SacreD 🔺🔮,🧙⚡

Unitree unveiled the behind-the-scenes training of the game-changing Kung Fu robots Many world’s first high-difficult movements by Chinese robots: • World’s first continuous freestyle table-flipping parkour • World’s first catapult somersault, reaching over 3 meters in height • World’s first continuous single-leg backflips and two-step wall kick backflip • World’s first 7.5 full Airflare rotations • World’s first rapid group positioning…

You can also opt for self custody to keep the slab yourself. Team will ship it to you at delivery cost.

Each gacha pull is about 45$-50$. Every pull will be randomized using chainlink VRF and tx will be recorded onchain. Once reveal, you have 10 mins to decide on which can either keep it as part of your profile collection or quick sell it back to platform at certain % fee charged

NextRare: First perpetual TCG Gacha @NextRare_cards App currently live on IOS only. Android soon. Legit team behind backed with actual pokemon cards physical store. Can look up for "Discover Collectibles" online. You are still early nextrare.cards/r/sacred

@NextRare_cards use my code nr.cards/r/sacred

Referral system is LIVE 🚀 - 2% on every transaction from your referrals - Weekly payouts - No expiry, once linked, it’s forever - Unlimited referrals LFGacha 🔗 nr.cards/r/nextraregg

HOLY SHIT Anthropic Just Triggered a $285B Market Crash 😳 Bloomberg just reported that Anthropic released a new AI tool that caused: 󠁯•󠁏 $285 billion wiped out across software, finance, and asset management stocks 󠁯•󠁏 6% drop in Goldman's software basket (biggest since April) 󠁯•󠁏 7% crash in financial services index 󠁯•󠁏 Nasdaq down 2.4% at its worst This is MASSIVE. The market literally panicked over an AI automation tool. If you work in software, legal, or IT services, this changes everything. You just don't know it yet. On Jan 30, Anthropic quietly released 11 plugins for Claude Cowork. Not a new model , but plugins. But these plugins don't work inside your software. They replace it entirely. things like financial modeling & sales workflows, which lead to; 󠁯•󠁏 RELX (LexisNexis): -14% 󠁯•󠁏 Infosys: -7% 󠁯•󠁏 TCS: -6% 󠁯•󠁏 Wolters Kluwer: -13% Wall Street is calling it the "SaaSpocalypse." Because for the first time, a foundation model company didn't just build the AI. They built the application layer too. Anthropic isn't selling APIs anymore. They're owning entire workflows. Why pay $50K/year for legal software when Claude does it for $20/month? Why hire 500 IT consultants when one AI agent works 24/7? & the scary part? This is just 11 plugins in a research preview. Imagine what's coming next. If your company's value prop is "we automate X"... You're now competing with Claude. And Claude costs 1% of what you do. You're either building with AI, or getting replaced by it. No middle ground anymore.

THIS IS A SERIOUS CLAIM 🤯 OKX CEO Star Xu says the Oct 10 liquidation event wasn’t an accident -- and points directly at irresponsible marketing practices by major players. His argument, in plain terms: Binance promoted $USDe with high yields and treated it like $USDT/$USDC, even though USDe is not a traditional stablecoin -- it embeds hedge-fund-level risk. Users were encouraged to: 🔁 swap $USDT/$USDC into $USDe 📉 use $USDe as collateral 💸 borrow more stablecoins 🔄 loop the trade for higher APYs That leverage stack pushed 24% to 70%+ APYs, created systemic risk, and once volatility hit, $USDe depegged, triggering cascading liquidations across the market. Star Xu says the damage was worse than FTX in terms of market structure impact -- and that crypto’s microstructure permanently changed after that day. He’s not calling it an attack -- he’s calling it a risk management failure with industry-wide consequences. This is a rare moment of one major exchange CEO publicly calling out systemic risk -- not price action. Worth reading carefully.

📢MetaMask Rewards Claim Update We are currently completing final validations to ensure the distribution of $LINEA is as accurate and fair as possible. We'll have more information on claim date and distribution in the coming days! Thank you for your patience. 🧡🦊

it's time megaeth.

@AP_stocks How to check on the option volume and orders

$INTC Over 3.6mil into the 52.5 calls out to April. the R/R was better on this trade than the CORZ flow trade so i went in heavier. My style of trading an option position, because of the volatility, is never more than 3% of my account. So heavy is in the eye of the beholder i suppose. 15min close below 42.35 and ill take the L on these. Really like price holding the 21sma after this ER pullback.

Good article and what a good read!

@insiderwave_ Is there any time/data latency for these info that you published?

🚨 BREAKING: President Donald Trump spent ~$100mil on U.S. corporate and municipal bonds. Most likely betting on a big rate cut.

@PonziMarkets Where do you track this?

$INTC is so bullish that Trumps right hand man just opened $4 million in puts on it

@icobeast Arent RWA just the tokenization of illiquid and unsold product in web2? Repackaged and remarketed to sell to web3 folks to exit. Same shyt as fractionalized NFT with added gamification layer(DeFi) and fake security sense(You are buying and owning an asset feeling) on top.

@fimmonaci @meganacci Catherine!

@meganacci The vampire character was created by my cute little cousin. She knows I like Vampire Diaries, and she said the character looks like me (especially the hair) LOL.

Freemint NFT MegaETH Main-net 384 Supply Genesis Collection Nacci Cartel.

It's clear to me that AI is the thing that threw off the typical 4yr credit/business cycle (and thus BTC's cycle presumably) A completely uncorrelated catalyst, it could have happened any time but it happened at peak bear. It came in and saved the market right at the time where monetary policy/credit cycles normally would have had to start stepping in. The advent of AI, unlike normal business drivers, was not tied in any way to the normal timing of business cycles. It follows that throwing in a completely exogenous massively stimulative event would change the normal cadence of things. GDP stayed up, earnings stayed up, money poured into US tech, those invested in that tech and the indices containing them made out extremely well and could support the economy all on their own spending. But under the hood, normal people, normal businesses have been deteriorating. Without AI we likely would have fallen further in 2022 or needed easing sooner. But the huge AI stimulus lifted the indices and GDP so the Fed didn't need to step in, they could keep hiking rates for a bit, they could keep doing QT until now, etc. Everyone expected recession in 2022, perhaps they would have been right if AI capex didn't swoop in to save us at the bottom. But this "AI stimulus" is not as broad as monetary stimulus. It doesn't give all businesses access to cheap capital like low rates do, we don't see an uptick in most businesses because of this, we don't see the normal business cycle. The result is monetary/credit/business cycles got pushed back, there has not been reason for reignition of these cycles since overall the state of the economy is being held up by the top earners and the picture remains rosy so long as you look at the average. But this can only go on so long without those top 10% effects flowing down to the bottom 90%. That 90% needs saving at some point which is why I believe the cycle has just been extended, not avoided entirely. I imagine at some point we'll see more breadth to the market, that AI money hopefully propagating some as AI capex reaches a tipping point, and the middle class businesses getting a boost from stimulus and cheap capital. As always the tricky part is path dependency/timing. Even if everything I say here works out as expected, when it happens and how bad things get first can vary a lot. Do we transition smoothly right into a new business cycle or does it take a recession to reset us first? Lots of paths can bring us to the one result I've outlined.

HYPE build up their core supporters/users through exceptional DEX perp trading platform uptime and UI. Majority of chain revenue actually coming from there too. Their HyperEVM/core not so good and can only generate that much. But what's about MegaETH? What's the strong edge we have now in term of DAU and investors/builders demand with proper solid ed

what's the plan on builders adoption using MegaETH? User growth(DAU) and scaling will always be a concern for new protocol as what we see based on past L1 and L2 performance. Like how do you intend to attract big institution/ solid web2 team or web3 to build on your chain? Besides airdrop incentive, what else?

Since this is the case, I'm just going to brain dump and expand later. Things Mega has done differently: → Rejecting VC money in favor of community raises → Raise in multiple native vehicles so everyone has a chance at exposure → Building up an ecosystem via a co-living accelerator instead of blasting grants → Leaning into sequencer superpower instead of running from it → Using altDA to max performance even though it's not "aligned" → Proximity markets to close the colocation value leak that exists in all ecosystems → Enshrined oracle with Chainlink instead of doing "standard" integrations → Creating it's own stablecoin with Ethena instead of having value leak to Circle and creating a net-new economic model for the ecosystem → Running block building at-cost → KPI Staking instead of endless time-based unlocks → Giving token allocation based on objective onchain and social merit When people as me "what's Mega's moat?" I don't tell them any singular thing—I tell them it's a group of people with repeated desire to tackle problems with creativity, market awareness and an extreme willingness to say "fuck your norms." You can fork the outcomes but you can't fork the mindset.

What I said below was just my assumption and speculation. NFA and DYOR. I probably have no idea what I talking about either 😄 Ecosystem and chain usage wise, I am leaning towards @megaeth to have an edge over @monad simply because of better tech capability and token sink/utility design structure to drive up the demand. Disclosure: I am more invested into MegaETH and participated with some testnet activity. Really looking forward to mainnet. BUT in term of price action wise post TGE, Monad seems to be more bullish due to the facts they were actually transparent about who's the MM they engaged with and the facts that it will be Coinbase launchpad first token. I think this is the first time ever major chain ever disclosed who's their MM behind out in public pre-TGE? This should be the benchmark and standard for all the projects in the space moving forwards. If they play their card right and team/foundation not trying to do something stupid or shady to dump the price via side deal through liquidity unlock. Am predicting price might be able to sustain early selling pressure post TGE with the help of Coinbase and current MM. Naturally by crypto industry consensus and assumption, when token price up = good tech = best marketing to attract top team to build on their chain because of smart money and liquidity inflow. More good projects will attract more user and thus increases token demand and token sink and essentially create the network effect only IF price up and sustain and majority of user/investor make money. User tend to stay loyal to a chain where they forsee money making opportunity and actually making some profit at start. No exception to this rule. But well it's definitely still early to conclude anything, hopefully they handle their ICO sales well in term of who's getting the allocation and sizes. Cut short on drama and focus on building, execution and delivering instead. Hopefully not much drama as it's always not a good outlook for your project to get publicity due to drama. That easily going to shake off investor/user confidence in your chain/protocol. Would much prefer we get good publicity due to good project partnership, good token price action and good execution instead etc etc #MegaETH Also, seems like anyone in crypto can easily get into Monad/MegaETH ICO sales, so question would be who's going to buy the token on secondary if everyone gets the same opportunity?🤔🤔 Looking at HYPE; They have DEX trading fees to help them to generate enormous amount of revenue which going into buyback to support the price but seems like HyperEVM didnt really make them much. Wondering if Monad and MegaETH going have the same buyback plan in place and would the chain be able to generate good amount of revenue to sustain?

I wish more project follow this standard.