Mark X

TL;DR update on fixing Britain’s immigration + welfare mess (building on my last post + Rupert Lowe’s points): Unchecked immigration and failed integration are breaking us, but mass deportations right now, while welfare traps everyone, is a recipe for chaos. We’ve needed a smarter sequence for years. Despite the brutal crypto winter I’ve been calling for decentralised solutions the whole time. Now is finally the moment. 1. Overhaul the entire system on blockchain first. Transparent, immutable ledger for every tax penny spent. Everyone can audit, vote on allocations, and watch waste/corruption evaporate in real time. Tried, tested, secure tech, no more middlemen skimming billions. 2. Replace broken welfare with UHI (Elon-style Universal High Income). AI abundance makes a high baseline living standard possible for citizens without perverse incentives. Blockchain makes it efficient and fraud-resistant. This alone slashes administrative bloat so UHI costs less than today’s failing system. 3. Transparency bargain. I’m fine with tracking if we overhaul everything at once. Encrypted decentralised digital ID (gov can’t corrupt or weaponise it). Full visibility on spending + data security for all. Financial freedom + privacy preserved. Result? Lower overall tax burden. No tax on UHI itself. Incremental taxes on extra earnings kept well below current punitive levels so people aren’t penalised for working harder. Only after this foundation do we enforce strict merit-based immigration and deport non-contributors/criminals, without the old dependency machine propping up problems. Decentralisation is our best hope. Open, auditable, voter-driven. We fix root causes for natives and migrants alike instead of kicking the can or starting infighting. Who’s ready for real systemic reset that we control? My bias is clearly @MultiversX but DYOR, it has never been easier. #UHI #Blockchain #FixBritain #Decentralise

Like it or not, he’s creating a real market for what traders already scramble to monitor manually. Paid high-speed data feeds have existed in finance forever. Bloomberg terminals, Reuters, etc. This is just Truth Social formalising it instead of legacy incumbents owning the pipe. Better this than the old gatekeepers.

this guy will scam every dollar from the market

I run multiple wallets with Guardians too. Not because I don’t trust the Guardian system. It’s solid, but because any single device is still a point of failure. I know it actually works because even moving my own funds now requires those extra approval steps. Makes it way harder for anything to go wrong.

🚨Top ! 🔏 @MultiversX #Guardians ensures the security of funds by imposing a secondary on-chain signature, nullifying any unauthorized transaction attempt resulting from the compromise of private keys. $EGLD 💎

This deserves far more attention. Security should be this simple. 🔥

$XMN went wild last night, 200% spike and the DTCC quietly tinkering with digital rails. 🙄 MX haters: “This means nothing.” Also MX haters: frantically deleting two years of tweets 🤣🤣🤣 NFA #EGLD #simulation #matrix @MultiversX @xMoney_com 🚀 IYKYK.

State of this wanker.

🫂CEO Diary #1 - Community Focus A slightly different kind of update today. We’ve had Dev Diaries before, but this one is more about the thinking behind some recent decisions. Over the past few weeks, a lot of the focus has been on one thing: alignment with the community. Not in a fancy corporate slogan way. More in a “what is actually fair, sensible, and long-term focused?” kind of way. So here’s where our heads are at: • We committed to burning the original Team allocation • We’ve already started that process • Regular buybacks have begun • Those buybacks are currently coming out of our own pocket • Half of buybacks are burned • Half are locked for the Team for 12 months • We’re actively exploring how to make future buybacks bigger and more sustainable One thing we also listened to was the community feedback around Team alignment. Some people felt the Team should still have a stake in the token’s long-term success, but not in a way that creates concern around the original allocation. That feedback made sense. So instead of keeping the original 120M Team allocation, that is being burned as it vests. And instead, any Team allocation now comes from buybacks, is locked, and is tied to us actively supporting the token over time. That feels like a healthier balance. It reduces supply, keeps things transparent, and still gives the Team a reason to keep pushing hard for long-term $A1X value. We’re not pretending every decision has been perfect. We’re building, adapting, listening, and trying to make the best calls as we go. That’s our ethos. Thank you for the community who stuck by us throughout it all! Powered by $A1X.

🚨 THE US COULD LOSE ITS BIGGEST ADVANTAGE IN CRYPTO. Yesterday was supposed to move the CLARITY Act one step closer to becoming law. President Trump was expected to meet with key senators. Many expected the updated draft of the bill to be released shortly afterward. Neither happened. Then another report made things even worse. Democrats are expected to oppose the bill if the current draft is released without major changes. That completely changed market expectations. Prediction markets have now cut the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 to roughly 36%, down sharply from the 60-70% range seen earlier this year. And here's why. The bill has almost no room for delays anymore. Before lawmakers leave for the August recess, three major things still need to happen. • The final draft of the CLARITY Act has to be released. • Republicans and Democrats must reach an agreement, especially on the ethics provisions that have become the biggest obstacle. • The Senate must then bring the bill to the floor and vote on it. If any one of those steps fails... The chances of passing the bill this year fall dramatically. And if the bill slips beyond this window, many analysts believe it could be pushed into 2027 or even later, especially if the political balance changes after the midterm elections. This is much bigger than one piece of legislation. Without the CLARITY Act, the crypto industry goes back to living under whoever happens to run the SEC. A pro-crypto Chair may encourage innovation. An anti-crypto Chair could once again rely on regulation through enforcement. We've already seen what that looks like. During the last cycle, many projects spent years fighting lawsuits instead of building products. Altcoins were repeatedly accused of being securities. Even stablecoins faced constant regulatory uncertainty. Developers stopped building. Investors stayed on the sidelines. Capital moved elsewhere. That's exactly what this bill was designed to fix. The CLARITY Act would move crypto regulation out of the hands of changing administrations and put clear rules into law. That means the framework would remain in place regardless of who becomes the next SEC Chair. But while Washington is still debating... The rest of the world isn't waiting. Japan is moving ahead with clearer crypto rules. South Korea is accelerating tokenization and stablecoin regulation. Other countries are racing to attract crypto companies before the US finishes debating its own framework. The United States became the home of today's biggest internet companies because it created the right environment during the internet boom. Crypto is entering a similar moment. The CLARITY Act isn't just another crypto bill. It could determine whether the next generation of blockchain companies is built in America... or somewhere else.

@RippleXrpie While the Clarity Act news is exciting, if I had to put money on it I’d expect only minor upside for ripple:native from here. My long-term convictions are $EGLD and $XMN.

💥BOOM! 🇺🇸 U.S. Congressman Bryan Steil says that the Senate will PASS the CLARITY ACT NEXT WEEK. IT'S HAPPENING!🔥

All are manipulated for good or bad. Capitulation creates opportunity where there was none. That’s the feature, not the bug as you say. Markets don’t owe anyone comfort or timelines. They exist to test conviction and separate the ones who actually understand the game from the ones still shouting “certainty” at every extreme. Doomer math says “this time it’s permanent.” Moonboy math says “To the moon tomorrow.” History has already buried both versions multiple times. What survives is execution through suppression. @MultiversX keeps doing exactly that: Supernova shipping sub-second finality by decoupling consensus & execution. Open Rails lives for the agent economy. Thousands of decentralised validators. Real upgrades, real infrastructure, not promises. The ruthlessness clears the weak hands and the over-risked. So the ones still here, still stacking at these levels while the team builds, get a well-deserved position in the next leg.

@MarkX867 Your posts helps my acceptance of financial markets' ruthlessness - it's a core feature not a pesky bug. It must be so, and it should be so. It's good that way.

Calling your delusions math because you hallucinate with digits 🥶. Bottomless stupidity is such a human trait. On a related note, SpaghettiLentilsBrainFry🤡continues to nudge remaining $EGLD hopefuls to bankruptcy with the unabating clowniade. (They do appreciate the support.)

@joeroganhq Paper is just as corruptible.

Elon Musk: "In my opinion, we should have paper ballots only. It should be in-person voting, with ID, end of story."

Quoting my earlier take on fixing Britain’s immigration & welfare crisis the right way, dismantle dependency first via UHI, then strict controls: Even Elon is calling for paper ballots + in-person voting with ID to restore trust. I agree we need ironclad election integrity. But let’s be honest: Paper ballots can ultimately be manipulated too. History shows it. Centralised systems, whether paper or digital, remain vulnerable to insiders. The real long-term solution is a fully decentralised, trusted ID system built on blockchain. - Immutable, transparent, auditable by everyone. - Encrypted digital ID that governments cannot corrupt or weaponise. - Every citizen votes securely from anywhere while the ledger proves eligibility, citizenship, and one-person-one-vote in real time. - No more trust issues, the code and open ledger are the trust. This same decentralised backbone lets us track every tax penny, slash waste/corruption, fund UHI efficiently, and lower the overall tax burden without punishing extra earnings. No tax on UHI, lighter rates on top. We’ve been heading toward this for years. Now, with AI abundance and maturing blockchain, we can finally build the system that secures both our elections and our finances at once. Decentralisation beats centralised bandaids every time. Who else sees the bigger picture? x.com/joeroganhq/sta…

TLDR on market history: Every big downturn has come with loud “certainties” that this time was different. Permanent decline, no recovery, end of the system. 1929 crash: “The stock market and capitalism are finished.” Markets recovered and made new all-time highs. Dot-com bust 2000: Tech was “dead forever.” One of the greatest bull runs in history followed. 2008 financial crisis: “Wall Street is over, systemic collapse.” Markets came back stronger than before. Oil shocks, stagflation in the ’70s, every commodity winter, same story. The doomer certainties almost never held up in the end. Markets are cycles of fear, innovation, and adaptation. The ones who keep delivering real value and building through the suppression are the ones positioned when the cycle turns. Your repeated “certainty that nothing will happen” is just the latest version of an old, tired narrative. History has schooled it repeatedly. Some of us see the pattern and back execution over doom math. Generational dips exist for a reason.

History lesson on market fluctuations, since your “certainty” game is getting repetitive. Crypto doesn’t move in straight lines, it viciously cycles. Every major bear: • 2011: BTC from ~$30 to $2 (93% wipeout). “Bitcoin is dead.” • 2014-15: $1,100 to $200. “Over.” • 2018: $20k to $3k. “Crypto winter forever.” • 2022: $69k to $16k after FTX. “This time it’s actually dead.” The doomer certainty was loud every single time. The “simple math” of permanent decline got posted on repeat. Then builders kept shipping, adoption compounded, and new ATHs followed, often 10-100x+ from those exact generational lows. Meanwhile MultiversX is doing the one thing that actually matters: delivering through the suppression. Supernova (sub-second finality by decoupling consensus & execution), Open Rails live for the agent economy, thousands of decentralized validators. Real upgrades. Not promises. Your version of “delusion” is just the bear-market mirror of moonboy certainty. History has repeatedly humbled both extremes. The only thing that ages well is execution + buying the actual dip instead of doomposting it for the 3rd time. Impaired comprehension? Keep projecting. Some of us are still stacking at these levels while the team builds. Different priorities. $EGLD setup looks familiar. History doesn’t do straight lines… but it loves rewarding the ones still here when the cycle turns.

@MarkX867 3rd time: The delusion is the certainty that something will happen. That is the delusion I pointed out in my OP (again: certainty of future developments; "proven" by simple math, no less). Not "consistent delivery". Impaired Comprehension & Passionate. Perfect EGLD "investor".

The original claim is not accurate for President Trump’s July 16, 2026 primetime address. He did not tell every governor to switch to paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship in that speech. What he actually did: • He announced the release of declassified intelligence on alleged election vulnerabilities and foreign interference claims. • He said his administration was in the process of informing governors (along with senators and members of Congress) about potential issues in their states and directing DHS to notify states about noncitizens on voter rolls so they can be removed. • He urged Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require photo voter ID for all voters and proof of citizenship to register to vote. He also called for strict limits on mail-in ballots (only for illness, disability, military, or travel). Trump has advocated for paper ballots + same-day voting in other speeches, but he did not say that in this specific July 16 address. Sources: CNN live coverage of the speech + transcript excerpts confirm no mention of paper ballots or same-day voting, and no directive to governors to “switch” systems.

$EGLD 👀 $3.64, $4.15, $4.85

This you @Keir_Starmer?