Lobster

Islam is the infallible truth. Nobody can defeat it. So the world does everything in its power to destroy the believers.

@StancesScifi @Ony1nyechi LOL, literally.

The fact that over a billion idiots believe this happened 😂

Abu Hurairah said: "I have not seen anyone quicker in his walking than the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)." [Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3648]

...

Dear Americans, Your president is a madman.

Make no mistake: when Trump said “praise be to Allah,” he was mocking Islam and insulting 2 billion Muslims around the world. Shame on those Muslim countries that continue to stand with him as he denigrates Islam. Where is your ghayrah for your deen?

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 Citing Galatians 1:8 is a massive self own. Paul used that to tell people to ignore the actual disciples of Jesus if they didn't follow his new 'visions.' You're following a man who never met Jesus and told you to reject the ones who did. Talk about a deception. 🤷‍♂️

@LobsterPSD @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 Matthew’s chain is Matthew to the disciples. Mark is Mark to the disciples. Luke is Luke gathered from eyewitnesses. Not one person saw an Angel deliver message to Muhammad. Even if so, Bible warned that Satan comes as an angle of light looking to deceive. Galatians 1:8

Christians say the Quran copied the Bible. But the Quran mentions Jesus speaking as a baby, and it tells you why. When Mary was accused, she pointed to the child, and the baby spoke to defend her, declaring his mission and clearing her name. Open the Bible, that moment is not there at all. So think. If the Quran was copying, where did that detail come from? Copying doesn’t create new information. So here’s the real question to any Christian: Since this story is not in the Bible, do you consider it a lie… or a truth your scripture never preserved?

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 Quoting Aisha (RA) out of context is a weak reach. Your own Bible says Solomon had 1,000 women (1 Kings 11:3). Was that his desire too? Aisha’s witty comment doesn't change the fact that our history is forensically audited while yours is based on anonymous tradition. 🤫

@LobsterPSD @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 In the Quran Muhammad is criticized for restating fables and legends and that is true. I follow Jewish Bible because it predicts Jesus. Bible history is rich, deep and diverse. Quran is superficial and meets some of the desires of men for wealth, power and women.

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 You’re literally making up 'chains' for Matthew and Luke that don't exist in history. Those are anonymous Greek texts written decades later that plagiarized 90% of Mark. You have no Isnad, just a 2nd century guess. Stop inventing history to hide your lack of an audit trail.

@99Zane00110 @aitiamonarchy @MasterMaliq The Jews who have spoken Hebrew for 3000 years, have never interpreted the Shema as a "unity". To suggest that the Jews didn't understand their own language until 4th century Roman Christians explained it to them is the height of arrogance.

@LobsterPSD @aitiamonarchy @MasterMaliq If you know the meaning behind the Shema you would never quote it to prove your point. The Hebrew word for "one" used her is linguistically used as a 'unity', the same way we are one family. It inherently implies more than one person forming one unit. Sound familiar?

@aitiamonarchy @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 No point to talk to you, you're being very disrespectful. Not what Jesus taught according to the Bible as long as I recall.

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 That is not true, look up Sumayyah and Yasir ibn Ammar the first martyrs of Islam. Along with Bilal ibn Rabah who heard the message of Islam and was tortured until the Prophet had to buy him off. Just as the disciples of Jesus, they didn't stop believing in Prophet Muhammad.

@LobsterPSD @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 Many disciples and followers of Jesus died because they would not deny Jesus as their savior. Many Muslims died trying to get riches from war and believed they would get virgins in heaven. Big difference.

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 If Matthew is so early and reliable, show me the original signed manuscript. Oh wait, you only have anonymous copies from 100+ years later. Meanwhile, the Quran was memorized and written during the life of the Prophet. One is history, the other is a guess. Alhamdulillah.

@LobsterPSD @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 There is a good argument that Matthew was written within 10 years of the crucifixion of Jesus.

@MARKBARNHART1 @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 So a Perfect Isnad is a paradox and can't be trusted, but an "Anonymous Gospel" is Gospel truth? 😂 You’re literally arguing that being too accurate is suspicious, while being completely unverified (like the Bible is fine. That’s the definition of a double standard.

@LobsterPSD @MasterMaliq @99Zane00110 Muslims cannot be trusted.

Indeed. Praise be to Allah who will humiliate you in this life and the next.

@MasterMaliq Alhamdulillah

Science just caught up… Islam taught this 1400 years ago! Sit & drink. Prophet said it first.

Don't argue with your own logic just to avoid the conclusion.

The Pivot: "Wait.. accurate transmission doesn't guarantee the source is accurate!" If you have to move the goalposts the moment the evidence doesn't suit your narrative, you're not looking for truth just looking for an exit.

Spot the contradiction. This is what happens when you try to use logic against the Qur'an you end up arguing with yourself.