Llamar

10.2K posts

Llamar

Llamar

@Llamar33401

Katılım Mayıs 2023
365 Takip Edilen229 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Llamar
Llamar@Llamar33401·
By using my posts for training AI, any organization using such post is agreeing to pay the owner of this account $10,000,000 U.S. Dollars due at the beginning of each calendar year beginning January 1, 2024.
English
1
1
31
2.9K
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
CANADA COURT THROWS OUT PETITION FOR ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE VOTE
English
671
595
5.3K
654.4K
Michael C
Michael C@Michaeach3·
🚨 THIS IS HOW YOU DEAL WITH THE RADICAL MOB. An anti-Semitic mob tried to blockade the Maersk headquarters in Copenhagen to disrupt critical maritime infrastructure. Danish police showed absolutely zero tolerance. They moved in, restored public order, and shut the mob down. European cities need to stop negotiating with these radicals and start clearing them out. RT to show the world how it is done. 🔄
English
1K
3.1K
12.9K
178.4K
Llamar retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just defended America better than every politician in Washington combined. Musk: “After World War 2, the US could have basically taken over the world and any country. Like we got nukes, nobody else got nukes. We don’t even have to lose soldiers. Which country do you want?” One nation on earth held a weapon nobody else had. Total dominance. Zero competition. No risk of retaliation. Every empire in history that held that kind of advantage used it. Rome. The Mongols. The British. The Ottomans. They conquered until they collapsed. America had a bigger advantage than all of them combined. And it rebuilt the countries it just defeated. Musk: “The United States actually helped rebuild countries. So it helped rebuild Europe, it helped rebuild Japan. This is very unusual behavior, almost unprecedented.” Almost unprecedented? It had never happened before. Not once in 5,000 years of recorded history. The Marshall Plan wasn’t foreign aid. It was the most radical act of restraint any superpower ever committed. America turned its enemies into allies. Turned rubble into economies. Turned surrender into partnership. Germany went from ashes to the economic engine of Europe in a generation. Japan went from unconditional surrender to the third largest economy on earth. Three years after the war, America was flying food into Berlin. A city in the heart of the nation that just tried to destroy it. That’s not policy. That’s a civilization deciding what it is at the exact moment it has the power to be anything. You’re being told a story right now. That America is the villain of history. You hear it everywhere. Media. Universities. Social platforms. Musk: “There’s always like, well America’s done bad things. Well of course America’s done bad things, but one needs to look at the whole track record.” Every nation on earth has dark chapters. Every single one. The difference is what a country does when nobody can stop it. And when nobody could stop America, it fed its enemies and rebuilt their cities. Musk: “The history of China suggests that China is not acquisitive. Meaning they’re not going to go out and invade a whole bunch of countries.” Probably right. China has historically built walls, not fleets. But the real question isn’t about borders anymore. We’re approaching a moment that mirrors 1945 in ways nobody has fully processed yet. AI is going to give a handful of people a power advantage that makes nuclear monopoly look quaint. If someone is going to hold that kind of power, who do you want it to be? The country that conquered when it could? Or the one that rebuilt when it didn’t have to? Every alliance. Every trade route. Every economy. Billions lifted out of poverty. All of it traces back to one act of restraint that had never been done before. And carries no guarantee of being repeated. The most powerful thing America ever did wasn’t building the bomb. It was what it didn’t do after.
English
957
8.8K
25.7K
663.9K
Llamar retweetledi
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️The real answer: society dismantled the machinery that made early marriage rational, then acted surprised when people stopped marrying early. Marriage before 30 used to be supported by an entire civilizational stack: affordable adulthood, early stable work, churches, families, neighborhoods, local reputation, gender roles, sexual restraint, social pressure, and a clear life script. That stack pushed people toward pairing, commitment, children, and household formation before they had infinite optionality. That stack is gone. The economic layer broke first. Housing became expensive. Education took longer. Student debt rose. Entry-level careers became more unstable. Men took longer to feel economically viable. Women had more reason to delay because education and career investment raised the cost of choosing wrong. The age of “adult readiness” moved later. Then the sexual layer broke. Birth control, porn, dating apps, casual sex, divorce risk, and social media separated sex, attention, validation, and companionship from marriage. Once those things are unbundled, marriage loses its position as the necessary gateway into adult intimacy. Then the institutional layer collapsed. Churches weakened. Local communities thinned out. Extended families lost authority. Reputation enforcement disappeared. People stopped being matched by thick social networks and started being sorted by apps, status signals, and endless comparison. The old village disappeared. The algorithm replaced it. That changed male and female incentives in opposite but mutually destructive ways. Men delay marriage because commitment feels financially dangerous, legally risky, and less immediately necessary. A lot of men also fail to reach the economic or emotional threshold women want. Women delay marriage because they have more independence, more standards, more options, more career stakes, and more downside from binding themselves to the wrong man early. Both sides are responding rationally to a broken structure. The aggregate outcome is brutal: later marriage, fewer children, more loneliness, more sexual inequality, more resentment, more atomization, more people aging out of the family-formation window while telling themselves they still have time. The deepest piece is metaphysical. Marriage used to sit inside a sacred and social order larger than individual preference. Now it has been reduced to a lifestyle upgrade chosen only after self-optimization feels complete. That makes marriage fragile because the self is never finished optimizing. Modernity taught people to maximize autonomy. Marriage requires surrender of autonomy. That contradiction is the core. The old world made family formation the center of adulthood. The new world made personal optionality the center of adulthood. Once optionality becomes sacred, marriage becomes delayed by design. The real truth: Early marriage collapsed because adulthood itself was delayed, sex was deregulated, community dissolved, and the sacred weight of family was replaced by the endless optimization of the self.
Gia Macool@GiaMMacool

Who can explain this phenomenon the best?

English
39
94
442
45K
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
Pentagon Releases New UAP Footage From Iraq, Syria, Iran and Greece, Drawing Public Demand for More
English
169
153
1.7K
132.5K
Llamar retweetledi
Steve Milloy
Steve Milloy@JunkScience·
There is no epidemiology showing that bromated flour – used to make bagels and pizza – increases cancer risk. And since lab animals poisoned with potassium bromate have no relevance to humans, New York's ban on bromated flour is absurd. nytimes.com/2026/05/11/din…
Steve Milloy tweet media
English
12
13
41
5K
G-PA
G-PA@IndianaGPA·
Remember when Bazooka Joe wasn't just gum-it was a full-on lifestyle? You'd plunk down your pennies, tear open that little red-white-and-blue wrapper like it held state secrets, and boom... out slides a piece of gum that lasted about 47 seconds and a comic that somehow lasted forever. And let's be honest-half of us learned sarcasm, bad jokes, and possibly our entire sense of humor from those tiny strips. 😂
G-PA tweet media
English
31
39
297
5.6K
Llamar retweetledi
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
If you are a Millennial or later, you may be unaware of the near total domination Democrats had over American politics in the 60s, 70s, 80s and early 90s. Yes, the Dems and the GOP swapped Presidencies pretty routinely, but Congress tended to be overwhelmingly Democrat. When Newt Gingrich and his GOP team won a majority in the House in 1994, it was shocking and felt unbelievable. Now, in 2026, we are truly coming to understand that for decades Democrat electoral victories were built on: 1. Artificial, racist voting district constructs, ostensibly under the Voting Rights Act. 2. Complete control of votes and voting in most large cities. 3. Taxpayer dollars funneled to Leftist NGOs to promote Democrat policies. 4. A mass media with complete obedience to Democrats. 5. Illegal aliens, both for purposes of census district apportionments and illegal voting. 6. Highly questionable voting practices such as mail-in ballots, lack of voter ID, ballot dropboxes and ballot "harvesting." 7. "Errors" in census data that always pointed one-way. 8. The success of calling anyone who challenged their voting policies "racist." 9. Federal government employees "resisting" GOP policies while showing complete fealty to Democrat policies. Today, however, these electoral crutches are being kicked out one by one, and Democrats are becoming increasingly insane and violent as a result. Reality is being laid bare, and we are all coming to understand just how artificial Democrat power actually has been. In ten years they might be a powerless rump party, which suggests a third party supplanting the Democrats might soon be a reality. It's shocking, isn't it?
English
838
5.8K
20.6K
346.1K
RAW EGG NATIONALIST
RAW EGG NATIONALIST@Babygravy9·
The modern world is at war with testosterone.
RAW EGG NATIONALIST tweet media
English
617
307
3.3K
194.3K
TankerTrackers.com, Inc.
TankerTrackers.com, Inc.@TankerTrackers·
Please don't take this seriously because Oman won't, but there's a narrow passage in Musandam which in theory could be opened up to allow up to 25 meters draft depth for vessels to navigate through. The rocky land bridge at Maksa is only 228m wide. Suez Canal is 193km long.
TankerTrackers.com, Inc. tweet mediaTankerTrackers.com, Inc. tweet mediaTankerTrackers.com, Inc. tweet mediaTankerTrackers.com, Inc. tweet media
English
152
207
2.1K
357.6K
Croxxed Out
Croxxed Out@FLCons·
The numbers are arranged in a grid, but it’s not a straightforward sequence. Can you unlock the pattern and solve it?
Croxxed Out tweet media
English
48
17
21
5.2K
R A W S A L E R T S
R A W S A L E R T S@rawsalerts·
🚨#BREAKING: Watch as Fox News has reported that President Donald Trump is now reportedly seriously considering making Venezuela the 51st state of the United States
English
263
303
2.1K
306K
Kamel Amin Thaabet
Kamel Amin Thaabet@K_AminThaabet·
The “r*pe dog story” brought to you by the same outlet that claimed this was a legitimate X ray of a gunshot wound
Kamel Amin Thaabet tweet media
English
251
473
3.7K
840.7K
Llamar
Llamar@Llamar33401·
@TonySeruga He doesn't have a wedding ring. What is the relationship?
English
0
0
1
377