Matt Foley Capital

2.5K posts

Matt Foley Capital banner
Matt Foley Capital

Matt Foley Capital

@MattFoleyCap

Head of Macro at Foley Cap. Well, I’m here to tell you that you’re probably gonna find out, as you go out there, that you’re not gonna amount to Jack Squat!!

Van down by the river Katılım Temmuz 2021
370 Takip Edilen180 Takipçiler
Capitano Jacko
Capitano Jacko@CapitanoJacko·
@KettlebellDan The problem is being lectured by people who are full of shit, drinking or not drinking is irrelevant.
English
1
0
5
117
Dan
Dan@KettlebellDan·
I’m pretty sure that if you have a problem with other people not drinking, then you have a problem with drinking
English
104
19
445
22.1K
claire
claire@rosiekennedyxx·
If notre dame wins today he’s letting me peg him 🤞🏻
claire tweet media
English
27
2
237
56.1K
😲
😲@cringeNOTbased·
It’s breakup with your latina gf and make a scene at the bar Friday
English
2
0
7
288
AK
AK@Sub_Debt·
These guys are taking it too far
AK tweet media
English
3
0
1
100
Matt Foley Capital
Matt Foley Capital@MattFoleyCap·
@TrungTPhan I thought you weren’t allowed to use your personal accounts to conduct firm business
English
1
0
0
923
Trung Phan
Trung Phan@TrungTPhan·
Goldman CEO David Solomon apparently slid into Elon’s DMs on X to initiate convo on the SpaceX IPO. Back in 2007, Solomon helped Goldman win the Lululemon IPO by showing up to the pitch meeting in all Lululemon gear.
Trung Phan tweet mediaTrung Phan tweet media
Trung Phan@TrungTPhan

Goldman Sachs is lead underwriter for the SpaceX IPO. When Goldman did Tesla’s IPO in 2010, Lloyd Blankfein writes in his memoirs that senior bankers on the commitments committees voted to turn down the deal. As CEO, he made a rare decision to overrule them and do the listing.

English
15
20
452
174.3K
nicole
nicole@cocteautweets·
are you guys on nicoletwt
English
12
1
93
2.2K
duck
duck@duck90493943·
Is Twitter premium worth the clout?
English
1
0
1
25
Jackuu
Jackuu@Jackyuu_1·
Starts with D and we all like it
English
2.1K
277
7K
4.9M
Dianna
Dianna@Dianna143327·
@theMEAN Thank you for your question. I just want to clarify that this was a simple business idea, showing how you could earn on a small scale using a vending machine. It was just an illustrative example of a small business concept.
English
1
0
2
1K
Dianna
Dianna@Dianna143327·
In this video, it’s shown how you can start a profitable business using this machine 🚀💼
English
10
107
1.4K
32.1K
Matt Foley Capital
Matt Foley Capital@MattFoleyCap·
@EndresenHeather That’s a pretty nice enhancement right? May improve valuations for RE- and equipment-heavy businesses that may have been getting capped out due to prior limits? Or no change, because it was possible to stack a RE loan on top of an SBA before?
English
0
0
1
393
Heather Endresen
Heather Endresen@EndresenHeather·
This new SBA limit will be useful for business acquisitions that include heavy equipment and/or real estate, here's an example:
Heather Endresen tweet media
English
2
6
67
128.3K
CrabCapitalist
CrabCapitalist@crabcapitalist·
I am at a place where our Top 10 looking NOTHING like anyone else’s. We do the work. It’s hard. It’s lonely. We went from almost $10b to now < $1b. Staff halved. Morale a dumpster fire. When your clients are stupid fucks who fire you for NOT herding, it’s very difficult not to herd.
English
1
0
0
413
Lee Roach
Lee Roach@leevalueroach·
The 13Fs I have seen so far this quarter are, with maybe four exceptions, the most embarrassing display of professional herding I have witnessed in a decade. Every “widely followed” fund owns the same nine names. The differentiation between them, when you actually lay the holdings out side by side, is statistical noise dressed up as conviction. These are people charging 2 and 20, and 1.5 and 15, and a flat 1% on $4 billion accounts, to deliver portfolios that a Vanguard index fund could replicate at 4 basis points, except with worse turnover, higher tax drag, and a manager letter every quarter explaining why owning the same seven mega-cap names everyone else owns is, in fact, a contrarian act of independent thought. There is no work in these portfolios. There is no original research. There is no name on any of these 13Fs that required the manager to fly somewhere, sit in a lobby, eat a cookie, call a CEO at a number listed in a proxy statement from 2011, or do anything that any well-read 19-year-old with a Bloomberg login could not have done in an afternoon. The entire industry has, in the last decade, quietly stopped doing the work, because the work is hard, the work is lonely, the work makes you look stupid for 18 months at a time, and the work, when it produces a name nobody else owns, is the single greatest career risk in modern asset management. Nobody gets fired for owning Microsoft. Everyone gets fired for owning a $90 million market cap Pennsylvania bank that the LP committee has never heard of, even when the bank doubles, because by then the LP has already pulled the capital and the manager is already at a different firm doing the same thing he was doing before, which is owning Microsoft. You can do the work. You can own the small cap they will not. You can build a portfolio that does not look like anyone else’s. You will not be on Bloomberg. You will not be invited to speak at the conference. You will, however, in some ten-year window that you will not be able to predict in advance, outperform every one of these herded portfolios by margins that will, in retrospect, look obvious to everyone except the people who were doing the herding, who will, as they always do, explain that they were right in spirit and just wrong in price, which is, as it has always been, the entire reason the trade on the other side keeps working.
English
39
41
462
118.9K
Admiral Waterworld
Admiral Waterworld@WaterworldCapi1·
@MattFoleyCap It's absolutely ridiculous. Criticize funds that mechanically have to own larger cap stocks for owning them instead of micro caps they could never buy or get out of.
English
1
0
7
421
Admiral Waterworld
Admiral Waterworld@WaterworldCapi1·
Do you want to fly to some CEO and eat a cookie, call a random number in a 15 year old proxy...or make money?
Lee Roach@leevalueroach

The 13Fs I have seen so far this quarter are, with maybe four exceptions, the most embarrassing display of professional herding I have witnessed in a decade. Every “widely followed” fund owns the same nine names. The differentiation between them, when you actually lay the holdings out side by side, is statistical noise dressed up as conviction. These are people charging 2 and 20, and 1.5 and 15, and a flat 1% on $4 billion accounts, to deliver portfolios that a Vanguard index fund could replicate at 4 basis points, except with worse turnover, higher tax drag, and a manager letter every quarter explaining why owning the same seven mega-cap names everyone else owns is, in fact, a contrarian act of independent thought. There is no work in these portfolios. There is no original research. There is no name on any of these 13Fs that required the manager to fly somewhere, sit in a lobby, eat a cookie, call a CEO at a number listed in a proxy statement from 2011, or do anything that any well-read 19-year-old with a Bloomberg login could not have done in an afternoon. The entire industry has, in the last decade, quietly stopped doing the work, because the work is hard, the work is lonely, the work makes you look stupid for 18 months at a time, and the work, when it produces a name nobody else owns, is the single greatest career risk in modern asset management. Nobody gets fired for owning Microsoft. Everyone gets fired for owning a $90 million market cap Pennsylvania bank that the LP committee has never heard of, even when the bank doubles, because by then the LP has already pulled the capital and the manager is already at a different firm doing the same thing he was doing before, which is owning Microsoft. You can do the work. You can own the small cap they will not. You can build a portfolio that does not look like anyone else’s. You will not be on Bloomberg. You will not be invited to speak at the conference. You will, however, in some ten-year window that you will not be able to predict in advance, outperform every one of these herded portfolios by margins that will, in retrospect, look obvious to everyone except the people who were doing the herding, who will, as they always do, explain that they were right in spirit and just wrong in price, which is, as it has always been, the entire reason the trade on the other side keeps working.

English
9
0
52
21.2K
Financial Dystopia
Financial Dystopia@financedystop·
A lot of Americans in the 55–65 age range are getting forced into early retirement after being laid off and replaced. He spent 35 years working in IT and suddenly got let go. It’s that brutal gap where you’re not old enough to comfortably retire with benefits, but not young enough for a lot of companies that want younger and cheaper workers.
English
460
444
3.7K
470.8K
White Crayon
White Crayon@White_Crayon_00·
@literally_chad And im still making you look retarded. You know how stupid you have to be for that?
English
2
0
14
1.5K