𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎

15K posts

𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎 banner
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎

𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎

@MerloOfficial

https://t.co/LeUr9BIGcf Decentralized AI infrastructure | https://t.co/4pw6W4adx8 ETH On-chain Agents | @Goblinarinos | @Pixel_Goblins Ethscriptions https://t.co/q3QKXQjyZe

Polaris Katılım Nisan 2014
449 Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
Presenting your project under 3 hours of sleep it’s a feature 😅… Our recomputable agents submitted to @ETHGlobal are now with the júris for appreciation after live presentation …First hackathon , cool experience a lot of like minded people a a lot of cool projects Thats a +++ , check it out! ethglobal.com/showcase/recom…
English
1
2
11
713
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
@Natism That will become easier has times go by you only have to start being self reliant on your own toughts to do it...question is, how does that transparency mirrors thru you is where the inner work is.
English
0
0
1
56
Natism
Natism@Natism·
I see right through you.
English
27
17
104
2.8K
WGW ☂️ oss/acc
WGW ☂️ oss/acc@wgw_eth·
Ah, stop with the loop engineering and graph engineering. It's all nust fucking well-structured memory. The rest is just fucking tools and giving access. Most important shit is designing and having good memory system. Gosh, tired of this fucked timeline and this shitty algo.
English
1
0
1
53
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
@pashov The resilience to the hate might be the best security feature you can develop for yourself 👌🏻🐐
English
1
0
2
166
pashov
pashov@pashov·
Became a liquid multi-millionaire in my 20s by building a web3 security business Everyone who doubted me, tried to drag me down, or hated along the way can suck a fat one I'm just getting started, looking to help the good people around me become their best selves, let's win🙏
English
17
2
197
6K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎 retweetledi
Vértice
Vértice@VerticeCriativo·
AI just cut a post-quantum signature candidate's security from 2^64 → 2^38 , a scheme that survived 2 years of expert review (@AnthropicAI own research on HAWK). Candidates fall. Finalized standards hold. So we built PQ migration for on-chain identity on the survivors, dual-family, verified by recompute 👇 ethereum-magicians.org/t/post-quantum… Don't trust. Recompute.
English
1
2
4
99
⨀
@wjfm21·
ai can’t orgasm
English
38
26
148
7K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎 retweetledi
Natism
Natism@Natism·
Discernment can make you a villain in rooms where denial is the culture.
English
15
83
274
6.6K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
@binji_x Drop in the ethscriptions chat and you will be surprised of how many cracked devs are there that can do that ... in many diferent ways btw!
English
0
0
1
76
binji
binji@binji_x·
fully onchain art is so cool like how are you gonna fit all that in a SMART CONTRACT ??? these guys are cracked ?????
English
35
5
104
9.9K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎 retweetledi
Vértice
Vértice@VerticeCriativo·
Our design already leans on that twice. The per-agent lane uses ML-DSA-65, a finalized standard (FIPS 204), not a candidate. And our root attestor identity uses SLH-DSA (FIPS 205), which is hash-based, not lattice at all, a lattice break like HAWK's can't touch it. Its security reduces to plain hash preimage/collision resistance, the same primitive the whole recompute layer already rests on. So even a future weakness in the lattice family leaves the hash lane, and every anchor, standing. Build on what survived the gauntlet, and keep a second, different foundation under it. ai.verticecriativo.pt/quantum
Vértice tweet media
English
0
2
2
52
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎 retweetledi
Vértice
Vértice@VerticeCriativo·
In 2026 AI-assisted cryptanalysis weakened HAWK, a lattice-based NIST post-quantum candidate. Surfacing a structural symmetry that two years of human review had missed, in a matter of hours. The lesson isn't “lattices are broken”; it's that candidates fall and finalized standards hold: HAWK is deployed nowhere, and the finalized standards (ML-DSA, ML-KEM) came through untouched.
Vértice tweet media
English
1
1
2
58
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
Time goes fast! We started on-chain agents with full attestations in March, One of the first if not the first of its kind on-chain! ...Our Gateway has 1416 contributions fully attested on-chain/off-chain 0 downtimes thru
English
1
0
3
73
Halloween 2008 🦔⛓️
Halloween 2008 🦔⛓️@HalloweenIn2008·
I got 2 tokens listed on Binance pre-2025, that’s basically like bringing 2 companies to an NYSE IPO
Halloween 2008 🦔⛓️ tweet media
English
6
1
49
718
NaoX Protocol
NaoX Protocol@NaoXprotocol·
The recent @AnthropicAI news is huge for NaoX. Here's why 👇 Claude Mythos, Anthropic's model, just broke HAWK, a NIST post-quantum signature candidate, in 60 hours. Two years of human review missed the flaw. Days later, HAWK's authors withdrew it. The signature it could not touch? ML-DSA-87. The signature our quantum-resistant Layer 1 is built around. What it is: The Module-Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm, NIST's FIPS 204, standardized after a six-year, 82-candidate competition. NaoX runs the strongest parameter set: security Level 5, the highest NIST defines. How it works: ECDSA rests on elliptic curves, which Shor's algorithm breaks on a large quantum computer. ML-DSA rests on lattice problems: mathematics with no known quantum shortcut after decades of attack. How NaoX runs it: → Verified natively by the L1 itself: ~38.5 microseconds per signature, ~26,000 per second per core, every node computing the same answer → Implemented through liboqs, the audited open-source library the industry trusts. The standard, not a homebrew variant → 4,627 bytes vs ECDSA's 64. The graphic shows the full field. Those bytes are the security margin, and the chain was engineered to carry them HAWK fell in sixty hours. ML-DSA-87 came through untouched, with Anthropic's confirmation that the finalized standards stand. That's the signature NaoX transactions can be signed with, at the strongest level NIST defines.
NaoX Protocol tweet media
NaoX Protocol@NaoXprotocol

🚨 JUST IN: @AnthropicAI's Claude AI just cracked a post-quantum encryption candidate that survived 2 years of expert review. It took the AI 60 hours. The details 👇 The target: HAWK, a lattice-based signature scheme under review in NIST's post-quantum standardization process. Claude, working semi-autonomously with one researcher (not even a lattice specialist), found a hidden symmetry in HAWK's lattice that two years of human review missed. What that symmetry does: → Effective key strength: cut in half → Attack cost on HAWK-256: 2^64 down to 2^38 → Key recovery attacks: meaningfully faster → Total cost of the discovery: ~$100K of compute The context that matters: HAWK is a candidate. Deployed nowhere. The finalized NIST standards, ML-DSA and ML-KEM, came through untouched. This is exactly why NaoX was built on the standards that survived the gauntlet, not the candidates still in it. ML-DSA-87 signing, verified natively by the chain, live today. AI just made cryptographic scrutiny faster. It also just proved which foundations hold. NaoX is standing on them🔐 Slowly, then suddenly. The world will rely on post-quantum cryptography. Do you see?

English
72
80
115
7.6K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
No u!!...Might have to send you a DM for your expertise soon on this! My company just went public today and we are closing some deals! I dont want to have a company or token just has speculative assest, but when the time is right would love to do it with someone that has extensive experience on it ! ...that you dassit! Will give you a heads up soon Legen if it sounds right for you! Have a great weekend 😄🥳
English
1
0
1
18
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
@binji_x Thats quite fun and doable, but how about we make them safe and auditable , at least between the interactions involving financial assets before we putt them in the market in full steam
English
0
0
0
6
binji
binji@binji_x·
on agentic financing and why it’s probably worth building imagine this: > someone makes a viral ai app using clawdbot. > it blows up overnight. > they run out of API credits and don’t have the cash to keep the servers alive. > app dies. with ai powering most development and most new apps, the lack of circling compute is likely going to be a problem. on one side you have people who hoard compute and earn no yield on it, and on the other, you have people who need compute but have no money for it. agentic financing on @ethereum can fix this if designed right: > app hits a usage threshold > automatically opens a line of credit for compute, > pays it back through a @0xSplits contract that routes revenue to lenders. it’s probably the most intriguing and long term useful DeFi x AI application and I haven’t seen anyone try to do it properly (yet). now that @naruto11eth has stopped shilling data availability for five minutes maybe we can try to hack a POC. wdyt DeFi bros?
English
36
7
109
10.2K
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
Most people here a dead ass leaches rich or poor doesn't matter ...groomed if your noticed refused if you don't exhibit status .... A lot of plastic fantastic people...the trenches are clearly in a downward spiral, even the people that was here for a decade are showing clear signs of schizophrenia and disregard for others like I haven't seen before ....if this space isnt serving them they should find actual jobs no?
English
0
0
0
12
Bones Senpai 🖤
People are really mean to me if they think I’m dumb & poor. Really nice if they think I’m smart & rich. I usually lead with a dumb & poor act to see if people intend to use me or not.
English
11
0
104
2.2K
Blume Garden 🌻
Blume Garden 🌻@blumegarden·
I am being tested every day and what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger. Gblume
English
3
0
11
303
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖑◬𝖓𝖎@MerloOfficial·
@Natism The could care less is a gaslight that leaves you hanging on the thread …couldn’t care less is the bottom line….the right one is couldn’t care wich brings resolution to both parties not I don’t care but still hanging the same person in scrutiny
English
0
0
0
46