Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)

28K posts

Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious) banner
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)

Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)

@LocumRex

Chicago based investor | AI-product & visuals engagement | often skeptical observer of tech, history & markets.

Chicago, IL Katılım Eylül 2009
703 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
Chicago students at Thomas Kelly College Prep are passionate animal advocates running the Paws & Tails club! They host pet food pantries and free vaccine clinics, and now they want to amplify their voice with a badge-making machine for awareness campaigns to help spread the awareness for animal rights, adoption, and responsible pet care. Support this awesome DonorsChoose project. Every dollar helps. donorschoose.org/project/animal…
English
1
0
2
213
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
This is a physical manifestation of the Uncanny Valley. She personifies, the psychological and aesthetic phenomenon of great discomfort, eeriness, and revulsion that people often feel toward things like robots, CGI characters, dolls, or animations. They look almost human, but not quite. There is something off. Something not quite right. Something dire and wrong. Some say that it is a pathogen avoidance. Or just category confusion. A threat detection, where our brains have specialized systems for recognizing humans in social interactions, mate selection, etc… Something that looks human but isn’t, creates a mismatch. It is processed in the reptilian part of the brain as a “defective” or abnormal, triggering instinctive wariness and suspicion. Often a threat.
English
0
0
0
11
Rep. Nancy Mace
Rep. Nancy Mace@RepNancyMace·
@OliLondonTV Nothing about this is natural. A woman pretending to be a man is not and will never be normal.
English
67
123
3.3K
18.8K
Oli London
Oli London@OliLondonTV·
Transgender actress Elliot Page promotes her new nature documentary teaching kids animals can be gender fluid and LGBTQI+. “It is so exceptional sharing this information that we did not learn in school about gender and sexuality in the natural world.”
English
2.7K
191
1.2K
744.4K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
@OliLondonTV There are always anomalies in nature. They are rarely if ever encouraged in nature. In fact, anomalies are often dispatched and removed from the herd in ruthless and grizzly manners.
English
0
0
0
16
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
@sourpatchlyds @CollinRugg Yeah, it’s always been that way. We’re leaving at exposed to the public and anyone can go through it. Once you leave your trash at the curb, police can go through it without a warrant. Been like that as far as I can remember.
English
0
0
0
7
Collin Rugg
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg·
Sacramento, California, will now be inspecting residents' trash to make sure they are in compliance with state law. The City of Sacramento will send crews across the city to track and check that residents are sorting their trash properly. It's just a matter of time until they install Flock cameras inside your trash cans.
English
1.1K
866
4.2K
549.1K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
It’s not about recycling. It’s not about the environment It’s not even about a “scam” It’s about totalitarian overreach that will eventually slide into everything that you do. And there will be consequences financial and social consequences that will follow you. Eyes on your car, eyes on your trash, eyes on your social media, eyes in your home, eyes everywhere, telling you what to do and how to do it. And you will comply, or they will employ the means to ruin you.
English
1
0
2
10
Odog Off Leash
Odog Off Leash@OdogOffLeash·
@CollinRugg ACTUALLY, almost none of what you put in the so called recycle bin actually gets recycled. Just another far left scam.
GIF
English
8
13
227
2.8K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
People don’t seem to understand it’s not about wasting time, effort, or energy. It’s not even about fines or revenue. It’s all part of the slippery slope to normalize authoritarian order by normalizing the obscenely ridiculous. First, it’s this. Then they come to check your odometer on your car to see how much you’ve been driving. Then they start looking at your electricity and water on your meters. Hell, they can do that remotely. They don’t even need access to your home for that. But maybe they will go in your home just to check your thermostats. See what you got in the fridge. Maybe a little too much meat and milk. Maybe you’ve got that hat in a corner from that Trump rally you went to 12 years ago. And they will notice, and they will take note. Eventually limits and rationed amounts of commodities are employed. Of course, with steep fines will follow. Until men with with guns, come to your door and force you into compliance. Hell, it may not even be men or women. Might be some robotic fucking dog with a net comes to your door to snag you like a wild rabbit. They will then find ways to legally take your finances, lock you out of your digital banking, hold your property, and leave you destitute. As a punishment. As an example to others. They only need to do this to a few people. As a show of force to everyone else of what will happens when you do not comply. It may happen in a few years, or maybe not even in your lifetime. But left unfettered, certainly in your children’s lifetime. And your children and grandchildren will be vassals to the state. You are raising the indentured servants and slaves to the state for tomorrow.
English
0
0
0
18
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
@Oilfield_Rando This has nothing to do with sexualizing the athletes. This has everything to do with not being able to point out the prodigious cumbersome bulge of the top ranking so-called “female” athletes.
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious) tweet media
English
0
2
21
3.3K
Lou Perez
Lou Perez@LouPerez·
@Dexerto Now I'm fine with trans women competing.
English
3
0
56
4K
Dexerto
Dexerto@Dexerto·
New broadcasting guidelines for women's athletics have been released to crack down on camera angles and slow-motion replays that ‘sexualize’ athletes The guidelines highlight shots broadcasters are urged to avoid
Dexerto tweet mediaDexerto tweet media
English
4.6K
2.2K
65.3K
20.3M
𝕰𝖒𝕲
𝕰𝖒𝕲@Emilio2763·
I Should Move to Belarus 🇧🇾 I’d be like Elon Musk Rich…
English
15
4
164
7.9K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
@IfindRetards We got fucking cameras that can tell from the outline of your cumbersome pant bulge whether you’re circumcised or not. And this is the fucking camera footage that they release of this homunculus? 🤔🤨 Fuck off London pork chops!
English
0
0
1
39
Retard Finder
Retard Finder@IfindRetards·
CCTV footage has been released of a person police want to speak to after a lone woman reported being dragged to the ground on the London Tube by a man who tried to rape her. Imagine coming across this creature alone at night.
Retard Finder tweet media
English
93
227
1.6K
25K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
Tennessee and Kentucky will pull you over for any goddamn thing, and then they will take anything of value as an “asset forfeiture.” Because I 65 is literally a meth corridor. And God forbid you’re driving from Chicago to Nashville to pick up a classic car, because with that Illinois or Wisconsin plate, you have a high probability of your cash becoming Kentucky’s cash. But they won’t pull over a truck driver with a four armed elephant dangling in the cab, who learned how to drive a bus on the road to Punjab. Oh, that they’ll let slide. 😡😡
English
0
1
3
39
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortor·
🚨 INFURIATING: Democrat KY Gov. Andy Beshear is REFUSING to stop issuing driver licenses to illegals driving MULTI-TON TRUCKS with NO ABILITY to speak basic English INNOCENT AMERICANS ARE DYlNG. BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS, @AndyBeshearKY This guy wants to be elected PRESIDENT in 2028. CAN’T HAPPEN!
English
2.1K
15.4K
41.7K
829.6K
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
The funniest thing to me is that all this liminal Backrooms business began with a simple photograph of a furniture shop in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. I have relatives in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, and I always like to remind them that the rest of the world thinks, where they live is a nightmare. I mean, it’s not. But I still tell them that anyway. 😂😂🤣
English
0
0
0
291
cinemoments
cinemoments@TheCineMoments·
sequence of the year
English
101
1.4K
18.1K
1.7M
Right Angle News Network
Right Angle News Network@Rightanglenews·
UPDATE - I spoke directly with the Baltimore Jersey Mike’s franchise owner and can confirm David, the employee who went viral for standing his ground while being abused by a customer, has not been fired. In case you were wondering what to have for dinner.
English
834
3.2K
40.1K
1.1M
Drew P. Sack (Skeptical/Suspicious)
Brevity is the point, because people have the attention of a damn goldfish and won’t read. But, if you’re looking for the TLDR, then here it is… The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is a federal-level protection against “dragnet” or “fishing expeditions” in law enforcement. Of course it states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE…” This prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by all government agents (including police). There is no single federal statute called “anti-dragnet law.” However, constitutional doctrine has enforced Supreme Court rulings, federal civil rights laws like 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Police cannot pull you over and search your vehicle or belongings arbitrarily. They must have your consent. Unless there is “probable cause.” And that’s why you often hear police say, “I smell marijuana” or “I smell alcohol.” or, they will use a canine unit to state that they have a hit, and therefore probable cause. None of these things are provable in a court of law. It is strictly the officers best guest predicated on his perceived judgment. You cannot capture on aroma or ascent and bring it into court as evidence. Even body cams cannot capture any smell smells or aromas. However, the abuse of these contrived excuses are a whole other discussion. Bottom line is if an officer cannot just arbitrarily collect information on you, search your vehicle or just run you through a database. Then neither can an AI. Just because you have removed the human being from the process and are using an AI as a proxy does not make it legal. It makes it an unconstitutional, digital dragnet. Not that this is the entirety of the argument, but it is certainly the tip of the iceberg.
English
0
0
0
20
0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️
0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️@BabyD1111229·
Novel idea… Go stand in front a Flock camera and record the same thing the camera is recording. When asked, say this, "I'm recording the same public area the camera is recording. The difference is that my recording is protected by the First Amendment, while this camera raises important questions about the Fourth Amendment when the government collects, stores, and searches people's movements over time". 🎩 Dave Blanton
0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️ tweet media
English
59
382
1.2K
24.7K