Lion Of The North
1.2K posts

Lion Of The North
@LionoftheNorth
Musician, Songwriter, StuntMan, Follower of Jesus I Sometimes make stunt cars for Movies, TV #Supernatural #Smallville On The Road like Jack Kerouac...
Vancouver, BC, Canada Katılım Ekim 2009
281 Takip Edilen128 Takipçiler

@_DHDS @Pastor_ChrisH Hebrews 4:
For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who was tempted in every way that we are, yet was without sin.
English

@Pastor_ChrisH A relational God is incompatible with Classical Theism
English

@rabbriansamuel He is talking to the Cross-dressing Dionysian mystery cults who were enslaving the men through sexual deviancy, where societal boundaries between genders were symbolically broken down. As well, the Artemis cult practices in Ephesus. Get to know your history before you cherry pick
English

@rabbriansamuel Hb 8 Jesus a much more excellent ministry..the covenant He mediates is better and founded on better promises..if that first covenant had been without fault no place would have been sought for a second..He made the first one obsolete; what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear
English

@WesleyLHuff Except Enoch is quoted in Jude. The only being in the Universe who knows what actual scripture is, is God. The rest was assembled and 'declared' by men.
English

If you’re arguing that “the Septuagint” or “the Dead Sea Scrolls,” both included certain books, and on that basis we must have those books in our Bibles today, then you have a big problem. Both “the Septuagint” and “the Dead Sea Scrolls” are mini-libraries — they include documents considered both scriptural and non-scriptural in their day.
For example, the Letter of Aristeas, 3rd and 4th Maccabees, the Ascension of Isaiah, the Testament of Job, the Life of Adam and Eve, the Psalms of Solomon, and the Assumption of Moses are all part of the Septuagint collections. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, The Community Rule, recordings of the last words of Joseph, Judah, Levi, Naphtali, and Amram (the father of Moses) were amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls. Few (if any) of these books are considered scripture today by modern Christian or Jewish groups.
Both the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls are representative of ancient library collections — collections that contained scripture but that were not themselves wholly considered scripture. We today group them in these convenient categories with these helpful titles, but it is a misunderstanding to think of them as, or necessarily representative of, a single thing.
English

@JoshuaBarzon What are you doing posting these? 30k views. No NDA? You just gave their logo to 30 thousand people, posting this before a final opportunity to TM, ©, etc. Completely unprofessional.
English

@RestoredMySoul So what of the 3rd Temple of Ephesians 2? It clearly says the NEW Humanity which is the Jews being Grafted into the Gentiles, the ordinances DESTROYED, and Jesus the foundation. All the type and shadow practices would be accumulated into THIS Templeas historical. Vs 11 onward
English

@LionoftheNorth Yeshua proves you wrong.
And by your statement I can tell you haven’t spent much time in the prophets, because they all prophesy a messianic kingdom where Sabbath will be kept and enforced among all the nations.

English

It’s loving to remind you that the Sabbath is eternal no matter what you’ve been taught (by sinful man) about it, and when our Messiah returns the whole world will be keeping His Sabbaths and feasts.
Why not start now? It’s called Practice.
Frank Turek@DrFrankTurek
Why does God allow demonic power? I recently addressed a question about the Prince of Persia and Archangel Michael during a recent Q&A session at Michigan Technological University.
English

@mikevlach Perhaps. But Ephesians Ch 2 Vs 14-15 certainly do!
English

With this new blog post I argue that Galatians 3 does not teach the end of national Israel place in God's purposes: michaeljvlach.com/blog/does-gala…
English

@oliverburdick You people are creeps. You want Timothy 2:12 explained? Here you go:
sirrichardthelionheart.blogspot.com/2021/08/to-be-…
English

@EvidenceFirstYT @darwintojesus Why your wrong. You said no evidence for 'Earth Creation'. Ok. Hey, I got one! We live on Earth!
English

Here's the difference between me and @darwintojesus and other frauds.
Provide me evidence for why I'm wrong and I'll change my mind.
Genesis 1:1 earth creation (no evidence)
Genesis 1:14 sun creation (no evidence)
PLANETS FORM DUE TO GRAVITY. THE SUN "MADE" THE EARTH!!!!
English

@P_Ratchford I'll tell you what supersedes a treaty. Being Conquered.
English

@Fred_Butler Apparently you don't understand the simple fact that the Bible itself is a form of archeology.
English

The Bible apparently isn't good enough.
CharismaMag@charismamag
New Testament scholar Jeremiah J. Johnston is on a mission to explore archeological evidence for Jesus. Full story in the comments.
English

@orthodoxscribe Because real Jesus followers aren't Calvinists.
English

@3AngelsWatchman It's surprising how you have never understood scripture yet feel the need to teach. Hebrews 4 contradicts you. I'd be careful about what 'spirits' you let speak for you.
English

@PracticalTheolo Your choosing to believe what you want, and don't believe in the Divinity of Jesus. You have more trouble than just the concept of the Trinity.
Good Day, Sir.
English

@LionoftheNorth If it requires more than one, God is one. So you don't have more than one. God is still loving Himself. There is no other beyond God who is being loved, on the Trinitarian view. I have no idea what your eros/agape argument is supposed to be.
English

Trinitarians seem to often think of 'God' as something like an *office*, which can be shared by multiple persons.
For ex., imagine you had the office of 'Mayor', but this office was shared simultaneously by two persons. It's unusual, but certainly not impossible.
So, you could say:
"Bob is the Mayor"
*and*
"Sally is the Mayor"
without a contradiction. One office, two persons.
But here's the problem. If you say
"Bob is the only Mayor"
you are excluding that possibility in any sort of common-sense semantics. And if you then go on to talk exclusively (in any clear cases, anyways) about Bob as the Mayor, and Sally as someone distinct from the Mayor (the Deputy Mayor, say), any listener will understand that you mean to exclude Sally as the Mayor.
Yet both these considerations apply to the NT: the Father is called the only God, and the NT talks exclusively (in any clear cases, anyways) about the Father as God, and Jesus as someone distinct from God.
So when it comes to the NT, either
a) God is just the Father
or
b) the NT is written in a way that's highly misleading, only to be properly clarified hundreds of years later.
Your pick.
English

@PracticalTheolo Of course you don't. That's why you are Unitarian.
English

@LionoftheNorth No idea what your argument is here, tbh.
English

@David_wthebeard Hey Calvinist, Provision of, does not equal acceptance of. You may have a winning lottery ticket, but it is worthless unless you go cash it in. It's right there in the most well known scripture. That 'Whosever believes in Him..'
An action.
English












