LuBerra

The destruction of the Guidestones says a lot about where humanity is as a species. And the builders of the stones were alarmingly prophetic. Georgia Guidestones: 'America's Stonehenge' demolished after blast bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-…

The fact that the richest man on earth is paying someone to play a video game for him around the clock, so that he can pretend to be one of the best players in the world to his Twitter followers would be hilarious if it wasn’t so incredibly sad.

Here's the new report that @elonmusk, Reform UK & Tory MPs, Jordan Peterson, Laurence Fox, Andrew Tate & other high profile influencers, far-right extremists, GB "News" presenters & mainstream print & broadcast news seem almost entirely disiniterested in: news.npcc.police.uk/releases/vkpp-…

@soychotic What about ugly on the inside?

You can actually tell how attractive you are based on the way ppl insult your looks online! If they say you’re ugly, you’re likely a 6 or below (Average or ugly). If they say you’re plastic/fake, hey that’s pretty good! You’re probably a 7 maybe an 8! If they say you look like a whore, that means you’re literally one of the hottest people they’ve ever seen.

@SenSanders He’s probably talking about Dominic Cummings. That ”super high IQ revolutionary” was part of Boris Johnson’s government in the UK. It’s precisely as you say. Make the rich richer and disenfranchise ordinary people. Anyway. That didn’t turn out well in the UK…

Musk is hiring “super high-IQ small government revolutionaries” for DOGE. What do these super-humans have in store for us mere mortals? Will they create universal health care, address the housing crisis or climate change? Or will they just make the rich richer? Stay tuned.

European countries should simply either block or tax the parasitic US big tech companies that insist on violating their laws and roiling their internal affairs. Promote local competition. You don’t need these toxic, retrograde companies.

A day in the life of elon musk, master of free speech and world improver. I analyzed elon musk's tweets and forwards in one day. Interference in the politics of another country: 64% Insults: 15% Hate: 11% Neutral: 6% Disinformation: 53% Criticism of Russia: 0% Criticism of China: 0% Positive: 0% Some tweets were rated multiple times.

Here is a listicle from some FSB funded shit account here on (formerly) twitter. I am an actual russia so I will make my own listicle explaining why each point is either wrong, misleading, or moot. Thread🧵👇

Don Gustavo says that they’re actively looking for new field workers. He kindly welcomes all the Americans that have been complaining about immigrants taking their jobs. As well as other Latinos who are up for the job. $16.50/hr, no time off, & no benefits! #Bakersfield

I grew up in a UK where: gay sex was illegal, abortion was a crime, smogs were common, non-whites were refused hotel entry, women were paid far less for the same job, & kids were beaten at school. It was far more white & monocultural. Some want that country back, I don't, do you?

MAGAs saying we do not have free speech here in Europe.. we do.. we have free speech. But what you need to understand is that there is a huge difference between free speech and the right to spread mis information and lies about everything and everyone you do not like..

Andrew Tate is the easiest moral test ever devised. If you think there is anything valuable about him, you've failed.

So Cummings is the man aiding and abetting Musk to overthrow the government and install their own start-up party. He's feeding Musk with a strategy to destabilise the UK. The man is a traitor.

@000nessi @HanShawnity So be a man Nessi, grow up and take responsibility for your shit instead of being some narcissist rapist’s cuck guy.

This is Andrew Tate. We absolutely should NOT be normalizing this man. If you promote and platform him you are complicit in this. He should be ostracized and shunned from civil society.

Statement on National Security Staff Firings Yesterday, President Trump’s National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz @michaelgwaltz , announced a sweeping directive to terminate all national security staffers loaned from other departments and agencies who serve in apolitical, non-partisan senior staff roles. Waltz framed this decision as a means to eliminate Biden-era appointees and enforce absolute alignment with Trump’s policy agenda. Notably, Waltz justified this move by referencing my role in exposing Trump’s abuse of power, which led to his first impeachment. Using my actions as a rationale, Waltz aims to purge scores of professionals from the Department of Defense, Department of State, CIA, and other agencies—not because of their conduct, but due to a demand for blind allegiance to Trump. This approach sends a stark and troubling message: in a second Trump administration, only political loyalists will be permitted to serve on the NSC. To set the record straight, I served as an apolitical detailee and a faithful Army officer implementing President Trump’s national security agenda, as outlined in the National Security Strategy he approved. My actions did not conflict with Trump’s stated national security policy. My reporting of corruption—my refusal to remain silent as Trump engaged in criminal activity, undermined free and fair elections by pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rival, Joe Biden, to steal the 2020 election—and my refusal to betray my oath to the U.S. Constitution are why I was fired. These are the same reasons professional staff are about to be purged, and apolitical staff will be barred from the NSC. On the surface, it is reasonable for a president to seek a loyal and trusted teams faithful to their agenda. However, absolute loyalty should not be the exclusive qualification, overriding competence, experience, and fidelity to a constitutional oath. An NSC staffed with “team members who are 100% aligned with the president’s agenda” will not only diminish the NSC’s capabilities but also erode continuity in policy. Worse, it will create an environment where dissenting views, even those grounded in experience and ethical responsibility, are stifled. The so-called “Vindman Rule” sets a dangerous precedent by ensuring that only political loyalists can serve on the NSC, advise the president, and interact with the president and top decision-makers. Such an approach will have a chilling effect on senior policy staff across the government. Talented professionals, wary of being dismissed for principled stances or offering objective advice, will either self-censor or forgo service altogether. This undermines the very purpose of the NSC: to provide the president with the best possible advice as well as the coordinating team to advance U.S. national security interests. The implications of this loyalty-above-competence model are dire. By purging the NSC of apolitical, experienced professionals, Trump and Waltz are hollowing out the institutional expertise required to navigate complex global challenges. This will create a policy apparatus incapable of discerning sound policies from reckless impulses—or worse, one that actively disregards legal and ethical obligations to implement Trump’s personal whims. Consider the implications: Would Department of Defense detailees still counsel against invading Greenland or Canada or feed those foolhardy thoughts to curry favor? Would FBI detailees agree to engage in political reprisals against Trump’s enemies to serve in the NSC? These are not far-fetched concerns but real dangers inherent in the precedent Waltz establishes. This announcement also presages broader plans by the Trump administration to fire tens of thousands of senior apolitical government officials and replace them with Trump loyalists. By prioritizing loyalty above all else, the Trump administration will significantly undermine the foundations of good governance, jeopardize U.S. national security, and weaken U.S. democracy.

The idea that Dems ostracized Musk and pushed him reluctantly into the arms of the GOP is so absurd. He has billions in contracts from a Democratic administration; Pentagon officials defer to him per the New Yorker; Chuck Schumer hosted him in the Senate less than 18 months ago.