zk luvin

458 posts

zk luvin

zk luvin

@Luvizk

Katılım Ekim 2024
559 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@cnfinancewatch Ai只会随着时间越来越强,ai是趋势,是新时代的变革,就像电脑的出现,最终落在在家家户户,生活方方面面,这必然是信息化时代中流砥柱和领头羊
中文
0
0
2
782
华尔街观察 Xtrader
华尔街观察 Xtrader@cnfinancewatch·
只要这轮牛市没走完,即使AI科技有波动,它是不回到头的 从这个角度呼吁allin AI制造(设备和制造),并没有错 但是,合规的v,是不敢说这种话的
中文
16
0
29
16.6K
墙街研究猿_The Ape of the Great Wall
让AI给我解释了一下: 传统芯片升级(摩尔定律)的“老路”是这样的: 想让芯片更快、更省电、塞更多晶体管 → 必须把晶体管画得越来越小(从10nm → 7nm → 5nm → 3nm → 2nm……)。 “画”这么小的线条,只能靠超级贵、超级难的光刻机(尤其是EUV极紫外光刻机)。 
每下一代节点,光刻机都要升级,成本爆炸(一台EUV光刻机上亿美元),设计预算也上10亿刀。 
华为以前被卡脖子,就是卡在这里——拿不到最先进的光刻机,就没法继续“横向缩”。 LogicFolding完全换了一条赛道: 它不缩小晶体管,而是把同一代工艺(固定节点)的电路,像折千层饼一样竖着叠起来! 还是用原来的晶体管大小(不需要新光刻机去画更小的图案)。 把关键的逻辑电路、内存、模拟电路拆开,一部分放在上层硅片,一部分放在下层硅片。 用超级密的“垂直电梯”(混合键合,1.5微米间距)把上下层直接焊在一起。 结果:信号走直达电梯,不用在平面上绕远路 → 线短了30%,RC寄生小了,频率更快、功耗更低、密度更高。
墙街研究猿_The Ape of the Great Wall tweet media
中文
68
48
307
142.6K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
时间会证明一切妖魔鬼怪都是纸老虎,只有坚持独立自主,突破封锁,才能开创未来。 就像那句偈语所说: 世间有人谤我、欺我、辱我、笑我、轻我、贱我、恶我、骗我,如何处治乎? 曰: 只要忍他、让他、由他、避他、耐他、敬他、不要理他,再待几年你且看他
中文
10
0
0
2
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@ShanghaoJin 蠢人就是蠢人,拿自己业余都不是挑战别人的专业
中文
0
0
0
38
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@QiaoJiaXY 华为的对手都尊重和重视他,只有那些脑残傻逼们天天嘲笑他,说华为不懂芯片的,华为是怎么从制裁中走出来的,简直笑死🤣
中文
0
0
36
537
乔家小院
乔家小院@QiaoJiaXY·
华为身上的仇恨值是真的高,而且是那种见不得你说华为半点好的仇恨值....... 但是华为这样一家成功的企业,身上不可避免的会有一些优势啊,怎么办? 要不你们自S吧,一了百了,愿天堂没有华为。
中文
93
4
239
17.3K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@Compute_King 实际打个比方,原来是二维平面设计,但是碍于物理极限,只能到2纳米,现在华为的方案就是进入三维层面设计,除了长宽还有高
中文
5
0
5
2K
Compute King
Compute King@Compute_King·
论文中的这段是精髓:华为是直接把Die Boundary当金属层。。。 两个思考: 1,为了极致压缩数据移动时间,逻辑与存储必须重新走向紧密的物理融合(Re-Fusion) 。这也意味着供应链的话语权正在向内存和先进封装供应商倾斜 。 2,业界需要原生的3D-Native或者LogicFolding的完整EDA工具:目前的EDA工具是基于Interposer,基于2D平面建立的,将面积、时序和功耗独立优化 。LogicFolding需要将多层堆叠的裸片视为一个连续的设计实体,在单元(Cell)级别进行跨晶圆的3D布局布线与时序收敛。 这两个方向会比较有意思。
Compute King tweet mediaCompute King tweet media
Compute King@Compute_King

借一张图解释华为Tao定律。 Photo credit to 睿而不酷 & Gemini.

中文
21
36
250
146.4K
Fortune Bridge
Fortune Bridge@hins27297221·
@ApeOfGreatWall 老黄的作风比中国很多巨头企业家要好,看看国内的余大嘴,雷不群😁。 不觉得羞愧吗😳
中文
2
0
2
2.8K
墙街研究猿_The Ape of the Great Wall
华为这个方案,很多人在嘲笑,然而老黄是认可的: 他在Dwarkesh Patel 播客访谈(2026年4月)中的原话: “AI is a parallel computing problem, isn’t it? Why can’t they just put 4x, 10x, as many chips together… If they wanted to, they just gang up more chips, even if they’re 7nm…” (人工智能本质上就是一个并行计算问题,不是吗?他们为什么不能把4倍、10倍的芯片组合在一起……如果他们想的话,就多堆叠一些芯片,即使是7nm的也行……)
中文
41
9
128
58.7K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@Mimiwftt 美股都几百倍,中国这才哪到哪
中文
0
0
1
3.1K
Mistery
Mistery@Mimiwftt·
哈哈哈!所以今晚会不会有一堆人回家拿钱继续加仓半导体?在听薛松直播!笑死我了!
中文
44
1
126
66.5K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@off_thetarget 新安做光?不是硅基液冷么?好像算力也有参与
中文
0
0
0
183
pepper 花椒 (赚钱版)
pepper 花椒 (赚钱版)@off_thetarget·
你说研究光 三孚股份稳定量产9N级(99.9999999%),国内唯一可大规模供货芯层PC­VD工艺的厂商,金属杂质控制在ppb级别(十亿分之一),是光纤芯层刚需。 新安股份目前公开信息仅能做到6N–7N级,可做包层OVD/VAD工艺,暂时达不到9N芯层级,也未通过长飞、亨通等大厂的芯层认证 所以谁是A股的光,不可替代的光?
中文
7
11
41
17.7K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@miren_41319 犹太鬼肯定不让美国出泥潭,前面谈着,后面估计还要偷袭伊朗
中文
0
0
0
257
迷人的小红
迷人的小红@miren_41319·
啊?懂王居然签了?美帝现在门槛和要求这么低了吗?
迷人的小红 tweet media迷人的小红 tweet media
中文
31
0
17
6.9K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@williamlab 世界公认最没礼貌,喊话的是韩国和阿三哥吧
中文
0
0
0
193
陳威廉
陳威廉@williamlab·
硅谷员工疯狂吐槽团队里几乎全是中国人,哈哈哈哈哈他写的太好笑了。 鸠占鹊巢了属于是。
陳威廉 tweet media陳威廉 tweet media
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

中文
224
122
1.1K
728.2K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@HougeSol 为什么中国氮化镓雷达技术领先,氧化镓好像听说应用到飞机上了,国外领先为啥不上呢?
中文
1
0
1
233
猴哥|houge.sol
猴哥|houge.sol@HougeSol·
猴哥:1~4代半导体核心设备龙头清单 先搞清一个核心逻辑: 每一代半导体 = 对应材料升级 材料升级 = 设备升级 很多人天天研究芯片,但真正赚钱的往往不是芯片本身,而是卖设备的人。 直接上全球龙头 + 国内对标。 第一代半导体:硅(Si) (传统芯片时代) 核心设备: • 光刻 • 刻蚀 • 沉积 • 离子注入 • 薄膜设备 全球龙头: 光刻: ASML(荷兰) 刻蚀 / 沉积: AMAT(应用材料) LRCX(泛林) TEL(东京电子) 国内对标: 中芯国际(代工) 北方华创: 刻蚀 / 沉积 / 热处理 中微公司: 刻蚀 / MOCVD 拓荆科技: 薄膜沉积 一句话: 第一代设备已经非常成熟,欧美日基本统治市场,国内还在持续追赶。 --- 第二代半导体: GaAs(砷化镓) InP(磷化铟) (射频 + 光通信时代) 核心设备: • MOCVD • MBE(分子束外延) 全球龙头: MOCVD: AIXA(Aixtron) Veeco 两家加起来市场份额超过85% MBE: Veeco Riber(法国) 国内对标: 中微公司(MOCVD) 北方华创 沈阳科仪(MBE) 一句话: 第二代基本是AIXA+Veeco双寡头时代,也是800G、1.6T光模块背后的核心设备供应商。 --- 第三代半导体: SiC(碳化硅) GaN(氮化镓) (新能源车 + 快充 + 光伏) 核心设备: • MOCVD • SiC外延炉(CVD) • 离子注入 • 高温退火 全球龙头: GaN MOCVD: AIXA(Aixtron) 市场份额75%+ 200mm领域接近90% SiC外延: AIXA(约37%) LPE(意大利) AMAT(应用材料) 国内对标: 天岳先进 / 天科合达 (SiC衬底) 三安光电 (化合物半导体IDM) 北方华创 (设备) 一句话: 第三代功率半导体设备,AIXA几乎就是绝对龙头。 --- 第四代半导体: Ga₂O₃(氧化镓) (特高压 + 储能 + 航天) 目前仍处研发阶段 核心设备: • 氧化镓专用MOCVD • 晶体生长炉(EFG / VB) • HVPE外延设备 全球格局: 设备端: AIXA(Aixtron) 目前属于领先布局者。 已经向大学和科研机构出货研究设备。 但要注意: 现在整个产业距离量产还很远。 材料端: NCT(日本) 全球Ga₂O₃衬底龙头 计划2029量产。 Kyma(美国) Ga₂O₃外延材料玩家。 国内玩家: 富加镓业 镓仁半导体 铭镓半导体 中国电科46所 基本还在: 实验室 → 中试阶段。 一句话: 第四代还没进入真正产业化,AIXA提前卡位,但离“垄断”还很远。 --- 终极极简总结 🥇 第一代硅: ASML + 应用材料 🥈 第二代GaAs / InP: AIXA + Veeco 🥉 第三代SiC / GaN: AIXA(绝对龙头) 🚀 第四代Ga₂O₃: AIXA提前布局 --- 投资逻辑一句话: AIXA真正厉害的地方,不是押中了二代,而是从第二代吃到第三代,还提前坐上了第四代的桌子。 但注意: 第四代氧化镓现在更多还是“未来故事”。 真正能不能大规模商业化,还需要时间验证。 $AIXA #爱思强 $ASML $VEECO #猴哥10倍潜力标
猴哥|houge.sol tweet media
猴哥|houge.sol@HougeSol

猴哥10倍潜力标: Aixtro这家公司最可怕的地方,不是技术,而是根本换不掉! $AIXA(Aixtron)是干什么的? AIXA(Aixtron)本质上是: 化合物半导体设备 + MOCVD龙头 + AI光通信隐形冠军。 很多人第一反应: “做半导体设备?跟ASML差不多?” 方向对了,但赛道完全不一样。 ASML干的是光刻机。 Aixtron干的是 MOCVD(金属有机化学气相沉积)。 说白了: 它是负责在晶圆上“长材料”的机器。 很多芯片不是拿硅切出来就行,而是一层一层“长”出来的。 而Aixtron卖的,就是那个负责“种”的工具。 它造出来的东西主要用在: • AI数据中心光模块 / 光收发器(InP) • SiC碳化硅功率芯片(电动车核心) • GaN氮化镓芯片(快充、服务器电源) • 激光器 • MicroLED • 光通信器件 很多人天天盯着英伟达GPU。 但你想一下。 GPU堆得再多,最后也要互相通信。 未来几万个GPU一起跑的时候,真正容易堵车的地方可能不是算力,而是: 数据怎么跑。 而光模块,就是修高速公路的。 Aixtron卖的设备,就是高速公路施工队的挖掘机。 而且在高端光电领域,它市占率超过90%。 这已经不是卖铲子了。 这更像: 全世界只有一家铲子厂。 护城河在哪? Aixtron真正厉害的不是机器本身。 而是: 设备 + 工艺 + 客户锁定。 很多客户在Aixtron设备上调工艺参数,可能调了三五年。 换设备意味着什么? 意味着所有东西全部重来。 良率重新调。 配方重新开发。 时间重新烧。 芯片厂根本不敢赌。 这就像你辛辛苦苦把游戏账号练到满级。 突然让你删号重练。 没几个人愿意。 最近为什么又开始被资金盯上? 过去两年: SiC有点产能过剩。 GaN需求也不算特别强。 所以市场一直不太兴奋。 但最近出现了变化。 Q1新增订单: 1.714亿欧元,同比增长30%。 其中: 光电订单占了69%。 管理层直接说: 拐点可能到了。 背后的逻辑其实就一句话: AI数据中心越来越大。 800G、1.6T光模块开始升级。 未来数据跑得越快,对高速光通信需求越高。 而Aixtron几乎站在产业最上游。 估值怎么看 现在: 股价大概52欧元附近。 市值大概58亿欧元。 看起来不便宜。 但问题在于: 市场已经不是按传统半导体设备公司给它估值了。 开始按: AI光网络基础设施。 如果未来AI光通信真的进入超级周期。 再叠加: SiC、GaN在2027—2028复苏。 那现在58亿欧元,未必就是高估。 最大的问题就两个: 第一: 半导体设备本身周期非常强。 景气的时候订单爆炸。 不景气的时候也会跌得很惨。 第二: 最近涨太快了。 一年已经涨了270%+。 短期很容易出现大波动。 你买进去后看到回撤20%-30%,一点都不奇怪。 一句话总结: AIXA可以理解成:AI光网络时代的“隐形军火商”。 护城河:9/10 弹性:8.5/10 确定性:6/10 10倍概率:7/10 它不像BKSY、LUNR那种全靠讲故事。 它是真赚钱、低负债、有市占率。 赌的不是公司会不会活下来。 赌的是: AI光通信这个超级周期,到底会不会来。 $AIXA #MOCVD #光通信 #猴哥10倍潜力标 #Aixtron

中文
9
58
192
47.1K
鳌少保
鳌少保@f92748719·
@Luvizk @szslg 傻逼又开始把自己当成国家的主人了,你就是个屁民,醒醒吧
中文
1
0
1
291
苏里格
苏里格@szslg·
你们还有境外股票账户的赶紧把钱转回来,现在转回来,叫受害者的涉案资金,晚一点可能就变成留在境外的违法所得了……
中文
57
2
49
48.6K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@James_liu715 @jxzdmzw 为你屁点大的地方表姿态?你也太看的起自己了,当年香港也暴乱,有管过?笑死🤣
中文
0
0
0
34
怪物民族
怪物民族@James_liu715·
@jxzdmzw 嘴国的最恶心的地方就是只会嘴。台湾都已经说日语了,可是嘴国啥也不敢做。嘴国如果想被当作人看待,必须彻底摧毁西方。可惜嘴国只能嘴。
中文
1
0
0
388
侥幸没歪
侥幸没歪@jxzdmzw·
当你把中共想得这么蠢,不用怀疑,蠢的那个一定是你。 中国是不可能接受美国拿台湾问题敲诈勒索的,从川普1.0杨洁篪说的那句“我把你们想得太好了”开始,中国就彻底看清了美国。 也即,美国是那种当面谈得好好的,回转头就凭空造牌继续敲诈的流氓。因此中国不会再轻易在贸易协议上签字,只会释放意向订单,掌握是否落实、何时落实、落实多少、如何落实的主动权。 此番中国以最高规格接待川普,开出大笔大笔的飞机大豆订单,就是在跟美国释放姿态:只要不触及中国红线,我们可以愉快地合作。 中国可以赠与川普政治资本,可以在贸易合作中适当照顾美国利益,但这些都只能是基于中美友好合作。美国在台湾问题上处理得当,中美就能友好,意向订单就能落地,反之就会取消。 如果川普拿台湾来要挟、敲诈、勒索,任何有点脑子的中国领导人都不可能答应。这不是贸易问题,而是原则问题。一旦忍受敲诈,就会有源源不断的敲诈。 美国可以随时重启军购案,中国也可以随时暂停落实订单。大不了是个双方两败俱伤,想要共赢还是想要共输,就看美国怎么选了。 无论美国怎么选,中国都会奉陪到底,不可能任由美国拿捏。
侥幸没歪 tweet media
中文
76
5
139
44.9K
Richard feng
Richard feng@RichardFengKing·
@jxzdmzw 哈哈哈,没在体制内待过吧!月薪过3000了吗就来瞎逼逼,中国这么高规格接待川普,本质是因为习包子抓了张又侠地位不保,要川普来给他站台,显示他搞了中美关系,算是政绩!结果川普都不吊他!
中文
11
0
0
2K
郑敏
郑敏@MinMin89485072·
Taiwan is a country 台湾🇹🇼是一个国家。
郑敏 tweet media
中文
1.2K
1K
10.1K
162.4K
雅量高致
雅量高致@lalianggaozhi·
@jjamesw1 只是有一点,为什么一定要盯着台湾不算完?互不隶属,维持现状是不是更好?搞好中美关系,日韩关系。与朝、俄保持距离是不是会更好?
中文
76
0
21
48.8K
紫水晶Amethyst
紫水晶Amethyst@jjamesw1·
习老大外交能力如何? 说句实话,远远超过普京这个大傻。 习近平主席在外交方面的有两个很厉害的策略: 1、剪裙边策略,或者说温水煮青蛙。习特别能忍,而且不怕等待,往往是一步步侵蚀,极有耐心。最终在意想不到中,达到大水漫灌的外交效果。台湾吧,还是小心点啦,现在的台湾政府,根本就没啥像样的外交人才。当年李登辉为了过嘴瘾就出卖了刘连昆,这是外交家该做的事情吗?习老大绝对不会犯这种低级错误。 2、设置底线原则,避免外交中的危机失控。这个策略在中印冲突中表现非常明显。两个核大国,如果没有冲突底线,进入火器冲突,想想就知道了后果了。习老大设置了冷兵器的底线,印度也认可这个原则,最终并没有酿成不可预测的后果。现在谁还记得中印危机? 反观普京,好好的剪裙边不用,直接下手猛攻乌克兰,把俄罗斯的家底彻底打光。现在普京在习面前,根本就是个小弟的角色。 普京在冲突中完全没有外交底线,动不动就用核武器威胁,这根本是把自己当金三胖来看待了。只是这威胁多了,大家都不信了。真到该用的时候,你能冒着俄罗斯被彻底灭族的危险使出来吗? 习在内政方面就不说了,懂得都懂。😄
中文
109
26
534
346.3K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@JamieMetzl 是的,你根本没办法证明你是人生的依据,所以你只能是畜生生出来的畜生
中文
0
0
0
11
Jamie Metzl
Jamie Metzl@JamieMetzl·
台湾其实并不是中国的一部分。中国对台湾的主权主张缺乏实质依据。
中文
616
77
1K
53.7K
zk luvin
zk luvin@Luvizk·
@richmomz @MissGinaDarling 在中国,公民的基本吃饱肚子的食物是不允许涨价的,真羡慕你们的食物能涨价的买不起🤣
中文
0
0
0
51
Adeptus MAGAnicus
Adeptus MAGAnicus@richmomz·
@MissGinaDarling China subsidizes food costs because if they didn’t millions would starve. The average income is like $4k/yr. I don’t know about you but I prefer a world-class income over cheap but sketchy street food.
English
58
0
9
13.1K
Gina Darling
Gina Darling@MissGinaDarling·
Disgusted by the price of food in America now that I’m back from China 😭😭😭😭
English
120
61
1.9K
404.3K
Leeroy Jerkin
Leeroy Jerkin@JerkinLeeroy·
@MissGinaDarling In China they dont have much quality control so there is that...chemicals, pesticides, etc all fair game until something happens and then they just sacrifice a handful of businessmen/leaders.
English
4
0
0
931