Maholopa Laveil

3K posts

Maholopa Laveil banner
Maholopa Laveil

Maholopa Laveil

@MLaveil

Economics | Tweets are my own

Papua New Guinea Katılım Temmuz 2018
3.5K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Maholopa Laveil
Maholopa Laveil@MLaveil·
"The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see" ~Winston Churchill
English
2
2
22
4.2K
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
devpolicy.org
devpolicy.org@devpolicy·
“The closure of the regional processing centre saw the end of the economic boom in Manus,” says @MLaveil. “While it is unclear how the Manus administration utilised the revenue boost it received, it is unlikely this windfall was saved or invested.” devpolicy.org/the-manus-asyl…
English
0
3
2
205
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
devpolicy.org
devpolicy.org@devpolicy·
"New wards and LLGs have required new rolls, new ballot papers and the coordination of more individual elections, making the job of the PNG Electoral Commission, which is conducting this election, more difficult and creating delays," says @MLaveil. devpolicy.org/shining-a-ligh…
English
0
1
0
175
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
devpolicy.org
devpolicy.org@devpolicy·
"This [research] suggests that the national government responds more adequately to the needs of urban local level governments, which is problematic given 90% of Papua New Guinea’s LLGs are rural," says @MLaveil. #PNG #governance devpolicy.org/shining-a-ligh…
English
0
1
0
186
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
John B. Holbein
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1·
Here's another recent critique of close elections RDDs. It's unclear whether there is actually good evidence against potentially fatal precise manipulation around the cutoff in these designs. The McCrary (2008) DCdensity and Cattaneo, Jansson, & Ma (2018; 2020) rddensity approaches are widely used as tests for precise manipulation. But virtually everyone interprets statistically insignificant results of these as evidence of no manipulation. @FitzgeraldJack_ has a new working paper that argues that we should actually be using equivalence testing on this test, similar to Hartman's (2021) argument about using equivalence testing in tests of covariate balance. Fitzgerald develops a 3-step procedure which tests for evidence that precise manipulation is practically equal to zero. He shows that precise manipulation at the cutoff is potentially a serious problem. In his sample of recent RDD research (which is made up of 75% close election RDDs), he finds that >44% of studies can’t be significantly bounded even beneath a 50% upward jump (or equivalently, a 33.3% downward jump). This is a problem!
John B. Holbein tweet mediaJohn B. Holbein tweet media
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1

Since we're talking about the validity of close elections RDDs today, I thought I'd drop a few recent articles about issues that arise in this space so that folks can have them all in one place. #1. Hartman (2021) shows that most tests of covariate balance around close election cutoffs fail to rule out large imbalances. Remember to equivalence test when testing for covariate balance! #2 Marshall (2022) shows that it is far from clear what effects you are estimating with close election RDD estimates of candidate characteristics. There are compound treatments at these cutoffs! #3 Stommes et al. (2023) shows that RDDs in political science, many of which are close election RDDs, are "underpowered to detect all but large effects." As with all low power tests, we should be wary not only about large standard errors, but also type M/S errors! #4 de la Cuest and Imai (2016) discuss the limited external validity of close election RDDs. Generalize beyond close elections with care!

English
2
26
120
36.5K
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
Ryan
Ryan@ryanbedwards·
New blog, new paper: Australians have much to learn about Pacific migration devpolicy.org/australians-ha…
English
1
3
7
1.3K
Ryan
Ryan@ryanbedwards·
@devpolicy @MasoodA_ And since I did not tag him in the first one, a huge welcome back to @MLaveil to @ANUCrawford , ACDE, and @devpolicy , where he will start his Economics PhD in 2025 following a prolific couple of years at UPNG, Lowy, and more.
English
1
0
4
203
Ryan
Ryan@ryanbedwards·
I've updated my website (a) checking the resources page OK, (b) acknowledging my awesome new and recently graduated students, and (c) rearranging the research and writing under the 3 main themes (migration; trade/enviro; other, by papers, blogs, slides) so easier to find and use
English
1
0
11
944
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
Alyssa Leng
Alyssa Leng@AlyssaLeng·
Really enjoyed briefing some of the PNG media today on PNG's budget documents and fiscal policy, in a session organised by @ABC media development initiative and @MLaveil!
Alyssa Leng tweet media
English
0
1
3
425
Daniel Flitton
Daniel Flitton@danielflitton·
A call to recalibrate Australia’s relations with PNG from former PM Peter O’Neill. “PNG does not need more money from Australia. We are asking for that money to be better targeted, more transparent and better aligned to outcomes that are needed.” lowyinstitute.org/the-interprete…
English
1
0
0
219
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
Blane Lewis
Blane Lewis@BlaneDavidLewis·
Interested in political economy of local elections? We find that Indonesia's local democratic transition had a mostly negative impact on key public spending and service outcomes, especially in districts where clientelistic practices were pronounced. authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S03…
Blane Lewis tweet media
English
7
501
1K
175.4K
BronMuse
BronMuse@BronMuse·
Describe LeBron James in one word
BronMuse tweet media
English
264
44
1.1K
35.7K
Maholopa Laveil retweetledi
Marian Faa
Marian Faa@marianfaa·
Australia spends over $600 mil in aid to PNG annually - but one PNG minister has warned of wastage, duplication and funds being “withheld in Canberra”. tinyurl.com/46wx7u8z
English
2
10
16
1.1K