Michael Gonzalez

40 posts

Michael Gonzalez banner
Michael Gonzalez

Michael Gonzalez

@MichaelAtPalus

Co-founder @ https://t.co/n8Ob0A0dZK. Helping startups and SMBs optimize their treasury yields.

San Francisco, CA Katılım Mayıs 2025
53 Takip Edilen68 Takipçiler
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
so glad that all these really and truly concerning vulnerabilities from this week were actually just april fools jokes
English
0
0
4
17
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
hey just saw the axios supply chain attack… reminds me of another package that used to be stable (us) thinking about how i’d still roll us back in a heartbeat… secure or not. what we had was a vulnerability that didn’t need fixing
English
0
0
6
87
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
you know you’re breaking the system when your competitors watch your demo day pitch from their HQ and email you about it if you’re a founder and tired of shitty legacy treasury options, come talk to us
English
0
0
6
70
Antonio
Antonio@abustamante·
@MichaelAtPalus @ycombinator @PalusFinance @Sam_Lushtak The extra 1-1.5% yield is simply not enough to justify MBS carry prepayment, convexity, and liquidity risk. That’s normal for fixed income portfolios, but it’s not obvious that company operating cash should be taking those risks just to pick up a point of yield
English
1
0
0
67
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
@drbillsz @mil000 treasury yield isn’t a huge portion of their revenue, so it just isn’t a priority for them. as we all know most businesses only change their offerings when it profits them. classic corporate america 😍😍
English
0
0
1
26
Doctor Bills
Doctor Bills@drbillsz·
@MichaelAtPalus @mil000 I guess my question is, why don't legacy financial institutions offer similar rates to commercial companies? Like, they have access to the same AAA rated MBS products, and they'd have an advantage with economy of scale. Is it just laziness on their part?
English
1
0
0
41
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
@mil000 agency MBS are mathematically orders of magnitude safer and guaranteed by the federal government! also you’d be surprised what risks your bank takes on right under your nose… take a look at the fund rho treasury uses and what it did in ~2022
English
2
0
1
62
Milo Smith
Milo Smith@mil000·
@MichaelAtPalus I just dont get why I would risk it all for that. I'd rather just let my bank do it.
English
1
0
1
67
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
@Duderichy just clarifying that we explicitly lay out the tradeoff of our product, which is exactly illiquidity (we are not same-day like a typical money market fund) check out the comparison on our front page
English
1
0
0
34
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
@mil000 we actually specifically talk about that right here :)
Michael Gonzalez tweet media
English
1
0
0
61
Milo Smith
Milo Smith@mil000·
We learned this lesson. Was 2009 so long ago that everyone forgot?
Milo Smith tweet media
English
2
0
16
1.2K
Michael Gonzalez
Michael Gonzalez@MichaelAtPalus·
@mil000 not doing that at all! private-label MBS is what blew up in ‘08, whereas we only use agency MBS (MUCH stricter underwriting standards)
English
0
0
7
417