Min Hyung Ryu

507 posts

Min Hyung Ryu banner
Min Hyung Ryu

Min Hyung Ryu

@MH_Ryu

Postdoc at Channing Lab (CDNM), @BrighamWomens, @harvardmed. PhD from @ubc. Love science, GxE interaction, omics, and #bioinformatics 🇰🇷🇨🇦🔬🧬

Cambridge, MA Katılım Kasım 2011
174 Takip Edilen201 Takipçiler
Min Hyung Ryu retweetledi
Giulia Menichetti
Giulia Menichetti@menicgiulia·
📢Join our team to explore the fascinating intersection of Precision Nutrition, Network Science, and Machine Learning in next-gen drug discovery and scalable public health interventions! 🌱🧪I am hiring a postdoc to tackle these beautiful challenges together. 👇Apply now!👇
Giulia Menichetti tweet mediaGiulia Menichetti tweet media
English
1
5
14
2.1K
Min Hyung Ryu
Min Hyung Ryu@MH_Ryu·
@jiahweing Not taking notes on ideas, progress and overall goal of each project (coding, analysis, manuscript writing, etc.). I relied on to-dos and no note on what’s done and what is next action. #GTD by David Allan and “Building a second brain” by Tiago Forte is worth a read on this.
English
1
0
2
51
Jia Ng, MD MSCE
Jia Ng, MD MSCE@jiahweing·
Any other time wasters you've experienced? Would love to hear from all of you.
English
7
0
3
1.5K
Jia Ng, MD MSCE
Jia Ng, MD MSCE@jiahweing·
My early researcher days were filled with Time Wasters I wasn't even aware of.  Here are some of my blunders. Steer clear of them.
English
2
11
59
17.7K
Min Hyung Ryu
Min Hyung Ryu@MH_Ryu·
@jiahweing I am not a journal editor. I think it has to do with the fact that publishing work of well known institutions and scholars (network hub for academia) get more readers and citations. Many good mentors told me that good science, not popular science, last longer and eventually win.
English
0
0
1
18
Jia Ng, MD MSCE
Jia Ng, MD MSCE@jiahweing·
@MH_Ryu Double blinded review will help with bias. But I wonder why it is not used more often. Perhaps journal editors could weigh in.
English
1
0
0
104
Min Hyung Ryu
Min Hyung Ryu@MH_Ryu·
More systematic approach to peer review would help us be more efficient and reduce potential biases. Also, I’ve found double blinded review also interesting concept and helpful.
Jia Ng, MD MSCE@jiahweing

Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing.  Some reviewers offer gentle, yet unhelpful feedback. Others may be harsh but give insightful comment.  Striking the right balance is key.  Let me share my approach on being the 'just right' peer reviewer

English
1
0
1
353
Min Hyung Ryu
Min Hyung Ryu@MH_Ryu·
Fascinating AI methodology combined with big data for nutrition study can pave the way to use #nutrition for understanding and interventions. Love your work @menicgiulia
Giulia Menichetti@menicgiulia

Big Thanks to @IAFNS_science for inviting me to discuss #AI in #food and #nutrition in the prestigious setting of the National @PressClubDC in #WashingtonDC. What an enriching experience it was to spend time with such a diverse group of experts working on food!#grateful

English
1
0
4
358
Min Hyung Ryu retweetledi
Jia Ng, MD MSCE
Jia Ng, MD MSCE@jiahweing·
Four years of peer reviewing has taught me this: 'flawed study design' = rejection.  Let's conquer this.  Time to craft a strong methods section.
GIF
English
2
10
48
17.5K
Min Hyung Ryu
Min Hyung Ryu@MH_Ryu·
We thank the COPDGene, ECLIPSE, and SPIROMICS participants, physicians, investigators and staff for making this research possible. Information about the studies and how to access COPDGene and SPIROMICS data are available at copdgene.org and spiromics.org.
English
1
0
0
110

Keşfet

@tinaafshar_ @arunijha @PollutionLab @ACYYuen @SikkemaLisa @MDLuecken @fabian_theis @jiahweing