Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸

3.2K posts

Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 banner
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸

Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸

@Mike_OMac

NC via MA since 2022 #USMC 🇺🇸 Retired Detective Sometimes edited with AI

North Carolina Katılım Mart 2009
638 Takip Edilen298 Takipçiler
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
InfantryDort
InfantryDort@infantrydort·
That’s a lot of words to give credit for the rescue to anyone but the executive. You don’t get to say “this took decades” when it goes right and then pretend no one is responsible when it goes wrong. That’s not how this works. Yeah, the force is built over time. Everyone knows that. SOCOM, CSAR, joint integration. None of that showed up overnight. Thousands of people built it. Fine. But that’s not what wins or loses operations. Because we just watched the same force run Afghanistan. And it didn’t look like some clean, inevitable success story. It collapsed faster than expected. We gave up Bagram early. We waited too long to move on NEO. Everything got funneled into one airfield in a collapsing capital. And 13 Americans died at Abbey Gate. So what changed? Not the force. The decisions. That’s the part people like you seem to blur out because it’s uncomfortable. There’s a difference between having capability and knowing how to use it. You can build the best force on earth and still screw it up if you drag timelines, ignore indicators, restrict options, or wait too long to act. And you can take that same force and succeed when decisions are actually aligned with reality. That difference doesn’t come from “decades.” It comes from leadership. The President sets the boundaries. The Secretary drives how it gets executed. Risk, timing, sequencing, that all lives up at their level. They don’t build the force. But they absolutely decide how it’s used. So you can’t have it both ways Greer. You can’t say “this success belongs to decades of effort” and then turn around and act like “failures just… happen” No. Same force. Different decisions. Different outcomes. That’s the truth. And pretending otherwise isn’t some noble, unifying take, it’s just avoiding who owns the result.
The Operational Alchemist@jameskgreer77

1/11 Thoughts on the successful rescue of the two downed airman in Iran:  First, so incredibly thankful that the mission was accomplished without American loss of life. Second, couldn’t care less about the loss of aircraft on the ground. Military equipment and systems are expected to be lost at some point. But the US military is built around people and saving the lives of the people is worth any amount of equipment.

English
45
290
1.4K
30.3K
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Manny Salazar
Manny Salazar@SetantaADV·
Intangibles on the Personnel Recovery operation: 1. Our military is not working within a zero defects environment right now. Yes, that legacy attitude will not disappear overnight, but I can absolutely guarantee to you that mid level commanders took note of the fact that when we had not one, but two C-130s get stuck in the dirt last night and the Commander tasked with the PR mission said “Understood. Scuttle those birds. We’re sending three more.” that the result was considered mission accomplishment and accolades given. That is massively comforting for decision makers. Subordinates will want to emulate that informed risk taking. Company and Field Grades will let them, as long as they aren’t being penalized themselves. 2. Nobody is thinking “Oh my gosh. This is getting dangerous. I might get shot down. I had better stop doing this job.” The exact opposite will be true. Our people will feel as if they have super human powers now because if things do happen to take a bad turn, they believe there is an extremely high probability that they will come home. Did I say “believe”? Strike that. They “know” they will come home. They just saw the evidence in real time. 3. Humans really are greater than hardware. Our martial philosophy was just put into action. Other nations can’t comprehend this because they simply don’t have the hardware to spare. They spare people instead. Guess which fighting force really likes to fight. 4. There were influencers out there screaming about “CENTCOM hasn’t given us a briefing on this! POTUS hasn’t briefed the media on this!” When something like this happens, outside comms are actually shut down. Morale lines are shut down. Troops cannot call their families anymore until the blackout is lifted. The media blackout that POTUS just conducted shows how serious and in touch he actually is with the war fighter. He didn’t play politics during this time. He empowered Commanders to get the job done. That matters. Because there should have been a blackout, I am more than a little concerned how certain people like Jack Murphy received any word on this at all. The ability to scoop anyone on this type of mission shouldn’t be a possibility. That topic is for another time though. In short, despite a few trophies left behind in the desert, the most sought after being American flag boxer shorts apparently, our force just became more powerful. Not less. Play your politics. The troops are there to win. It’s a bad time to be our enemy.
English
22
157
913
23.5K
Social Matrix
Social Matrix@Socialmatrix189·
@Osint613 Interesting how the reported crash site in Kohgiluyeh doesn't perfectly line up with the US ops near Isfahan. Classic fog of war or something more? What do you think really happened here pure rescue or layers on top?
English
2
0
4
7.4K
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Al Hadath WILD Report: Iranian officials suggest the U.S. rescue mission may have been a cover operation, possibly linked to moving uranium or other sensitive materials. They point to a mismatch between the reported crash area and where U.S. forces operated, raising questions about the mission’s true objective.
English
84
115
1.3K
173K
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Golf Digest
Golf Digest@GolfDigest·
"In your life, have you seen anything like that?!?!" Maybe the greatest shot in Masters history.
English
40
186
1.9K
80.3K
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸@Mike_OMac·
Eisenhower was a skeptic when it came to military expansion. From President Eisenhower's farewell address in 1961: "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
English
0
0
1
11
F.X. Regan
F.X. Regan@FXRegan·
Lit 👇
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets. The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural. Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them. That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it. After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble. The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first. Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon. American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life. Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake. Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs. We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating. So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving. We were manufacturing jealousy. And it worked. The Wall came down. But here’s what no one accounted for. When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs. And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle. An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas. And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized. So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening. Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude. Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated. Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass. Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar. Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity. What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle. For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked. Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid. Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.” We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries. Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit. You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators. What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization. It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine. That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report. Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us” Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.

QST
1
0
5
524
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Tim Soret
Tim Soret@timsoret·
As a European, I apologize to Americans for all the idiocy coming from our side. You save your pilots no matter the cost. You send humans to the moon. You fight authoritarianism head-on. It's truly inspiring. We're on the wrong side of the moral equation.
English
4.3K
12.3K
96.5K
1.6M
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸@Mike_OMac·
Your opinion doesn’t matter because you’re not an American That said, the president of the United States is the commander in chief of the military. You don’t have to like our way of government, but that’s the way it is. As far as the draft goes, a draft dodger is someone who doesn’t register, and runs away if called says. He said. Trump registered and was deemed medically ineligible. In fact Trump’s timeline for not being drafted mirrors Joe Biden‘s exactly. From initial registration, to college deferments, to Medical disqualification.
English
3
0
37
295
Frank Wesseling
Frank Wesseling@frank_wess6648·
@jackunheard So help me out here somebody with no military experience that was a draft dodger now suddenly became part of this really critical mission to rescue an American pilot What did he do have a nap in the meantime?
English
128
4
138
6.8K
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Jack
Jack@jackunheard·
What we experienced in the last 24 hours from the Left was nothing short of demonic. While President Trump was working all day on a critical mission to rescue an American pilot, the left ran a massive campaign pushing the lie that he was dead. We need a complete investigation into who paid for and coordinated these posts. Every account involved should be fully demonetized on X. They knew Trump had one mission: save the American pilot, not walk around and talk to the press. They still chose to attempt a mass distraction from it with a disgusting lie. If you need more proof the left hates America, you’re no better than them.
Jack tweet media
English
4.2K
10.6K
32.4K
3M
Mike Young
Mike Young@micyoung75·
Driscoll refused to pull the names for months. Hegseth did it himself, likely illegally. George asked to discuss it. Hegseth refused the meeting, then fired him two years into a four-year term. Nine officials confirmed. Pentagon disputed nothing specific.
Mike Young tweet media
Ryan Goodman@rgoodlaw

Hegseth purge of Black and women officers larger than previously reported "Hegseth has taken steps to block or delay promotions for MORE THAN A DOZEN Black and female senior officers across all four branches of the military." nbcnews.com/politics/natio…

English
96
1.5K
4.9K
289.4K
Batman
Batman@keithamccluske1·
Thanks. But it’s not. They can pull you from a post, don’t even need a reason. But, they did allow 2+ years for the ones they pulled. Meaning, a good OER, should they go to another post. The COS has no place to go, so he will retire. But his term was almost 3 years. Which is the max. So he was due to retire anyway. The chaplain did it to himself. Have to accept changes in policy. Don’t have to like it, but have to obey them.
English
1
0
0
25
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Wade Miller
Wade Miller@WadeMiller·
While people line up to blindly proclaim that his firing was unjust… let me tell you something General George did that lacked integrity… An anecdote of the woke nonsense that Gen. George was up to… In 2024, Gen. George approved a command slate override for a Black female officer who had failed the Battalion Command Assessment Program (BCAP) twice. Another General, Gen. Charles Hamilton had: - Attended her board uninvited. - Attempted to sway panel members. - Lobbied George directly for a waiver. Despite this egregious ethical violation of the process, George approved the promotion anyway, overriding BCAP’s judgment. Sources: - taskandpurpose.com/news/army-gene… - military.com/daily-news/202… Why it matters: This wasn't just a questionable call—it was a breach of the Army’s only objective leadership vetting process. And it happened in a politically charged climate, with obvious DEI implications. When merit is sidelined for optics, readiness suffers.
Brandon Weichert@WeTheBrandon

This man had honor and integrity. I don't care who appointed him.

English
32
733
2.7K
150.5K
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸
Mike O'Mac 🇺🇸@Mike_OMac·
@acnewsitics Dude, Hunter got tossed for drugs after obtaining almost impossible to get waivers for drugs and psych. He never should have been allowed in to the Navy. But when your father is VP… Plus, why no complaints about Obama kids? Or Bush’s kids? Or Clinton’s kid?
English
1
0
2
226
Alex Cole
Alex Cole@acnewsitics·
Both of Joe's son's served in the military. Where's Barron?
English
938
1.4K
15.6K
215.3K