Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands

22.4K posts

Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands banner
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands

Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands

@MatthewGattozzi

Founder of @GoodoStudios | Building a creative studio creating content for 7-9 figure consumer brands | Ex-professional ballet dancer

Seattle, WA Katılım Ocak 2011
1.6K Takip Edilen5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands
It's 7:35 AM in Times Square, and I am crying seeing our ad on a billboard. This is by far one of the biggest moments in my life and for Goodo Studios. Thank you to @shesbirdie for trusting us with this project. Thanks to @brexHQ for sponsoring this billboard. Shoutout to my team, @GoodoStudios. WE did this. Okay back to work now.
English
29
3
122
20.2K
Colby Flood
Colby Flood@Colby__Flood·
@durov @telegram Why is it so hard to get a group run by scammers posing as a legitimate business taken down? Do you care about stopping this?
English
1
0
1
86
Cody Plofker
Cody Plofker@codyplof·
@binghott Yup. Just cut replo and just Claude. Just cut all page builders. Much easier to just Claude it
English
8
1
60
18.1K
Barry Hott ☄️
Barry Hott ☄️@binghott·
Is it me or is Replo's AI page builder unusable? (seriously, am I missing something?) On the other hand, Claude is very good at building custom code components quickly and it's very easy to toss them into existing Replo pages.
English
17
1
42
7.2K
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands
It's not a viral launch on X if you paid for a bunch of retweets. It is fine to do it, but don't say it went viral. Viral means it organically was shared. MRR/ARR/Viral are all terms used VERY loosely.
English
1
0
1
138
Ben Radack 🏝️
Ben Radack 🏝️@benradack·
@MatthewGattozzi good brief should make it hard to make the wrong ad. if there's room to interpret it differently then its not done yet
English
1
0
1
115
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands
When the brief doesn't have one clear angle, every person making the ad makes a different ad. The creator sourcing lead gets talent they think will work. The creator performs toward what they thought you meant. The editor cuts toward what they thought you meant. You get three pieces of three different videos. Not because anyone did a bad job. There just wasn't a shared target going in. Spending the time to clarify vision and expectations allows you to get great ads.
English
3
0
6
277
Cody Plofker
Cody Plofker@codyplof·
@MatthewGattozzi any ai is as valuable as the context layer. but its not just data in here; has a ton of frameworks and insights. would need those.
English
1
0
4
915
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands
If you have more retweets than likes - this is an ANTI signal on twitter. You just paid for lots of retweets. Make good content that speaks to people/users not fundraising announcements. Weak
English
2
2
3
329
Clifton Sellers
Clifton Sellers@CliftonSellers·
Officially spent $20k on ads this month ask me anything
English
116
0
128
14.3K
Matthew Gattozzi 📷 Ads/Videos/Photos for Brands
I have seen this many times in ad accounts. Sustainability attracts a certain crowd and alienates another. Very rarely allows you to take a large share of market because you alienate in a narrow POV. I think this also speaks to the classic DTC "cut out the middle man" This era is over.
Alex@heyitsalexP

What no one is saying about Everlane's sale to Shein: politically-adjacent brand positioning is a dead end, whether you are pandering to the left or to the right. Everlane built their brand platform on "radical transparency". In 2012 that was refreshing. A decade later, it became politicized, even though that was never the intention. When you tie your brand to one of these politically-coded stances, the loudest and most extreme adherents will hold you to an impossible standard and criticize your every move online, loudly. Again, it doesn't matter if you're right-coded or left-coded. People use online political debates to escape an unsatisfying reality, and to regain a sense of power and status when their real life offers little/none. So, by "taking a stand", your brand is putting itself at the mercy of blackpilled yappers who are highly unlikely to buy anything from you. Obviously Everlane couldn't have predicted this when it chose to center "radical transparency" in 2011. But if you're thinking of making something similar the core of your brand's identity– whether you're "sustainable", "organic" or "made in the USA"– think twice...

English
0
0
2
902