MilRotors

717 posts

MilRotors banner
MilRotors

MilRotors

@MilRotors

Wirly bird doctor. History, Military, Flying Vibrating Boxes, Occasional Opinion Presentor.

United Kingdom Katılım Nisan 2023
204 Takip Edilen29 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
1/ A proposal for how Western European Countries could implement a light for conscription / mandatory service. @BritishArmy @DefenceHQ
English
1
0
1
204
MilRotors retweetledi
JamesFennell MBE
JamesFennell MBE@FennellJW·
We should not scoff at interest from other nations in GCAP, its exactly what is needed to ensure its success. India, Poland, Germany, Saudi can all ensure lower unit costs, spiral development and longer production runs. We need to find a way for them to play.
ArkadiuszM Aki Tank@ArkadiuszMolis1

Poland wants to join the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), a new program to build a 6th-generation multi-role aircraft by Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Serious official talks are underway with the Italian and Japanese aviation industries. 1/2 #PAF #PolishArmy

English
40
23
323
22.2K
MilRotors retweetledi
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonNews·
Anonymous tweet media
ZXX
63
2.3K
9.5K
134.4K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@TheStoicSailor Even then how can you ask a country to send both of their carriers when they only have two. Would it be reasonable in the next conflict to ask the US to send all of their carriers in one go to a conflict zone.
English
0
0
1
7
The Stoic Sailor
The Stoic Sailor@TheStoicSailor·
This demonstrates that he didn't consult his military planners before launching into an absurd conflict, because they would have immediately told him that we only have one capable of putting to sea.
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK

🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump says it was "terrible" of Keir Starmer to not get involved in the Iran war "We requested two aircraft carriers which they had and he didn't really want to do it... I was not happy... they should be involved enthusiastically"

English
4
6
29
2.2K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@bokoen1 There's also a very strong difference between protecting "international shipping" and the "principles of freedom and navigation" and just protecting US trade interests which is what they were doing until post WWII.
English
0
0
8
850
Bokoen1
Bokoen1@bokoen1·
The Royal Navy would like to have a word lmao. The US navy couldn’t even enforce the Monroe Doctrine initially.
Bokoen1 tweet media
English
37
25
968
35K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@7signxx But I'm sure that this is some super duper secret undetectable radio (except by the us base 1000's of miles away), built into the airframe and metalwork that can only be accessed by being dark wizards and is powered by a future tech battery that never runs out of charge.
English
0
0
0
19
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@7signxx If this technology was available then we would use it instead of pilots ti flip bombing missions over enemy territory surely. Also, what if the engineers just took out the radio and replaced it. Then it can't communicate to a us base if that was even a real thing.
English
1
0
0
18
Idris
Idris@7signxx·
"**Eye-Opening Reality — A Lesson for African Leaders** Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad says: In 2004, Malaysia purchased 8 F/A-18 Hornet fighter jets from the United States, which were among the most advanced aircraft at the time. The value of this deal exceeded $640 million. After receiving the aircraft, Malaysia formed a team of experts and engineers to conduct a detailed study of their features and combat capabilities. 👈 The Malaysian experts discovered that the aircraft was transmitting every flight's information to a US military base, such as: - Flight altitude - Speed - Location - Route - Mission details - And the pilot's communication with the ground control room Not only that, but the aircraft's operating system and autopilot feature could also be controlled from the US base. This means that if a US officer on the ground simply presses a button, the aircraft's route can be changed, it can be crashed, or even the target of its attack can be altered. When Malaysia tried to modify the aircraft's operating system, the United States and manufacturer McDonnell Douglas strongly objected. They even threatened to stop supplying parts and maintenance, and impose restrictions. Even when Malaysia requested specific parts to activate certain capabilities of the aircraft, the company rejected that as well. Ultimately, Malaysia realized that it had bought aircraft that could not be used in actual combat without US approval. This issue is not limited to Malaysia alone; many Arab and Muslim countries face the same reality. **The lesson is clear:** Until a nation develops its own defense technology, it will remain dependent on others." (Source: TV interview on Al Jazeera with Mahathir Mohamad)
Idris tweet media
English
532
9.4K
21.8K
1.1M
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@77thUnit7 @thinkdefence @Melling1979 Depends what role you want it to fulfill for me personally. Best I've heard is having it move priority Spares and supplies between ships underway at sea without having to use a whole manned helicopter and waste flying hours, fuel, maintenance etc.
English
1
0
2
37
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@AirPowerNEW1 1200 round 30mm proximity fused, 76 APKWS guided hyrda rockets, air search radar tuned for UAS sized targets. This could be a seriously powerful new role for the AH64 within NATO. Operated by multiple nations its almost a bespoke drone hunter killer platform.
English
0
0
0
58
Air-Power | MIL-STD
Air-Power | MIL-STD@AirPowerNEW1·
The Yuma Test Center at U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground recently tested a new 30 mm Aviation Proximity Explosive, APEX, round primarily developed for firing from the AH-64 Apache helicopter. The APEX round was developed to be a frag round that would prox in front of the [unmanned aerial system] and make a frag pattern that would take out a UAS. ~ US Army 🔗👇
Air-Power | MIL-STD tweet mediaAir-Power | MIL-STD tweet media
English
18
118
1K
57.1K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
1200 round 30mm proximity fused, 76 APKWS guided hyrda rockets, air search radar tuned for UAS sized targets. This could be a seriously powerful new role for the AH64 within NATO. Operated by multiple nations its almost a bespoke drone hunter killer platform.
Air-Power | MIL-STD@AirPowerNEW1

The Yuma Test Center at U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground recently tested a new 30 mm Aviation Proximity Explosive, APEX, round primarily developed for firing from the AH-64 Apache helicopter. The APEX round was developed to be a frag round that would prox in front of the [unmanned aerial system] and make a frag pattern that would take out a UAS. ~ US Army 🔗👇

English
0
0
0
59
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@wraggi74 @Gabriel64869839 In theory yes, but even if they arrived tomorrow you'd have to qualify all of the aircrew on the new weapon system prior to use.
English
1
0
0
6
mark
mark@wraggi74·
@Gabriel64869839 Couldn't we just get some APKWS from US stocks as this is a priority mission capability requirement. Or are our AH64Es lacking some additional hardware/software still?
English
1
0
0
46
Gabriele Molinelli
Gabriele Molinelli@Gabriel64869839·
With suicide USVs and drones being the primary threat for ships in transit through Hormuz, US Army AH-64Es could actually help a whole damn lot the escorting business. More than even warships, in some ways. Plenty of stored drone kills, both surface and air; reach; radar; link 16
English
8
5
104
7.6K
Alborz Azadrad
Alborz Azadrad@azadradn7·
@MilRotors @SandyofCthulhu One issue is that naval reactors is classified as military not civilian meaningless oversight and their information is much more limited. Designs differ though. French have reactor and steam generator in the same structure whereas American ones are miniaturized land versions.
Alborz Azadrad tweet media
GIF
English
2
0
1
36
Sandy Petersen 🪔
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu·
Britain's empire started to have real problems when steamships began to replace sailing ships, because now their boats couldn't just sail anywhere - they needed coaling stations and so they had to go capture bases all over the world where they could get coal. This also meant that coaling stations were targets for enemies. It wasn't improved later on when we traded coal for oil. The creation of nuclear engines mitigated it a little.
NO CONTEXT HUMANS@HumansNoContext

English
18
44
2.2K
149.4K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
While I'm mot a fan of the RCH, I'd much prefer either French Ceasar, Archer on MAN SV (Wheeled) or K9 (tracked), I'm gladweve finally bought something. Ideally we would have upgraded the AS90 with the longer barrel for 3 Div and bought wheeled SPH for 1 Div.
Defence Equipment & Support@DefenceES

Ordered: 37 weapons systems for RCH 155. ✅ Under a £53m contact to ARTEC GmbH by OCCAR, RCH 155 will eventually replace AS90 and will fire 8 rounds per minute at targets up to 70km away. 👉 £30m will go to @RheinmetallAG's manufacturing facility. More: ow.ly/ZSpG50YtwYO

English
0
0
1
32
MilRotors retweetledi
OSINTtechnical
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical·
A better look at the partially sliced-off tail of the USAF KC-135 involved in the mid-air collision over Iraq yesterday, back on the ground in Tel Aviv.
OSINTtechnical tweet media
English
208
1.2K
10.1K
1.8M
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@Telegraph We have a permanent aircraft carrier in the Eastern Mediterranean that's impervious to nay attempt to sink it. Its called Cyprus. Hence the F35 flying from it. Sending a carrier literally provides zero benefit.
English
0
0
5
104
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
@FennellJW I whole heartidly beloved that every couple years we need to run an excerise of retaking the falklands. The falklands garrison troops would play enemy, this also allows them to practice defending the island from invasion.
English
0
0
3
166
JamesFennell MBE
JamesFennell MBE@FennellJW·
For years we were asked if we could do a Falklands again, and we were assured we could. Now it has become clear we would be hard pressed to defend the Channel Islands what will the government do?
English
21
6
83
4.7K
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
Maybe one permanently around the Falklands?
English
0
0
0
6
MilRotors
MilRotors@MilRotors·
This, SSK's should absolutely be in the Royal Navy's assets. SSN's aligned to CSGs or other task forces. SSKs operating independently similar to WW2 operations. Mixture of GIUK defence with the T26 and a bit of oversea presence potentially.
David Blagden@blagden_david

The case for Royal Navy SSKs - real ones, not glorified sonobuoys* that we hope/pretend will suffice - is overwhelming. “But they don’t have an SSN’s range!” Yes, but in the GIUK Gap, Med, Mid-Atlantic, S Atlantic, or even Gulf/Malacca/Mid-IO, they’re always near UK bases. 1/8

English
1
0
1
42