Mike Blesch

155 posts

Mike Blesch banner
Mike Blesch

Mike Blesch

@MikeBlesch

Writer • Test Driver ☯ Instructor @ JKD WNG

Colorado, USA Katılım Kasım 2012
70 Takip Edilen145 Takipçiler
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
Amazing news! My script, ULTRATERRESTRIAL was just selected by Outstanding Screenplays Feature Competition via FilmFreeway.com!
English
5
0
6
102
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@TheUfoJoe That we’re operating craft that can go anywhere in space and time is a step too far for me, especially in light of Lacatski’s description of getting inside of one. I get the impression that alone was a big step.
English
0
0
0
26
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
Well, Will Miller told me... Miller: "It’s my firm belief that yes, we – the Russians, probably the Germans, & perhaps the Chinese have at least partial technologies (pieces), and most likely for the US – entire operational craft. "I believe we have our own trans-luminal velocity craft that can take us anywhere in space and time.  Did we develop this technology independently? Probably not!" I don't know if that's true. But if it is, it's more than just loiter time.
English
2
0
4
467
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
💥 I Did NOT Expect Lacatski to Say This 💥 Levitating triangles have been reported over military bases. Has the USG been able to achieve that level of technology? Lacatski: "(3-second pause) It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." (I think this is kind of a bombshell claim, but I don't understand why he can say that, but not say if he saw, and entered, the alleged non-human craft that we, supposedly, acquired and have allegedly breached the hull on. And as far not achieving the level of tech to its full extent? How far have we gone? 50% 75%?) ~ @JeremyCorbell: You (Dr. Jim Lacatski) said, "a study focused solely on UFOs, on various unknown nuts and bolts-type craft, flittering around in the skies over military bases and facilities would never get to the heart of a much larger and complicated mystery. And I think what you were trying to say to us is, if you just think you're gonna study UFOs, you're gonna be smacked with reality. Reality is, the UFO phenomenon is just shrouded and covered with what you would call, I don't know the good word, abnormal aspects of reality." Lacatski: "Yes, yes. That you've gotta look much further than nuts and bolts. Now, can you study nuts and bolts and use it for a levitating craft? [That] would be tremendous. Doesn't have to be a fast craft. But a levitating airliner? Think about where it could go, everywhere in the world, it wouldn't need an airport." Corbell: But don't you think we've already achieved that, like we hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent."
English
25
71
470
38.3K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@EricRWeinstein You go to work attempting to shape the world to what you believe it should be.
English
0
0
0
10
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Imagine you finally get all the power, control and wealth you dream of. You then buy all the stuff that you salivate over. Toys, homes, experiences. All of it. Okay. Tough Question: Now what? Seriously. After the party gets old: Now what?
English
12.9K
1.6K
21.3K
2.4M
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@TheUfoJoe Not just this case and def not saying the whistleblower is involved with that. IIRC, David Marler has a triangle case from the 60s. Decades later and none of the steps to develop that tech are visible. Any leaks about origin will be dubious.
English
0
0
1
46
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
@MikeBlesch But it happened so long ago in 2006 and we're just hearing about it now. The CI component is being spread 19 years later?
English
1
0
1
62
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
🚨🛸💥🔥 Have We Cracked Gravity? 🔥💥🛸🚨 Thoughts? "I can see that it's a perfect triangle, and it's gigantic, and it has a white light at each apex of the triangle and a large, white light in the center. And it takes off, and it zips out of sight." 2006, Eglin AFB... (This sounds similar to what @TheDylanBorland says he saw at Langley AFB. If this stuff is so secret, why do they seem so lax in allowing others, who are not cleared, to see it? If this craft exists... Is it ours, that we developed own our own? Is it craft that we constructed and reverse engineered, based, in part, on technology of unknown origin that we have acquired? Is it a craft of unknown origin that we acquired and learned how to fly? Are "they" working with us and showing us how to fly "their" craft? Was Will Miller right? And if you don't know who Will Miller is, do some searching. I'll pull up some of my older quotes later.) ~~~ Daniel Gockerell: "I step outside, and I look to my left, and about, I would say, three, four hundred yards, there was a clearing. And surrounding this clearing is these high-mass portable generator lights like they use on construction for...in roadways that you see and stuff, and highways and stuff like that. And I saw Humvees, military personnel out there, it looked like, and some black SUVs. "And I see hovering, about 15 to 20 feet off the ground, this giant, maybe 300 or so feet in length (size of a football field. ~Joe), aircraft. There was no visible cockpit, you know, no visible like, traditional fuselage or engine. Like, I couldn't see...it just, it was different to me. "So, right about the time I get out and I notice this, it hovers, it goes straight up. And when I say hover, I don't mean in a traditional sense. So when you think about, uh, you know, any fixed-wing aircraft, any bird that we have, known to man right now, even a rotary bird, it oscillates when it hovers. This just goes straight up and it's dead quiet, nothing, not a sound. I could hear the buzzing from the generator lights, right? "So, this gets about to the canopy, like, height, a little over the canopy, and does a slight bank, and takes off. And it rips right over the canopy like, looks like it was heading northeast, which I'm guessing. I honestly couldn't remember, just, I don't know, sometimes you know, you feel like you know your cardinal directions, like, which way is home. "Anyway, this aircraft, when it banks, I can see that it's a perfect triangle, and it's gigantic, and it has a white light at each apex of the triangle and a large, white light in the center. And it takes off, and it zips out of sight. I mean, Mach something we don't know. And, I mean, it takes off. And the biggest shock to me at that point was there was no audible report. There was nothing...like something going that fast, it's gonna bust the sound barrier, you're gonna hear it. And I didn't. I heard nothing. And, at that point, again, it was just the buzzing of the generator lights out there. "I watched this as I'm smoking my cigarette, seemingly do several touch and goes, but it doesn't go down at that little drop zone that it took off. It just comes back, stays there for a second, couple seconds, and then takes off again. Comes back, stays there for a couple seconds, takes off again. And at that point I grew bored of it. And I was impressed, obviously, but I'm like, okay, this is our military testing some awesome technology and... "You know, again, this isn't my wheelhouse, so I'm not, you know, this is...I'm not really realizing that this is some sort of zero-point energy or something that we, you know, we've never seen before. So, it's nothing like I've ever seen before. I've never seen any military or civilian bird have the capabilities that something like this has. Again, there's no signage, there's no visible cockpit fuselage, you know, there's nothing that I can see that, you know, would make me think it's any kind of traditional bird that we've seen, or I've heard about. It takes off and I go back inside, and that's it. "So, the biggest thing to me, and when we were discussing it, is the notable observations, and that there's zero oscillation, right? The propulsion and noise...there was no audible report, no hum, nothing. What was it? It lacked, uh, like, an obviously visible cabin, uh, any signage, engine housing, exhaust systems. And it's the sheer speed that it that, you know, that was, you know, one of the most notable things."
English
44
41
274
77.7K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@TheUfoJoe We have hard evidence available to everyone that shows that humans exist and build advanced tech. Zero hard evidence available about E.T.’s, cryptoterrestrials, or any other intelligent life form capable of building flying triangles.
English
1
0
1
59
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
"It's non-human intelligence technology, or it's something that we've figured out how to operate, and it's like a breakaway civilization." ~Corbell (We MUST hold open the possibility that some (or a lot?) of these craft may be made by humans. Glad to see Jeremy go there.) ~ @JeremyCorbell: "It was a huge triangle that had this electrostatic charge. The other thing you told me that I want to hear more about, was the gold glow, because I've heard this over and over and over. Like a lava lamp,. It was a sort of undulating on the skin of this thing, right?" @TheDylanBorland: "Basically, yeah. The best way I can describe it is overlay. If you're looking out a lava lamp and seeing that flow, place a yellow, semi-transparent lava lamp flow on this craft, making 90-degree turns and all over the craft. And it's just this yellow, transparent, almost like, smoke cloud, pulsating all around the craft." Corbell: "So clearly a technology like, um, like Matthew Brown (@SunOfAbramelin) has kind of thought, that either it's like, it's non-human intelligence technology, or it's something that we've figured out how to operate, and it's like a breakaway civilization. It's so advanced that this is something that's not acknowledged, even to Congress, the people that should have oversight. So you've got that big one UFO experience, right?"
English
34
63
476
62.3K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
A family is thrust into a hidden war between corporations and covert programs, where control of breakaway technology could decide humanity's future. #ufox #screenplay #limitedseries
Mike Blesch tweet media
English
0
0
0
109
Steven Greenstreet 🐷
Steven Greenstreet 🐷@MiddleOfMayhem·
I asked Sean Kirkpatrick, the former director of the Pentagon's UFO office, to respond to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) announcing yet another Congressional UFO hearing featuring dubious UFO personalities. Kirkpatrick pulled no punches as usual. His comments are below. First, some backstory context for those unfamiliar: Over the last few years, Luna and her Scooby Doo team in Congress have been hunting UFOs and "interdimensional beings" on the taxpayer's dime. Luna says she views UFOs from "a Christian perspective" and Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO), one of Luna's saucer-hunting cohorts, believes UFOs could be "angels" or "messengers of God". Luna and her Congressional team have brought on several "witnesses" to testify about UFOs but these witnesses were mostly grifters and charlatans from the UFO entertainment industry who have books, podcasts, TV shows or movies to sell. These "witnesses" provided lots of spooky stories, but zero evidence. It's been an all-around waste of taxpayer resources. Undeterred (and unchallenged by the media), Luna has now invited George Knapp, the final boss of UFO grifting, as a "witness" to testify at her new UFO hearing on Sept 9th. Knapp, the host of a late-night paranormal radio show, the author of several UFO books, and the star of a recent Netflix alien series, is a long-time celebrity in the UFO world. Joining Knapp on Sept 9th as Congressional "witnesses" will be other UFO storytellers who've either appeared on Knapp's dubious UFO podcast or who are directly associated with Knapp. It's going to be the George Knapp show - the final scene of a Hollywood movie years in the making. And I mean that literally... Hollywood is currently in production on a movie about Knapp's life. With red flags abound, I reached out to Sean Kirkpatrick, the former director of AARO, the Pentagon's "UFO office", for comment. For 18 months, Kirkpatrick investigated all these UFO claims and released a damning report in 2024 debunking the main UFO personalities and most of their claims as inaccurate, misinformed or completely fraudulent. The news media, of course, mostly ignored Kirkpatrick's report, choosing to instead continue publishing salacious alien clickbait nonsense. Here's what Kirkpatrick has to say about Rep. Luna's upcoming UFO hearing: --------------------------- 🔴🔴🔴 SEAN KIRKPATRICK: If Luna and her “Lunatics” want to continue to parade charlatans and grifters in front of an audience to satisfy her need for playhouse politics, then the American people should demand accountability of all the wasted taxpayer money and Congressional time she has derailed from more serious issues facing this country. Clearly she has been working quietly with these pseudo scientists and attention seekers to script a hearing and then launch it as a surprise onto the world, possibly to distract or more likely because that’s all she is qualified to do. In the face of international crises, where is the accountability? Where is DOGE when there is a legitimate target of fraud waste and abuse in Congress? Where is the DOJ investigation into the Congressional misappropriation and corruption associated with trying to funnel money to these grifters and actively obstruct legitimate work by the DoD and IC? It’s a disgrace to the Congress and the US government and only serves to provide reality TV. 🔴🔴🔴 --------------------------------- And here's some of my @nypost reporting on all this nonsense. I've been the only mainstream journalist consistently investigating this and calling it out. nypost.com/video/ufo-reli… nypost.com/video/ridiculo… nypost.com/2023/03/21/ufo…
Steven Greenstreet 🐷 tweet media
English
117
36
186
105.6K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@TheUfoJoe Too many contradictions. -US contractor has tic tac 21 years ago. -We can’t take out Chinese drones over strategic air defense sites. -Contractor won’t share with US gov -Sits on tech worth untold amounts of money - doesn’t sell, doesn’t use as extreme leverage, nothing?
English
0
0
0
40
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
If Tic Tac is human tech (I'm still skeptical), it's very possible Fravor doesn't know about it. He could have TS/SCI access but not be read in to the right compartment because he doesn't meet the criteria. Or, maybe it's something off the books? I don't know. In 2019, at McMenamins, Fravor was also skeptical and doubtful data was taken off the Princeton. I think we all realize that DID happen. @dave_beaty wrote about it for my blog, also back in 2019.
Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell@JeremyCorbell

CDR David Fravor not only brings firsthand authority on the 2004 TIC TAC UFO (because he chased it), but also holds a current, classified role in industry - giving him insider perspective on aerospace development, that others simply don’t have. WATCH : youtu.be/MHycTQC62WA

English
12
2
29
4.8K
John Greenewald, Jr.
John Greenewald, Jr.@theblackvault·
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick stated that the "operations plan" mentioned by Tim Phillips likely refers to the debunked SOM1-01 MJ-12 document. He confirmed no new documents of that type were found during his time at AARO. h/t @ddeanjohnson This is all... kind of strange.
D. Dean Johnson@ddeanjohnson

SEAN KIRKPATRICK COMMENTS ON THE "OPERATIONS PLAN" DESCRIBED BY TIM PHILLIPS IN JOHN MICHAEL GODIER INTERVIEW By email, I asked former AARO Director Sean Kirkpatrick to comment on the remarks of former AARO Deputy Director Tim Phillips regarding a document of unclear origin that Phillips described as "an operations plan for contact with alien beings," in an interview with John Michael Godier posted on YouTube on July 2, 2025. The document as described by Phillips was reminiscent of the "Special Operations Manual SOM1-01," a document attributed to "Majestic-12 Group" that surfaced mysteriously in 1994; it has been judged a forgery by several serious ufological researchers, a view that I share. However, Phillips' description, offered from memory, differed from the SOM1-01 in some details (e.g., the SOM1-01 contains drawings but Phillips said the document he remembered did not, and he dated the document he remembered to the 1940s, whereas the SOM1-1 carries the date April 1954). Phillips told Godier, "When we worked with the archivist, we were trying to determine was this a real plan? And we could never find proof....I don't recall the name of the document." My email exchange with Kirkpatrick follows: Sean Kirkpatrick: "I am fairly confident he [Phillips] is recalling the MJ-12 document, and confusing it with something else. That was all we found by the time I retired [in December 2023]. It was in a bound form, handheld like other military plans of the time. If there was anything new, then yes it should/would be released just like all the new documents we posted on NARA’s website." Douglas Dean Johnson: "At the time you examined the matter, what was your own assessment regarding the most likely origin of this bound volume, and the motives or purposes of its creators? I am not asking for an official AARO conclusion regarding the origins of the document, although I would hope that it would be addressed in the next historical report, if not sooner." Sean Kirkpatrick: "My assessment was that it (the book I examined) was the same as what had been released on the internet and debunked some years prior [i.e., the SOM1-01]. It was clear to me that the way it was written, its author was someone familiar with the style of military planning documents. The binding was not relevant as lots of people bind things to make them look nice or more authentic, and it’s easy/cheap to do, more so in the past than now. Since it was already out in the world, and at the time I did not deem it new, I saw no reason to include it in the [vol. 1 AARO historical] report as a finding. As I said, if there was another newer version or knock-off discovered, I would expect them to release it in vol 2 [of the AARO historical report]."

English
20
16
93
15.1K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@theblackvault I was just checking your directory listing for 180-10145-10265 and was wondering why it didn't appear.
English
0
0
0
64
John Greenewald, Jr.
John Greenewald, Jr.@theblackvault·
🚨 More JFK Files dropped late tonight in addition to those a few hours ago. I’ll be updating everything and will keep you informed on .zip file being updated and OCR processing of all of them. The latter will likely take all night. Stay tuned… I’ll keep you updated.
English
29
38
514
25.1K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@theblackvault If China has this propulsion and it’s far enough along in its development to deploy it over the U.S. to such an extent, then why waste time and money building new stealth fighter jets? Why openly show the tech so that your rival can test their systems and tactics against it?
English
0
0
0
98
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@TheUfoJoe Imagine telling a nation of 300 million people that their elected representatives must lie to them and withhold basic facts so that society doesn't collapse.
English
0
0
2
51
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
A lot of folks, including Sheehan, are not understanding what Nell meant by catastrophic disclosure. For the sake of accuracy, this is from my notes taken during Nell's presentation and may be close to word for word. Catastrophic Disclosure is all the information being dumped out there by an adversary or a non-human intelligence, to create societal disruption. ~Karl Nell Going by Nell's definition, the goal is to create societal disruption. That wasn't what Greer was trying to do in 2001 and not what current whistleblowers are trying to do. I watched his 2001 event online with a horrible feed. Sheehan was a part of that. ABC News article on Greer's event from May 2001. abcnews.go.com/Technology/sto… #ufos #uap #aliens #ufoX
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity

Whatever you think of the man is irrelevant, at one point Steven Greer represented what we would now call Catastrophic Disclosure. So he was deliberately kneecapped and replaced with a Managed Disclosure that we are now encouraged to support. You decide, which one is better?

English
48
38
261
98.3K
Mike Blesch
Mike Blesch@MikeBlesch·
@theblackvault Probably increase conflict. More desperation and anger if it was revealed that the US, China, Russia, et al. were in possession of world-changing tech being secreted away and/or maybe even being used against the citizenry. Even worse if one or all had direct means of contact.
English
0
0
0
10
John Greenewald, Jr.
John Greenewald, Jr.@theblackvault·
Hypothetical Wednesday: Lets say "Disclosure" happened, and the U.S. government admitted contact with extraterrestrials. The world finds out we aren't alone. Would it help with global conflict here on Earth? Would wars subside? Increase? Would it have no effect?
English
306
19
246
89.1K