
Michael Angiletta
665 posts

Michael Angiletta
@MichaelAngil
Idaho. A redoubt of sanity in an insane world.





It's a red state. OF COURSE we have a RINO problem. 🙄🦏 Sift through the receipts with me from Kootenai Freedom Caucus. Part 1 of 2






**BREAKING — Idaho governor caught by and independent journalist complaining about outsiders — BUT, then basically acting like he’s a liberal on one of the coasts when it comes to Illegal Immigration. Why? The AG and Dairy lobbies are caught on tape explaining why. Must See 👇👇👇👇👇👇







Idaho is full of faux conservatives. 8+ illegal immigration bills introduced in 2026. ZERO passed. Deep-red on the surface. But closer to purple when you look at the voting records. Time to clean house.




If you live in Utah, Idaho, the Mountain West, or anywhere in America with “conservative Republican” leadership, follow @BigRockInsights for breakdowns on how GOP leaders push open borders and soft-on-crime sanctuary policies. Subscribe on YouTube: youtu.be/fU5XYnVqr08



Data analyst Tim Oren returns with a look at where campaign donations are going in the legislative primary: @TimOren54 gemstatechronicle.com/2026/04/primar…

The childbearing gap between liberals and conservatives is absolutely exploding and has now reached 2 to 1 among women 25-35. In 1980, there was hardly any difference. Conservative fertility actually increased over 40 years, showing the power of pronatal culture on one side!



2026 SESSION WRAP-UP SPECIAL: Illegal Immigration with Rep. Kyle Harris, Rep. Dale Hawkins, Rep. Steve Tanner, and Sen. Brian Lenney and Michael Angiletta. Ending DEI and Medical Freedom wins with Rep. Clint Hostetler and Rep. Chris Bruce. JFAC and the Budget with Rep. Josh Tanner. Plus Maxford Nelson from Freedom Foundation and Brian Almon. @kylenharris1234 @DaleHawkinsID @Daniel10_USA @brian_lenney @MichaelAngil @clintforidaho @ChrisBruceID @josh_idaho @FreedomFdtn @MaxfordNelsen @brianalmon @gemstatechron x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

After publishing the scorecard, we took a closer look at the data, specifically campaign contributions from Big Ag. A pattern emerges. The typical F-rated legislator received around $11,000 in Big Ag money, while the typical A/A+ legislator received just $125, nearly 90x more. Many of the lowest-performing legislators received some of the highest levels of Big Ag support, while many of the top-performing legislators received little to none. What does that mean? We will let people draw their own conclusions. The scorecard shows how legislators voted. The funding data raises the question, why?