Lucas Miller

2.9K posts

Lucas Miller banner
Lucas Miller

Lucas Miller

@MillerFarm06

We’re a family farm in Nebraska raising corn, soybeans, cows, pigs, and kids. 😉

Katılım Nisan 2019
420 Takip Edilen992 Takipçiler
Lucas Miller
Lucas Miller@MillerFarm06·
@Bkitch1Bodie @jasonmauck1 I did 40’ corn - 40’ beans and then did 20’ corn and 20’ beans and neither was a small enough block to maximize the edge effect in the corn to make it a positive return
English
1
0
1
98
Bodie Kitchel
Bodie Kitchel@Bkitch1Bodie·
@jasonmauck1 Jason, back in 2018 I had a dream of strip cropping on 40’ an running corn an rye harvest rye to sell for cover seed then plant clover peas vetch oats in that 40’ pass after harvest an plant corn there the next year. Question I’ve wrestled with is 40’ to wide to max benefits?
English
2
0
6
3.5K
Jason Mauck
Jason Mauck@jasonmauck1·
This was shared last week on a FB group. Space and time. Agriculture is very product centric… because it’s something to sell. Want to increase NUE Want to increase WEOC? Want to lower chemistry costs? Being different isn’t always better.. But better requires doing it different. Sequencing over achieving plants… not due to products but arrangement.
Jason Mauck tweet media
English
9
4
100
15.8K
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Mike and Jeff show @AgrisAcademy
Mike and Jeff show @AgrisAcademy@AgrisAcademy·
I came across a post on the fertilizer ratio to corn price. Stone X did the research and the math and they are not wrong. @JLinvilleFert We can get down on ag and wallow in self-pity or stand up and fight. 1. Fertilizer efficiency per bushel has never been better. Investment in precision technology is rising. Investment dollars are tight so let's get them placed in high value optimization work. 2. We can hedge of higher December futures than the price in the data today. We can then turn the grain over to the "elevator" side of our farm to earn carry. 3. The import tariffs on PHOS are providing a profit umbrella to largely ONE company. MOSAIC has 74% of the US market. Can someone look at the world price vs US price? Take the difference, if it exists, X Mosaic sales? Let's be data driven and fight inflation Jeff
English
1
1
31
7.1K
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Mark McHargue
Mark McHargue@NefbPres·
Nebraska's farmers have been anxiously waiting for today's announcement, and we appreciate EPA’s efforts again giving us access to dicamba for over-the-top use on soybeans. Nebraska Farm Bureau has and continues to be a supporter of crop protection product technology, and we thank EPA Administrator Zeldin for his continued support of these technologies. The use of this product has the potential to save Nebraska farmers thousands of dollars due to reduced weed pressure and potential fewer passes with a sprayer. For years, NEFB has supported substantial flexibility when it comes to the use of this important product, and we continue to believe in its safety and effectiveness. Today’s announcement provides Nebraska farmers with needed certainty as they make plans for the 2026 planting season.
U.S. EPA@EPA

🚜 America’s cotton and soybean growers are a vital element of US agriculture. Cotton farmers across the southern United States have been particularly vocal about why they desperately need Over The Top dicamba application as herbicide-resistant weeds like Palmer amaranth have become nearly impossible to control with other available tools, threatening crop yields and farm viability. These "super weeds" can grow 3 inches per day and destroy entire fields. To be clear, dicamba has already been on the market and available for sale and in wide, continuous use on farms across the United States totally aside from farmers’ pleas for OTT application. President Trump strongly supports America’s farmers, and today’s temporary approval reinforces that commitment. Included are the toughest environmental and human health protections on OTT application in history: halved annual use rates, doubled drift-reduction requirements, stricter temperature limits, and mandatory conservation practices to protect pollinators, neighboring farms, and endangered species. Grounded in gold-standard science, radical transparency, and accountability, this action ensures farmers have the tools they need to succeed responsibly while safeguarding the environment and rural communities. For MANY more important specifics, read the detailed announcement here: spgv.io/6017BAiT

English
0
3
15
2.3K
Lucas Miller
Lucas Miller@MillerFarm06·
Honestly, I’m just shocked he reached someone to talk to.
Roger Ledbetter@rledbetterCPA

The IRS is going to start screening my calls Me: "Hi, I'm calling because I got this penalty notice and---" Agent: "Tax ID please" Me: "---I don't think I owe this. The notice shows a 1099 I didn't receive" Agent: "So you didn't report a 1099?" Me: "Right, because I never got it." Agent: "Well I see it here on your account." Me: "You see the 1099?" Agent: "Yes." Me: "So you have the 1099, and I don't have the 1099." Agent: "Correct." Me: "And I'm being penalized." Agent: "You should have received it." Me: "But I didn't. And you did." Agent: "The employer was supposed to send it." Me: "But they only sent it to you." Agent: "We were both supposed to receive copies." Me: "So they failed to send it to me, they succeeded in sending it to you, and I'm the one getting penalized." Agent: "You need to report your income, sir." Me: "How? I don't know what it is." Agent: "It's on the 1099." Me: "Which I didn't have." Agent: "You still need to report it." Me: “How? You're the one with the information." Agent: "That's between you and your employer" Me: "I'm just trying to understand. You have the document. You know the amount. You caught the discrepancy. Without me doing anything. And now I owe money?" Agent: "You owe a penalty." Me: "For what?" Agent: "Not reporting the income." Me: "That I didn't know about." Agent: "Yes." Me: "That the IRS knew about." Agent: "Correct." Me: "But I should have known about." Agent: "Right." Me: "And that's my problem? How do I know there's not more missing stuff?" Agent: "Well you could request your Wage and Income Transcript. It shows all your income sources we have record of." Me: "Wait. You have a... transcript?" Agent: "Everyone has a transcript, sir. It shows all reported income and some deductions." Me: "You can see all my income." Agent: "Yes." Me: "From the 1099s and W2s?!” Agent: "Right." Me: "So you have a complete record of my income." Agent: "Yes." Me: "And you knew about this 1099 because it's on that transcript." Agent: "Yes." Me: "So why does anyone file a return? Couldn't you just... look at the transcript and know what someone owes?" Agent: "I don't---." Me: "But instead you make everyone fill out forms?" Agent: "That's how tax works, sir " Me: "Can I see the transcript?" Agent: "Of course. You just needed to request it" Me: "Why wouldn't you just automatically send it to me every year?" Agent: "We don't do that sir." Me: "So the IRS requires me to transcribe information that's already on your transcript that you make me request so that you can penalize me when I don't transcribe it correctly?" Me: "Feels like a set-up" Agent: "That's how tax works. Is there anything else I can help you with today, sir? Me: “I’d like to go ahead and request that transcript can you send it to me?” Agent: “Sure thing, I’ll get you that fax number” Me: “The what---”

English
0
0
2
193
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Roger Ledbetter
Roger Ledbetter@rledbetterCPA·
The IRS is going to start screening my calls Me: "Hi, I'm calling because I got this penalty notice and---" Agent: "Tax ID please" Me: "---I don't think I owe this. The notice shows a 1099 I didn't receive" Agent: "So you didn't report a 1099?" Me: "Right, because I never got it." Agent: "Well I see it here on your account." Me: "You see the 1099?" Agent: "Yes." Me: "So you have the 1099, and I don't have the 1099." Agent: "Correct." Me: "And I'm being penalized." Agent: "You should have received it." Me: "But I didn't. And you did." Agent: "The employer was supposed to send it." Me: "But they only sent it to you." Agent: "We were both supposed to receive copies." Me: "So they failed to send it to me, they succeeded in sending it to you, and I'm the one getting penalized." Agent: "You need to report your income, sir." Me: "How? I don't know what it is." Agent: "It's on the 1099." Me: "Which I didn't have." Agent: "You still need to report it." Me: “How? You're the one with the information." Agent: "That's between you and your employer" Me: "I'm just trying to understand. You have the document. You know the amount. You caught the discrepancy. Without me doing anything. And now I owe money?" Agent: "You owe a penalty." Me: "For what?" Agent: "Not reporting the income." Me: "That I didn't know about." Agent: "Yes." Me: "That the IRS knew about." Agent: "Correct." Me: "But I should have known about." Agent: "Right." Me: "And that's my problem? How do I know there's not more missing stuff?" Agent: "Well you could request your Wage and Income Transcript. It shows all your income sources we have record of." Me: "Wait. You have a... transcript?" Agent: "Everyone has a transcript, sir. It shows all reported income and some deductions." Me: "You can see all my income." Agent: "Yes." Me: "From the 1099s and W2s?!” Agent: "Right." Me: "So you have a complete record of my income." Agent: "Yes." Me: "And you knew about this 1099 because it's on that transcript." Agent: "Yes." Me: "So why does anyone file a return? Couldn't you just... look at the transcript and know what someone owes?" Agent: "I don't---." Me: "But instead you make everyone fill out forms?" Agent: "That's how tax works, sir " Me: "Can I see the transcript?" Agent: "Of course. You just needed to request it" Me: "Why wouldn't you just automatically send it to me every year?" Agent: "We don't do that sir." Me: "So the IRS requires me to transcribe information that's already on your transcript that you make me request so that you can penalize me when I don't transcribe it correctly?" Me: "Feels like a set-up" Agent: "That's how tax works. Is there anything else I can help you with today, sir? Me: “I’d like to go ahead and request that transcript can you send it to me?” Agent: “Sure thing, I’ll get you that fax number” Me: “The what---”
English
509
1.5K
21.3K
2.1M
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Steve Strasheim
Steve Strasheim@TRFyeomanfarmer·
Transplants going into the ground today. Season 12 is moving.
Steve Strasheim tweet media
English
2
1
45
1.4K
Lucas Miller
Lucas Miller@MillerFarm06·
@NebGradDubDub @GeoffreyRuth @sustainablegreg Unscientific personal observation - di-flexx and status sprayed on corn caused more damage than dicamba sprayed on beans. EPA needs to approve a label so we have can have access to multiple options for weed control
English
1
0
2
153
Doug Meyer
Doug Meyer@NebGradDubDub·
@GeoffreyRuth @sustainablegreg We need a product that won’t damage others crops, and trees more than we need a label for over the top use of dicamba on soy beans. I grow Xtend soybeans but I won’t use that awful product
English
1
0
0
121
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Geoffrey Ruth
Geoffrey Ruth@GeoffreyRuth·
As a farmer here in Nebraska who continues to battle chemical resistant weed varieties. It is imperative that we have every safe and scientifically proven chemistry available for use in 2026. #planting26 is quickly approaching.
American Soybean Association@ASA_Soybeans

Farmers need a dicamba label now for the 2026 growing season. ASA urges @EPA to continue its long history of upholding safe, sound science & approve this critical tool to grow efficient U.S. soybeans. @epaleezeldin

English
1
3
11
1.2K
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Dave Walton
Dave Walton@waltonagseed·
Health & safety are of utmost importance to soybean farmers. @EPA has a long track record of upholding sound science when approving innovative ag tools. America's soybean farmers urge @epaleezeldin & the agency to approve a dicamba label now.
Wilton, IA 🇺🇸 English
0
2
5
861
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Tanner Johnson
Tanner Johnson@VuhnillaGorilla·
The availability of dicamba is imperative to U.S. soybean farmers for the 2026 growing season. @EPA has consistently followed sound science & law when approving safe, effective crop protection tools. @epaleezeldin
English
2
4
12
2.4K
Lucas Miller
Lucas Miller@MillerFarm06·
@ScottCh19823439 @FoulkShay @zebulousprime @DamianPMason What is discriminatory about putting limits on a program? If someone farmed through the 70’s and is still farming today good for them, but they have had 55 years of gov support so far. Is it unrealistic to say that maybe they should either be able to do without or pass it on
English
2
0
0
23
Scott Church
Scott Church@ScottCh19823439·
@MillerFarm06 @FoulkShay @zebulousprime @DamianPMason Soooo you want to discriminate against age and success? You don’t think older farmers that went through the 70’s and 80’s didn’t have plenty of struggles? Agriculture has always been a difficult business. Find a way!
English
3
0
1
53
Shay Foulk
Shay Foulk@FoulkShay·
Removing current subsidization makes consolidation go parabolic and reduces entry access to next gen. Change my mind Regardless, good episode guys!
Damian Mason@DamianPMason

52% of farms were profitable 2025. Cost of entry is formidable. USDA policy favors incumbents while keeping lesser producers financially viable. #business of #agriculture brought to you by TidalGrow @nanoyield. @ElliottHenders7 and @PetersenFarms guest. youtu.be/mlaDC80vX34?si…

English
11
0
32
9.3K
Lucas Miller retweetledi
FloWrestling
FloWrestling@FloWrestling·
Tired of falling for every fake? Here’s a slick counter for when they’re just dancing in front of you—drop to both knees, snag the foot, and finish. Presented by Athletes Ocean
English
8
17
242
26K
Jacob Wilgenburg
Jacob Wilgenburg@jwilgenburg1·
Price is right rules, guess the price for 3 augers, an axle, and a set of knives for a Supreme 1700...
Jacob Wilgenburg tweet media
GIF
English
14
1
16
9.8K
Lucas Miller
Lucas Miller@MillerFarm06·
@FoulkShay @zebulousprime @DamianPMason I don’t think that there is a perfect option but I firmly believe that 85 yr olds still fully controlling an operation is just as detrimental to ag as consolidation in fertilizer and retail has been
English
0
0
2
30
Shay Foulk
Shay Foulk@FoulkShay·
Your point reinforces what I’m trying to say. With no incentives or benefits to the “marginal class” of young farmers, and no protection of catastrophic loss in early years or back to back drought etc, only those with cash, owned land base, and sufficient margin contribution are left to scoop up the failure. This is what commodity markets demand. Without subsidization, the true commoditization (and consolidation) will occur at speeds that will make most people’s heads spin.
English
2
2
24
2.8K
Lucas Miller retweetledi
Mark McHargue
Mark McHargue@NefbPres·
Nebraska Farm Bureau continues to be a strong supporter of the work of the Nebraska Brand Committee, including its important role in mitigating cattle theft in our state. While we have been open to discussions centered around modernization to ensure the current fee system is equitable for program participants, our members have made it clear that they are not supportive of changes that would effectively end the mandatory brand inspection program as it exists today in favor of a voluntary statewide system as proposed in LB 1258, legislation introduced by Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair. Given the volume of questions we’ve received about the legislation, we felt it is important to be clear that Nebraska Farm Bureau is opposed and will actively work to stop any effort to implement a statewide voluntary brand inspection system.
English
0
3
8
1.6K
Neil Overby
Neil Overby@overbystockfarm·
Parts guy - "that loader level bracket will be $87." Me - "Not today, Satan!"
Neil Overby tweet media
English
5
1
87
6.9K