Mark_Streamr

11.3K posts

Mark_Streamr banner
Mark_Streamr

Mark_Streamr

@Mark_Streamr

Building @streamr_app - trustless, secure, scalable video streaming powered by @streamr and @0xPolygon.

Katılım Kasım 2011
3.1K Takip Edilen4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@shotgunner101 Android will patch a pixel glitch in 24 hours, but a de-anonymizing regression gets a shrug. Noted
English
0
0
17
827
Dodge This Security
Dodge This Security@shotgunner101·
Apparently Google claims that VPN apps not being properly functional on Android isn't an issue needing fixed. Weird how methods of de-anonomizing users in ways that benefit governments and companies arnt considered "bugs" and aren't a problem with fixing. Bug door go brrrrttt.
Proton VPN@ProtonVPN

1/4 Google has known about a bug that breaks VPN apps for 7 months, leaving users exposed with no warning or error, just a VPN app that stopped working in the background. If you're using ANY VPN on Android, you can help us by getting Google's attention to fix it. Details 👇 🧵

English
7
320
1.8K
34.5K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@CryptoCyberia Even if it’s “just metadata,” it becomes a reusable cross-app attribute. That’s the privacy risk
English
0
0
0
64
Lain on the Blockchain
Lain on the Blockchain@CryptoCyberia·
wow, systemd is adding an age variable for future digital ID laws. Linux users are not going to like this.
Lain on the Blockchain tweet media
English
326
384
3K
243.5K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@BigBrotherWatch The outcome is a double loss: a permanent identity checkpoint gets built for a temporary moral panic
English
0
0
7
196
Big Brother Watch
Big Brother Watch@BigBrotherWatch·
👎Australia's social media ban has failed 70% of children are still on social media sites and many others are being pushed into less regulated corners of the internet The UK must learn from Australia's failings and drop plans to enforce a social media ban for under-16s It will come at the cost to all of our rights, freedom and internet access.
Senator Sarah Henderson@SenSHenderson

One hundred days on, it’s clear Labor’s under-16s social media ban has not delivered as promised.  Families were assured this would be a practical and enforceable safeguard, yet what we’ve seen is confusion for parents, uncertainty for platforms and real questions about how this works in practice. The Coalition has consistently supported stronger protections for young Australians online. But good policy is not just about announcing a plan, it’s about making sure it can actually be delivered. The government must now be upfront about what’s working and what isn’t.  Parents deserve clarity and transparency, not confusion and obfuscation.  This includes coming clean on how many accounts have been shut down.  In January, the Prime Minister and Communications Minister announced that 4.7 million accounts were deactivated, removed, or restricted within days of the ban coming into force.  This claim, inconsistent with some publicly released data, is now under a cloud after the eSafety Commissioner confirmed an investigation was underway to verify the number of impacted accounts.  ➡️ afr.com/technology/fin…

English
29
283
871
20.2K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@juliecbarrett If this is how they treat AI chatbots today, imagine what happens when they aim the same logic at apps and operating systems tomorrow
English
0
0
2
160
Julie Barrett
Julie Barrett@juliecbarrett·
🚨America's newest Digital ID proposal just dropped in the US Senate. Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn has introduced a new AI bill that bundles 17 different policies into one massive, 291 page bill. This is just like all these other tech bills we've been seeing - a massive Digital ID framework - with universal age verification being the key to access to the tools. The bill includes mandatory age verification for every existing account and freezing accounts until users verify their age.
Julie Barrett tweet media
English
371
1.5K
2.5K
213.2K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@Pirat_Nation This is how OS-level age gates get normalized: one harmless-looking field at a time
English
0
0
7
311
Pirat_Nation 🔴
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation·
The main program that starts and manages almost everything on modern Linux computers, “systemd”, recently added an optional "birthDate" field to its user database records. This stores a user's full birth date so apps can check age, for example, to comply with new age-verification laws in places like California, Colorado, and Brazil. It is not automatic age checking. Systemd only saves the date. Only admins can set or change it, but the user and some sandboxed apps can read it.
Pirat_Nation 🔴 tweet mediaPirat_Nation 🔴 tweet media
English
194
233
2.6K
166.5K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@Polymarket We’re basically speedrunning “papers please” but with better memes and worse privacy
English
0
0
1
257
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: UK demands 4chan pay fine for not complying with age verification laws, lawyer responds with revolutionary war rant & image of giant hamster dressed as Godzilla.
English
242
648
10.2K
492.4K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@LundukeJournal When you censor the debate, you don’t reduce conflict. You export it, and you lose trust on the way out
English
0
0
2
195
The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal·
Moderators of the r/Linux subreddit are now censoring posts which talk about Age Verification. Not only are posts being removed, but I’ve heard from multiple Reddit users who have been banned from r/Linux for expressing opposition to Age Verification.
The Lunduke Journal tweet media
English
354
1.3K
8.3K
233.3K
Mark_Streamr retweetledi
Streamr Network
Streamr Network@Streamr·
A smoother on-ramp matters. In this demo, the team shows how @openfort_hq powers biometric login in @Streamr_App, making it easier to onboard both Web2 and Web3 users without the usual friction. Big shoutout to Openfort for the tech here. Very clean integration.
English
2
6
23
886
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@ProtonPrivacy We were all born private. Then someone clicked “Accept all” on our behalf before we could read lol
English
0
0
1
224
Proton
Proton@ProtonPrivacy·
We were all born private. Then our parents signed us up for Gmail, and Big Tech spent the next decade building a profile on us before we were old enough to understand what that meant. It doesn't have to start that way for the next generation. #BornPrivate
English
20
97
494
17.7K
alan ⚡💵
alan ⚡💵@0xalank·
hey Paolo! testing out all of these bitnet models locally and trying to pull them into my hermes agent to test around with fabric-llm seems like BitNet is fine-tuned on biomedical data? could you explain the reasoning there on that? will poke around and take some benchmarks for BitNet and other qvac interfaces if all looks good for local, we can pull it in to @Entropic_AI (a 1-click agent harness) encourage you to check it out!
English
4
0
5
282
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@em_Lazzy Ownership used to mean offline works. Now everything wants a login
English
0
1
143
5K
Lazzyyyyyy
Lazzyyyyyy@em_Lazzy·
You know what really bugs me these days? We can't own anything. Everything is a subscription service, like literally everything. You can't buy Microsoft Office, you have to purchase a subscription for a year. You literally have to pay for everything FOREVER. Isn't anyone else bothered by this?
English
725
2.6K
16.4K
575.3K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@EliBenSasson So yeah, the real question is “what do you want to shield,” and right behind it is “what are you willing to trade to shield it”
English
0
0
2
36
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io
Privacy isn't a 'yes/no' feature, it's a 'how much' feature. Even more precisely: it's a 'what kind' feature. Not all privacy is the same. Not all implementations are equal. Some approaches work better than others. The important question: what do you want to shield?
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io tweet media
English
14
3
36
1.8K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@mert And it’s why chains without it trend toward centralization. People flee to custodians and wrappers to get basic discretion
English
0
0
1
21
mert
mert@mert·
any chain that doesn't treat privacy as a first class citizen will eventually go to zero
English
105
23
430
23.6K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@CyberRacheal If users have to suffer to be “secure,” they will route around you. Every time
English
0
0
0
23
Cyber_Racheal
Cyber_Racheal@CyberRacheal·
Password rotation or Forced changes lead to "password hedging," where users just add a number or change one letter (e.g., Summer1! becomes Summer2!). It is biologically impossible for most people to memorize a high volume of complex, random strings every few months, leading to "sticky note" security risks. When security is a hassle, users find dangerous shortcuts, like reusing the same "strong" password across every site they own. The most important fact is that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), the global authority on cybersecurity standards, officially retired this method In its Digital Identity Guidelines (SP 800-63B), NIST now explicitly states that organizations "SHALL NOT require" periodic password changes. They’ve shifted the focus to Length over Complexity. They recommend allowing passphrases of up to 64 characters and only requiring a change if there is actual evidence of a compromise.
Cyber_Racheal@CyberRacheal

Password rotation every 90 days actually makes your company LESS secure. Change my mind.

English
314
1.1K
10.9K
813.6K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@Nithin0dha Zero-permission design is how you earn trust: reduce what can be stolen, not just promise you won’t steal it
English
0
0
0
19
Nithin Kamath
Nithin Kamath@Nithin0dha·
I don't use net banking apps on my phone because the mandatory permissions they ask for make no sense. Why does a banking app need access to my SMS, phone, contacts, etc., in the name of security, when not seeking invasive device permissions is, in fact, the global benchmark for cybersecurity. This is called the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP). “Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you” has been at the heart of the Zerodha philosophy. This is exactly why we've built Zerodha the way we have. Kite asks for ZERO permissions on mobile, for instance, and this is one of the big reasons why millions of people trust us. What has enabled us is SEBI's mandatory strong two-factor authentication framework strike the right balance between security and privacy.
English
573
1.4K
15.4K
710.3K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@ProtonPrivacy Build systems that work without knowing who people are. That’s real freedom tech
English
0
0
0
113
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@DeepHumor If a law requires face scans and third-party vendors, it’s not safety. It’s building an identity pipeline and hoping nobody messes up
English
0
0
8
181
DeepHumor
DeepHumor@DeepHumor·
Spain has just fined Yoti, the "world's most trusted identity platform," for mishandling biometric data. This is why you can't trust any of these awful ass ID vendors. New video will be up at 10:40 AM PST
DeepHumor tweet media
English
20
170
480
10.4K
Mark_Streamr
Mark_Streamr@Mark_Streamr·
@Artemisfornow This is the exact nightmare with centralized identity: one weak link turns into mass doxxing and fraud at scale
English
0
0
1
66
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
Absolutely brilliant! The thing Labour said about Digital ID being secure was of course a lie. Companies House admits their system is so shit anyone could have changed your details online for 5 MONTHS.
Dan Neidle@DanNeidle

Companies House has put out a statement confirming that, for five months, every company in the UK was vulnerable to the simple exploit we identified on Friday. It enabled anyone in the world to view and change their company details.

English
36
1.5K
3K
54.2K