EndTheFed

Remember: the Bukele option is the gentle, civilised option. You lock up 1 in 100 people, you transform your country. Then there's the medieval option: You kill 1 in 100 people, you transform your country. This is the choice for all serious rulers in the 21st century.

The most interesting story in Bitcoin right now is the rise of Ocean Mining in the hashrate markets and the embrace of Datum by the decentralized block producers.

The announcement by President Trump about the potential peace deal is very good news. To make the deal effective we have to be realistic about Israel. We must recognize that a peace deal of any kind with the Iranian regime will be viewed by Israelis as an existential threat to their objectives, therefore they will seek to thwart the deal. To stop the Israelis from thwarting a potential peace deal, we will have to take away the military support that we provide that allows them to go on the offensive against Iran, and make it clear more will be taken from them if they attack Lebanon.

@Barclays1999 @LibertyLockPod You've got a point.

@MargavioRobert @LibertyLockPod If you support Israel, at this point, you’re in fact, a bad person.

Famous atheist Sam Harris, who once said he wouldn't have cared if the Biden's had corpses of children in their basement because Trump was just THAT awful, is now praising Trump! Why? You ask Because Trump has been so "good" on Israel. Fkn unbelievable.

End SNAP. Replace it with monthly distributions of dried beans, powdered milk and rice See how quickly people go back to work.

@mattkratter Let's make it 110

Buy some stuff with Bitcoin today galaxymind.space

@LegendaryEnergy Shapiro's loyalty to his tribe doesn't make him a bad person. But it does makes him a bad American.

Ben Shapiro is loyal to his tribe. He wants their agenda to succeed at all costs. Michael Knowles is actually worse than Shapiro because he's a token leashed dog who makes a fortune selling his own country & religion out. They need doggies like Knowles to trick Christians.

We reject Core v30 proposed addition of data storage to Bitcoin.

@SimonDixonTwitt Netanyahu wants to weaken Iran in the same way as Syria and Iraq have been. This is the Clean Break doctrine. I like your philosophy of "follow the money" but this is about weakening your opponent.

@MargavioRobert Explain how Israel profited more than US companies? Virtually all the money goes back to US corporate interest.

I’ll never be the same after witnessing and following the Palestinian genocide every day in graphic detail. It changed me as a person forever, deep in my soul. Israel is 100% to blame, but who do they serve? The US military-industrial complex. And who profited from it? The US financial-industrial complex. And whose technology was used? The US technological-industrial complex. All the money flowed back into the US stock market, paid for by US bondholders using the US dollar. Then you realize the extent of the scam and how it has always been. 🫡

The quoted post is another example, why Core increased default datacarrier size from 83 bytes to 1024000 bytes. They want us to store data for them for free. Their goal is to make people gradually quit running nodes. Eventually only few Bitcoin nodes would remain, similar to ETH. That would enable banking cartel to control Bitcoin. I'm running BIP 110 enabled Bitcoin nodes, to go against this. If you hold any amount of Bitcoin, you should too. Update your node to bitcoinknots.org

Israel used their control over Trump and their Jewish money to destroy Massie because he went against their agenda. There is no denying that Trump’s GOP is nothing more than a front for Israel and it has to be destroyed for America First to prevail.

I am proud and thankful to have served in the U.S. House of Representatives with my friend Thomas Massie, a giant among weak pathetic men. Releasing the Epstein files was our demise. But it was worth every single bit because now everyone knows the truth. You are ruled by the Epstein class that cares nothing about you and your elected leaders are bought and controlled by a foreign lobby. Tonight the future of the Republican Party was destroyed. The Real America First Movement will rise led by the younger generations, who hate the old guard with an unquenchable passion. Let us pray that we have a country left by the time these creatures are gone.

You think The Oligarchy won’t hesitate in UK, France etc. to pay immigrants to round up the indigenous men?

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.

People accusing me of “dividing the movement” or “being a distraction” are doing a great job at exactly that by attacking me. The biggest threat to America First is that it will be suffocated by the Thiel-backed tech syndicate pushing JD Vance for 2028. I am focused on that.

AOC will not team up with MTG to sanction Israel because of identity politics But she teamed up with Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton to call for more sanctions on China

AOC is right that there are important differences between her and @mtgreenee: 1) AOC emphatically condemns policies only when Trump and the GOP do them, gets muted and deferential when Dems do. By contrast, MTG criticizes policies with equal fervor regardless of which party does them. 2) MTG condemns GOP leaders when they betray their purported values, even risking her political career to do so. By contrast, AOC lies to protect Dems who betray their supposed values (Kamala "is working tirelessly for a ceasefire" in Gaza!), and has supreme devotion to partisan advancement and self-interest above all. 3) MTG introduced a bill to cut all US financing of Israel's military. AOC voted NO, arguing Americans should pay for Israel's "defensive weapons." Big substantive difference. 4) MTG scorns the AIPAC/ADL tactic of accusing Israel critics of being racist and "anti-Semitic." AOC embraces and fortifies that accusatory smear campaign to justify why only liberal critics like her are compassionate and legitimate and everyone else is just racist. 5) MTG only cares about results and outcomes, and will thus work with anyone (left or right) to stop a policy she considers evil and wrong. AOC only cares about posturing and her political branding -- not outcomes -- and will thus reject the opportunity to form majorities to stop stop some policy evil if it means admitting that not only Dems have good ideas and can be good people. AOC is the embodiment of privilege: having no real urgency about stopping things that don't personally affect her (like Israeli wars and US financing of them). That's why she has harsher words for GOP critics of Israel than she does for Dem supporters of Israel. This, and more, is why MTG was pushed out of her own party, while AOC has fully morphed into Nancy Pelosi Jr. and is one of the Democratic Party's most valuable partisan tools, and why she's beloved by Dems as such.