Roko

El ingeniero que creó claude code acaba de soltar un video de 28 minutos donde te enseña a escribir prompts que realmente funcionan. He visto cursos de 300 dólares que no llegan ni a la mitad de lo que explica en los primeros 10 minutos. Archivos CLAUDE.md, atajos de memoria, sesiones paralelas y patrones de prompting que cambian el juego. Todo en un solo video y completamente gratis. Da igual si eres desarrollador, principiante o ya llevas meses usando Claude. Esto te va a volar la cabeza.

@BitAgere ChainX (@chainx_org) has already rugged — many people lost money. Now we’re seeing a very similar story with this account: loud philosophical threads about Bitcoin + AI, CAS, programmable relations of production, but almost no real product and zero transparency.

Everyone says #Bitcoin is the relations of production, and #AI is the productive forces.But almost no one asks the next question:What are relations of production? How do we design relations of production? How can relations of production become programmable technology?This is precisely what GEB is doing. One thread to make it clear

This is my CIPHER from the #OrdinalsSupercommunity! This new alternate art is generated based on my existing ordinal or my Bitmap using #DMT. Follow @BignoodleBTC for more. reveal.bignoodle.com/share.php?img=…

This is my CIPHER from the #OrdinalsSupercommunity! This new alternate art is generated based on my existing ordinal or my Bitmap using #DMT. Follow @BignoodleBTC for more. reveal.bignoodle.com/share.php?img=…

Bitcoin closed March at $68,215 (RSI 44🔵) As said before, I would not be surprised if BTC dips below 200w moving average ($59k) and realized price ($54k) before next leg up towards S2F $500k levels ($250k-$1m range). Interesting times head.

The ORDINALS SUPERCOMMUNITY is almost there! This is a current screenshot, It's free alternate artwork for a #QUANTUMCATS inscription ID (shown at top of the image). Stay tuned folks, we're doing this to bring some fun to the space & I promise all founders - our intentions are respectful. Some of you, I reached out to, but I don't know every Ordinals founder. Everyone gets alt art made by DMT & soon gets some AI agentic capabilities too. We also have our episodic sci-fi story driven by DMT & Bitcoin. More to come...

bitmap.land v0.5.2 is live! Click for changelog. Today I made the Feedback system slick and bulletproof to reduce any friction going forwards. You can search, tag & follow issues, and there are new project stage pots, & more! @BankofNFTs: "it gets addictive"

Happy holidays to all #Ordinals enjoyers 🧡🎉 Wishing everyone health, peace and time to recharge with the people who matter most. Grateful for this community, the builders and the journey we’re on together. #Bitmap never sleeps 🦒🚁🟧🏗️🌎 2026 and beyond is when the fun begins 🥂✨

We May Be Witnessing Truebit’s Tokenomics Go Live Quietly Check for yourself TruebitStats.io Overview page token Burn and Mints No announcement. No countdown. No marketing campaign. Just on-chain behavior. Over the past ±9 days, something subtle but important appears to have changed in the Truebit ecosystem: the tokenomics look like they’ve moved from theoretical to operational. Not flipped “on” loudly but routed into real usage. The question everyone keeps asking “Why would anyone mint TRU on the bonding curve if it’s cheaper on a DEX at ~$0.16?” That question only makes sense if you assume: minting is optional users are price-optimizing traders the protocol is idle Those assumptions are likely wrong. What the bonding curve is actually for The bonding curve is not a retail convenience feature. It exists to: guarantee protocol access ensure deterministic pricing for compute decouple usage from market liquidity enforce burn mechanics tied to real work If you are: an application an enterprise an AVS a system that must execute a job You don’t speculate. You settle. And you settle through the purchase contract, not Uniswap. What “soft-on” tokenomics looks like Infrastructure protocols don’t announce when economics go live. They: route real jobs first limit initial volume observe system behavior avoid attention Early signs look like: small, consistent mint activity usage-driven timing (not trader timing) no incentive programs no hype To Crypto Twitter, this looks like “nothing happened.” To anyone watching the mechanism, it looks like ignition. Why price hasn’t reacted Because: demand is still low burns are small DEX liquidity is still dominant no narrative has been pushed That’s normal. Token price always lags utility activation, sometimes by months. The important distinction This is not: “full adoption” “price discovery” “speculation season” This is: production economics entering live use the first real test of mint → burn dynamics the protocol moving from promise to plumbing Why this matters long-term Once real workloads scale: minting becomes non-optional burns accelerate non-linearly DEX price becomes irrelevant supply dynamics tighten mechanically At that point, there is no announcement either just confusion about how price moved so fast. Bottom line If tokenomics truly began routing real jobs ~9 days ago, then most of the market is already late just unaware of it. That’s how infrastructure wins: quietly unannounced boring on the surface irreversible underneath Watch the chain, not the noise

One of the core features of Atlas is path locator addresses. The addresses that are compatible are: 🔸 #.bitmap (district) 🔸 #.#.bitmap (parcel) 🔸 #.sat 🔸 #.uncommon 🔸 #.rare 🔸 #.epic atlas.land It defaults to latest on sat (-1), but you can specify with /{index} For example: 🔸 4.epic/0 🔸 692769.bitmap/-1 There are plans to add more rare sats, so long as they rely on a mathematical index. I also plan to add further functions so you can navigate the children and even parents with paths.

Whilst crypto natives panic over prices, tariffs, and macro volatility, the legendary and crypto-foundational @truebitprotocol quietly releases general availability of the Truebit Verify platform, ushering in The Age of Verification and cementing the foundations of a real verification layer for decentralised compute, off-chain workflows, and web3 in general. They have finally moved from beta docs to a productised platform, with RWA, compliance, and AI verticals. This is very exciting, and wonderful to see after 4.5 years of waiting (if you count from the OS deployment), or 8 years of waiting (if you count from the publication of the first paper by @JasonTeutsch and Reitwießner people.cs.uchicago.edu/~teutsch/paper…). Some observations (apologies for the long post). 1. The positioning is clearly enterprise-ready. It appears to be a SaaS-first go-to-market approach, with crypto rails half-implemented (the node side is done, the task side is not). Many of you are upset with the monthly subscription fiat pricing, but this is an absolute necessity on launch because low-friction onboarding is needed, especially given the fact that immediate verification customers are going to be enterprises ("crypto bros" don't need verification right now, they need therapy, a box of tissues, and a 9-5 job), it goes without saying that trying to onboard enterprise customers through crypto rails is counterintuitive. It's akin to asking institutional ETH ETF investors to install Metamask and get their ETH exposure from Uniswap. 2. I'm very happy to see unit definitions, so one certified transcript is one task execution. This makes transcripts a clear and billable metric, a task under the Developer plan costs you approximately $0.026 ($29 divided by 1100). This is dirt cheap if you need audit-grade proofs and even better for accelerating adoption. There's maybe a potential reseller business idea in there (you heard it from TBG first). 3. The lower and middle tiers provide insufficient transcript storage for enterprises that have large audit windows and large data retention policies. I expect proper businesses to opt for a custom plan. Also, the lower and middle tiers only give you five verifiers, you absolutely need more than this for the big stuff. The more verifiers working for you and competing for a slice of the pie the, more robust your results. 4. The verification game, which has inspired so many protocols since its inception, is more explicit now, and is named as being done by the Truebit Control Node. Disputes land here, and are adjudicated here. 5. "Under the hood, Truebit leverages blockchain-based ledgers to secure execution, ensure full transparency, and manage system-level financial mechanics." - This is the phrasing that many were waiting for, this confirms the economic layer we all knew was coming. 6. Regarding transcripts, we can see which nodes participated and which ones got paid, and if applicable, which ones were penalised (after adjudication). Node leader board anyone? Would be fun. @ShaneOnChain something to think about and build. 7. We now have some information, albeit just a little, on the AI audit trail. Given the rise of AI Agents, this will likely be THE major driver for verification, especially if companies in regulated industries deploy agents. 8. We now have clear definitions of the major stakeholders. You've got the task developers (currently guys at Forte, see here - x.com/TrueCryptoPowe…), the task requesters (the enterprise customers seeking certified transcripts), and the node operators (who put up collateral to win the jobs that verify the work). 9. The node payout rail is in USD stables, a clean path to revenue for node operators. Paying nodes in USD stables is a sober design choice because infra providers pay bills in fiat, not tokens (not to mention the sell pressure from them having to repeatedly sell their TRU). Increasing demands for verification means more parallel nodes competing for work as dispatched by the Verify Hub. The way the network adds capacity is for more TRU to be acquired and locked. Price pressure therefore has to migrate to TRU as verification work increases with demand. There's also the institutional fit, naturally some enterprises may want to dabble in the node operators lane, and payment in stables (post GENUIS Act) is a genuine and legit revenue pathway. 10. Running a node now has a cash incentive. USD is easier to forecast and easier to fund your current and future infra with. Professional infra providers want this. Also, at $0.14 per TRU, the cost to run a node is approximately $280, a small price to pay for an early slice of the verification pie. This invites competition, fast capacity growth, and network effect. 11. Cheaters are slashed, good participants are rewarded. Classic incentive for good behaviour and honest work. A predicted flywheel 1. Demand shock as verification needs grow. Watch Larry Fink predict the tokenisation of all assets here - x.com/ShadowofEzra/s… 2. More nodes needed, thus more TRU needed for security and staking. 3. Nodes earn stables, the operators pay their OpEx, withdraw some profits, and then recycle the rest into more TRU for node expansion (after all, once you get a taste of the rewards, you'll want more and more). Node operators begin to seek OTC and secondary market deals, their last resort is calling the buyTRU(uint256 X) function. We all know what that does. 4. At some point (as per the official FAQ), they begin allowing the lower and middle tier plans to use TRU for payment, meaning transcripts/tasks are crypto railed and denominated in TRU, augmenting the game theory and driving the utility of TRU: A] Task requesters mint TRU from the OS, or acquire through secondary markets if price < mint price (dependent on liquidity and availability). B] Their tasks receive some kind of priority QoS or faster orchestration from the Verify Hub or perhaps discount on tasks, I'd love to see a 'TRU-pay' toggle. This fires up the game theory dynamics, and will indirectly impact the staking price collateral for nodes. It also means professional enterprises who only deal with fiat can continue to subscribe in the conventional USD way as per the pricing page. C] Leftover minted TRU can be used for more tasks down the line, can be retired to the OS (at a loss as per the spread between the retire and mint price), or they can be sold on the secondary markets if the price is higher than retire. D] Possibility of OTC acquisition, given that there is still a lot of free-floating TRU circulating as a result of the May 2021 events. OTC can be directly with Truebit (I imagine they minted and/or acquired their fair share), or with other holders. There's a potential OTC/P2P marketplace idea in it for you TRU-holding entrepreneurs out there in the ether (think TAO early days, before exchanges, ping me if you want to explore this further). 5. Suddenly, an entire verification marketplace is teeming with buy, sell, retire, mint, and stake. 6. Bots wait in the shadows, arbitraging price gaps, policing the curve and helping the fair value discover itself. Those of you who are here for speculative purposes only will have to deal with the fact that for now, near-term "price action" is the result of node demand, which will be the result of increased verification needs, and this will not be an overnight event. Sorry if this disappoints you. CT doesn’t need a new 'casino' right now, what's needed is a 'factory' for verifiable workflows. A few outstanding questions from my list to @Truebitprotocol 1. Is there any kind of legal exposure for node operators? If my node verifies compliance steps for tokenised securities, do I carry any obligations related to data handling and/or audit trails? 2. Slashing slashing slashing, this is a big one! Clarity on the slash amount, clarity on where the slashed TRU goes, does it get retired/burned? Does it go to the treasury, is it distributed to other nodes, or is there a split between all three? 3. Is there scope for the staking amount to grow with network usage and scale? If so, will the early nodes at 2000 collateral get to keep their early bird/early adopter low collateral option? #AI #VerifiableComputation #Truebit #ProgrammableTrust #OnChainTrust #TrustlessProofs #Web3Infra #ERC3643 #RWAs #JustVerifyIt #TruebitVerify #TRU #AgeOfVerification #VerificationLayer

So @Truebitprotocol announced the launch of 'Truebit Verified Compliance' on Monday, and for the last few days I've been reading and re-reading the literature, and synthesising it where I can with what I know and what I am currently learning on the side regarding many of these verticals (RWAs, ERC-3643, tokenised assets, securities stable coins, etc.). I have to say, I am relishing this new 'branch' of the Truebit Verify platform. I think a New Age just clicked into place.... If we are truly opening the door into the RWA decade, then we need to realise that the blocker hasn’t been blockchains, it’s been compliance that others can trust. I imagine that most people looking into this haven't yet realised that compliance IS NOT a document problem (crossed t's and dotted i's), it's a VERIFICATION problem. eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3643 Monday's initial bulletin said this: "Built natively on the ERC-3643 standard, the platform enables..." ERC-3643 is a turning point, not just for Ethereum and RWAs, but also for Truebit, as it helps smoothen the road that Truebit has been laying. It’s an identity-aware token standard where 'who can hold/transfer this?' is enforced by the token itself via registries and policy checks. If you’re not eligible, the transfer simply doesn’t clear. This is important for RWAs because different deployers won't be issuing their own mini-stacks with their own KYC processes. There's a standard, composable rail for KYC/AML and jurisdictions etc. However, enforcement alone isn’t enough. Regulators, auditors, and counterparties won't just be asking “were rules configured?”, they'll be saying “Prove the rules actually ran correctly every time.” Enter Truebit Verified Compliance. Truebit will likely turn policy into code and attach cryptographic proofs for every step and/or decision (think back to the transcript component in the Verify docs). Not much has been said on the 'how', but I can certainly see the 'why', and I've done my fair share of 3643 reading to envision how this could work. The TruebitGod envisioned simple flow : 1. A 3643 RWA token receives a transfer request. 2. It calls its compliance module (these are defined in the 3643 tech docs and can govern things like allowed amounts and geographic location). 3. Truebit executes the checks in steps such as KYC, sanctions, location, limits, off-chain API needs, and then returns its decision with a proof of execution. 4. The token then does its decision and enforces what needs to be enforced. All this is backed by a solid Truebit-delivered audit trail. I cannot overstate the importance of Truebit here, because it's turning the whole "please trust the system" into a proof-carrying compliance pipeline. Everything is verified: inputs, code, and outputs. As Jason always said, black boxes are a problem. If ERC-3643 if going to set the rules, Truebit Verify Compliance will prove that those rules are followed, and will help RWAs go from pilots to markets. #ERC3643 #RWAs #JustVerifyIt #AI #VerifiableComputation #Truebit #ProgrammableTrust #OnChainTrust #TrustlessProofs #Web3Infra

Can’t wait to disclose our 2026 projects especially about the US for @Chiliz #SportFi

The Bitcoin economy starts today. Mainnet is live: decentralized, EVM-equivalent, built on Bitcoin.

Emiliyan Enev from @DataPondAI explains how AI data usage is a black box—content creators have no idea if, when, or how their work gets scraped by AI agents. Website owners watch their information get used and abused with zero control or compensation. "You can set the terms and control your information—share with AI, but on your terms." For more, watch this pitch 'Datapond AI: Market for AI Data' from WCS25 youtu.be/o7-inKQT4CM cc @DFINITYDev

Gold market cap is ~$20T Bitcoin market cap is ~$2T So, gold is worth 10x bitcoin Gold scarcity (stock-to-flow ratio) is ~60 Bitcoin scarcity is ~120 So, bitcoin is 2x scarcer than gold IMO bitcoin is at least 10x undervalued

Top 10 No KYC crypto cards... No passport. No selfies. No BS. Just anonymous spending power — backed by crypto. Most people have no clue these cards exist.🧵👇

𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐍𝐞𝐰 Governance Votes Live! 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭: Decide on the introduction of a $DOG/NUSD trading pair on HyperMall (@bamkfi). 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝: Decide on the integration of @mezcalbtc protocol with HyperMall, starting with TACO/USDT. Vote with $TRAC at Tracvalidator.com

Coming June 18: Fortnite Blitz Royale 📲⚡ Battle Royale, faster. Made for mobile.

Representing Bitmap @OrdinalsLisbon talking shop. Dropped some alpha regarding Termina and the future of Bitmap. Met some really cool Bitcoiners along the way, and briefly caught up with @uniqueNFT finally. Shout-out to @Mighty_33 for being a great partner in crime. 🫡