
AI is going to make a lot of people feel poorer, not richer.
Matthew Gerard
80.9K posts

@MatthewCGerard
Father. Husband. Entrepreneur. Tech Oriented, Data Driven Problem Solver. #HumanityFirst #AI

AI is going to make a lot of people feel poorer, not richer.


Andrew Yang ran for president in 2020 on a promise to introduce universal basic income and protect Americans from AI-induced mass employment. The future he predicted is now here. River Page sits down with him for Two Drinks. thefp.com/p/two-drinks-w…










we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

Changpeng Zhao just identified the next financial market, and every traditional bank is structurally obsolete for it. “Transacting millions of times more than humans.” The Machine Economy. Financial systems were built for human speeds. We buy coffee, pay rent, sleep. AI agents operate continuously without rest. Zhao: “You’ll soon have thousands of AI agents working for you.” Negotiating APIs, buying compute, booking logistics, executing trades. All simultaneously at machine speed. Transaction volume from AI commerce won’t supplement human activity. It’ll eclipse it completely. The infrastructure isn’t Visa or banks. It’s stablecoins like USDC. AI needs programmable money settling instantly, not in “3-5 business days.” Zhao: “Digital assistants will not find banks suitable.” AI executing millisecond arbitrage can’t wait for bank transfers. Delays don’t slow the system. They break it entirely. From high-frequency trading to high-frequency living. Banking adapts or gets routed around. Zhao: “They’ll book hotels, buy tickets… transacting millions of times.” Credit cards need identity. Stablecoins need cryptographic keys. AI excels at key management, not waiting for human approval processes. Default currency for AI won’t be physical dollars. It’ll be programmable dollars. First institution integrating with AI agents captures next-century transaction flow. Legacy banking assumes human speeds with settlement delays. AI operates at microsecond velocity with instant settlement requirements. Architecturally incompatible. Infrastructure handling trillions in human commerce becomes the bottleneck strangling quadrillions in machine commerce. Markets eliminate bottlenecks by building parallel systems. Once machine economy reaches scale, traditional banking doesn’t compete. It becomes the slow legacy option only humans use while everything significant happens in infrastructure they can’t access at competitive speeds.



