robert 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇺🇦

@daniellismore No the only rollback of women's rights are the rights of those men dressed as women. Real women get THEIR rights BACK

I wrote a statement this week about how voting for Reform UK would represent the biggest rollback of women’s rights in the UK since before the Abortion Act 1967. I provided evidence. I listed sources. I explained the pattern of how abortion rights are removed gradually through strategic silence and institutional positioning. The responses I received were disturbing. Not because people disagreed with my analysis. Because they agreed with it and celebrated it. Dozens of people commented on my Facebook post saying this was exactly why they were voting Reform. Men and women from all over the country openly stated that women losing reproductive rights was a good thing. They praised the idea of abortion access being restricted. They said this was precisely what they wanted. “Roll on May 7,” they wrote. “Good,” they said. Some said women had too many rights. Some said abortion was murder and should be banned. Some said women needed to face consequences for their choices. Some said the 1967 Abortion Act was a mistake that needed correcting. Misogynistic men and women who vote Reform thought this was worth celebrating. They were gleeful about it. They couldn’t wait for it to happen. These were not fringe voices. These were ordinary people from across the United Kingdom saying openly that they support removing women’s bodily autonomy. They were proud of it. They were voting for it deliberately. And they wanted everyone to know. This is what you are dealing with, United Kingdom. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is not speculation about what might happen. This is people telling you directly what they want to happen and why they are voting to make it happen. But abortion rights are just the beginning. Reform UK has stated they want to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. They want to remove the protections embedded in European law that currently safeguard women’s rights in the workplace, in healthcare, in public life, and in private life. These are not abstract legal frameworks. These are concrete protections that affect women’s lives every single day. The European Convention on Human Rights protects women from discrimination. It protects women from violence. It protects women’s right to privacy, to family life, to fair treatment under the law. Leaving the ECHR removes those protections. It removes the legal framework that allows women to challenge discrimination when it happens. It removes the international accountability that forces the UK government to uphold women’s rights even when domestic political pressure pushes against them. European employment law guarantees equal pay for equal work. It protects women from being paid less than men for doing the same job. It protects pregnant women from being fired. It guarantees maternity leave and maternity pay. It prevents employers from discriminating against women who have children or who might have children. It protects part-time workers, who are disproportionately women, from being treated as second-class employees. It guarantees rights to parental leave, to flexible working, to protection from harassment in the workplace. Reform UK wants to remove these protections. They call it cutting red tape. They call it reducing burdens on business. They call it sovereignty. What it actually means is removing legal protections that prevent women from being exploited, discriminated against, underpaid, and dismissed without recourse. The Working Time Directive limits working hours and guarantees rest breaks. Women, especially women in low-paid work, rely on these protections. Without them, employers can demand unlimited hours with no guaranteed breaks and no overtime protections. The Agency Workers Directive protects temporary workers, again disproportionately women, from being paid less than permanent staff doing the same work. The Pregnant Workers Directive protects women from being dismissed or discriminated against because they are pregnant or on maternity leave. All of these

@Martin_Abrams Not a chance I am viting @reformparty_uk

The Labour Party establishment is rattled. Join the Green party 💚 join.greenparty.org.uk

@UKLabour @reformparty_uk The cobra room in number 10 is named after a vicious snake for this government they should be renamed the pussy room

@daniellismore Nude bike ride in London is trying to be banned yet every year a pride event is allowed so show off weirdos and fetishist merchants and trans child groomers to walk around as if that's normal

Homophobia and transphobia are so dumb. Only uneducated idiots practice that kind of hate. We know your see you say you are not scared of us, but you are. We also know if it’s not fear it’s stupidity. We’re amazing human beings. We create so much of the art and culture you love. Leave us alone. You don’t deserve us. 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈✨

@UKLabour Voters for #Labour NEVER learn

@Heccles94 So OUR country's flag is EVIL but Palestinian, Pakistan, India, Hamas etc are all OK

Hannah is spot on 🎯

@sebastiansalek After the way you have spoken especially on young girls getting raped by immigrants AND calling me Far right cos I will be voting @reformparty_uk I hope you don't think you will keep your councillor job cos you will be OUT

@UKLabour @AngelaRayner So right

@UKLabour @TheGreenParty

@DavidPacefico @daniellismore So affirming care you now agree is wrong if it's not right for someone that WANTS to be blind therefore it's wrong to affirm anyone and treat them for the problem and not cover it up by surgery just because they WANT it

@MajorNormal @daniellismore It isn’t. Blinding people doesn’t help them. Gender affirming care does. That’s the difference.

A reminder 💜🤍💚

@DavidPacefico @daniellismore Oh is that the help where bits are cut off or added ? I refer you to the last point if someone is mentally ill and they want to become blind would you poke their eyes out. by your logic blinding someone is affirming their belief and is caring for them

@MajorNormal @daniellismore Cis women can also suffer from mental illnesses. Your point? Also how the fuck does blinding someone help them? Meanwhile, gender affront care is known to help people. It’s like comparing stabbing someone to injecting them with a vaccine. Like no shit it‘s different.

@Heccles94 You have been taking those drugs that your drug addict patients have been on

Meet Zack Polanski. The next Prime Minister of the UK.

@DavidPacefico @daniellismore trans women suffer from gender dysphoria which again by any metric is a mental illness. You would not poke somebodies eyes out JUST because they feel they should be blind

@MajorNormal @daniellismore Trans women are women. And they do not always wear dresses.

@DavidPacefico @daniellismore How many women have prostates ?

Just been blocked by @PITTpersons afyter asking this question. I wonder why ???

@PITTpersons Tell me the rights that normal people have that trans people don't I bet you can't