@lostpatriotdad @DefiantLs You have no substantive rebuttal to anything she just said in this clip, and you know it.
English
Little Venture Co
486 posts
Little Venture Co
@LittleVentureCo
At Little Venture Co., we are dedicated to providing high-quality sleepwear for children that combines comfort and style.
Katılım Kasım 2024
67 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler
@DefiantLs Tarlov is the biggest clown in cable news. Lies about everything. Not a single redeeming quality. She's the main reason I don't watch Fox News anymore.
English
Watters: "Are you saying this operation is not going well?"
Tarlov: "I am saying that there are problems with this operation."
English
@vroman_robert @AP4Liberty They pretend like it’s impossible that the Vietnamese would try to stop us from going to war against them AND many Americans also recognized that it was immoral and strategically idiotic to do so.
English
The American anti war movement is a wholly owned subsidiary composed of each of America's greatest enemies. Has been since Vietnam. McCarthy was right.
English
He can’t put words in your mouth. You already stuck your foot in it by alleging that the people who helped you get to where you are are “bought and paid for” by “America’s enemies” when they do things like say “hey, let’s not start another war against our interests that drags on for years only for us to lose it.”
English
@ThomasEWoods My loyalty isn't to a man it's to my country. It's not like you to put words in my mouth though Tom, you must be really furious with me to accuse me like that. I'm disappointed in you. I sent you a DM if you want to discuss it.
English
@KillmerCj “History started in [year convenient for my narrative] when the bad guys came out of nowhere to do the bad thing.”
English
Here we go-like we haven’t all heard the Boomercon narrative on Iran 10K times in the last few days, consisting of a handful of cherry-picked historical events & lies by omission -selectively excluding LOTS of other historical events that would totally change people’s perceptions
Larry Alex Taunton@LarryTaunton
Dear @MattWalshBlog: I was 11 when the Islamic Revolution swept the Ayatollah into power in 1979. You weren’t born yet, I know, but for those of us who were, well, the memory of it is seared into our consciousness. 66 Americans were held hostage for 444 days. America was held hostage. Then President Carter was impotent. Americans wanted, no, they demanded a strong response. It never came. Since that time, the ayatollahs have waged war on America and Americans — they coined the term “The Great Satan” — with impunity, knowing that the America governed by Clintons and Obamas and Bidens (and even Bushes) was weak and tolerant. Thus, the Iranians funded 90+ attacks on American soldiers since 2020 alone. They have killed more than 600. So, no, I do not accept your straw man argument that those of us who support President Trump’s decision to bomb Iran came up with the talking points “5 minutes ago.” We came up with them 47 years ago, Matt. The charge is outrageous, condescending (which you are prone to), and historically ignorant — but you weren’t born yet and maybe you just don’t know any better. You’re better than your flaccid arguments. (I saw your What is a Woman? movie. And liked it. Do better.) Many of us do remember 1979 and the attacks and tortures and murders since, and we’ve wanted a strong response for decades. Not for revenge, mind you, as that makes for poor policy. But for justice. And because Iran is the head (a hydra, there are many heads) of the terrorist snake. You want the terrorists at home gone? So do I. So does every Trump voter. But who do you think funds them, trains them, sends them to do their dirty work? I live in the South. Fire ants are a thing. I fought that battle for years pointlessly. Why? Because my neighbors didn’t fight it at all. No sooner did I destroy an ant hill than a new one almost spontaneously generated. Finally, I convinced my neighbors to let me kill theirs, too. Only then were my children safe from the bane of fire ants. This is America First. You tend to lean not America First, but America Only. Get out more. See the world as I have. And when you do you’ll realize the storm brewing at home is fueled from abroad. They are not mutually exclusive. Attack both. Strike the root of the terrorist tree or you accomplish nothing.
English
English
@Microinteracti1 @bannerite I’m so sick of seeing these fake posts. The USS Arlington is not even in Norfolk right now. It just underwent almost two years of dry docking for upgrades and repairs and is still completing drills for certification. STOP trying to be dramatic and scare people.
English
🚨🚨🇺🇸 Reports say USS Arlington is loading nonstop in Norfolk, with armed security nearby.
Here is what that actually means.
Arlington is an amphibious transport dock, LPD-24, San Antonio class. Think of it as a floating logistics hub for a Marine landing force. It can embark hundreds of Marines plus vehicles, ammunition, and supplies, then push them ashore using landing craft from its well deck and helicopters or tilt rotor aircraft from its flight deck.
It is a ship you load when you might need Marines and equipment on short notice.
If the US is rushing to backfill gear now, it suggests basic readiness and prepositioning was not in place before Trump lit the match. You do not start a war and then remember the packing list.
So which is it. Evacuation, deterrence, or the first step into something bigger?
Stay connected,
Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1
English
Yes, sadly, truth is regularly in the minority.
Precedents don’t change justice. Once it was the precedent that every nation in history had allowed slavery - it still needed to be ended. If every President in American history violated the Constitution to start wars of choice, it would still be wrong and should still be prevented by Congressional action.
English
@LittleVentureCo @DefiantLs If that is true for you, that puts you in an extreme minority. Regardless, any current enforcement would go against precedents.
English
US soldier calls on people to overthrow Trump and his admin.
English
Good faith efforts at negotiation? Israel has engaged in perfidy TWICE in the last year, attacking in the middle of said negotiations, and BOTH TIMES it has come out that they never really meant for a deal at all and had decided to strike well in advance of the negotiation beginning.
English
On Saturday, President Trump released a statement laying out clear objectives to the American people for Operation Epic Fury.
Let me reiterate them:
Destroy the Iranian regime’s missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground.
Annihilate the Iranian regime’s Navy.
Ensure the regime’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world and attack our forces.
Stop them from making and using IEDs or roadside bombs, which have gravely wounded and killed thousands and thousands of people, including many Americans.
Guarantee that Iran can NEVER obtain a nuclear weapon.
Preventing this radical regime and its terrorist leaders from threatening America and our core national security interests is a clear-eyed and necessary objective.
Killing terrorists is good for America. 49 of the most senior Iranian regime leaders – including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – have already been wiped off the face of the Earth so far in the opening strikes of Operation Epic Fury.
Finally, while Operation Midnight Hammer did obliterate Iran’s major nuclear sites, the regime was fully committed to rebuilding their nuclear program, and they REFUSED to make a deal, despite months of extensive talks and good faith efforts by President Trump’s top negotiators.
Simply put, the terrorist Iranian regime would not say yes to peace.
For 47 years, the Iranian regime has actively and intentionally facilitated the killing of Americans while chanting “death to America” and funding other bloodthirsty terrorists seeking to destroy the United States and all of Western Civilization. Prior American leaders were too weak and cowardly to do anything about it. Now, President Donald J. Trump is correcting decades of cowardice and holding those responsible for the deaths of Americans accountable.
Their brutal attacks and threats will finally end under President Trump.
America will win – the terrorists will be defeated.
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog
So far we’ve heard that although we killed the whole Iranian regime, this was not a regime change war. And although we obliterated their nuclear program, we had to do this because of their nuclear program. And although Iran was not planning any attacks on the US, they also might have been, depending on who you ask. And although we are not fighting this war to free the Iranian people, they are now free, or might be, depending on who seizes power, and we have no idea who that will be. The messaging on this thing is, to put it mildly, confused.
English
My concern is not selective. I’ve been opposed to every unconstitutional war in my lifetime, and would have opposed any before it.
My criticisms apply equally well to Obama in Syria and Libya, Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan, Clinton in Kosovo, and all of them in Somalia.
Your false assumption of partisanship tells on yourself. It has nothing to do with me.
English
@LittleVentureCo @DefiantLs I was wisely taught to be suspicious of selective concern.
English
@KeithPluml11362 @bigdave @DefiantLs @grok Not a Democrat. And I don’t care how many Presidents violated the Constitution, it’s still not something we should accept.
Iran was not a problem for the US. It wasn’t even a problem for Israelis - it merely blocked their territorial and hegemonic ambitions.
English
@LittleVentureCo @bigdave @DefiantLs @grok 43 out of 45. Decades old problems are being dealt with by a real president. Notice how the dems always side against America? Wake up.
English
English
The man on the balcony (mug + phone) is Yair Netanyahu, son of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. He's been living in a luxury condo near Miami/Hallandale Beach since at least early 2024, per multiple reports.
Yair is not married and has no wife. The woman in pink holding the drink isn't his partner (no public record of any such marriage or relationship). The "son and his wife" framing is satirical/meme-style exaggeration.
Your attached image nails it: question the narrative.
English
The War Powers Resolution does not give any authorization to use troops in a conflict. It explicitly specifies when they can be used.
This is why Afghanistan and Iraq required an “Authorization of the Use of Military Force.” Trump does not have one for Iran. He violated the law - which is much broader than a reporting requirement. The law is not just “tell Congress and you can do whatever you want.”
English
I’m glad you took the time to research this topic before responding. It’s obvious you still don’t know what you’re talking about because the part where you heard someone else say it or copy and pasting, “still requires a specific statutory authorization” what do Trump do that is not within WPR? Rubio notified the Gang of Eight prior to the strike.
Your last statement doesn’t make sense “this is a problem, not a permission”.
English
@DDe_Yonge @DefiantLs Didn’t your mother ever teach you that two - or 45 - wrongs do not make a right? Or not to point to other kids getting away with violating the rules to try to justify yourself when you break them?
English
@_meme_bots @DefiantLs War Powers Resolution is of dubious constitutionality and still requires a specific statutory authorization.
Many Presidents have ignored the Constitution. This is a problem, not a permission.
English
It’s called War Powers Resolution (1973).
Many Presidents have done this.
Truman: Ordered U.S. forces into the Korean War in 1950 without congressional authorization, framing it as a “police action” under United Nations auspices.
JFK: Authorized the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in 1961, a CIA-backed operation against Fidel Castro’s regime, without seeking congressional approval.
LBJ: Escalated U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War following the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which was based on disputed incidents and used to justify broader military actions without a formal war declaration.
Nixon: Ordered the secret bombing of Cambodia in 1969–1970 as part of the Vietnam War expansion, without congressional consent.
Reagan: Launched the invasion of Grenada in 1983 to oust a Marxist government and protect U.S. citizens, and ordered airstrikes on Libya in 1986 in response to terrorism, both without prior congressional approval (though Congress was notified afterward).
HW Bush: Directed the invasion of Panama in 1989 to capture Manuel Noriega on drug-trafficking charges, without congressional authorization
Clinton: Authorized NATO airstrikes in the Balkans, including against Serbia in Kosovo in 1999, without congressional approval.
Obama: Ordered U.S. military intervention in Libya in 2011 to support rebels against Muammar Gaddafi, without seeking congressional authorization.
Conducted airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria starting in 2014, relying on existing post-9/11 authorizations rather than new congressional approval.
Biden: Directed airstrikes in Iraq and Syria in 2021 targeting Iranian-backed militias, invoking Article II powers without new congressional approval.
Authorized military actions in Yemen against Houthi forces, deemed unconstitutional by some critics for lacking congressional authorization
So it’s happened plenty of times before so stick to making Onesies or research things before you start saying retarded shit.
GIF
English
@LittleVentureCo @DefiantLs By those standards, so has nearly every president since Washington.
English
🚨🚨Senior Trump Administration officials telling me that credible intelligence indicated Iran planned preemptive missile strikes against US military targets in the region, and against civilian targets as well. Failure to act would’ve resulted in mass US casualties.
English
No, neither of those are my point. My point is that Epstein was a Jewish supremacist tied heavily to Israeli intelligence and political figures. His lawyer is also tied to them.
Dershowitz is not a neutral figure, but a supremely biased one. His “constitutional scholarship” is also nonsense. You don’t have an actual argument, this is why you just go “but Dershowitz says”. You didn’t even cite his argument, just claimed he has one.
English
You want to claim I'm appealing to authority? Fine. Let's dance.
You chided me for a logical fallacy and then immediately committed two of your own in the exact same breath:
Appeal to Emotion: Arguing that I should have picked a 'better' or 'nicer' scholar because of his past.
Ad Hominem: Implying that Dershowitz is somehow less qualified on constitutional law based on who he has defended in court.
An appeal to authority is simply a failure to expound. I'll happily concede that I should have cited why he says you're wrong instead of just dropping his name.
You, on the other hand, don't have the luxury of your fallacies being innocent structural errors. They are willful deflections. If an architect that moonlights as a serial killer tells the city that a bridge is going to collapse because the math is wrong, the bridge still collapses. The messenger's morality does not change the physics, just like Dershowitz's client list does not change the text of Article II or the validity of his interpretation.
English
@BreakerBakerX @BullTheoryio The US and Israel blew up a school in Iran.
English
@BullTheoryio If this Fairmont Palm hit is confirmed…
… that’s a deliberate expansion into civilian targets & it changes the map fast.
Dubai isn’t regional it’s global capital.
How do you think GCC responds when tourism becomes the battlefield?
English
@jimmycrossusa @DefiantLs That is not the full extent of the War Powers Resolution. It also limits the Article II power to a declaration of war or “specific statutory authorization,” unless the US is clearly attacked first.
English
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (or Act) checks presidential power to initiate military action without Congress, requiring notification within 48 hours of deploying forces into hostilities. It limits troop engagement to 60 days without congressional authorization or a declared war. Aside from that there is the while Article II debate.
English
@HunterPSU01 @Major1tyRules @DefiantLs Uh, no, that’s not accurate. On either case.
And this is the most ridiculous argument yet.
English
@LittleVentureCo @Major1tyRules @DefiantLs Our soldiers have been attacked numerous times by Iran and its proxies. As always stated, after an attack, we choose the time and degree of our response. This is part of that response. :).
English
The list is WAY too long to put in a tweet, but here’s a high level overview.
Mass spying in violation of the 4th Amendment.
CIA mind control experiments (MK Ultra)
Conscription after the 13th Amendment was established
Japanese internment
Sedition Act of 1918 (made criticizing the government illegal)
Vietnam War
Korean War
Honestly, goes all the way back to how Washington handled the “Whiskey Rebellion” defying an unconstitutional tax.
English
@LittleVentureCo @The_Memenator_ @DefiantLs What violations specifically? List them or shut the fuck up it’s really pretty simple.
English