Michael Gackstatter

1.4K posts

Michael Gackstatter

Michael Gackstatter

@Michael__Ga

Co-Founder, CEO @TODAY__HQ - AI Agent for Financial Advisors

CPH Katılım Mayıs 2015
1K Takip Edilen760 Takipçiler
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi
Jean P.D. Meijer ― 🇪🇺 eu/acc
EU Inc. proposal right now: - max. 48 hrs and €100 to incorporate - registration through common EU portal, automatic tax registration - fully digital process, no notaries - EU employee stock option plans, taxed only when sold - simplified insolvency procedures
European Commission@EU_Commission

We are introducing EU Inc. To make building and growing a business across the EU faster, simpler, and smarter. 🔸 Start a company in less than 48 hours 🔸 No minimum capital requirement 🔸 Fully online and borderless

English
136
191
3.6K
677K
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi
Packy McCormick
Packy McCormick@packyM·
Ben Thompson with the best take on DOD v. Anthropic, which is basically: if you don't want the government to treat your technology like nuclear weapons, stop comparing your technology to nuclear weapons. Hype Tax.
Packy McCormick tweet media
English
87
203
2.3K
276.9K
Katrine Daugaard
Katrine Daugaard@KatrineDaugaard·
Det er fuldstændig urimeligt at folk hetzer Erling Daell og nu skal jeg forklare dig hvorfor. Forestil dig, at S vinder valget og ejer af Harald Nyborg, Erling Daell rammes af en formueskat på 0,5 %. Familien er vurderet til ca. 9,9 mia. kr. Det giver omkring 49 mio. kr. i formueskat hvert år. Men pengene står jo ikke “på en konto” – de ligger i virksomheden. For at skaffe 49 mio. kr. skal de typisk hæve udbytte. Og så kommer 42 % udbytteskat oveni. Det betyder i praksis, at man skal trække omkring 84 mio. kr. ud af virksomheden for at kunne betale 49 mio. kr. i formueskat. Samtidig betaler virksomheden allerede massivt til fællesskabet – fx 300 mio. kr. i selskabsskat i 2024. Og hvad hvis året bliver dårligt, og overskuddet falder? Skatten forsvinder ikke. Staten vil stadig have sin procent af værdien – også når det gør mest ondt. Formueskat lyder som “kun de få”. I virkeligheden er det en skat på dansk ejerskab, investeringer og arbejdspladser. Det er ikke rimelighed. Det er en straf for at drive virksomhed i Danmark. #dkpol
Katrine Daugaard tweet media
Dansk
95
50
777
62.8K
Steffen W. Frølund
Steffen W. Frølund@SteffenFrolund·
Et ekstremt almindeligt scenarie når det gælder tidlige selskaber er følgende: En ung startup founder, uden egne penge, laver en ny lovende virksomhed. Måske med livsvigtig droneteknologi til vores forsvar, eller dele til kvantecomputere. Den vokser og har stadig underskud fordi den er under udvikling. Så den skal bruge kapital til at vokse, udvikle sit produkt og skabe jobs. Nye investorer værdisætter den til 150 mio. kroner. Den unge stifter ejer rundt 50%. Samtidigt er investorerne kun interesserede hvis founderen har incitamenter til at blive. Det kan endda nogle gange være hele årsagen til værdisætningens højde, at ejerskabet skal forblive i stor grad på founders hænder - og at vedkommende ikke kan sælge sine anparter undervejs. Så har den unge stifter nu en formue som løbende skal beskattes ifølge venstrefløjen. Men ingen penge at betale sin skat af. Man kan ikke sælge sine andele som medstifter, da det er hele årsagen til investeringen, at stifteren er bundet til selskabet. Vedkommende er hele værdien. I dette meget almindelige scenarie, ville personen skulle beskattes af Socialdemokratiet med 0,5% af (150x0,5-25) = 50 mio. om året. Altså 250.000 skal en ung håbefuld dygtig person, der måske kun tjener 400.000 om året (før alle de andre skatter også skal betales), finde yderligere til at sende til Sheriffen af Mettingham. Det kan vedkommende jo umuligt. Så er stifterens muligheder enten at flytte ud af landet, eller opløse selskabet. Ingen i Danmark vandt noget. Mange tabte. Landet stod uden en ny Novo til at betale for velfærden. Vi stod uden drone og kvanteteknologi til at forsvare os med. Cyanid for iværksætteri og for vores sikkerhed.
Dansk
43
28
453
31.6K
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi
DHH
DHH@dhh·
The Danish prime minister is campaigning for the next election on a wealth tax. Poisonous for entrepreneurship, and its unrealized paper gains. The state doesn't even need the money (huge surplus!), but needs to feed the envy. So Danish, so sad. borsen.dk/nyheder/perspe…
DHH tweet media
English
62
57
993
50.3K
Hugo Mercier
Hugo Mercier@hugomercierooo·
𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝗻 — 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿. No setup. Secure. Infinitely scalable. We just raised a $𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗱. After a beta with 𝟭𝟬𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬+ 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱, we’re now opening to everyone. RT and comment “Twin” — first agents on us. 👇
English
6K
3.2K
8.4K
3.2M
Neil Chudleigh
Neil Chudleigh@neilsuperduper·
Superwhisper 2.0 on iOS has arrived!
Neil Chudleigh tweet media
English
4
2
66
13K
Dev Shah
Dev Shah@0xDevShah·
This is the DeepSeek moment for Voice AI. Today we’re releasing Chatterbox Turbo — our state-of-the-art MIT licensed voice model that beats ElevenLabs Turbo and Cartesia Sonic 3! We’re finally removing the trade-offs that have held voice AI back. Fast models sound robotic. Great models are slow. And none are built for trust. We fixed all three. Chatterbox Turbo is transparent, auditable, and built for a world that needs proof.
English
172
390
3.8K
465.6K
Dickie Bush 🚢
Dickie Bush 🚢@dickiebush·
What’s the best book you’ve read this year?
English
337
33
391
121.2K
richard
richard@richardzphotoz·
A goal I’ve set for myself this coming year is to read more. People in tech, what are your best book recommendations?
English
117
1
265
55.8K
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
I absolutely love when life confirms that a hard decision I made was actually the right one.
English
84
13.3K
53.4K
1M
Dominique Paul
Dominique Paul@DominiqueCAPaul·
I’ve been using Google Sheets to track outbound, which works well initially, but as I build repeated touchpoints with early prospects the “Notes” column is becoming unmanageably large. HubSpot is the obvious standard, but at ~900€/month it’s not feasible pre-funding. I’m evaluating Pipedrive now — affordable, simple, and feature-rich enough for an early-stage pipeline. Is there anything else I should seriously consider? What tools are you using?
English
20
1
9
2.2K
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
What's crazy about this is: I have a close friend in Europe who got megarekt by this "tax stock options on exercise" and who literally paid millions on tax exercising his Then the stock crashed and became worthless And so he literally lost millions for working for a startup, he never got the tax back (they can't!) I hope more EU countries will now follow the Netherlands to tax stock options when sold and not when exercised
@levelsio@levelsio

🇪🇺 More great news from Europe 😊 Gradually, then suddenly. Nothing changed for 2 years and now a lot of things are finally changing: The Netherlands is changing its stock options tax to be modeled after the American system, which is the default in startups (!) Stock options will now be taxed when sold, not when exercised (!) This was #7 most voted idea on euacc.com to save Europe and now it's happening! Right now in most of Europe, stock options are taxed when exercised This creates very problematic situations: imagine you have stock options for a startup you worked for. Many/most startups have a clause that says "you must exercise your vested options within 90 days after leaving, or you lose them". So you exercise them, which in Europe means paying tax on their value immediately, that's regardless if you actually made money on them! So you could exercise your stock options when the price is $100, and let's say you have 10,000 stocks, so that's 10,000 * $100 = $1,000,000 in value at the time of exercising. Let's say you pay 50% tax on that, so you pay $500,000 in tax Where do you get that $500,000 from in the first place? Remember you now exercised your stock option but you haven't sold it yet. So you're still a broke startup guy. Often you'd loan the money from the bank. And then you could just sell the stock immediately right? No wait...you can only sell your stock that you just exercised during a liquidity event. That means when the company is acquired, or IPOs, or a secondary sale happens (you can sell your stock to other investors) So that means the wait can be forever, while you already paid tax on your options, now you pay back that $500,000 loan over many years But startups are risky, we know that. What if the stock price crashes from $100 to $10? Doesn't matter. You already paid $500,000 on the exercised stock. But now you only make 10,000 * $10 = $100,000 instead of $1,000,000! So now you got a $500,000 loan, paid $500,000 in tax with that loan, only made back $100,000, and now have to pay back this loan with what money? Exactly. You can't and you lost at least $400,000! And that's without the interest of the loan! You just lost a lot of money by being European and working for a startup! Crazy right? But that's the reality in most of the EU (including Germany, Spain, etc). With the new Netherlands law, that finally changes. And that makes working for European startups much more attractive for the top-tier talent. Because startups in the beginning are lean and can't pay a high salary but they can pay in stock in their company easily. The Netherlands also reduces the tax rate of stock options to something more similar to the US: from 49.5% to 32.17% The new ruling only applies to employees at a startup or scale-up The amendment to the Netherlands Income Tax Act is expected to come into effect on January 1, 2027 (in ~1 year) h/t @bobbygaal for the tip

English
68
43
1.4K
183.9K
Michael Gackstatter
Michael Gackstatter@Michael__Ga·
To add: 1. Most insuretechs just innovated on UX without changing combined ratios 2. High CAC prevented acquiring profitable cohorts within VC funding timelines, leading to bad risk (some players getting 180 combined ratios) 3. Many firms raised too little to actually offer 2+ insurance categories, thus their LtV was capped given high CAC But exciting AI startups emerging to empower brokers.
English
0
0
0
92
David Galbraith
David Galbraith@daveg·
The reason insurtech was a total failure was because you only interact with insurance companies when you are having a bad time and their interests are aligned to give you terrible service and stall, quibble over or deny claims. Insurance should be bought from brokers who act on your behalf when you make a claim.
English
4
0
13
1.9K
Michael Gackstatter retweetledi