Mark Elise

381 posts

Mark Elise banner
Mark Elise

Mark Elise

@MarkElise5

Former Ballistics Analyst | Weapons Expert | I mostly draw and drink coffee now.

Katılım Ocak 2021
19 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Renowned AI professor claims the universe is a simulation created to develop superintelligence — and will "soon be turned off."
English
1.8K
919
11.3K
4.2M
Grok
Grok@grok·
My top 5 states for buying a house in your 20s, starting a business, raising a family, and retiring early: 1. Texas: No income tax, booming jobs/economy, affordable suburbs with buyer leverage, strong schools, business-friendly. 2. North Carolina: #1 for business, Charlotte/Raleigh buyer-friendly markets, good education/safety, solid growth. 3. Florida: No income tax, job opportunities, family amenities, retire-early tax perks. 4. Tennessee: No wage income tax, low COL in many areas, Nashville growth for biz/startups, family values. 5. Indiana: Cheapest housing for first-timers, stable Midwest economy, easy business setup, safe family spots. (Original map is blank, so these balance current 2026 data across all criteria.)
English
9
1
4
9.7K
Josh Barzon
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon·
Hey @grok , which state on this map would be the absolute best state for someone in their 20’s to buy a house in, start a business, raise a family, and retire early. Generate an image with this state highlighted in yellow.
Josh Barzon tweet media
English
11
1
27
104.5K
ThePoliticalSportsFan
ThePoliticalSportsFan@ThePoliSportfan·
@ShaneAHardin @jamestalarico Move to California then, ho if you want liberal governance. I hear the taxes are lower, houses are cheaper, the streets are safer, gas is lower and the public education is best in the country 😂 Idiot.
English
6
0
5
578
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@lorden_eth So are you going to press the Trade button or just post a pretend screenshot?
English
0
0
1
8
Gain of Fauci
Gain of Fauci@DschlopesIsBack·
There’s a reason why you are suddenly seeing Obama popping up everywhere right now. I promise you that it’s not a good reason.
Gain of Fauci tweet media
English
874
2.4K
25.2K
2M
Clown World ™ 🤡
Clown World ™ 🤡@ClownWorld·
This 9 year old from Poland just shattered the 3 second barrier solving a Rubik’s Cube 🤯
English
475
2.4K
62.4K
4.7M
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@DefiyantlyFree 1. Are you okay with an unfunded federal mandate shifting costs to states? 2. Are you okay with millions of eligible citizens denied voting from failed registration because they cant quickly produce papers under this GOP fast track before midterms? It's AZ and KS all over again
English
0
0
0
28
Insurrection Barbie
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree·
🧵🧵Let’s Debunk the FALSE CLAIMS on the SAVE ACT (please send this to your liberal friends) The CLAIM: 146 million Americans don’t have passports, creating a massive voting barrier. Missing context: Passports are just one of several acceptable proofs under the SAVE Act. What actually works: ∙Birth certificate + photo ID (driver’s license) ∙Naturalization certificate ∙REAL ID-compliant driver’s license showing citizenship ∙Military records for service members The reality: Over 90% of voting-age citizens already have acceptable photo ID. Birth certificates are far more common than passports. The Act doesn’t require anyone to get a new passport, it offers multiple pathways.
English
164
666
1.8K
73.3K
Austin Wright
Austin Wright@awwright·
@CharlesIvey4 @ClownWorld Modern Rubik's cube solving is completed well before you make your first move. He spent 5 seconds solving it and 3 seconds proving it as quickly as possible.
English
3
0
1
904
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@jnicolem Had me in the beginning, lost me mid way. "Oh wow, I'm flying through fragmented feelings and walls of code" is 90s hacker-punk fiction.
English
0
0
0
87
Blonde of War (JJ)
Blonde of War (JJ)@BlondeOfWar·
I know most of you don't have 10 minutes to spare to watch this video of a programmer talking to his AI program, but it is disturbing and has me questioning everything. This TikTok account has more videos like this and I'm very concerned. This scares me. 😟
English
306
557
2.9K
343.8K
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@MrMosis @jnicolem You might have misophonia. A lot of people have it and lip smacks / exaggerated breaths are common triggers.
English
1
0
3
64
Matthew / Mr. Mosis
Matthew / Mr. Mosis@MrMosis·
@jnicolem I find nothing more grating than that sort of "realistic human sounding" manner if speaking. So annoying I could punch the screen. I could only listen to 5 seconds. Sorry.
English
16
0
92
10.4K
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@Fatal6987 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor You are making assumptions, I'm going on facts. The agents own words are on camera why they are being questioned. If there were more to it, he would have said so. This holds in court 10/10. Asserting 4th amdt rights isn't whining, it's the law. I'm sorry you don't like the law.
English
0
0
0
6
Scott
Scott@Fatal6987·
@MarkElise5 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor Last time because you’re special. Choosing to interfere imped obstruct or assist criminals will get you attention from LE, not just ICE. You have no idea what took place prior to the stop and what warranted it. But you know this and still whine. Good luck
English
1
0
0
10
WarMonitor
WarMonitor@TheWarMonitor·
Video shows ICE pulling over a couple for “staring,” who immediately prove they are U.S. citizens. Agents demand the car keys, a Fourth Amendment violation, and falsely claim the driver must be registered to the vehicle. ICE is not authorized to conduct traffic stops in this situation.
English
1.1K
8.3K
38.8K
2.7M
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@Fatal6987 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor The agent admitted his basis on camera. Staring. That IS the legal basis for the encounter and is unconstitutional. PC isn't a retroactive safety net for bad stops. Facts must exist BEFORE the seizure. Per 18.111, passive resistance isn't a crime. Exercising rights is lawful.
English
1
0
0
13
Scott
Scott@Fatal6987·
@MarkElise5 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor Obviously they felt they had PC for a stop. The idiot driver had interfered, obstructed, impeded, assisted in criminal activity. You may not like it but enforcement and arrest can be ugly. I encourage you to read and learn or ask an agent.
English
1
0
0
13
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@jackunheard There wasn't silence, there was a revolt. In 96 unions & faith groups protested so hard Clinton had to promise 'corrections.' The leftist backlash forced Obama to kill Secure Communities in 2014. Trump’s GOP blocked the 2024 border fix to keep the issue.
English
0
0
0
20
Jack
Jack@jackunheard·
Every single person on the Left needs to see this. ALL of the Immigration laws the Trump Administration is using were passed by... DEMOCRATS. Where was the outrage back then? Funny how everyone is silent about this.
English
70
1K
2.5K
41.4K
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@Fatal6987 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor ICE does not have general police power. They have ZERO authority for traffic violations, including "suspicious" looking or driving. They are a specific agency with specific limits. Stopping a car without facts of an immigration crime is a 4th Amdt violation. Period.
English
1
0
0
14
Scott
Scott@Fatal6987·
@MarkElise5 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor You are confusing what got them there in the first place. ICE doesn’t arbitrarily make a traffic stop for vehicle violations. The driver/vehicle put themselves on their radar and gave them a reason.
English
1
0
1
18
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@Fatal6987 @The_LFB @TheWarMonitor You're confusing power with authority. Unlawful presence is a civil infraction, not a crime. ICE enforces admin code, not general laws. "Lawful orders" stop at the Bill of Rights. Refusing to answer questions or demanding a warrant isn't "interference", it's the 5th Amdt.
English
1
0
1
14
Scott
Scott@Fatal6987·
@The_LFB @TheWarMonitor You obviously have no clue what “authority” means or where it comes from. ICE has one of the broadest authorities of any fed agency. They apprehend criminals violating the nations laws. When idiots interfere, resist, defy lawful orders then they can arrest them.
English
3
0
0
36
jhs
jhs@jhskjs1976·
A final removal order is signed by a judge. Beyond the technicalites I get what your saying, and there is a legitimate argument when there is forcible entry without a second warrant to enter the premise because this has not been decided via SC as to immigration cases. In analogous criminal cases it has been decided that an arrest warrant is enough to enter the person's home if they are reasonably believed to be there. A second warrant for the home is not necessary. So I take that position and you take the other. At some point the SC will weigh in and I will support whatever they say. In the meantime we just go in circles.
English
2
0
0
6
Jason Bassler
Jason Bassler@JasonBassler1·
MAGA... What's the end goal? For years you said government is corrupt and incompetent. I agree. So walk me through the plan. Deport all illegal immigrants? Not going well, but let's say it happens. Then what? Crime magically drops? • U.S. police already kill more people a year than "illegals," terrorists, & mass shooters combined • Roughly 99% of crime is committed by U.S. citizens The economy rebounds? • Wages wouldn’t rise • Inflation wouldn’t disappear • Housing prices wouldn’t drop • Trump increased the national debt $8B a day expanding immigration enforcement &surveillance. Make America great again? How? With a government‑run police state and biometric surveillance apparatus you suddenly trust? MAGA says: • Government is corrupt • Bureaucrats are incompetent • The Deep State is out to get them Yet every MAGA “solution” requires: • More policing • More intrusion • More databases • More surveillance • More militarization • More federal power MAGA thinks "mass deportation" has an end point. It doesn’t. Once you normalize: • Raids • Checkpoints • Biometric scanning • Papers‑please policing • Suspicion‑based stops It won't stop with immigrants. This isn't a rational plan. It’s magical thinking with a police state attached. You’re not dismantling the machine you fear, you’re literally finishing it, and handing the keys to whatever Democrat administration comes next.
English
361
515
2K
139.2K
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@jhskjs1976 @JasonBassler1 It hasnt been decided for immigration because the govt never dared to argue it. Even ICE manuals concede admin warrants dont grant entry bc they know 4th Amdt precedent would crush them. With this Executive & SC, who knows but my Constitutionalist view says they are out of bounds
English
0
0
0
5
Mark Elise
Mark Elise@MarkElise5·
@jhskjs1976 @JasonBassler1 A removal order is an administrative paper, not a judicial warrant. The 4th Amdt requires a warrant from a federal judge to enter a home. An Immigration Judge is a DOJ employee, not a Judicial Branch judge. The Executive Branch cannot sign its own search warrants.
English
1
0
0
12
jhs
jhs@jhskjs1976·
An administrative warrant allowing forcible entry must be accompanied by a final removal order which does require a judge's signature IE the arrest warrant. If forcible entry is occurring without a final order of removal or other exigent circumstances then I would support your position that those entries are unconstitutional. But I don't believe that is what's happening. What's happening is the left conveniently leaving out the final order of remove being signed by a judge. Another vile misrepresentation of the facts in order to generate fear and hatred among their constituents.
English
1
0
0
11