consulting: https://t.co/Qfp4Tfp3jf ⚛️
Kansas City Katılım Ocak 2009
808 Takip Edilen158.2K Takipçiler

@glenn_faison Even different stacks can benefit from colocation because I can do an atomic commit for front and backend
English

@schneidenbach Generally agree but since max context windows recently quadrupled on Opus I’m reevaluating the effects
@scottsauber has been experimenting with rarely clearing
English

@housecor A good rule of thumb is that about 1/8 through the max context window, you should start to think about context management. At a quarter you should definitely clear context
English

Problem: I'm not sure if I should clear context before my next prompt.
Solution: I ask Claude if I should've cleared context. This improves my intuition over time.
Example:
Prompt 1: "Recover my corrupted blog by pulling files from the Internet Archive."
Prompt 2: "Extract each post's content into markdown."
Should I have cleared context before step 2?
I wasn't sure, so I just asked Claude (I used /btw so it could keep working while answering this side question):

English

@schneidenbach I agree on point 1, and kept context.
And this is the first time I've asked such a thing, but I found the detailed explanation helpful.
English

@housecor I don’t think keeping context is harmful here. Also, I don’t think an LLM would do a good job of knowing when to clear context tbh. I would not ask Claude/Codex that almost ever lol
English

@mvidia84853 Yes, I chose to keep the context. But as you can see in the response, it was a gray line whether that was the right call in this case.
Tradeoffs to consider.
English

@aminnnn_09 Only around 45 minutes since it had to throttle to avoid getting rate limited
English

@housecor You could've asked Claude to migrate it to a static site generator like Jekyll or Hugo. That way you could continue to write articles without boilerplate html and in markdown. :)
English

@ricaldonis @MrPeterLMorris Coloration doesn’t require synced release
English

Answering to your original question I’d say that it depends.
Now, regarding the statement backend changes = UI changes, that’s not necessarily true. There are situations where you definitely want to have those two decoupled from a release perspective. I can provide a few examples if that helps
English

@housecor Every tech stack and compile belongs in its own repository.
VMs make hosting multiple repositories an admin, not a purchase, decision.
English

@housecor That’s a quick way to discover that the README is broken. I love it.
English

@housecor Are you assuming the README.md is up to date?
I usually ask the agent to do a quick architectural review against what’s in the read me. It’s more work up front but saves a ton of time in case the read me was stale.
English

@nefthy I struggle to think of a good reason not to sync them when the backend is dedicated to the frontend, and they're in the same repo, and supported by the same team
English

@MrPeterLMorris Agreed, no guarantee, but easier to assure via automated checks before merge
English

@housecor Having a single repo wontb guarantee they are in sync.
I'd generally keep BeFFe together though.
English






