IamV

@RealCandaceO @candaceoshow Who cares about hunter Biden?! None of these political families will be held accountable for their corruption (Clinton’s, Biden, trumps…) so can we get a break from more uninteresting takes from the crackhead son?

This Thursday. Hunter Biden and me. @candaceoshow

@TLHb6bh She didn’t say a peep against Erika until Erika started lying all over the place-look it up. Is it moral to lie and reverse everything your husband publicly stood for.Candace knew Charlie well;she can speak to their history and call out the lies she has proof on.

It is 💯 morally inappropriate for a married woman, who is not Charlie’s wife, to publicly discuss intimate details about him, particularly when he is dead and his widow is still alive and raising their children. There is a line between commentary and exploitation, and this crosses it. Discussing politics, public statements, or even disagreements is one thing. Sitting around dissecting a dead man’s marriage, hinting at improprieties, implying betrayal, and turning deeply personal family matters into entertainment for clicks and engagement is something entirely different. What makes it worse is the self righteousness attached to it all. You cannot claim to stand for family values, morality, Christianity, decency, or protecting children while simultaneously feeding millions of people intimate gossip about a husband and wife whose children will one day read every word of it online. Those children did not ask for this. His widow did not ask for this. A grieving widow should not have to wake up every day wondering what new insinuation, rumor, or “just asking questions” segment is going to be blasted out to millions of viewers next. There is nothing brave about it. There is nothing journalistic about it. It is gossip packaged as righteousness. At some point people need to ask themselves what they are actually consuming and supporting. Because when someone profits from tearing apart the intimate details of a dead man’s marriage while his family is still trying to survive unimaginable loss, that is not truth seeking. That is cruelty for the sake of cruelty! And since when did “journalism” become gossiping about whether Charlie was a virgin or claiming he only dated Erika to make another girl jealous? That is not investigative reporting. That is middle school gossip with a microphone. It’s morally bankrupt. A man was murdered, children lost their father, and somehow people turned the conversation into psychoanalyzing his dating life for clicks and engagement. It’s so grotesque.

@RealCandaceO @candaceoshow I’m a big Candace listener but I am not interested in this interview

@Hop__1234 @Nero How does being a stay at home mom and wife automatically prepare you and grant you the competence to run a huge organization, above candidates with years of experience in a related field?

@Nero I'm having a hard time understanding why it's such a ridiculous idea to some people that a wife takes over a husband's position after he dies. And people acting like it was a sudden decision don't consider that they most likely made that decision long before Charlie died.

So what you’re saying TPUSA is that Charlie’s dying wish was for his wife to take over and be the next one in the crosshairs. Maybe I misjudged him 😅

@BishopBarron Please retreat into prayer and stop this social media podcasting White House etc. Please.

Friends, in a new episode of Bishop Barron Presents, Dave Rubin and I discuss the lost art of civil discourse; his own ideological journey from left to right; the cultural impact of Charlie Kirk and Jordan Peterson; and more.  Watch our full conversation here: youtube.com/watch?v=6Esvap…

@BlakeSNeff @RealCandaceO We all know Blakey, Charlie knows. That’s what you have to live with

@RealCandaceO Nailed it.

Hi Charlie, May I ask why you wrote that you contacted me to no avail when this did not happen? In fact you were in communication with and received a response from Mitchell regarding a separate matter this month and you never once asked any questions about access to donors who dispute this video. Separately, can you make any logical sense out of why they chose to introduce the audio to the public without the video component? Respectfully, is your skill set AI? Were you the correct person to assess whether the video was real or made by the Hollywood A.I company that Turning Point met with following Charlie’s death? Were you even aware they met with an A.I company that specializes in post-humous video making? Does that at all strike you as odd? I don’t doubt your sincerity, but you underestimate their cunning and technological capabilities. I am personally in possession of material from Aspen which could easily identify whether the video they showed you was adapted using A.I. I suspect they know that.

@AshtonForbes @Villgecrazylady Why are you so obsessed with Candace?

@Villgecrazylady Hope that's not true because it'll be hard to argue you're not doing something illegal if you're knowingly going to these steps to release controlled information. Sadly it seems like this is going to all end with Candace in a jail cell or a nuthouse.

The reason Candace had to retype the email is because of a security feature embedded in the email called FontCode. FontCode works by weaving tiny, imperceptible perturbations into the font of a text. These perturbations serve as a kind of fingerprint on the email in the chance that it leaks, it’s easy to trace back to the source. This has nothing to do with simple redactions of email addresses.

@RealCandaceO Late again??

Today on the show: The White House military office attempted to rescind an email that they sent out shortly following the Correspondent’s dinner “shooting”. We have the email— and the public deserves to know about it. Plus, the Macron couple says that their domestic abuse incident on the plane was actually about another woman… Which… isn’t exactly possible. Join us LIVE! youtube.com/live/7FS1tUeSf…

@ItsKingSlime All three are gross

Racist Ø/F girl gets a BRUTAL reality check and starts crying to Clavicular for not defending her after getting HUMBLED by a Persian guy 😳💀👀 “Is it really worth $7 a month to see pictures of you?… I don’t think you’re providing any value to the world… You’re just getting people to g**n”

@disclosetv People don’t have money for groceries, can’t find jobs, but this is what’s important…

@RealCandaceO You’re always late Candace; what is supposed to be the air time anyway? Every day it’s different and we wait. I love you but you’re always late.

Show will be running late today! Had an interview this morning that went over.

@nickshirleyy @RealCandaceO What does this prove?

@RealCandaceO Here you go Candace here is the full favela video that you cannot comprehend is real lol More dangerous than any of your "family reunions" (I’d hope) didn't know you were built so favela like and dangerous but respect🫱🏻‍🫲🏽

Today on the show: -It becomes increasingly likely that the Charlie audio “I appoint Erika” was A.I. We explain why this may become the single most consequential lie. -Erika becomes a doctor. -Nick Shirley is rightly called into question. youtube.com/live/KpxIBWkNs…

@LionelMedia The last 3 are the hardest to listen to

Behold! This ignominious quintet single-handedly killed late night television. Who is the worst culprit?

@JayTC53 Why don’t you deal with the Epstein shit and then we can discuss anything else

NEW 🚨 THOMAS MASSIE FILES Cynthia West EX GIRLFRIEND of Thomas Massie exposes him as a sexual deviant & bribed her with $5,000 cash to stay silent. Massie DM'd her on X in August of 2024 not even 2 months after his wife of 31 years passed away in June 2024. Massie ended up getting her a congressional staffer job in D.C. Massie pressured her to be involved in deviant sexual behavior with him. Cynthia rejected feeling extremely pressured and uncomfortable. When she rejected, Thomas Massie had her fired, bribed her & threatened her not to file a complaint. A complaint was filed in fall of 2025. The same time period when Thomas Massie remarried to a different staffer 20 years younger than Massie. The man who claimed screamed the loudest about "Transparency for Epstein" turned out to be a scumbag himself.

@Catholic_bro He axed

@lisaknows429 She mentioned him because HIS POSTS ARE SCREENSHOT in the lawsuit

The Candy Cult thinks Candace isn’t panicked by the Brian Harpole lawsuit. Her behavior of throwing other creators under the bus to take the heat off herself is totally not panicked behavior. And they seem to think Erika Kirk will be called to the stand so we had to give some education on what a scope is.

@EricLDaugh Insufferable. I would have walked out if I was a graduate. Don’t have a speech if you can’t book inspiring people

🚨 JUST IN: Incredible moment as ERIKA KIRK just walked out at Hillsdale College to receive Honorary Doctorate degrees on behalf of Charlie Kirk 🙏🏻 Clarence Thomas is one other notable recipient of such an honor! She also just gave a commencement speech to the graduating class The place is ECSTATIC to see her! For Charlie 🇺🇸 👏🏻

@amiKozak @MrsErikaKirk Didn’t you like her before, when she gave you visibility?

Oh it’s on now @MrsErikaKirk

@CinemaShogun His screen grabs are in the lawsuit, she didn’t name him. His content is inside the lawsuit paperwork yet they don’t go after him - suspicious much?

WOAH 😳 Candace Owens is actively trying to get other Charlie Kirk conspiracy theorists sued now‼️ Blake Bednarz just SHUT DOWN his account after Candace Owens threw him under the bus on her show today. She wants him to be sued instead of her. So she collected his posts and clips of his videos to present on her show telling Brian Harpole’s lawyers they have a slam dunk case against him. Never thought I would see Charlie Kirk conspiracy theorists shutting down their accounts because Candace Owens is trying to get them sued. Yet here we are folks. She’s trying to drag everyone down now. She’s willing to eat her own so there’s no telling who she’s going to go after next.

@JeremyDBoreing Do yourself a favor and go away from the spotlight. A real man would have no problem talking to her live, from your studio.

The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books. She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case. Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it. The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying. Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents. I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim. But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her. I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years. But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer. So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died. But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep. Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting. I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them. Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child! The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion. Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei! Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall. You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor. But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it. To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.” Protect how? What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three. By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case. Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time. And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks! I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle. Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.