Stephen Mannello

UK general tells Britain’s ‘SONS and DAUGHTERS’ to prepare for war with Russia “More families will know what SACRIFICE for our nation means,” Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton warned in a scaremongering address

Round 2 all your comments are Bullshit 1. “Ukraine is run by Nazis” If Ukraine were “run by Nazis,” you would expect far right parties to dominate elections. They do not. In the 2019 parliamentary elections, the combined bloc of Svoboda, National Corps and other far right parties won about 2.15 percent of the vote, failed to cross the 5 percent threshold, and got one single seat in parliament. The party that actually governs Ukraine, Servant of the People, is a centrist, anti-corruption party that won 43 percent of the vote and an outright majority. You can criticise individual Ukrainian figures or units. You cannot honestly claim the Ukrainian state is “run by Nazis” when the far right cannot even crack five percent in free elections. Meanwhile, international courts and observers have repeatedly found Russia responsible for war crimes, MH17, abductions, torture and illegal aggression in Ukraine. So if we are going to talk about who behaves like the 1940s, the record is clear. 2. “Russia is just reacting, not imperialist” This is flatly contradicted by the last fifteen years. Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 and occupies about 20 percent of its territory. Russia seized and illegally annexed Crimea in 2014 and created puppet entities in Donetsk and Luhansk. In 2022 it launched a full-scale invasion of a UN member state that had not attacked Russia. The United Nations General Assembly, in an emergency session, adopted Resolution ES-11/1 condemning Russia’s actions as aggression and demanding full withdrawal. 141 states voted in favour, only 5 against. Later, Resolution ES-11/4 declared Russia’s annexation “referendums” in occupied regions invalid and illegal under international law. That is not “reactive self-defence.” That is recognised internationally as a war of conquest. 3. “Russia had legal justification: self-defence and Responsibility to Protect” Every serious international law body and most scholars reject that. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of another state, except in self-defence against an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorisation. Legal analyses find: Ukraine had not attacked Russia. Donetsk and Luhansk are not recognised as independent states, so Russia cannot claim “collective self-defence” of them. Claims of “genocide” in Donbas were examined by the International Court of Justice, which saw no evidence and ordered Russia to suspend military operations. Leading international law experts, and detailed academic reviews, conclude Russia’s invasion is an illegal act of aggression, with no lawful self-defence or R2P justification. So when he says Russia had “perfectly fine legal justifications,” he is simply asserting the opposite of what the UN, the ICJ and the majority of legal scholarship say. 4. “Ukraine fired first, OSCE proves it” The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission recorded a spike in ceasefire violations in Donbas in February 2022, on both sides of the line of contact. On 18–20 February it recorded about 2,158 violations in Donetsk and 1,073 in Luhansk, up from earlier periods. What the reports do not say: They do not say “Ukraine started the war.” They do not say there was a Ukrainian offensive to invade the “republics.” They do not endorse the Russian narrative of “preparatory fires.” What actually happened is simple: Russia had already massed more than 100,000 troops around Ukraine, then recognised its own proxies as “independent” and launched a multi-axis invasion across Ukraine’s borders on 24 February. That is not “reacting to shelling.” It is a pre-planned invasion. Using OSCE numbers, which show mutual shelling along a frozen front, as proof that Ukraine “fired the first shots of the war” is dishonest. 5. “UN Charter is a dead letter, Budapest means nothing” The UN Charter is not dead. It has been actively used against Russia in this war. The UN General Assembly has repeatedly condemned Russia’s invasion, called it aggression and demanded withdrawal. States are now creating a special tribunal with the Council of Europe to prosecute the crime of aggression by Russian leaders precisely because the law still matters and states want accountability. Budapest is not a defence treaty like NATO, but it is still a political and legal commitment in which Russia pledged to respect Ukraine’s borders in return for nuclear disarmament. Violating that promise does not suddenly become acceptable because someone calls it “nonbinding.” It just shows Russia gave its word and then broke it. Saying “the law does not matter because it was violated elsewhere” is not a legal argument. It is an excuse. 6. “Russia is booming, Europe is impoverished” The reality is more mixed than the propaganda. Yes, Russia’s GDP figures in 2023 and 2024 show headline growth driven by a massive war economy and heavy state spending. But the same analyses warn that this growth is based on unsustainable military and state demand, with: high inflation and interest rates labour shortages heavy dependence on sanctioned commodity exports structural problems that will hit when war spending slows Europe has taken an economic hit, especially on energy and inflation. That is true. But to claim that Russia is in an “era of unprecedented prosperity” while its budget, industry and infrastructure are bent around a long war and sanctions is sales talk, not sober economics. War can pump GDP for a while. It does not equal healthy prosperity. 7. “No moral or ethical case for Ukraine” There is a very simple moral case. A recognised sovereign state was invaded by a neighbour that had already seized part of its territory in 2014. That neighbour now occupies more land, has carried out mass killings, deportations and systematic attacks on civilian infrastructure, and is under multiple international investigations and court cases for exactly those acts. The UN General Assembly has condemned the invasion as aggression and affirmed Ukraine’s right to self-defence. You can debate strategy, aid levels and risks. What you cannot honestly say is that “there is no moral case” for a country defending itself against a war of conquest. The “Ukraine is Nazi therefore Russia is justified” line falls apart under two basic facts: Far right parties are marginal in Ukraine and have almost no electoral power. It is Russia, not Ukraine, that is on trial or under investigation for aggression and mass atrocities. 8. “Russia will win and prove NATO can be beaten” Predictions are not facts. What we know today is: Russia has taken territory but at enormous cost in men, equipment and long-term economic health. Ukraine is still fighting, still holding major cities, and still has international backing in terms of weapons, training and financial support. NATO as an alliance has not been “beaten” in any military sense; it has not fought Russia directly. It has, however, expanded, with Finland and Sweden joining because of Russian aggression. So when he says “Russia is going to win, full stop” and builds his whole argument on that assumption, he is not presenting evidence. He is telling you what he wants to be true. 9. “The US has no legal obligation to help Ukraine” Here he is partly right but also missing the point. The United States has no treaty like NATO Article 5 with Ukraine. Support is a political choice, not a legal requirement. That is true. The question is not “are we legally forced to help.” The question is “what are the consequences if we decide not to.” If a nuclear-armed aggressor can launch a war of conquest in Europe, commit documented atrocities, destroy the UN Charter’s basic rule against wars of aggression, and still come out ahead, that is a message to every authoritarian watching. That is exactly why many states see supporting Ukraine as self-interest, not charity. 10. The bottom line He accuses you of “ignoring the zoo animals in the room.” In reality: He ignores Ukrainian elections and reduces 40 million people to “Nazis.” He ignores UN votes, ICJ proceedings and almost the entire international legal community on the illegality of Russia’s invasion. He misuses OSCE data to pretend Ukraine started a war that Russia had been preparing for months. He cherry picks Russian economic numbers and ignores the cost and fragility of a war economy. He frames “no legal obligation” as “no reason at all” to help. You do not have to write an essay in reply. If you want a short punch back, you could post something like: You wrapped a lot of words around a few simple points that do not survive contact with facts. Ukraine is not “run by Nazis.” Far right parties got 2 percent of the vote. The UN calls Russia’s invasion aggression and demands withdrawal. International courts and scholars reject Russia’s self-defence excuse. OSCE reports do not say Ukraine started the war. You are free to cheer for Moscow. Just do not pretend international law, elections and basic reality are on your side. Final words you are full of shit...

BREAKING: Gilead Sciences has announced a recall of its antiviral drug remdesivir. Remdesivir had a 53% mortality rate in clinical trials done in Africa. This is the same medication they forced on us while preventing us from using hydroxychloroquine & ivermectin!

RFK Jr. on the COVID protocol that shocked the world: “Never before in history were patients with a respiratory illness sent home with ZERO treatment — told to wait until lips turned blue, then given remdesivir & ventilators that could themselves kill you.” He called it “a real failure of health agencies & the medical system” and says they’re finally fixing it. This clip still hits like a freight train in 2025. Do YOU think telling millions “there’s no treatment” was the biggest medical mistake in our lifetime?Sound on. Watch to the end.

There is no evidence linking vaccines to autism. Except these 110 studies. 🔬 RECENT STUDIES (2023-2025) McCullough Foundation Report: Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2025) Time Trends in United States Autism Prevalence with Co-occurring Intellectual Disability: Is There a Signature of Thimerosal? (2025) Autism Spectrum Disorders: Is Immunoexcitotoxicity the Link to the Vaccine Adjuvants? The Evidence (2025) Assessing the Health Hazards of Low-dose Ethylmercury: Neurochemical and Behavioral Impacts in Neonatal Mice (2025) Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid (2025) Multi-level Analysis of the Gut-Brain Axis Shows Autism Spectrum Disorder Associated Molecular and Microbial Profiles (2023) The Role of Environmental Trace Element Toxicants on Autism: A Medical Biogeochemistry Perspective (2023) Analysis of Whole Blood and Urine Trace Elements in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (2023) Altered Markers of Mitochondrial Function in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2023) 📊 2024 STUDIES Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats (2024) Does Acute Exposure to Thimerosal Affect the Mitochondrial Function of an Infant Model? (2024) 📈 2022 STUDIES Inflammation and Autophagy: A Convergent Point Between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)-Related Genetic and Environmental Factors - Focus on Aluminum Adjuvants (2022) Examples of Outcome Reporting Bias in Vaccine Studies (2022) Association of Autism with Toxic Metals: A Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies (2022) Oxidative Stress in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Current Progress of Mechanisms and Biomarkers (2022) 📉 2020-2021 STUDIES Methylmercury Interactions with Gut Microbiota and Potential Modulation of Neurogenic Niches in the Brain (2020) Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota and Short Chain Fatty Acids in Encephalitis (2020) Metal and Essential Element Levels in Hair and Association with Autism Severity (2020) Aluminium in Human Brain Tissue from Donors Without Neurodegenerative Disease (2020) JNK Signaling Regulates Cellular Mechanics of Cortical Interneuron Migration (2020) Maternal Gut Bacteria Drive Intestinal Inflammation in Offspring with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2021) Aluminum Environmental Pollution: The Silent Killer (2021) Reviewing the Association Between Aluminum Adjuvants in Vaccines and Autism Spectrum Disorder (2021) 📖 2017-2019 STUDIES Intracellular Aluminium in Inflammatory and Glial Cells in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (2019) Post-vaccination Inflammatory Syndrome: A New Syndrome (2019) The Impact of Neuroimmune Alterations in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2018) IL-4 Mediates Delayed Neurobehavioral Impairments Induced by Neonatal Hepatitis B Vaccination (2018) Another Step Toward Defining an Immune-Mediated Subtype of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2018) Association of Food Allergy and Other Allergic Conditions with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children (2018) Aluminum Adjuvant Containing Vaccines in the Context of the Hygiene Hypothesis (2018) Early Disruption of the Microbiome Leading to Decreased Antioxidant Capacity and Epigenetic Changes (2018) Multivariate Techniques Enable a Biochemical Classification of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2018) Autism is an Acquired Cellular Detoxification Deficiency Syndrome (2018) Pilot Comparative Study on the Health of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated 6- to 12-Year-Old U.S. Children (2017) Clinical Clues for Autoimmunity and Neuroinflammation in Patients with Autistic Regression (2017) The Putative Role of Environmental Aluminium in the Development of Chronic Neuropathology (2017) The Putative Role of Environmental Mercury in Autism Spectrum Disorders and Subtypes (2017) Classification and Adaptive Behavior Prediction of Children with ASD Based Upon Markers of Oxidative Stress (2017) Aluminium in Brain Tissue in Autism (2018) California Autism Prevalence Trends from 1931 to 2014

RFK Jr. gaslights parents about vaccines and autism. (6 minute CNN clip)

Do you believe that this should be legal?

Do you believe that this should be legal?

Do you believe that this should be legal?

Vaccines & autism 🧵

It's impossible to say vaccines don't cause autism when many of the vaccines haven't been tested for the association. And even if you do find no association, it doesn't mean there is no association. It just means that your study was unable to find an association. Which could be caused by the study design.