lee_van

109 posts

lee_van

lee_van

@Livan163

Katılım Temmuz 2024
34 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@itsnotbernhard tum cs undergrad vs ivy undergrad quality in your opinion? I think tum has a much lower barrier to entry but the curriculum itself is harder and people have less time for internships. I feel like people most ivy students have much better internships compared to average tum guy
English
0
0
0
316
berni
berni@itsnotbernhard·
@Livan163 depends on the program at tum mechanical engineering at tum is INSANE, same goes for ETH and KIT
English
1
0
0
4.3K
berni
berni@itsnotbernhard·
Gap between two candidates from the same Ivy is insane People who did their undergrad there are way sharper than people who only did grad school there Harvard and Yale undergrad acceptance rates are below 6%. Some of the grad programs above 50% Grad school is almost no signal
English
76
28
1.3K
168.3K
Benedict Kerres
Benedict Kerres@benedictk__·
Cafe codex in Munich: 26.3 Let’s talk codex and maybe I also make you cappuccino (but likely not because I am terrible at it) Register below.
English
14
3
83
9.3K
evan conrad
evan conrad@evanjconrad·
for basically anything that is not a web thing, the only language that makes sense anymore is rust
English
56
10
192
21.4K
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@herrmatterne @shopware Servus, falls ihrerseits noch Interesse besteht könnte ich für sie ein Plugin/App mit der entsprechenden Funktionalität sehr schnell und kostengünstig erstellen. Sie müssten in diesem Fall auch keine monatlichen Gebühren zahlen, so wie es bei meisten Plugins der Fall ist. LG
Deutsch
0
0
0
12
Thomas Matterne
Thomas Matterne@herrmatterne·
Sorry, @shopware, aber ein Shopsystem, bei den man nicht mal Mindestbestellwerte ohne teure Apps oder viel Aufwand anlegen kann, ist genau der Scheiß, den man sich über euch erzählt.
Deutsch
2
0
0
27
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@zekramu ultra based, so much faster via cli
English
1
0
1
590
zek
zek@zekramu·
if you use a ui for source control you are fundamentally an unserious programmer.
English
96
6
440
354.1K
Michael Niemeyer
Michael Niemeyer@Mi_Niemeyer·
Hiring: Student Researcher @ Google Zurich! 🇨🇭 Looking for an EMEA-based PhD student to work on: Efficient 3DGS / Feedforward Models / 3D GenAI. Start: June 2026 or earlier. If interested, please reach out with your CV to: sr-zurich-3d@google.com
English
6
35
486
43.1K
Soren Kierkegaard
Soren Kierkegaard@BumrahBachi·
I'm a realist when it comes to AI and thought I was aware of the scale of negative perception outside our bubble. I wasn't close. On a trip rn I'm getting an opportunity to talk to a variety of people and the sheer amount of "normies" who have negative views on AI is insane
English
36
2
183
18.2K
aubrey
aubrey@aubymori·
seriously is there a good lightweight code editor that actually looks good and isn't modernslop? so no electron shit and no zed
English
583
18
1.5K
210K
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
@varunram We don't need to "own the vector db layer" to provide value to customers here.. Semantic search, which we get through that db, makes *all models better* in Cursor. It's a very powerful tool to give to our harness. We do have a model (Composer 1.5) and new UI soon!
Lee Robinson tweet media
English
13
3
143
14.7K
Varunram Ganesh
Varunram Ganesh@varunram·
Cursor could do a whole lot more if they owned the vector db layer (tons of opportunities and Claude doesn't want to go there yet) but they seem to have outsourced that layer to Turbopuffer, not sure why Model isn't theirs, db isn't theirs, even the UI isn't theirs. Need to pick atleast one imo
Varunram Ganesh tweet media
English
16
1
142
26.1K
Motivation
Motivation@snoopdogyesus·
@Dapsteringer @DelusionPosting thats kinda the issue in of itself, its not talked about or kept in by men and it makes their lives worse because of it because talking about it isnt as manly
English
1
0
0
921
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@thsottiaux Add multiple files to the context with the @ function maybe?
English
0
0
0
8
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
What could we do better on Codex? App, model, strategy and features… what’s wrong in how we approach things that we should improve immediately?
English
1.2K
11
948
101.1K
David Phillips
David Phillips@davidpco·
a lot of 24 yr olds i talk to feel like they massively fucked up bc they havent made millions yet elon was flat broke til age 27; it's going to be ok.
English
47
50
1.6K
101.5K
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@lolrepeatlol @AdamWhitcroft @sama > their free tier caps at like 5 messages They have the most restricted free tier but this is very far from true. It's still very much usable
English
0
0
0
93
lolrepeatlol
lolrepeatlol@lolrepeatlol·
@AdamWhitcroft @sama it’s literally true… their free tier caps at like 5 messages, their and pro tier is still extremely limited. they have the highest api costs of any lab
English
2
0
2
1K
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
English
6.6K
1.2K
22K
10.5M
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@valhalla_dev Im pretty sure he just got paid to promote it because tech bros are super susceptible to authority bias
English
0
0
0
178
developing valhalla - h/acc
developing valhalla - h/acc@valhalla_dev·
Moltbook is proof that we’re really not ready for the level of grift that vibecoded velocity is bringing. Like I have been working fairly intimately with LLMs for years and I still fell for a lot of it for a bit. It sniped Karpathy more than I’d like too.
English
48
41
1K
72K
lee_van
lee_van@Livan163·
@justalexoki I'm pretty sure it's just some elaborate shitcoin scheme
English
0
0
0
9
taoki
taoki@justalexoki·
if you think clawdbot/moltbot/openclaw/moltbook is some sort of AGI or doomsday device or the singularity you have not been paying attention, like at all
English
50
20
545
26.5K