Mau

108.2K posts

Mau banner
Mau

Mau

@MauritzPreller

Passionate about nature, tech, and people. Backyard scientist 🔬 | Armchair genealogist 🧬 | Advocating to save lives and build a world that works. #VaxStatRep

Katılım Haziran 2014
2.6K Takip Edilen4.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
Follow me as I seek to explain & validate the argument that wins the vaccine debate. My🧵s in search of the truth. 1) What happened in New Zealand? How and why does a small island country show us beyond doubt how safe vaccines are? twitter.com/MauritzPreller…
Mau tweet media
Mau@MauritzPreller

Clear evidence that covid vaccines are safe can be found in New Zealand, a country of ~ 5.1m people where ~12,8m vaccines were administered to date. As the graph below from NZ health shows, most of those were administered from March 2021 to March 2022. tewhatuora.govt.nz/our-health-sys…

English
40
9
50
30.2K
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod @giannmi @ButHisEmails You are a funny guy. You can insult me as much as you like, but you better bring data to back up your claims or I'm just going to laugh at you.
English
1
0
0
7
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
The “ventilators killed patients” narrative persists for the same reason as many others I've been highlighting here. It exploits a complete lack of understanding of critical care. Ventilators weren’t causing death. They were used in patients already in severe respiratory failure. Many of whom would not survive without intervention. Early in the pandemic, mortality was high because the disease was severe, protocols were evolving, and clinicians were dealing with an entirely new pathology under pressure. Blaming the intervention instead of the underlying condition is basic cause and effect failure. As evidence improved, ventilation strategies changed and outcomes improved with them. That’s how medicine works. Rewriting that history as “doctors killed patients” isn’t analysis. It’s ignorance dressed up as accusation.
Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry.@naomirwolf

“Was COVID just mismanagement—or worse?”

English
60
80
348
10.7K
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@Debbielud59 Well, if someone died from a car crash, should that be counted as a result of the trial?
English
0
0
0
1
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
That’s a lot of claims that don’t align with the evidence. Covid vaccines were tested in large randomized trials and then monitored across hundreds of millions of people globally. Known risks, like myocarditis in specific groups were identified, quantified, and openly studied. If this were “the most harmful product ever,” we would see clear, consistent signals in all-cause mortality and health systems tied to vaccination campaigns. This is not evident anywhere. What we do see is that vaccines reduced severe covid outcomes, especially before widespread immunity. By contrast, large, well-conducted reviews have not found meaningful benefit for ivermectin in covid. Promoting ineffective treatments while discouraging interventions that reduce severe disease isn’t harmless and it risks worse outcomes. If we’re going to use language like “crimes against humanity,” it should be applied carefully and based on evidence. Undermining effective measures while promoting ones that don’t work has real-world consequences too.
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD

More gaslighting from the establishment. It’s not a “vaccine.” It was created by the military and foisted on civilians like guinea pigs. I’ve never seen such harm from any other product on the market. It should have been pulled a long ago. Those who don’t speak out are guilty of crimes against humanity.

English
18
10
81
2.1K
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod Funny you say that. This trial is like a shaky first clue. Interesting, but too flawed to be trusted. Relying on it would be like betting on a coin toss. And it has a lot to do with the controls. Do you want to know why?
English
0
0
0
11
Bruce Maguire
Bruce Maguire@TheMindshockPod·
@MauritzPreller Clearly you don't know what the scientific method is 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Do you even know how CONTROLS work? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
8
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
The belief that “early ivermectin works” for Covid is internally inconsistent and not decision-rational. If taken seriously, it also means claims that doctors treated thousands of patients and kept them all out of hospital cannot be relied on as those claims don’t align with trial evidence or real-world patient flow. The argument is unfalsifiable and non-reproducible. Negative trial? Too late. No effect? Wrong dose. No replication? Wrong population. Real treatments don’t behave like this as they show a consistent signal, even in imperfect studies. Across randomized trials, ivermectin shows no reproducible clinical benefit. Even in early-treated groups. To sustain the claim, the conditions keep narrowing until it becomes untestable and unusable. What remains isn’t evidence. It’s an irrational belief that adapts to avoid being disproven.
Mau tweet media
English
10
4
29
600
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod Wonderful. Do you know what an open-label prophylaxis trial is?
English
1
0
0
6
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@Debbielud59 You do understand that people die all the time?
English
1
0
0
6
Debbie Ludwig
Debbie Ludwig@Debbielud59·
@MauritzPreller All you need to know about the trial is that more people died in the vaccinated group versus the placebo group from all causes. They allowed the placebo group to get the vaccine before they looked at long term effects. Remember all animals died in the animal studies!
English
1
0
0
12
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod Are you going to pick the ones to look at or do you want me to do it? At least if you pick them you can say "I told you so" if you turn out to be right.
English
1
0
0
7
Bruce Maguire
Bruce Maguire@TheMindshockPod·
@MauritzPreller So you're too retarded to know what meta-analysis is...and think a single or a handful of studies are more accurate than larger pools of data?
Bruce Maguire tweet media
English
1
0
0
4
Bruce Maguire
Bruce Maguire@TheMindshockPod·
@MauritzPreller No preschool tutor to help you out here, dummy? "Significantly lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies."
English
1
0
0
10
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod Im telling you that you cannot find a single study in that whole website that proves Ivermectín works. Not 1. Prove me wrong.
English
1
0
0
6
Bruce Maguire
Bruce Maguire@TheMindshockPod·
@MauritzPreller Ah, pretending all scientific evidence and stats are "nonsense". Classic cope 🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
6
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@isgitt_joh53252 The evidence says it does not. If you have something that proves it does, bring it and lets see. x.com/i/status/20315…
Mau@MauritzPreller

0/6 if you count Itech TOGETHER Trial 2022 1,358 High-risk outpatients 400 µg/kg daily for 3 days Hospitalization or prolonged ER observation No reduction in hospitalization vs placebo nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…⁠ I-TECH Trial 2022 490 Hospitalized mild-moderate patients with risk factors 0.4 mg/kg for 5 days Progression to severe disease No reduction in progression to severe COVID-19 jamanetwork.com/journals/jamai…⁠ ACTIV-6 (standard dose) 2022 1,591 Outpatients mild-moderate COVID 400 µg/kg for 3 days Time to sustained recovery HR 1.07 no clinically meaningful improvement jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…⁠ ACTIV-6 (high dose) 2023 1,432 Outpatients ≥30 yrs 600 µg/kg for 6 days Time to recovery Higher dose also showed no benefit jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…⁠ PRINCIPLE Trial 2024 ~2,000+ platform participants Community patients ≥50 yrs or comorbid 300 µg/kg daily for 3 days Time to recovery / hospitalization No clinically meaningful improvement in recovery or hospitalization sciencedirect.com/science/articl…⁠ COVID-OUT Trial 2022 1,323 (ivermectin arm) Early outpatient COVID ~390–470 µg/kg/day for 3 days Hospitalization / urgent care / death No benefit compared with placebo

English
1
0
0
11
NoKetoCardio
NoKetoCardio@isgitt_joh53252·
@MauritzPreller It works. Are you up to date on your boosters? If not, why not? The experts say you regularly need more mRNA. So do it!
English
1
0
0
7
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@TheMindshockPod Do you have a problem with comprehension? Pick some studies from there. Bring them here. Lets look at them together. You dont think Ive look through that nonsense before?
English
2
0
0
8
Bruce Maguire
Bruce Maguire@TheMindshockPod·
@MauritzPreller Seriously, retard? Appeal to Authority fallacy all you have? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I literally posted all the studies, dummy! You illiterate? c19ivermectin.com
English
1
0
0
9
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@fieldmixer Jeez dude. I'm using my real name. I have no relationship with pharma and I have a day job for which I get paid. Dont play the man, play the argument. Or block me and go away. 😉
English
0
0
0
1
David Andrews
David Andrews@fieldmixer·
@MauritzPreller This account and ALL accounts like it are FALSE PAID DISINFORMATION PHARMA ACCOUNTS. Attempting to create and control a new narrative. Detestable. Block + report.
English
1
0
0
5
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@fieldmixer Have you got evidence that Ivermectín works? Share it, lets see.
English
0
0
0
2
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
Its more like you are the satire account. You may want to read what some of the experts have to say, but let me also put my money where my mouth is and make you an offer. If you can find a study that nonsense that stands up to scrutiny and shows without doubt that Ivermectín works I'll pay you $5000. I'll wait here. x.com/i/status/14220…
English
2
0
0
27
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@IanSolliec You said you dont care, so I have you a hypothetical example to see how you look at things. To see if a significant benefit would change your mind.
English
0
0
0
10
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@SharpeRich94006 Surgisphere actually shows the system working. Bad data was identified and retracted. So you think Mary Bowden is lying?
English
0
0
0
5
Private Richard Sharpe
Private Richard Sharpe@SharpeRich94006·
@MauritzPreller Like the Surgisphere paper, which contained all made up data, and was likely commissioned by Big Pharma, the IVM papers have been criticized for using inappropriate designs. Doses too small and give too long after symptoms. Big Pharma has plenty of money to derail alternates.
English
1
0
0
5
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@bosma2002 What is the difference between knowing and believing?
English
2
0
0
16
Luke
Luke@bosma2002·
@MauritzPreller It’s not a belief it’s an understanding that we know to be true now
English
1
0
0
17
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
@bosma2002 @UnWokeAudio Let me focus your immense mental capacity. Do you think it works the way Mary claims it does? None of her 6000 patients ended in hospital or in the way these people who want to avoid answering to the trials do. That you had to talke it early?
English
0
0
0
4
Luke
Luke@bosma2002·
@MauritzPreller @UnWokeAudio It does. And always did. It doesn’t matter that it works other things work too. Stop lying please
English
1
0
0
4
Mau
Mau@MauritzPreller·
I have no need to prove it. I played the game with someone yesterday but how it translates in my life is that in the 2nd wave in my country I lost more loved ones than I can count on my two hands. I often tell the story of my cousin and his mom who died within days of each other. His daughter had the first of many strokes. So its not something I believe. Its something I know. Hope that helps.
Mau tweet media
English
1
0
0
8

Keşfet

@TheMindshockPod @giannmi @ButHisEmails @Debbielud59 @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano