John Mandlbaur

85K posts

John Mandlbaur

John Mandlbaur

@Mandlbaur

Inventor & Founder, Baur Research.

Randburg, South Africa Katılım Ocak 2011
2.9K Takip Edilen403 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@NASA @NASAArtemis @JimFree @SciGuySpace Artemis II has a math problem. On Feb 10, watch for a 145–180 kg propellant surplus that NASA's models can't explain. I am timestamping this prediction 17 days before launch. Telemetry will confirm. (1/2)
English
2
0
2
3.5K
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
These two geniuses think I’m a flat earther and moon landing denier. On my post mocking moon landing deniers... 🙄😂
Alex Boge tweet media
English
12
2
71
1.8K
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@DeeWaynee94 Scientists refuse to question conservation of angular momentum which is why it remains completely weak and useless.
English
0
0
0
0
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Scientists question evolution all the time. That’s why the theory got stronger, not weaker. “Darwinism” is just the creationist pet name for a field they can’t beat on the evidence. If modern biology rested on pride, new evidence would kill it. That’s literally how science works.
Wendell@wendelltalks

Scientists cannot question Darwinism. Challenge it publicly and you’ll be chastised and ostracized by your peers. Why the fierce protection? It’s baked into biology, psychology, anthropology, medicine, and countless other fields. Overturn it and large swaths of modern science gets discarded overnight, devastating to the community and collapsing public trust in institutions. In fact, I suspect if there was smoking gun evidence that Darwinism is false, many would still cling to it as a matter of pride. This isn’t science. It’s dogma.

English
8
3
27
623
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@DrNeilStone Conservation of angular momentum is pseudoscience. It is supported by things that “spin faster” for a different reason.
English
0
0
0
0
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
Science is sometimes wrong Pseudoscience is always wrong I'll take my chances with science
English
56
88
591
6.8K
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@Askwhyisit Yup. That’s why people fight to the death to defend conservation of angular momentum even though it is trivially falsified.
English
0
0
0
0
Harry Margulies
Harry Margulies@Askwhyisit·
People don’t believe what’s true. They believe what they were taught early, and defend it as if they chose it.
English
10
2
11
202
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@biblemythology Science cannot be updated because scientists personally attack anyone who points out a flaw in it, so the errors it contains will always be there. Physics is unreliable.
English
0
0
0
5
Archaeologian
Archaeologian@biblemythology·
The Bible cannot be updated, so the errors it contains will always be there. Meanwhile, science, archaeology, and history have made huge advances, which has widened the gap between the Bible and reality. The Bible will not change, it will always be unreliable.
English
29
6
55
1.3K
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@haprho Poor scientific community thinks that conservation of angular momentum is caused by things spinning faster.
English
0
0
0
7
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
Aww, poor flerfs — they think sunsets are caused by ... perspective
Hap Rho tweet media
English
3
0
7
108
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@usablejam @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge Nope. You made a delusional claim which contradicts the scientific method. If a theory makes predictions that are wrong then the theory is wrong, no matter who you imagine is responsible for it.
English
1
0
0
10
Severn Dweller
Severn Dweller@SevernDweller·
@Mandlbaur @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge Ah, evidence. The thing is, I don't need any. You can only provide evidence that an experiment has no torque by showing that it conserves angular momentum. Which you obviously can't do, as you've shown it doesn't. Your argument is self-defeating.
English
2
0
1
15
Severn Dweller
Severn Dweller@SevernDweller·
@Mandlbaur @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge Your claims are not backed up, and will never be. The paper ball example is a commonly used demo of acceleration due to gravity. It has a constant linear force acting on it, yet has constant kinetic energy. What does that prove? Which laws does it dispute?
English
2
0
1
14
Severn Dweller
Severn Dweller@SevernDweller·
@Mandlbaur @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge You can't use an experiment with significant torque to disprove the law, any more than you can use an experiment with significant drag to disprove acceleration due to gravity. If it doesn't conserve angular momentum, it doesn't comply with the law.
English
1
0
1
10
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@usablejam @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge No, the laws of physics are the same and universal and work the same in all directions. They just work differently to how we have been deluding ourselves. It is angular energy that is conserved and not angular momentum.
English
2
0
0
15
John Mandlbaur
John Mandlbaur@Mandlbaur·
@SevernDweller @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge I’m not asking you to follow what I say. I’m asking you to follow the scientific method and reject the theory which makes predictions that are wrong. If you can see the experiment does not conserve angular momentum then by the scientific method you have seen the theory is wrong.
English
1
0
0
14
Severn Dweller
Severn Dweller@SevernDweller·
@Mandlbaur @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge I don't learn anything if I blindly follow something you say, any more than the other way round. You can easily see that the experiment does not conserve angular momentum, just by extending the falling paper ball example to a force/energy system with losses.
English
1
0
1
14

Keşfet

@SevernDweller @DavidRu31988626 @packers_owner_j @Chucktown_Tiger @alexboge @DeeWaynee94 @DrNeilStone @Askwhyisit